Win Gruening: Juneau Assembly takes on food tax

5
850

By WIN GRUENING

During the City and Borough of Juneau Finance Committee meeting on Feb. 3, Assembly members agreed to re-consider removing the city’s sales tax on food, a subject that has been discussed numerous times over the years. 

While the idea may enjoy popular support, including the endorsement of the Juneau Chamber of Commerce, the devil is in the details.  According to Jeff Rogers, Juneau Finance Director, the repeal of sales tax on food would blow a hole in the city budget amounting to $6 million annually.

How to plug that hole, up to now, created enough controversy and dissension to stymie three previous special committees or task forces formed to advance the idea.

One of the Assembly’s 2022 goals is “Continue to evaluate sales tax structure including equity and evaluate removing sales tax on food.”  Some Assembly members voiced the need to address inflation and the rising cost of living in the community.

Several comprehensive memos provided at the Finance Committee meeting capture the complexity and difficulty of the task at hand.  Defining which food items would qualify as exempt, then crafting a proposed ordinance by August in time for a public vote in October 2022, are the first steps. 

However, that is only half the battle, and the easiest half at that.

Without a long-term strategy for replacing the missing revenue, it’s doubtful that a majority of Juneau voters would be willing to sign on. Nor would they be willing to accept general tax increases without a rigorous review of CBJ expenditures anticipated in the FY2023 budget.

Ideas for revenue replacement considered in 2020 included raising the overall sales tax rate to 6% (either seasonally or year-round) and repealing selected sales tax exemptions for non-profits and federally recognized Indian tribes.  (A proposal to also tax on-board cruise ship sales was recently implemented.)

In past columns, I’ve laid out the rationale for requiring non-profits and tribal organizations to collect sales taxes on their retail sales.  Remember, in this case, it’s the customer who pays the tax. Consider the following examples:

  • When Tlingit & Haida Central Council sells a cup of coffee at their Sacred Grounds café or fireworks for July 4th celebrations, they don’t collect sales tax;
  • A cruise ship passenger purchasing items at the non-profit Discovery Southeast gift shop at Mendenhall Glacier doesn’t pay sales tax on similar items sold (and taxed) in Juneau stores;
  • When a visitor pays $5,000 for a carving at the non-profit Sealaska Heritage Foundation gallery, no sales tax is charged.

This exemption is rarely seen anywhere in the country and is hard to justify.  Cities and states have carved out exceptions for sales by organizations like the Salvation Army, Girl Scouts, and community sports leagues.

Kudos to the Assembly for their willingness to address that specific issue. 

Inexplicably, however, Assembly members opted not to pursue repeal of exemptions on sales to non-profits – only sales by non-profits.  However, continuing to allow non-profits to avoid paying sales taxes on their own purchases forecloses another significant option to help close the revenue gap.

Many 501(c) organizations and tribal entities already enjoy substantial benefits through income tax exemptions, avoidance of Juneau real estate taxes on qualified exempt property, and eligibility for generous private, local, state, or federal government grants.

The easiest and perhaps the most tempting solution would be to raise the year-round sales tax rate to 6% from its current level of 5% – thereby totally offsetting the revenue loss.  But would it be fair?  This would shift the primary burden of the change to residents and visitors and other organizations that already pay the most in sales taxes.  

Arguably, the brunt of impacts from the slump in Juneau’s economy has landed on property owners, storekeepers, and employees of small businesses – businesses that don’t qualify for special low-income programs or exemptions and are struggling with higher property taxes.

If the Juneau Assembly is serious about gaining support for a repeal of sales tax on food, then all options should be on the table that result in a solution involving all the various ideas being considered. Only this way, will the entire community share the benefits as well as some of the cost.

By spreading the impacts somewhat equally, the Assembly will avoid the pitfalls that have forestalled action in the past.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

5 COMMENTS

  1. I don’t want the food tax repealed for one simple reason: I don’t trust the Assembly.

    If they repeal it, that becomes an excuse for them to do God knows what under the guise of replacing lost revenues

    Pity, but that’s life in CBJ. At least we’re not Anchorage.

  2. A food tax is perhaps one of the most regressive taxes there is. Let’s face the fact that there are many folks who are either food deprived or one step from it. We should at least have the discussion on how we could equitably do this. And explore all the options available as Win suggests. Until we can make great strides towards stimulating our economy and having enough well paying jobs, this will continue to be one of our greatest challenges along with affordable housing. While a healthy economy is the real answer, we need to take care of our own in the meantime.

  3. How about cut $6 million worth of pork out of the budget? Piece of cake. Oh yeah, that would never happen, it would be like stealing candy from a baby. Chickens!

  4. Assembly member need to reduce expensive budget according to amount of money that is incoming.
    Assembly member should not just as homeowner can not spend what they do not have

Comments are closed.