Democrats, Republicans united against jungle primary, ranked choice ballot initiative

11

RANKED CHOICE ALLOWS VOTERS WHO PICK LOSERS TO HAVE THEIR VOTES COUNTED MORE THAN ONCE

Alaska Democrats and the Alaska Republican Party have something in common: They believe the upcoming November ballot initiative that would drastically change elections — and not in a good way.

Kay Brown, former executive director of the Alaska Democratic Party, told the House State Affairs Committee this week that the new proposal for elections “is not going to improve transparency. Labels mean something and parties mean something.” Brown was punching hard on the ballot initiative, explaining that candidates could hide their true political affiliation from voters if it passes.

That’s when the committee chair, Democrat Rep. Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, interrupted Brown and told her her time was up.

Yes, but this was Kay Brown, herself a former legislator, and longtime political activist. She was not intimidated.

“The prior speaker went over his time as well,” Brown said, referring to the proponents of the Better Elections initiative, who had held forth for an extended period of time.

Brown continued to explain that the ballot measure’s concept of “dark money” is confusing, and has little definition. At this point, Kreiss-Tomkins had lost the battle of wills and simply allowed her to finish.

“This measure impacts all Alaskans and fundamental voting rights,” she said.

Brown also inferred that the person behind the initiative, Scott Kendall, was working to make sure that Sen. Lisa Murkowski did not have to face another primary election.

That particular item was not the concern of Glenn Clary, chairman of the Alaska Republican Party, who next lobbed bomb after bomb at the initiative, saying it would destroy the election process in Alaska and is unconstitutional.

“Let me begin by addressing every Alaskan Voter and encouraging each of them to keep your right to vote by Voting no on Ballot Initiative #2,” he said.

“This initiative is anything but ‘better.’ The proposed initiative is extremely inferior compared to Alaska’s current election system. This proposed ballot initiative is a recipe for disaster and will destroy the very foundations of freedoms that this great state was founded upon,” Clary said.  

“Our present system of electing those to represent us was established and birthed by sovereign Alaskans working together in trust and unity, constitutionally guaranteeing every Alaskan the right to one vote under a system that has and continues to operate without flaws or fraud.

“However, the inferior system you are deliberating over today was conceived in private by a select elite few whose desire is to dismantle and destroy all that sovereign Alaskans hold dear regarding their election system,” he said.

“This initiative is 25 pages long, proposes 17 major changes to our existing Alaska State Statutes, and 75 section amendments to our Alaska election laws in order to codify this initiative into law, should this ruse garner enough votes to become law,” Clary said.

During the question and answer period, questions from Kendall’s brother-in-law, committee member Rep. Grier Hopkins, were directed at Kendall and appeared coordinated. When Clary tried to get a word in edgewise, he was cut off by Rep. Kreiss-Tomkins, who then went on to the next question from a Democrat. Finally, Clary just hung up on the meeting. He told Must Red Alaska it was simply no longer worth his time.

” This initiative is complicated and difficult to understand,” Clary told Must Read Alaska. “Everyone signing the petition to place this initiative on the ballot should have been required to read it in its entirety.” If they had read it, they never would have signed it, he said. But it is just too long and too complicated to read.

Ranked choice voting, as the ballot initiative proposes, lets people who vote for losing candidates essentially the opportunity to vote again in an instant run-off, giving people who vote for losing candidates more than one vote. People who choose winning candidates only get one vote, however.

Watch how it’s explained in San Francisco, where they have this ranked choice technique.

11 COMMENTS

  1. This a coordinated effort by a few to try and control the whole process and stack against the citizens. You feasibly can get someone elected who is not the choice of the people and desires to be a King or Queen over the citizens. This is completely unacceptable because politicians work for us not the other way around.

  2. Thank you Kay Brown. She was correct and right in her opposition to commercialization of marijuana and she is correct in her evaluation this time. I disagree with her on many issues but she is a tenacious and honorable person.

    • I knew her when we served together in the State House from 1987 to 1991. She was an honorable person, and pleasure to know.

  3. Scott Kendall and his brother-in-law, Grier Hopkins, need to be removed from Alaska politics. They are ideologically subversive to the Alaskan way of life. Hopkins dad, Luke Hopkins, nearly started a civil war in Fairbanks when he was mayor up there. Hopkins uncle, Rep. David Guttenberg, was a commie-type, Marxist-style legislator who cleared the way for his nephew to get into the State House. And the biggest idiot governor in Alaska, Bill Walker, supported these commie nitwits and pot m-smoking wackos. Check their true backgrounds again, and then get rid of them all.

  4. On ranked choice voting in particular it of course does not give different number of votes to different people. The only way that would be true is if you believe that if you have drunk 2 beers if you go to a bar , find out that your 1st choice is out and settle on a 2nd choice

    Ranked choice also has been voluntarily used this year at state Republican conventions in states like Indiana, Utah and Virginia. And Democrats used in several presidential primaries. It’s just sensible to provide a backup when you have more than 2 options.

    • One man, one vote! Anything else is unacceptable. Lipstick on the pig does not mean it is no longer a pig.

  5. Ted, you are correct. I understand that Kendall’s mother-in-law, Alice Hopkins, is also behind those in the Hopkins family that are attempting to take over Alaska commie politics. These 60’s radicals never grew up. Now, they have demoralized the next generation and brain-washed them with all of this Leftist crap. Too much pot smoking over the past 50 years. I will not live by their standards or their rules. This will be a fight that I will gladly participate in.

  6. This initiative is just one more step in destroying our elections and making sure that the Democratic Party subverts and corrupts our election system. Opposition to voter identification, refusing to purge voter roles so that only current legal residents Receive ballots and mail in ballots that do not have the security of the questioned or absentee ballot are all part of their plans to take over our country and institute the socialist state. Vote no on 2.

  7. When reps and dems agree on something, you should be very suspicious. Ranked choice voting threatens only the rep/dem duopoly, not the citizens’ rights.

  8. Who is running against Grier Hopkins? Our family is sending the max donation to end this family’s domination.

Comments are closed.