On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear the Biden-Harris Administration argue against a Tennessee state ban on giving children transgender hormone-blocking drugs and castrating surgeries.
On Wednesday morning, activist Chloe Cole and supporting medical professionals will hold a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court to support Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti as he makes his case for the legislation that blocks such irreversible and mutilating treatments in Tennessee.
Cole, who has spoken around the country, including in Anchorage, had identified as transgender and undergone a double mastectomy before detransitioning to her biological female gender at age 17, said that the Do No Harm nonprofit will hold its rally on the steps of the Supreme Court.
“Tennessee’s age restriction law is being considered by the Supreme Court,” wrote Cole on X. “Does the constitution protect the right of kids to mutilate and sterilize themselves?”
She noted that the case will set precedent for other states that have legislation blocking minors from medical intervention in their gender identity.
The Biden-Harris Administration on 2023 filed the lawsuit against Tennessee for its “Protecting Children from Gender Mutilation Act.” Biden-Harris says the Tennessee law violates the Equal Protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The Alliance Defending Freedom filed an amicus brief in support of Tennessee’s law, saying the states need to “stop experimenting on children.” The group says there is no such part of the Constitution that would support drugging minors with hormone blockers and cutting off their genitals.
“Tennessee lawfully exercised its power to regulate medicine by protecting minors from risky, unproven gender-transition interventions. It is not unconstitutional discrimination to say that drugs can be prescribed for one reason but not another. Weighing risks and benefits, States (and the federal government) draw age- and use-based distinctions for drugs all the time,” the attorney general of Tennessee argued in court.
Alaska has no such laws preventing child sexual mutilation, although 26 other states do. Wasilla Rep. David Eastman could not even get his proposed law prohibiting female genital mutilation to get out of a House committee, and it’s doubtful this type of child-protective bill would ever make it to the governor’s desk.
Why is this even a legal issue? Stop woke, SCOTUS, stop this child abuse.
There is no such thing as a “transgender kid”, as children can never give sexual consent.
When you hear or see a “transgender kid” what you are witnessing is severe child abuse.
A transgender child and a vegan cat have one thing in common.
.
Neither is making that decision.
No different than a unborn fetus still in the womb and a infant up to 30 days old from the hour of birth can be euthanized at the drop of a hat if someone changes their mind about raising a child if California legislators get the votes they need to pass it next time around.
They have no rights to life as well…its called “women’s healthcare”.
The story that lawmakers are trying to allow infants to be euthanized after birth is still not real. It is a social media spread lie. It takes very little time to look into this and see what you are saying is false.
Guess again Matt.
I have a close family member living in central California that spent lots of time and money campaigning against the ballot measure that was introduced in the past.
As in a lot of ballot measures there is a a lot of legal jargon written by attorneys to confuse the voters on what the real meaning of the ballot measures are the same as when heroine and other dangerous drugs were decriminalized by a ballot measure in Oregone in 2020.
Attorneys have a way of confusing the voters with legal jargon the same as when RCV was introduced as a way of keeping “outside dark money” out of our elections which is also “false”.
Not sure how removing a healthy baby from a healthy mother can be considered healthcare. Seems to be the opposite of healthcare to me.