The Alaska Commission Judicial Conduct will hold its quarterly meeting Friday, Dec. 6, at the commission’s office and by Zoom, with public participation available only via Zoom. The public session will begin at 9:30 a.m., subject to change, with closed session to follow.
The public session addresses the commission’s budget, educational activities, advisory opinions, and general administrative issues. The public session does not address any specific complaints against judges, which are handled in private.
While there will be a set amount of time for the public to address the commission, anyone wishing to speak at this meeting is requested to notify our office no later than 30 minutes before the start of the meeting to schedule. Speakers should tailor their remarks to public matters related to the commission’s function, the announcement said.
If you wish to appear, or have questions about Commission meetings, you may contact Commission Staff at [email protected] or (907) 272-1033.
The Alaska Bar Association recently sought nominations for two seats on the Commission on Judicial Conduct: one in the combined 2nd and 4th Judicial Districts and one in the 3rd Judicial District. Nominations were sought from Nov. 4 through 25th. Only one candidate ran for each vacant position and as a result, no advisory poll is needed. The following are candidates:
2nd/4th Judicial Districts: William R. Satterberg
3rd Judicial District: Donald W. McClintock III
To everyone please read the Commissions packet & budget Dir. Marla Greenstein makes $347,000.00 a year !!! ‘http://www.acjc.alaska.gov/docs/ACJC6Dec2024PublicSessionPacket.pdf Liberty Ed
Apparently covering up judicial corruption pays very well in Alaska.
When a Superior Court Judge violates the law(s) within her ORDER the result to Plaintiff isn’t justice. Appellate Rule 221 was NOT followed. The Supreme Justices wrote in the appeal “As for the second element, the superior court did not expressly make a best interests determination, though it noted that it was not unreasonable to assume…that both kids would benefit from having a relationship with a grandmother who dotes on them.” The Justices said, “…the superior court did not expressly make a best interests…” Why didn’t the Supreme Justices remand the case back to the superior court for the Judge to make a best interest determination?
A complaint was filed with the ACJC. Ms. Greenstein was a reference for the Judge to get a Superior Court position and Ms. Greenstein was the investigator of the complaint that I filed. During the January 2024 meeting I asked the question about how the ACJC determines a conflict of interest. To date, no answer.
I’ve written many letters, emails, and I have talked to many Legislators as to how we remedy the wrong of the ACJC. When Governor Dunleavy was running for re-election he spoke about Alaska needing JUDICIAL REFORM.
SB 14 died in Finance at the prerogative of the Chair and/or Co-Chair.
Senator Mike Shower then introduced SB 31.
SB 31 Testimony Starts are 04:30:06 PM
‘https://www.akleg.gov/basis/Meeting/Detail?Meeting=SSTA%202023-02-23%2015:30:00
SB 31 Selection and Review of Judges
‘https://www.akleg.gov/basis/Bill/Detail/33?Root=SB%20%2031
SOLUTION: Article III Section 16. The governor shall be responsible for the faithful execution of the laws and the Attorney General can assist the Governor. When a Judge violates Canon 3 and the Alaska Statute(s) then Governor Dunleavy has the authority and responsibility to ensure the faithful execution of the laws are followed for every Alaskan.
A records request for documents from the Governor or the Attorney General can be requested.
Let’s make Alaska great again by following the laws and ensuring justice prevails for ALL Alaskans.