City manager warns employees of ‘First Amendment auditors’ in the building

By
Suzanne Downing
-
19

The Anchorage city government is bracing for potential encounters with self-proclaimed “First Amendment auditors” who have been reported visiting City Hall and may target other municipal buildings.

In response, City Manager Rebecca Pearson has issued a memo to all municipal employees, advising them on how to handle interactions with these individuals.

First Amendment auditors are activists who film public officials in government buildings to test their compliance with constitutional rights, often livestreaming their interactions or posting them online.

While the practice is legal in publicly accessible areas, it has raised concerns among employees about safety, interference with municipal operations, and the potential exposure of sensitive information.

The memo, which was distributed this week, emphasizes the importance of remaining calm when interacting with auditors. “The most important piece of advice is to stay calm; they are seeking content that will get clicks, and we municipal employees are not all that interesting unless we get upset,” the memo states.

Employees are instructed not to argue or engage with the auditors’ arguments. Instead, they are given specific guidelines based on the location and behavior of the individuals filming.

For non-public areas, such as offices with no public-facing functions, employees are being advised to inform the auditors that they are in a restricted area and ask them to leave. If the individuals do not comply, security and a supervisor should be notified immediately.

For public-facing areas, such as customer service counters, employees are encouraged to determine if the auditors have a legitimate service request. If not, staff members are advised to politely disengage and return to their duties.

“If they cannot identify a legitimate service need, say ‘As I’m unable to assist you today, I’m going to [help the next person in line/get back to work/step away from this desk],’” the memo suggests.

Should an auditor escalate his behavior by taunting, shouting, physically intimidating employees, or blocking public access, security should be called to remove the person, the memo says. Employees are also being instructed to notify their supervisors and document any incidents for review by the Municipal Attorney’s Office.

City employees with additional concerns are being encouraged to reach out to the City Manager’s office for further guidance.

19 COMMENTS

  1. For those “non-compliant” city bureaucrats whom serve solely at the Taxpayers service, I’m guessing they might // could have Taxpaying visitors making an appearance at their homes, kinda like what happened to SCOTUS Kavanaugh.

  2. I don’t support annoying people at work on fishing expeditions.

    However, the muni should ask themselves what they’ve done to drive people to want to do this

    • As a 1st Amendment auditor you would not believe the games teleplay to hide puic records join me on YT I am who they are talking about

  6. Wasn’t there just an article above this about a voluntary “Alaska DOGE”? Seems like they would want to investigate the waste that happens when government employees are harassed and sent on spurious missions to please these first amendment warriors. Talk about wasting taxpayer dollars. All for a little internet clout.

  7. Just a sign of the times! The public is getting fed up with government corruption & waste and are reacting to it.

  8. Meanwhile, back in the dozens of homeless camps where feces, trash, wildland fires and crime are happening at this moment….

  9. What does the US Constitution say? President Trump said “You can run but you can’t hide”. The republic is guaranteed.

  10. Okay I am confused, is this really an issue or something some city employee read about and now everyone at city hall is fretting?
    How common are these incidences. What exactly do they have to do with the first amendment (do those phone recording individuals deem themselves members of the press or are they praying??) If they have legitimate grievances to be addressed, then they are there for a purpose and it isn’t a stunt. Otherwise it sounds like an exercise in self-aggrandizement and wasting of muni employees time.
    Could this be a pretext for muni employees to just throw out frustrated customers, exasperated in their dealings with the city?

    • It’s actually fairly common. There are tons of YouTube channels dedicated to this “auditor” garbage. These “auditors” are nothing but experts in harassing public workers for no legitimate reason. They’re akin to “sovereign citizens,” if not actually so. I strongly suspect these people were busted for things like underage drinking and are trying to get back at the gov’t… somehow.

      • They do it for clicks and views to make money, that’s their only motivation, they couldn’t care less about rights. If YouTube was to demonetized their channels, they wouldn’t do it.

Comments are closed.