Win Gruening: Juneau Assembly’s 2023 election report shows Vote by Mail deficiencies



The City Clerk’s office transmitted its final report on the 2023 Juneau municipal election for review during the Assembly’s reorganizational meeting on Oct. 23. 

The report contains some interesting statistics that bear on simmering dissatisfaction with the Assembly’s autocratic decision to permanently impose Vote by Mail in Juneau.

VBM was implemented because it would supposedly be more convenient, guarantee that every vote is counted, and increase voter turnout.

According to city officials, the voters in this election who actually used the U.S. Post Office to deliver their ballot were in the minority. Apparently, most voters chose to drop off their ballots at one of the two voting centers or at one of the available two drop boxes in the city. With the limited number of options available, this doesn’t make voting more convenient than traditional voting in your neighborhood precinct. 

Apparently, Vote by Mail does not guarantee that every vote is counted either. The report listed 168 ballots that were rejected for various reasons, including invalid registration, ballots not cured for signature or voter verification anomalies, and invalid or missing postmarks. With the exception of a handful of rejections due to invalid voter registration, those ballots would have been counted if the voters had cast their ballots conventionally at a precinct location where a helpful poll worker would have verified the voter’s identity and caught any mistakes.

Another telling statistic is the continuing absence of any significant increase in voter turnout despite the fact that 26,425 unsolicited ballots were mailed to Juneau voters for this election. Barely a third were returned.

Even more aggravating, after subtracting the 1,636 ballot packets that were returned to the city for incorrect addresses and deceased voters, over 15,000 unused ballot packets were needlessly added to the Juneau landfill.

This is an unwarranted waste of money and sends a message that undercuts the importance of voting in our democracy.

Since Vote by Mail was instituted, the number of registered voters in Juneau has remained almost unchanged, varying by no more than 100 voters from year to year. In the 2023 election, where 27,767 voters were registered, just 9,435 ballots were received and accepted registering a 33.89% turnout, an approximate 1% increase from the previous year. 

However, the real comparison that needs to be made should be between years when Vote by Mail was used and when conventional elections were offered. Ignoring 2020, the first year of Vote by Mail when it was a novelty, the 3-year average (2021-2023) of Vote by Mail turnout was 32.5% vs the 3-year average turnout prior to VBM (2017-2019) of 31.7%, an increase of only .8%. The number of average ballots voted and accepted over the same time periods was 9,029 vs 8,407 respectively, an increase of only 622 votes.

Does it make good financial sense to spend an exorbitant amount of tax money and limit voting choice on an election system that has only increased voter turnout by less than 1% and added a paltry number to vote totals?

Juneau city leaders have authorized this ongoing expenditure of hundreds of thousands of dollars every year to perpetuate a voting system that has failed to meet any of its purported goals. I previously suggested that Assembly members could consider an alternative, one that would lower costs, reduce the number of rejected ballots, and offer more choice to Juneau voters. The proposed hybrid system, one that is being used by other states, allows vote-by-mail, if the voter chooses, but also preserves the option for those who wish to personally insert their anonymous ballot into the vote-counting machine.

The Juneau Assembly has an opportunity to take this up at their scheduled retreat in December and direct the City Manager to conduct a thorough and transparent evaluation of Vote by Mail, with a comparison analysis to past elections, including the additional costs associated with this system of voting. 

Juneau voters were never consulted on whether Vote by Mail should be made permanent. The public deserves to know how much tax money is being spent on an election system that has little real benefit and unnecessarily disenfranchised over 160 voters.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.


  1. What a waste of money and resources. The left is using every means to retain power and the time has come to stop them any way possible.

  2. The only factor which counts concerning voting is which method more guarantees power to progressives. Nothing else matters to them. VBM most easily allows the magic victory margin to appear, thus saving the trouble of many other shenanigans.

  3. Anchorage has an equally severe, if not more egregious, problem with the exhorbitently expensive vote by mail issue. It should have never been implemented and is as disusting an act of voter interference as is the policy of allowing voters to vote for 4 different people on one ballot for the same office with the ranked choice crap.

  4. Juneau is an oligarchy, not a democracy. This has been true for years.

    VBM isn’t intended to increase turnout. It’s intended to decrease it. It’s a common secret most people toss the ballots with the rest of the junk mail.
    Too many people voting, it’s harder to get the predetermined results.

    Accept the fact most people could care less about who runs, who wins, and what they do to us.

    It’s a sad fact, but a true one.

  5. I for one was a disenfranchised voter. I did not vote in this election because I could not vote a secret ballot. I went to the polls with mail-in-ballot in hand and asked how I could vote a secret ballot. I was told I had only two options, hand them my mail-in ballot for placement in the ballot box (with my name and identity attached), or tear it up and cast another ballot and place it in an envelope (again with my name attached) and hand that to them for placement in the ballot box. Neither of those options are voting a secret ballot. A name attached is NOT a secret ballot. In fact it goes against their own voting rules (#2) to “not handing your ballot to another voter.” The mail-in-ballot goes thru many different hands with a voters name attached by the time it is tallied, unlike secret voting in the past. This is against the Alaska Constitution: Article 5 #3 “Secrecy of voting shall be preserved”. I am still waiting to hear back from my Representatives as to how this was allowed to happen and who is responsible. So far crickets.

    • Tom your information has already been taken and sold around the world. The make life easy electronic age has released everybody’s info. Look at all the hacks and data breaches.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.