Saturday, January 3, 2026
Home Blog Page 1374

Santa Claus wins reelection to North Pole City Council

0
Thomas R. McGhee8534.69%
Santa Claus10241.63%

Santa Claus, on the ballot in North Pole, Alaska, has won election to the City Council. Claus is a nonpartisan who trends liberal, while the second-runner-up, Thomas McGhee, is a Republican.

Since North Pole takes the top two winners in the race, McGhee has also won. Both have served on the city council before.

The vote was 102-85, with Carly Nelson picking up 55 votes, and three write ins.

North Pole is a conservative stronghold in Alaska and is the most Republican-leaning district in the North Star Borough.

In 2008, the North Pole area, gave John McCain 78.4 percent to Barack Obama’s 19.5 percent for president, and in 2010, Republican Sean Parnell beat Democrat Ethan Berkowitz by a nearly identical margin.

Juneau votes down controversial arts center

In a local election that pitted  an ambitious arts community against the rest of Juneau taxpayers, voters turned down Prop. 3, a grant measure that would help pay for a new Juneau Arts and Cultural Center.

While the first ballot proposition passed – to increase the hotel bed tax by 2 percent for repairs to Centennial Hall, Prop. 2, to borrow through bonds some $7 million for upgrades to the aging hall, failed narrowly, and Prop. 3 went down 59-41, a resounding defeat. It would have granted $4.5 million for the new JACC, paid for with sales tax.

All three measures were focused on Centennial Hall and the hoped-for arts center, which would have been connected to Centennial Hall via a covered walkway. Meanwhile, several schools are in serious need of repairs, but these were not on the ballot.

The Partnership, the group that has led the initiative to build the more than 44,000-square-foot arts center, was headed up by former Juneau Mayor and the architect of the Gov. Bill Walker Administration, Bruce Botelho, and former Justice Walter “Bud’ Carpeneti.

Turnout was 23.4 percent in Juneau’s election. There are 1,500 early votes to count plus questioned ballots yet to be counted:

Amanda Holland is acting budget director for Dunleavy

2

Amanda Holland is acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Governor’s Office announced today. She fills the position vacated with the departure of former OMB Director Donna Arduin.

Holland is OMB’s management director and the press release from the Governor’s Office makes it clear this is a temporary post while Gov. Michael Dunleavy looks for a permanent replacement. Holland will be help lead the Administration launch the 2021 budget proposal, due to the Alaska Legislature on Dec. 15.

“While we look to fill this role on a permanent basis, I’m excited to have Amanda Holland step in as Acting OMB Director,” Dunleavy said in a statement.  “Not only does she bring years of knowledge and management experience to the table, she is well-suited to lead OMB and our departments in building out the FY21 budget.”

Holland has served as division operations manager at the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. She was also acting deputy commissioner for the better part of a year and has over 25 years of State of Alaska service.

On Sept. 16, 2019 Donna Arduin transitioned from Director of the Office of Management and Budget to the position of advisor to assist in the development and implementation of performance-based budgeting processes and program prioritization methods for state departments.

Arduin was set to leave state employment on Oct. 1 during this transition, but her departure date has been extended while she and the Administration work through details of her contract to serve as budget advisor to the governor.

Jeremy Price added to oil and gas conservation commission

4

Jeremy Price been appointed to the public commissioner seat of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, a seat previously vacant for months, after Gov. Michael Dunleavy fired Hollis French. Price will chair the three-member commission.

[Read: Gov. Dunleavy lets Hollis French go from oil, gas commission]

 “Jeremy Price shares my vision for a state that is both economically competitive and protects the interest of Alaskans,” said Gov. Dunleavy. “I welcome him into this new role as Chair of AOGCC and look forward to his work to prevent waste of our natural resources while ensuring our regulatory environment yields greater recovery of Alaska’s oil, gas, and geothermal potential. I’m confident Jeremy will work to increase collaboration between AOGCC and the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. Ultimately, he understands that Alaskans are the customer and we are in their service.”

Price of Anchorage grew up in Salcha, where he worked at Salcha Electric as a young man. He has worked in a wide range of public policy roles, including in areas of oil and gas policy, for Congressman Don Young, Senator Lisa Murkowski, the American Petroleum Institute, the Alaska chapter of Americans for Prosperity, and currently as Dunleavy’s deputy chief of staff. 

Price will assume his position on Monday, Oct. 7, 2019, and is subject to legislative confirmation. He is an object of intense hatred by the Left because of his free-market views and his association as the founding executive director of Americans for Prosperity-Alaska. It’s certain that his confirmation will be met with resistance from Democrats.

The Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission is an independent, quasi-judicial agency of the State of Alaska that oversees oil and gas drilling, development and production, reservoir depletion and metering operations on all lands subject to the state’s police powers. Other members of the commissioner are Dan Seamount, who has been a commissioner for nearly two decades, and Jessie Chmielowski, who was appointed by Dunleavy earlier this year upon the retirement of Cathy Foerster.

Split-second decision: Man is beating up woman. What do you do?

28

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH

Recently retired Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety Michael Duxbury was back in Anchorage at the end of September for a few days of family time, when he faced a split-second decision about whether to intervene in a situation where a man was beating up a woman inside a car.

The scene occurred on the south side of the Dimond Mall parking lot, when Duxbury, who was driving from the mall after buying a doll for his granddaughter, observed bizarre commotion in the car ahead.

A man had the woman passenger’s head and was slamming it into the console. His hands were off the steering wheel as he used both of them to exert brute force. Her arms were fighting back, but she was clearly outmatched and getting pounded.

Another car scooted by and went on its way. Maybe the occupants saw the fight and decided it was too much for them, Duxbury wondered.

Duxbury had to decide: Does he get out of the safety of his car and approach the car in front of him, now stopped at a stop sign, or does he just call the police.

“The guy was uncontrollably wild,” Duxbury said, describing gestures that reminded the retired officer of behavior he’s seen in those under the influence of methamphetamines.

Duxbury’s instincts took over. Handing his phone to his wife and asking her to call 911, Duxbury opened the car door where the altercations was in full boil, and told the man to get out. The man was flailing and for a moment, reached toward the console. Was the man reaching for a weapon? Decisions were being made by both of them in the split second.

The assailant continued to flail and yell uncontrollably, and then Duxbury noticed something in the back seat:

It was a four-month-old baby.

It was 20 minutes before police arrived, and Duxbury was able to keep the man, woman, and baby at the location until officers were on the scene. The man had scratches and the woman had a bruise in what looked like it would become a shiner.

Duxbury was aware that as of September, he is a civilian for the first time in 30 years after being a State Trooper nearly his entire career. Now that he’s not a police officer in Alaska, he’s like everyone else having to make a quick decision about whether to intervene in a violent crime.

Since last week, he’s reflected on the advice he’s been giving communities for his entire career in law enforcement: Police are the people and the people are the police. It takes everyone. We’re all in this together.

October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month, and Duxbury told Must Read Alaska that it’s as good a time as any for people to stand up and intervene in domestic violence, if they can safely do so. Violence such as what he and his wife witnessed is not a one-time occurrence, and sometimes escalates to murder.

But what he also realized is that it’s easier said than done. Without his first-line protection of a uniform, a car with lights, and a badge, Duxbury knew the assailant was seeing him as just another person, not someone who could throw him in jail. It was an entirely different circumstance.

In the end, Duxbury and his wife had to leave right after police arrived, so they didn’t see the outcome of the investigation.

But one thing Duxbury did take notice of: Before he left, the woman was visibly mad at him for having gotten involved. She said the incident was nothing, and the abusing male said that no one was hurt.

That’s what makes it so hard for citizens to get involved, Duxbury noted. If the police don’t fully support citizen intervention in crimes, then citizens just won’t risk their safety or reputation, only to be told they’d overstepped or misinterpreted something.

It’s a conundrum that has bothered him, even now that he’s returned to Washington, D.C., where he’s taken a new position: How do you encourage the public to take a stand against domestic violence, when so many things can go so wrong for them?

It is a question he doesn’t have the answer for, other than to say that getting involved isn’t vigilantism — it’s citizenship. You intervene because there will never be enough police officers to stop every crime from being committed.

What would you advise Alaskans do if they’re seeing domestic violence and police aren’t coming? Add your comment below.

A university dripping dollars

THE ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET

Alaskans should be paying close attention. And they should be more than a little peeved.

The University of Alaska spent half-a-million dollars – $495,000 to be exact – on a PR campaign, “UA Strong,” to keep its state funding after Gov. Mike Dunleavy proposed a $134 million cut in state funding of the institution, KTUU reports.

University officials and supporters fibbed at the time that the cut would amount to 41 percent of the university’s funding; that the university would fail; that the end was near.

Media picked up the fib and repeated it, even in national publications that should have known better.

The proposed cut actually amounted to a 41 percent cut of the Legislature’s proposed $322 million contribution to the university. It would have amounted to something like 17 percent of the university’s complete annual budget, which, counting all revenue streams – including tuition, grants and contracts – hovers near $900 million.

The university, despite is caterwauling to the contrary, is far from broke. “The University of Alaska Foundation manages the Consolidated Endowment Fund totaling $337.5 million, which includes both $191.1 million in Foundation endowments created by gifts from donors over the years, as well as the university’s land grant endowment of $146.4 million,” the foundation says on its website.

While UA and the education industry in Alaska fought to persuade lawmakers to keep the university’s bloated budget in place, the university sought help, KTUU reports. The Anchorage-based agency Brilliant Media Strategies eventually won the bid for the work and the campaign ran from March 6 until the end of the legislative session.

It must have worked. The Legislature approved a budget that shaved only $5 million from state funding for the university. Dunleavy later vetoed an additional $130 million, and the university ran advertisements to raise stink on six Anchorage and Fairbanks TV stations and 26 radio stations.

The governor later signed an agreement with Board of Regents Chair John Davies that would cut $70 million from the university’s budget over three years, instead of $135 million in one.

It is unseemly to us that a university – or any government agency or entity, state or local, for that matter – would essentially put on an expensive, full-court press PR campaign for more government money to spend and play fast and loose with the truth along the way.

We suppose it should come as no surprise. As always with Alaska’s education industry, when you ask how much it needs, the answer is always, “more.”

Election Day around Alaska

4

For most municipalities and boroughs in Alaska, Oct. 1 is Election Day. Turnout for these elections is typically abysmal, and in many places, the slate for school boards, city councils, and assemblies is thin, with uncontested races being the norm this year.

One race to watch is the Fairbanks mayor’s race between incumbent Jim Matherly and well-funded challenger and hardline Democrat Kathryn Dodge.

JUNEAU’S THREE-HEADED TAX IS ON THE BALLOT

Juneau voters will decide on three ballot initiatives as the city, in an effort to build a new 44,592-square-foot arts facility, proposes three intertwined tax measures to find funds for a new Juneau Arts and Cultural Center.

Conservatives have come out against this rearranging of the chairs on the ship’s deck whilst the budget tempest continues across Alaska, but those in favor of the arts center say that it will send a message to Gov. Michael Dunleavy that Juneau isn’t going his direction.


HOMER VOTES ON PLASTIC BAG BAN

The question on the ballot is quite simple: whether to amend city code to ban single-use plastic carryout bags, by prohibiting sellers from providing those bags under 2.5 millimeters thick.

It’s a yes-no question with no qualifiers for produce bags, meat or fish bags, or little bags for your pharmaceuticals and Homer art items or big bags for your dry-cleaning. Maybe they don’t do dry cleaning in Homer, but you get the drift — this is a vague ballot measure.



SITKA ALSO TO DECIDE ON PLASTIC BAG BAN

A much more detailed ballot measure is in front of Sitka voters, which explains all sorts of exemptions (bags for fish, pharmaceuticals, flowers, ice, etc and other exemptions, including bags for marijuana, naturally.) 



KENAI TO VOTE ON BOROUGH MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT

The question for borough residents is: Shall the Kenai Peninsula Borough adopt a manager plan of government, where the chief administrative officer is a manager appointed by the assembly instead of the current form where the elected mayor runs the borough administration? This is a question for voters from an Assembly, some of whom do not like Mayor Charlie Pierce and would like to make him ceremonial.


KETCHIKAN TO DECIDE ON CANNABIS ON-SITE CONSUMPTION

The question for city residents of Ketchikan on Prop. 1 is whether to prohibit the use of marijuana in the same establishments in which it is sold. Chances are good this will fail. 


PALMER VOTERS TO DECIDE ON TERM LIMITS

Voters will be advising whether the Palmer City Council should consider enacting term limits for the mayor and council members. The vote is advisory.


BETHEL TO DECIDE ON POT BAN

Voters will decide whether the city will opt out of the state’s liberal commercial marijuana laws. The question is whether Bethel will prohibit importation, sales, cultivation, and testing of marijuana. Voters will also decide if the community will prohibit the sale of alcoholic beverages with the exception of restaurants.

Sweeping education ballot initiative OK’d for signatures

30

A voter initiative that calls for what supporters say is an Alaska Students’ Educational Bill of Rights  was approved by Lt. Gov. Kevin Meyer today, upon advice of the Department of Law.

The group behind the measure can proceed with gathering signatures in petition format, and that would lead to a question being put to voters.

The initiative outlines lofty, undefined, and unquestionably expensive goals that include certain vague outcomes, such as pre-K programs, and a “quality” education for all children in a state where education spending is the highest in the nation per student, but which has some of the poorest outcomes.

The initiative goes so far as to mention that learning begins at infancy, suggesting that in future years, litigation could occur if programs for infants are not implemented statewide. The initiative also mentions better pay for teachers and seems to grant authority that is now at the district level to the state:

The initiative says the State should ensure:

“students of all ages have access to a continuous system of high-quality public education;

“incentives are in place to make voluntary pre-elementary programs as available, affordable, and high-quality as possible;

“investments are made in high-quality, voluntary pre-elementary programs that reflect the best available data on outcomes for students throughout their academic careers;

“public schools are safe, accessible, and modern in order to facilitate an environment conducive to learning;

“public schools receive the tools, including salaries and benefits, to attract and retain highly-qualified professionals in a manner that is competitive with other jurisdictions;

“public schools provide a classroom environment, including class-size, caseloads, and educator workload, that is conducive to frequent one-on-one interactions with educators;

“public schools offer a comprehensive education that includes career and technical education; engineering; world languages; language arts; mathematics; physical education; science; social studies; technology; visual and performing arts; consistent with the provisions of AS 14.35.010-030; and other electives offering enrichment;

“voluntary pre-elementary programs and public schools offer access to extracurricular activities that enhance skillsets beyond the classroom;

“voluntary pre-elementary programs and public schools prepare students to be good citizens and productive members of society;

“public schools provide culturally sensitive curricula, including programs, experiences, and teaching methods that speak to and preserve Alaska Native identity and history, and reflect the needs and cultures of diverse student populations;

“where practicable, voluntary pre-elementary programs and kindergarten through twelfth-grade public education are available at or near each student’s place of residence; and

“voluntary pre-elementary programs and public schools provide for the social and emotional needs of students in order for them to succeed in their program expectations and academic studies.

UNIVERSITY INVESTMENTS

In addition to birth through 12th grade overhaul of education, the initiative calls for an undefined and non measurable investment in university programs, to ensure:

“quality public university education is affordable and accessible to Alaskans of all economic means and provides a clear value when compared to universities in other jurisdictions;

“provide for the maintenance of university facilities; ensure that academic programs and educational technology, including connectivity among university campuses, support lifelong learning opportunities for Alaskans in urban and rural Alaska; encourage research, discovery, and creative activities and, where appropriate, the commercialization of those activities in support of economic development and diversification; ensure coordination with Alaska’s schools in the preparation of educators and education leaders, and through provision of dual enrollment opportunities for academically qualified students; collaborate with the Alaska Department of Education and Early Development and the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development to ensure that Alaska’s students are prepared for a productive career that meets the needs of Alaska’s employers; provide programs and services that build on and contribute to the rich cultural diversity of Alaska’s people.”

The group of educators promoting the measure will need to collect 28,501 signatures and has a year to do so.

The lieutenant governor’s letter approving the initiative for the next stage is here: