Saturday, May 10, 2025
Home Blog Page 952

No, state pink slips will not go out June 1

The Alaska Legislature is not going to finish its work on the State of Alaska budgets before the end of the month, and without an operating budget, pink slips could be issued on June 1 for a government shutdown July 1.

That’s how the Walker Administration handled it twice during similar legislative delays, as he used “fear theater” to try to harass the Republican-led Legislature.

But there will be no pink slips on Tuesday. They are not required and there’s no evidence the Legislature won’t get its work done.

By law, the Dunleavy Administration must give workers 10 working days notice if the government is likely to shut down. That day would be June 17. The special session ends June 18.

This is not to say that supervisors in the State won’t let workers know on Tuesday that the budget hasn’t been finalized, but since the budget is really on the five-yard line, Gov. Mike Dunleavy has not seen it helpful to jack up the workforce. Nor is it his way to play the games that Walker played.

Both sides — House and Senate — are close on the Operating and Capitol budgets, and the Permanent Fund dividend will be reconciled, although not to the satisfaction of many. The way the budget bill has been designed this year, with everything crammed into one budget, has just made the whole thing trickier.

Sending out the “fear theater” pink slips resulted in needless harm in 2015 and 2016. It caused workers to become distracted, and many did something that seemed rational to them at the time — they rushed to their doctors and dentists to get work done just in case they were out of work and out of benefits. The run on medical services caused the state to have to pay enormous medical costs that year as an unintended consequence.

The House and Senate conference committee is hashing out the differences between the two budgets, but have no meetings on the schedule over the Memorial Day weekend. Work is planned for Tuesday.

The State is awash in money from the American Rescue Plan Act, but that is not a comfort for the tens of thousands of state workers who are hearing from the media that they might get laid off.

Anchorage muni clerk insults election observers as Washington Post picks up the story and blames Bronson volunteers

For Anchorage election workers, this month’s mayoral runoff was like no other, according to the Washington Post.

That much is true, but not informative: All election runoffs in Anchorage are unlike any other runoffs, but with the new all-mail-in election, this was the first mayoral runoff Anchorage has had under the new system.

This runoff stood alone in many respects, not the least of which that it appeared to be a close election. It deserved scrutiny, at least in the eyes of conservatives, many of whom are now less accepting that election centers around the country are being run fairly.

Also, since the mail-in elections started in 2018, there was an active campaign watching the ballot-counting process. It was more than apparent that Anchorage Municipal Clerk Barbara Jones didn’t like the scrutiny. She became more and more agitated as the days went by. Some days, observers said she was on the verge of “losing it.”

She told the Anchorage Assembly in her election report last week that her workers were accosted in the parking lot, when in fact, they were observed at the Election Office hours after they had told Bronson campaign volunteers they were done for the night, that they were going home. Bronson volunteers asked them what they were still doing there, after they had stated they were done for the night. This, according to Jones, is accosting.

The Washington Post reported that talk radio and blogs (really?) reported blank ballots being “smuggled into the Election Center, which Jones described as part of an effort to “sow distrust among voters.”

The reporter from the Washington Post was willing to allow these allegations to go unchallenged. The reporter’s call to the Bronson campaign came at 8 9 pm Alaska Time, the night before the Post published the story at 1 am. The Bronson campaign was not able to respond in time, but such are the techniques of fake news.

Jones’ and the Washington Post‘s parroting story is inaccurate: No one ever said the ballots were “smuggled in.” No blog has suggested that. No news agency ever suggested that.

In photos, Must Read Alaska showed they were brought in during broad daylight, and that caught the eye of Bronson elections observers who wanted to know, understandably, why boxes of blank ballots were arriving in the Election Center where marked ballots were being counted.

Read: What? Blank ballots hauled into Anchorage ballot counting center

In fact, Must Read Alaska wrote, “In what may be seen as an act of transparency or sheer cluelessness, election workers unloaded 50 boxes of blank ballots at the Anchorage Election Office on Friday, and stacked the boxes in one of the spacious rooms. In broad daylight, while counting is underway in the mayor’s runoff election.”

The Washington Post’s fake news machine interprets this as MRAK stating the ballots were “smuggled in.”

The boxes of blank ballots created a reasonable concern for observers, because this procedure was something never seen before by the public. Yet Jones acted as if this was an outrageous degree of curiosity.

It soon became clear to the Bronson campaign that the Election Office had not only blank ballots, blank envelopes but the ability to print bar codes on them — everything it would take to sway an election, and all in the same place where marked ballots were arriving. What could possibly go wrong?

It deserved an explanation, one that should have been offered to the campaigns in advance.

The Post also didn’t report that Jones had never faced any scrutiny before and thus was not emotionally prepared to handle it, nor did she have a good system in place to respond to challenges, many of which she has described as outrageous.

For example, when thermal totes filled with pizza boxes arrived at the Election Office, one Bronson volunteer asked to look inside, just to make sure those were pizzas in those big totes. Call it outrageous, but after the 2020 General Election, volunteers can’t take anything at face value.

The ramped-up scrutiny began when Jone and her staff failed to lock the door of the Election Center on election night. A citizen rolled through the parking lot and recorded a woman, after 11 pm, opening the door of the ballot counting building, because it had been left unlocked. Must Read Alaska posted the video. None of this is reported by the Post.

The next day, the Bronson campaign parked an RV outside the building and kept it staffed 24 hours a day with wide awake volunteers taking shifts to provide some sense of oversight to what was looking like a loose operation.

Jones also reported to the Assembly last week that observers were openly hostile to her. Losing candidate Forrest Dunbar reported to the Washington Post that those hostile observers were from the Bronson campaign, and the Washington Post ran with that as the truth. The sour-grapes candidate and the offended election clerk were the echo chamber corroboration for the fake news machine.

The Post reporter had not seen how collegial and “jokey” the Elections personnel were with surrogates of the Dunbar campaign, and how the Dunbar campaign had sent her flowers in the middle of the counting process. Those flowers came from Assemblyman Chris Constant, who was there on behalf of the Dunbar campaign daily.

The Post didn’t write about how a fire alarm went off moments after Constant had signed out of the building one day, and the building was evacuated for the false alarm. The Post didn’t report that the Fire Department union had endorsed Dunbar.

As both Assemblymen Constant and Dunbar are her employers, Jones is beholden to them and the other liberal members of the Assembly who had endorsed Dunbar. They can fire her at any time.

The Post did not report that the Dunbar election observers would appear just moments before the Clerk would announce the staff was going to do ballot adjudication, which gave Bronson volunteers the distinct impression that the Clerk had texted the Dunbar camp to let them know they should come over. An enterprising reporter should file a public records request for text messages sent between personnel at the Election Office and Constant and Dunbar and his campaign workers.

(Note to Jones and the Election Office in Anchorage: Did you destroy those text messages already? There are screenshots.)

What the Post did not know about was the open disdain that the election workers showed toward the volunteers from the Bronson Campaign.

Nor did the Post report on the ageism displayed by Jones as she told the Bronson campaign manager that, due to his age (all of 21) he could only speak when spoken to by his elders, including her. When he asked questions, she shouted at him and directed him to shut up. There is a recording of her bullying him.

What the Post doesn’t know is that the things Jones said was recorded by witnesses. What the Post doesn’t know is that Must Read Alaska has heard the recordings of her wild ranting and insulting of the Bronson campaign.

The Post doesn’t know that the attorney hired by the Municipal Clerk to oversee and consult on the the elections is the same attorney who has a separate contract with the company that runs the Dominion voting machines for Anchorage.

But Jones got the last word in the mainstream media, attacking the Bronson campaign volunteers with a vengeance. As with other stories placed in The Washington Post by leftists, this one was poorly reported and told but one side.

Jones released a report to the Assembly in which she complained loudly about the intensity of the volunteer observers, and how they were intentionally harassing her and her workforce.

She wrote the report not knowing that everything she said to Bronson volunteers is recorded, and that the campaign has been incredibly kind to her by not releasing the tapes to the media.

Read Barbara Jones’ report to the Assembly complaining about Bronson volunteer observers

Breaking: Permanent Fund hits $80 billion

The Alaska Permanent Fund hit $80 billion today, double what it was 10 years ago.

On Feb. 28, 1977, the Permanent Fund received its first deposit of dedicated oil revenues: $734,000. The fund has made money almost every year, except in 2009, when it lost 18 percent. It also lost money in 2001 and 2002, just 3.26 percent and 2.24 percent respectively. In 2020, the year of the pandemic, total return was 2 percent.

Back at the onset of the fund, investments were comprised almost entirely of bonds, while the Legislature had a four-year public discussion regarding whether the Permanent Fund should be managed as an investment fund or as an economic development bank.

In 1980, Gov. Jay Hammond signed a bill in 1980 creating the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation for the purpose of managing investments.

That year, the Alaska Legislature also approved the first Permanent Fund Dividend program, and the first dividend check of $1,000 was distributed two years later.

This year, the statutorily determined dividend would be over $3,000, but the Alaska Legislature is debating how much to appropriate for the dividend. The House has appropriated nothing, while the Senate voted on a $2,300 dividend, and the governor has a proposal to settle the matter by putting the formula into ths Alaska Constitution, which would require a vote of the people.

Jan. 6 commission fails in Senate

Democrats were unable to get the votes needed to set up a special commission to investigate the Jan. 6 surge into the U.S. Capitol during the certification of the Electoral College.

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski gave a long interview with reporters on Thursday, chastising her fellow Republicans. She voted for the commission, while Sen. Dan Sullivan voted against it.

Murkowski told reporters that Sen. Mitch McConnell was focused on “short-term political gain” rather than being interested in what occurred on Jan. 6. She said the principles of democracy are at stake.

There are already two Senate committees investigating the events of that day, and another in the House, and the FBI, Capitol Police, and other agencies are continuing their investigations, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer wanted a special commission, which opponents said would unnecessarily continue the political divide.

Five other Republicans voted in favor of proceeding with the commission vote: Sens. Bill Cassidy (La.), Susan Collins (Maine), Rob Portman (Ohio), Mitt Romney (Utah), and Ben Sasse (Neb.). Democrats needed six more votes to end the Republican-led filibuster.

Passing: Al Kookesh, Southeast Tlingit elder

JUNEAU – Former State Sen. Albert Matthew Kookesh, Jr. has passed after a long illness.

Born in Nov. 24, 1948 in Juneau, he attended Angoon Grade School and Mount Edgecumbe High School, completing college at Alaska Methodist University and the University of Washington, where he earned his law degree.

Kookesh was elected to the Alaska House of Representatives from 1997 through 2005, and to the Senate from 2005 through 2013. In 2012, he lost to Sen. Bert Stedman.

He was a commercial fisherman, lodge and market owner and operator, and worked as a special assistant for Rural Affairs in the Tony Knowles Administration and later the Bill Walker Administration.

He was married to Sally Woods Kookesh and was the father of Elaine, Jacleen. Reanna, Albert, and Walter.

Active in the Alaska Democratic Party for most of his adult life, he also served on the Board of Directors of Sealaska Corporation, and served as board chairman from 2000 to 2014. Kookesh was a member of the Haa Aaní, LLC Board of Managers, a member and former chair of the Elders’ Settlement Trust, served as a Trustee of the Sealaska Heritage Institute Board of Trustees, and served as Sealaska’s representative to the Alaska Federation of Natives.

Kookesh was also active in Native politics, as the former Alaska Federation of Natives chair, and former Alaska Native Brotherhood Grand Camp president, as well as a director of the First Alaskans Institute.

In the business world, he was business manager and acting president and CEO of Kootznoowoo Inc. between 1976-1992 and was the owner and operator of Kootznahoo Inlet Lodge.

His Tlingit name was Kaasháan. He was Tlingit/Eagle, Teikweidí (Brown Bear clan), child of L’eeneidí yádi clan. The family said that memorial arrangements are being made and will be announced at a later date.

Read: Must Read Alaska story from 2017 on Al Kookesh

Rick Whitbeck: Biden telling America’s Miners they matter less than Canadians, Australians

By RICK WHITBECK

You’d think the Covid-19’s supply chain issues might have been a wake-up call to America. You remember it, right?  Shortages of hand sanitizer.  N-95 masks and latex gloves nowhere to be found. Pharmaceuticals, disposable scrubs for frontline workers, and bare shelves where toilet paper and Clorox wipes once were.

America, as it always does, adapted.  Ford’s factories quickly changed from production of automobiles to ventilators. My Pillow started churning out masks and PPE. Breweries stopped making spirits and became suppliers of sanitizers. American lives were saved because of these responses to a crisis.

That was a year ago. America quickly paid attention to the fact that most of both our critical and day-to-day needs are not made domestically. China dominates the supply-chain, and logistics became exceptionally complicated and risky when China decided to flex its economic and political muscles on those items.

Now, in 2021, Covid-19’s stresses have – by and large – been reduced to back-of-mind status. With vaccines available to nearly everyone who wants them, we’re seeing a return to near-normalcy across the US.  People are traveling again. Office buildings are filling back up, with the daily hustle and bustle of businessmen and women spinning off good news for local dining establishments and support services.

But the threat of outsourcing critical industries has not diminished, especially when it comes to our energy industry.  Look no further than a recent story on President Biden’s plans to import much of the mineral, rare earth elements and critical minerals needed for his electric vehicles (EVs) mandate.  Why wouldn’t the President choose to mine in America, grow American jobs and build American wealth?  Why outsource those jobs to Canada, Australia, and yes, even Communist China?

The eco-Left often calls for a “just transition”- their lingo for that the shift from fossil fuels to renewable or “green” energy is somehow good or noble. Lost in this debate, even before we determine if green energy, wind turbines, solar panels, EVs are efficient, effective, or even “green”, is the dependence these technologies are on these rare earths and metals. Just as a combustion engine needs oil, the EVs need rare earths, and we will be getting them from China.  

We have rare earths in America. We have many of them here in Alaska, but the same green groups pushing for this “just transition” are preventing America from developing those resources. We shift the jobs, the revenue, the economic development to foreign countries, and, in the case of China, countries that are rife with environmental and human rights abuses.  Where’s the “just” part in this plan? 

There is nothing “just” about enriching our enemies. There is nothing “just” is sacrificing Alaska’s workers and Alaska’s recourses while rewarding foreign countries instead.  

If Joe Biden is going to push a green agenda, he should at least prioritize the American workers and American industry.  This could be Alaska’s great moment.  Instead, that opportunity will go to another country at our expense.

Rick Whitbeck is the Alaska State Director for Power The Future, a national non-profit advocating for energy workers, while fighting back against environmental extremism and the ideologues who fund radicalized efforts to thwart American energy dominance.  

Win Gruening: We pay, they spend, as Juneau Assembly rejects property tax relief

By WIN GRUENING

In a recent City and Borough of Juneau Finance Committee meeting, a majority of Assembly members rebuffed an attempt to provide tax relief to local property owners.  

The proposal by Michelle Hale, supported by Greg Smith and Wade Bryson, would have lowered the mill rate from its current 10.66 mills to 10.56 mills. After some discussion, it was defeated on a 6-3 vote. The decision to maintain the current mill rate (a reduction from the previously proposed .20 mill increase) was forwarded for final approval at the next regular Assembly meeting on June 14.

While the proposal would not have provided a substantial reduction in taxes at the individual level, it would have sent an important message to residents and businesses that their elected Assembly was cognizant of the past and future economic hardship caused by the pandemic.

If anything, the proposed reduction was woefully short considering the significant property valuation increases experienced by Juneau commercial property owners.  Consider that many Juneau businesses are struggling after experiencing their second year of minimal to zero revenue and, even with the prospect of some cruise arrivals by August, may not fully open this year.  According to City Manager Rorie Watt, the city was “way behind” on updating commercial assessments as required by state law.

The severe jump in assessed land values caught commercial property owners off guard and will result in major property tax increases. Predictably, this has provoked a sharp reaction from many downtown business owners.  Some owners that have purchased property in the last several years have reported assessments that have been double their original purchase price.  

Over 300 tax appeals have been filed this year contesting the city’s latest round of tax assessments – triple the number in a normal year.  According to the city, while the new assessments have primarily affected land values, businesses can expect similar increases in building values next year.

While recognizing that property valuation is a complex process with many factors, a cursory review of tax assessments on the CBJ website reflect some odd and outsized disparities.  The unimproved waterfront lot purchased last year by Norwegian Cruise Lines for $20 million is still assessed at $7.5 million which values the land at about $60 per square foot.  

Even if it were assessed at the higher sale value, it would be $161 per square foot. Yet, the Archipelago lot downtown on South Franklin Street is assessed at $300 per square foot.  Some nearby improved properties reflect updated land values of $450 per square foot – all resulting in double-digit increases in their property taxes.

Some Juneau Assembly members believe that continuing the current mill rate is tantamount to “holding the line” on taxes and that’s where their responsibility ends.  But everyone knows that property tax formulation is a combination of the mill rate and property valuation – and both should be considered when budgeting our tax dollars.  

Even amid the pandemic, the Assembly blithely approved some large discretionary expenditures – all while the private sector suffered massive layoffs. City staff never considered serious operating spending reductions.  Last year $1.5 million in scheduled pay raises for city employees were approved along with new hires, longevity pay and merit increases. Additional increases in employee benefits and compensation is expected this year. 

Also funded was a brand-new childcare program that adds millions to future expenses along with a $1.5 million grant to Sealaska Heritage Institute subsidizing their $14 million arts plaza under construction in downtown Juneau.

Why is it that municipal operating expenditures are never reduced but consideration of temporary property tax relief for residents and small businesses is considered a tax break for the wealthy?

The city currently has around $40 million in reserves and unrestricted fund balances.  This is considerably higher than past years and more than enough to absorb a substantial temporary reduction in property taxes. Our economy has begun to recover, and, with declining debt and increased sales tax collections, our municipal revenues will recover as well.

The economic health of Juneau’s families, businesses and their employees should be as important as non-essential CBJ spending. One of the most important ways the Assembly can continue to help existing small businesses and attract new startup businesses is to keep property taxes and overall cost of living low.

The Assembly can still reconsider property tax relief.  The time to act is now when Juneau’s businesses and citizens need it most.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening began writing op-eds for local and statewide media. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations and currently serves on the board of the Alaska Policy Forum.

Art Chance: When you wish upon a star

By ART CHANCE

Juneau is a nice place to live if you are among the upper levels of the local, state, and federal government and the people who deal with them.   

It is an especially nice place to live if you’re among the self-anointed “in crowd” of old Juneau money, Democrat and Native royalty, and lobbyist and political money.

This crowd and the people closely associated with them have pretty much a monopoly on the million-dollar houses with a water view.  Some of the old money goes back to the gold mining days when Juneau was the richest town in America and maybe in the world.   

The rest of the rich and powerful got their money and power from knowing the right people and being in the right place at the right time. Harry Truman once said that the only way you can get rich in government is to be a crook, and that is pretty much true. I know or know of a few who got rich by being inside government, though that can be risky business, but I know or know of many more who got rich by having connections inside government.

Juneau is not a very nice place to live if you are a Republican elected or appointed official, an employee at the delivery of service level in government, or below the owner/manager/professional level of what little private sector there is in the capital city. 

Compared to other urban areas in Alaska, and only in Alaska would a town of 30K people be considered urban, Juneau is breathtakingly expensive. The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not monitor cost of living in Juneau. The Alaska Department of Labor does a market basket survey that is sometimes reliable but is subject to political influence. The State last did a comprehensive and somewhat objective survey of cost of living differentials within Alaska and between Alaska and Seattle in 1984.   

The cold breath of the Capital move was still strong enough that the State concluded that there was no reason for a geographic differential for Juneau; the math was simple; if you paid a Geographic Differential for Juneau, it was easy to economically justify moving any position to Anchorage. 

The State also concluded that there would be a negative differential between urban Alaska, including Juneau, and Seattle of 12.5%. The Seattle based marine highway unions knew better and had the power to force the State to agree to a 25% differential for any of their members who claimed to reside in Alaska, which mostly meant those who claimed to live in Juneau or Ketchikan.

The Public Employment Relations Act requires that any labor agreement include a cost of living differential between Alaska and Seattle. That is language from the early 1980s and was precipitated by the Hammond Administration’s attempts to rein in the cost of the ferry system. By the time I became director of labor relations in early 2003, using Seattle as a base had become untenable. In the early 2000s, Seattle was far more expensive than Anchorage or Fairbanks.  

Since I had the power to do it and nobody knew enough to question me, I just made the base Western Washington, which is expensive enough, but not as expensive as Queen Anne Hill. I spent $100K on salary surveys but never could get a truly reliable number, but the old marine highway number of about 25% is pretty good for a Juneau differential.   

I kept my office in Juneau, but only because the governor and the commissioner of Administration were there most of the time. Most of our actual work was in Anchorage and Fairbanks and we spent hundreds of thousands of dollars a year on travel costs between Juneau and those cities. We were in Juneau for meetings, most of which were unnecessary or could have been done by phone or video.  We all knew that moving the office to Anchorage would be at least a 25% pay raise and a savings of several hundred thousand dollars a year in travel costs.

Gov. Frank Murkowski was the last governor to insist that all of his commissioners maintain their primary office in Juneau other than the adjutant general, and somewhat, the commissioner of Public Safety. Governors Sarah Palin and Sean Parnell let division directors and above maintain an office wherever they chose. Most chose Anchorage.  

Gov. Bill Walker made Bruce Botelho, former mayor of Juneau, his henchman to remove everyone who’d ever had a Republican thought from State government, but even Walker made little attempt to either hire the Juneau anointed ruling class or to return the runaway State employees to the People’s Republic.   

Actually, the Republican Dunleavy Administration has a bit more of a political appointee presence in Juneau than had its recent predecessors. In sum, the only vestigial remains of the State Capital in Juneau are some of the Office of the Governor, some of the Department of Administration, and some of the finance and budget sections/divisions of operating departments that have to deal directly with Admin or OMB.  

Oh, and they still have the star on the map and an old post office and a former federal office building that we call the Capitol.   Except during the legislative session, Juneau is nothing more than a regional center for government. 

They seem to think that star will be there forever.

But Juneau’s self-anointed in-crowd is, as always, totally lacking self-awareness. I read a Juneauite’s hoity-toity retort on a post on Juneau’s attempt to eliminate the cruise industry. He goes on and on about what a cultural mecca Juneau is.   

Well, it is, for a town of 30,000 people, but only if you are affluent enough to afford tickets to Perseverance Theatre, dinner at Salt, and drinks after work at The Hangar or other watering holes in town. 

If you’re a State Range 12 or 14, the typical delivery-of-service employee, those destinations are once a year, just for special occasions. Juneau can’t even support a McDonald’s downtown or chain restaurants in the Mendenhall Valley. Even Walmart couldn’t stay in business there.  

My former hometown in Georgia has about a third of the population and about a third of the per capita income as Juneau and yet it has a thriving Walmart “Super Center.”  Were it not for the vestigial remains of the upper levels of the Executive Branch, and the legislative session, downtown Juneau would be a ghost town between September and May. Ever been to Skagway in January? That would be downtown Juneau.

But Juneau’s clueless in-crowd wants to destroy the tourism economy that supports all the stuff they take for granted.   

I’ll admit that at the public policy level I’m not a big fan of a tourism economy; it produces a few rich owners and a lot of poor and transient service workers; as a public policy matter, you need more than that or you become a tourism city in the Third World.   

When I lived in Juneau, I saw the same ships in January in Puerto Vallarta that I saw in July in Juneau and even ran into people at bars and restaurants in Juneau who I’d seen in bars and restaurants in Puerto Vallarta. Those “cultural amenities” that the Juneau elite likes to tout are dependent for their survival not on government or the Juneau elite, but on tourism.  I’ve never lived off money that my great-grandfather made, so I know what it is like to live in Alaska’s seasonal and “boom and bust” economy.   

In the good times, you take money to the bank in a wheelbarrow; in the bad times you take money out of the bank in a wheelbarrow, and you hope that there is a little left over for you to start the next season.

I spent a quarter century in Juneau, most of it in the upper levels of state government.  I lived well though I spent a lot of time on airplanes, in hotels, and hearing rooms. When I came home it took a few days to not reach for the phone to call room service when the alarm went off.  I worked with people who I still cherish and I worked with people I simply hated; you have to be able to do that in government. 

We loved our boat and the lifestyle that goes with it. But, if you don’t have a job or business that allows you to have amenities and travel a bit, Juneau is a dismal, dark place.

Now, the people who are living off money granddaddy made or off public employee retirements are trying to make it impossible for anyone else to tolerate living in Juneau. It isn’t unheard of; Haines did the same thing when it chased the tourism industry away, but going to Haines isn’t exactly on anybody’s bucket list. Fairbanks is a regional center for government and can be brutal in winter, but you can drive out or fly out at a somewhat reasonable price. You can fly around the world from anywhere else in the US for the price of a ticket from Juneau to Seattle or Portland, and if you’re going anywhere other than the major left coast cities, throw in a few hundred bucks for staying overnight in the People’s Republic of Seattle or Portland.   

At bottom, if you don’t have a boat and have the money to travel a bit, or a job that pays for you to travel a bit, Juneau is pretty much unfit for human habitation. I guess the “in-crowd” just wants to keep their own company because a stroke of the governor’s pen or 21 and 11 in the legislature moves the Legislature and the upper levels of government out of Juneau.   

The federal employees follow the government out other than the Coast Guard and maybe some law enforcement.   Juneau can be cold, wet, dark, and lonely in January; check out Skagway in January some time.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon. 

Kristie Babcock: Only rural person of color denied opportunity by Chief Justice Bolger

By KRISTIE BABCOCK

Chief Justice Joel Bolger, like many lawyers, is good with words, but the words have no real meaning.

This is the lesson I learned during my first official session on the Alaska Judicial Council. I read the chief justice’s June 8, 2020 letter.  

Justice Bolger wrote: “We recognize that too often African-American, Alaska Natives, and other people of color are not treated with the same dignity and respect as white members of our communities.  And we recognize that as community members, lawyers, and especially as judicial officers, we must do more to change this reality.”  

Yet when confronted with a test of his own prejudice, his own condescending attitude toward rural Alaska, his own “big city” bias, he failed the test.  

The vacancy the Judicial Council was dealing with was to replace the soon to be retired Bolger himself.  On his way out, he still wanted to control who might replace him. There was one applicant for the State Supreme Court who was from rural Alaska.  That same applicant was also the only person of color to apply.  

That applicant was Superior Court Judge Paul Roetman, presiding judge of the entire 2nd Judicial District.  The Judicial Council split 3-3 on nominating Judge Roetman.  

The tie-breaking vote was Chief Justice Bolger.  

Let us review what Bolger wrote just one year ago: 

“We judges must examine…what biases – both conscious and unconscious – we bring, and how we can improve our justice system…We must continue our efforts to make our court system and its judges reflect the community that we serve.”  

“We must also work to attract more people of color to the practice of law and, ultimately, to judicial careers.”

Read: Alaska Supreme Court puts its judicial activism in writing

When put to the test, Chief Justice Bolger proved his biases against even nominating a person of color and a person who lives in rural Alaska.  What did the (very white, and very urban, and urbane) chief justice have to say when he denied Judge Roetman even the opportunity to be considered for appointment?  Nothing.

In my opinion his vote tells the truth and his June 8, 2020 letter was just puffery.

Bolger had no trouble writing these words: “To heal the raw wounds of racism and history so painfully laid bare.”  But when it was up to him to nominate the only applicant who was both from rural Alaska and the only person of color, he voted no.  Instead, only three white, urban judges were nominated.  

I was shocked that a highly qualified, sitting presiding judge was denied the opportunity to even be considered by the governor. You see, the way our Alaska Constitution is designed, the governor must appoint judges only from the nominations the Judicial Council sends along.   The Council has total control over the nomination.  The governor has no discretion except to pick from a list we send him.

And who are the seven members of the Judicial Council?  Three of us are public members, appointed by the Governor for six-year terms and subject to a vote of confirmation by a joint session of the Alaska Legislature. 

Three other members are privately selected by the Board of Governors of the Alaska Bar Association. Lawyers choosing lawyers to choose the judges.  That is the way the current system works.  The chief justice chairs the council and only casts tie-breaking votes.

Is it any surprise that the public members voted to give Judge Roetman a chance to be considered?  All three public members of the council were convinced Judge Roetman was highly qualified and deserved an opportunity to be considered by the Governor.  

The three lawyers voted no.   

What exactly was so negative about the presiding judge of the Second Judicial District that he should be denied the chance to be considered by the governor?   

He did not attend enough lawyer club activities in the urban areas?  Perhaps he does not dress the part?  Maybe he is good enough for rural Alaska, but not good enough for the big league in the big city?  Maybe he uses syntax that does not sound “white” enough?   I expect the responses from the lawyers will be what minorities are very used to hearing…not up to par, not quite good enough, not the “best timber,” does not have quite the right temperament, or some other gobbledygook.  

Those of us who are women recall such lame, chauvinist and absurd objections to our consideration in times past.   

At least the Judicial Council has moved beyond that prejudice, although it appears to still harbor some nasty biases – conscious or unconscious – when it comes to rural Alaska and people of color.

If only a presiding judge, a person of color, a lifelong Alaskan, with decades of experience, who lives and works and understands rural Alaska could be given the same opportunity. 

The ability, common sense and integrity of each applicant is what counts.  I do not make the argument that skin tone means very much, but Chief Justice Bolger prominently did. He made a huge point in his June 8, 2020, letter (a letter signed by 4 of the 5 members of the Supreme Court).  

The council is responsible for forwarding (at least two) names for nomination for every vacancy on the court, but nothing stops us from forwarding all highly qualified applicants for consideration by the governor.   

What Chief Justice Bolger, by his final act on the Judicial Council, did to the dreams and aspirations of people of color and rural Alaskans is devastating and terribly, terribly wrong.  

Kristie Babcock is a public member of the Alaska Judicial Council.  She is a lifelong Alaskan, business owner and resident of the Kenai Peninsula. She worked as director of boards and commissions for two governors and has observed the Judicial Council for over 30 years.