A US House resolution passed Wednesday that would ban federal district court judges from granting nationwide injunctions on some presidential executive orders.
House Resolution 1526 passed 218 to 214 with Congressman Nick Begich voting in favor of the bill, which is sponsored by Congressman Darrell Issa of California.
The bill says “no United States district court shall issue any order providing for injunctive relief, except in the case of such an order that is applicable only to limit the actions of a party to the case before such district court.”
“We took on the activist judges and their rogue rulings. Now it’s on to the Senate to send this to the desk of [Trump],” Rep. Issa wrote on X.
Earlier this week, the US Supreme Court ruled that district court does not have the jurisdictional authority to prevent President Donald Trump from deporting Venezuelan gangsters.
District judges appointed by Democrats have recently declared universal injunctions on Trump’s executive orders after lawsuits against those orders were filed in district courts. Republicans see this as a case of judicial overreach by judges who are granting relief far beyond those who are stakeholders in a lawsuit.
“It’s never been more obvious that parts of our federal judiciary have a major malfunction of judicial activism. Practically every week, we see yet another federal judge issuing yet another nationwide injunction in yet another gambit to stop President Trump from exercising his Constitutional Article II powers and carrying out the policy agenda he promised the American people he would make a reality,” Issa said in March.
“In only the latest example, US District Court Judge James Boasberg severely overstepped his authority and demonstrated the most critical shortfall of judicial temperament. By ordering planes containing dangerous illegal immigrants – that President Trump negotiated with a foreign country to let land – to turn around in midair makes a mockery of the important powers we assign to our federal judges. This isn’t even close to a legal disagreement involving standing, statute or precedent. It is the Trump Resistance in Robes,” he said.
“We have a crisis on the bench right now and not just with this or any single judge. My bill – The No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025 – won’t only deal with excesses like Judge Boasberg’s outrageous demands on the President and the Trump Administration. It is the comprehensive solution we need to ensure that this problem does not occur anywhere in our federal judiciary and resets the proper and appropriate balance in our courts. It has already passed the Judiciary Committee, and I look forward to this bill gaining the support of the full House, the Senate, and heading to President Trump’s desk,” he said.
Wow!
EXCELLENT WORK NICK!!
These are the type of judges that make it hard to trust the system If the Democraps don’t just sit back and shut up their rating is going to see 10%, THANKS NICK hope you run for a 2nd term
Hope?
🤣
You can’t get rid of them, that’s the problem!
They die of natural causes commuting home from The Swamp.
The Republicans were continually filling challenges against the Biden agenda in front of two judges. Judge Reed O’Connor, and Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. I understand the house under Johnson’s “leadership?” he feels he must do everything he can to advance the 47 agenda including not following the US Constitution. This will fail in the Senate but it makes for great grandstanding!
We need a federal district court judge to issue an injunction against federal district court judges from issuing nation-wide injunctions.
PS: Poorly-named “Alaskans for Freedom”, as usual for a radical leftist extremist lemming, you invert reality and accuse your opponents of that which you yourselves are guilty. How contemptible, how childish, how utterly stereotypically radical leftist.