Supreme Court leak: Decision overturns Roe vs. Wade

47
689

A document leaked by someone inside the Supreme Court shows that the court has overturned major portions of Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 decision that grants constitutional protection to women who get abortions.

No previous case has been leaked to the media by the Supreme Court in the history of the court, which is a vault of legal discretion.

“The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO,” the news organization wrote.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” the draft says. “Roe was egregiously wrong form the start,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito, the author of the opinion for the majority.

“The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right,” Politico wrote.

Politico said it received the document with someone inside the court.

The decision was reached in February but the draft is still being circulated among the justices. It’s likely that when it is released — or even before, at this point — it will cause civil unrest among leftists and abortion proponents across the country and may very well drive women to the polls in record numbers during the midterm elections. That could mean the anticipated Republican takeover of the Senate and House this November may slip away from conservatives, as women turn out to vote for Democrats who support abortion.

“Abortion presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views. Some believe fervently that a human person comes into being at conception and that abortion ends an innocent life. Others feel just as strongly that any regulation of abortion invades a woman’s right to control her own body and prevents women from achieving full equality,” Alito wrote in his introduction to the opinion, which is weighs the question of Dobbs and the State of Mississippi Department of Health vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, specifically whether all “pre-viability” prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional.

The U.S. Constitution makes no mention of abortion, Alito wrote. But the Court in 1973 conferred a broad right to obtain one. Without precedence, it broke pregnancies into three trimesters, with each one regulated differently. Roe vs. Wade was never constitutionally based law, “and gave almost no sense of an obligation to try to be,” wrote John Hart Ely in 1973 in the essay “The Wages of Crying Wolf,” a commentary on the Roe decision. Ely is quoted in the leaked draft of the opinion that has yet to be released that overturns Roe.

47 COMMENTS

  1. Think about this. Is the first time in the nation’s history that a SCOTUS decision has been leaked? What does that say about the security of our nation as a whole? Who leaked it? One of the justices? If so, is this grounds for impeachment and criminal prosecution? If a clerk leaked this, is this a federal crime? What will the repercussions be? Will the Left take to the streets and continue to destroy our nation’s cities? Since the decision has not been released, is it possible for a Justice to change their vote because of the subsequent intimidation about to be launched?

    • Probably Kagan’s law clerk. All the Left-wing judges have Marxist-thinking clerks. They wear it with a badge of honor. Disbarment is the price.

    • It’s corporate PR 101, you leak your own secrets, in an effort to direct their impact in one direction or another.

      SCOTUS Inc. leaked this, in an effort to derail the people’s movement and protect the firm known as government.

      It’s about time y’all started to study Sun Tzu, this is straight out of his playbook, the irony here is, the power-base is on the corporate Chicom payroll. #gamesetmatch

  2. Surely it must be easy to identify the perpetrator of said leak, and their motivation behind it, if such a leak is so ‘rare’….it is not, after all, information that just any individual has access to…

    It would not surprise me within the least that one of the ‘minority’ Justices within this decision leaked the document, venting their own rage and disappointment as to the majority decision…

    Most likely Sonia Sotomayor, but perhaps Elena Kagan as well, or perhaps within conjunction with….sigh…

    So much for neutral jurisprudence….

    • The churches leaders ought to immediately organize a prayer group to pray over the nation. Where two or more meet in the LORD’s name there he’ll be and the Father hears the prayers that suzanne and other politicos are there being civil unrest and that God’s spirit instead pour his peace across the nation extinguishing the prochoicers sparks and fire that they’d express their discouragement with civilty.

  3. The timing is suspicious… But the battle now goes to the states. We will have to work hard to fight off the dems on this. Pelosi still wants to make Roe statutory law.

  4. Interesting timing.
    This will blow the blockbuster revelations of 2000 Mules – of domecrat operatives CLEARLY stealing the 2020 election, clearly.
    I haven’t seen the democrats this upset since the Republicans outlawed slavery.

  5. Wondering if a different platform might be used to get your messages out. Right after the second paragraph is a giant ad for Lisa Murkowski, one of the most left-leaning, pro-abortion senators ever. Praying Roe v Wade is overturned once and for all and for revival in America. 🙏

  6. I encourage everyone to read the SCOTUS brief. Very solid basis for overturning a bad decision. Supreme Court should not take power away from states. Very interesting discussion on a wide range of topics including marriage, education, medical sovereignty, assisted suicide, etc. Maybe this will be the basis for eliminating jab mandates for experimental drugs. Who knows! Time for the crazy merry-go-round to stop!

  7. I am appalled that this leak from one of the most secure and confidential processes in the US judicial branch has happened. If a lawyer or someone on the path to a bar is responsible the person should be forever barred from the practice of law. Clearly whoever did this intended to fire up civil unrest. I have found no basis for abortion in the United States Constitution. But perhaps the Court may leave the issue to the states. Life is precious.

  8. Now the Democrats don’t even need voter fraud to win. All of their voters will come out of the woodwork to preserve their right to murder children.

  9. well its been long overdue anyways. I’d argue it’s unconstitutional but its probably more a 10th amendment issue.

  10. Never count a win before it happens, especially with the Dems involved. Consider their base awakened and deal with it! Same in Alaska. If Republicans, conservatives and Independents don’t use this coming election to grit their teeth and vote, things could be ugly for everyone. Period.

  11. Roe v Wade gave emphasis to “my body my choice” legal theory thus killing the prior theory predents of “the public and greater good” ensconsed in the quarantine I believe foreign cdc theories. Roe v Wade has to go for the Green Space laws already adopted surreptitiously in Alaska without any media announcement and signed by the Governor? Taking your freedom to move away from you. Signed at the height of “covid” Greater good? or my body my choice. These legal theories cannot coexist credibly. Of course Roe v Wade is going the way of the whirled – out the window. Communism typically is not the answer.

      • Look it up. Long term fema type lock up as housing because a health director thinks there may be a chance somone may have a shareable long-term illness (Typhoid Mary type syndromes) so occupants of social undesirables may be separated into surreptitious locations nicely called fema camps. This is a power not found in the US Constitution. These already written laws are not discussed in election seasons. Have you heard of long covid syndrome? My body my choice (Roe v Wade refutes this “authority”). The former opposite precedent “the greater good”, “quarantine” misapplications were removed by “my body my choice” in current admiralty legal popular customs. Wait til the time is right for the health czars to drop info on jubilant unsuspecting Americans embracing no longer in US Constitutional rights. Keep allowing WEF one world order protégés speaking in well modulated intonation of anti-freedom goals.

      • (“Health communications”) is the window that is needed in green space Laws to implement former “greater good” misapplications in authority to separate social striations based upon health quarantine definitions in a military “context” morphing with emergency health communication. Naturally we don’t like these anti US Constitution mandate/communications. The perverted very much desire this power and are willing to jettison “my body my choice” reproductive rights for “what’s a woman” rhetoric in lieu to get to fema nirvana of long-covid take a shot cuz I said so for the greater good.

  12. I’d keep my powder dry on this. Although we are in the early stages of the Fog of War on this one, it has the smell of the perfect hoax. From Scott Adams live stream this morning:

    A perfect hoax has the following:

    – An emotional trigger
    – Impossible to debunk
    – And a debunk won’t help

    This is exacerbated by the SCOTUS policy of never commenting, though they might this time around. Only Politico has the piece so far. No confirmation as yet. Writing style can be analyzed pretty accurately – and should. Best guess is that it was presented so as to drive a vote that has not yet happened.

    A lot of us were expecting another huge hoax before the 2022 election. This one is almost too perfect. Cheers –

    • You are correct. In the misunderstood case of national “abortion rights” existing in the U S Constitution, the leftist media is intentionally misinforming the public. The “right” to an abortion is not in the Constitution, it was just dreamed up. “Abortion rights” if they do exist, are a state’s rights issue period. However, Democrats love federal control over states and work hard to control unruly states that go against the flow. Remember their call for the elimination of the Electoral College and federal control of state election procedures. After I heard of the SCOTUS draft opinion, I instantly thought about the trick that Diane Feinstein pulled in the Kavanaugh hearings which led to a circus atmosphere in the U S Senate. That accusation of sexual abuse by Ms. Blasey Ford was a hoax also.

  13. Zero sympathy *now* with the “my body my choice” crowd, especially so, after the past year of them forcing their Covid poke-poison/mandates/discrimination on the rest of us.

    Lets hope the abortionist doctors get ostracized and fired like the Ivermectin/alternative Covid therapy prescribing MD’s did.

    Turn-around is fair play. #dingbats

  14. Let’s at least acknowledge that ALL the justices write draft opinions to explain their own viewpoint. Those drafts are circulated among the other justices.

    Nothing in this leak gives us any insight into the SCOTUS decision scheduled for release in June/July.

    It is simply Alito’s position that has been leaked. Most likely by one of the Democrat justices or clerks.

  15. Suzanne, I’m surprised by your commentary suggesting that women will turn out (more so than they otherwise would have) to vote for Democrats in this year’s midterms as a result of this apparent decision. Women are just as divided as men on this issue and I don’t think it is right or accurate to lump them all into one homogeneous voting bloc. I read and reread your words multiple times and I don’t think I’m misinterpreting them, but please correct me if I’ve missed something.

    • We can use the election of Donald Trump as what the playbook is going to be. Women poured into the streets the day after he was inaugurated. They are already gathering to do the same. But we shall see. November is a ways away. – sd

  16. Everyone should take the time to read the draft opinion and stop fretting about outcome. In reading the opinion it is very clear there never was a constitutional basis for stopping or allowing abortion. It is up to the states to determine this legislation. By the way, has anyone seen Oliver Stone’s Ukraine on Fire? Do you know what a NGO is? NGOs are non-government organizations of which many of us would call deep state. Soros type organizations that support radical groups to flip legal leadership in governments to corrupt leadership. NGO organizations are behind radical agenda to install a NWO. Planned Parenthood is the biggest NGO that is hell bent on destroying families. Abortion, transgender, etc. anything to destroy. Research Cabala Harris’ role with Planned Parenthood investigative journalist and you will have a thorough understanding of how deep all the corruption goes. Moving on Gates Foundation, IMF, WEF, NIH, CDC, FDA, WHO, etc. etc. and worst of all Roman Catholic Church. Read the book, America in the Lap of Rome (1888)-eye opener! None of us want these unelected dictators to provide oversite/control over the world! NGO organizations continue to work to push their agenda and install their puppets (Biden, Trudeau, Johnson, Merkel, Macron, etc.) Censorship violates the 1st Amendment so why do we allow it? Time to expose all of the corruption and remove it! Truth will set us free. Do your own research! Conspiracy theory was coined by CIA. How many that have tried to expose the truth have been suicided or murdered? 7 billion against ogliarchs and their puppets is very good odds if we unite and stop allowing them to divide us. They divide by pro-life versus pro-choice, destroy family units, us versus them, Christians against non-christians, liberal versus conservative, jabbed versus unjabbed, unions against employers, opioid crisis, border crisis, BLM, Antifa, any way they can. Energy disruption to force Green New Deal B.S. Supply chain corruption and now orchestrated food shortages. United we stand, divided we fall.

  17. Given the misinformation and outright lies that the left has not only pushed but wholeheartedly endorsed, how are we to trust an unprecedented and treasonous leak? Whomever it was that is the source of this treasonous leak should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law as this is an attack on the legitimacy of the SCOTUS independence and an attempt to put undue outside political pressure on the court. The first thing Joe Biden did was try and use this leaked document to try and score political points and push for democrats in the upcoming election cycle, when the first thing he should have done was rail against the unprecedented attack on SCOTUS.

    • “misinformation and outright lies” is in the wheelhouse of the Republican authoritarians. Remember January 6? The domestic terrorist violence was the result of Trump’s pathetic and destructive con that he was and still is President. Pure and perfect “misinformation and outright lies”

      • Check out the documentary that was released this week called 2000 Mules. Trump was right and everything else has been to distract us from it.

    • I have not heard anyone discussing a law that was broken concerning this SCOTUS leak. Rules set up by the SCOTUS itself may have been broken and a precedent may have been broken, but what law?

  18. I wouldn’t be surprised if this name isn’t known already. Everything is so political.

  19. There was no leak. Another false flag operation to stir up the emotions it stirred up.

Comments are closed.