Of masks and guns - Must Read Alaska
Connect with:
Friday, June 5, 2020
HomeColumnsOf masks and guns

Of masks and guns

AS WITH GUNS, ONLY PROTECTIVE IF USED PROPERLY

By CRAIG MEDRED

If you live in Alaska, there are situations in which a firearm just might save you from being mauled or killed by a grizzly bear.

With the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the loose, the same might be said of a face mask, not as protection against a grizzly, but from those around you.

The comparison is being made here because these two pieces of equipment – for lack of a better word – share something in common.

Whether they help you and others, or endanger you and others, is contingent on your knowing how to use the equipment.

Consider for a moment the results of one of the few actual tests done on masks and SARS-CoV-2. Among other things, the study reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine in early April found this:

“Neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered SARS–CoV-2 during coughs by infected patients.”

But that wasn’t the most important finding. The most important finding was arguably this:

“Of note, we found greater contamination on the outer than the inner mask surfaces…. The consistent finding of virus on the outer mask surface is unlikely to have been caused by experimental error or artifact. The mask’s aerodynamic features may explain this finding. A turbulent jet due to air leakage around the mask edge could contaminate the outer surface. Alternatively, the small aerosols of SARS–CoV-2 generated during a high-velocity cough might penetrate the masks.”

The outsides of the masks ended up carrying significant viral loads. In possibly the most understated sentence in the entire study, the South Korean researchers wrote that “these observations support the importance of hand hygiene after touching the outer surface of masks.”

How many people do you see in Alaska thoroughly washing their hands after any touching of the outer surface of a mask versus those pulling the mask up and pulling the mask down with no thought to the germs on the surface, or just pulling their bandana off their face and stuffing it in their pocket?

What are they doing when they do this? They’re coating their hands with those spiky, sticky, but invisible SARS-CoV-2 pathogen of which everyone has now seen hugely blown-up photos. When those hands touch things, they create what are called “fomites,” virus-coated inanimate objects just waiting to spread disease. 

There is still debate as to how exactly SARS-CoV-2 is most easily transmitted, but fomites were years ago identified as playing a big role in the transmission of viral diseases long thought to be spread by aerial transmission or direct contact with the infected.

Read the rest of this column at CraigMedred.news.

Donations Welcome

Share

Latest comments

  • We don’t need masks, and this comparison of guns to masks is a poor attempt at justifying the mandatory use of face masks on those who do not wish to wear one. Are you in favor of mandating that everybody has to carry a firearm?

    Get outta here with that ridiculous analogy.

    • If you aren’t packing in Anchorage, you may be the only one who isn’t.

    • Agreed, Carry all the time it is a freedom !

  • I’m 65, and I have a 262 chance in a million of dying from Covid-19 IF I catch it. To put it another way, my odds are 262 out of 1,000,000 of dying IF I catch it.
    If you are 24 or younger, your odds are 1 out of 1,000,000 IF they catch it.
    I’m totally cool with those odds. Are those odds worth destroying the country?

    • flawed stats.

      • My thoughts exactly.

  • I know of 2 people still practicing social distancing, wearing N95 masks and wearing gloves in my village.

  • Afraid they’re not flawed, boys, if you like the CDC. Per the CDC. I would post the chart and the link, but the system isn’t allowing me to.

  • One I dea might be, let the people who want to stay home stay home, the ones who want to work, work, the ones who want to wear masks, wear masks. Seems to me if you are really worried about this thing, just don’t go out. If you are- and still need to go out, go full kit and haz Mat suit if you want, but leave your neighbor to his own decisions on how he wants to protect himself or his family. That may not be a perfect strategy, but it has to be better than forcing people to destroy their life’s work and give up all of their liberty to a flawed state, using (some would say) flawed stats, to make flawed decisions. If, in your infinite wisdom you reckon you can’t go out for fear of contracting the virus, then dont go out- but don’t hold the gun of government to your neighbors head on things like masks, which 3 weeks ago the “experts” said we shouldn’t be wearing, and which now the SJWs want to string you up for if you don’t.

leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: