Sunday, September 21, 2025
Home Blog Page 46

Linda Boyle: EPA launches public hub on contrails, weather manipulation geoengineering

By LINDA BOYLE

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has taken on the challenge of contrails.

“Americans have legitimate questions about contrails and geoengineering, and they deserve straight answers. We’re publishing everything EPA knows about these topics on these websites,” he announced this month.

We know the US military seeded clouds in Vietnam to produce rain, providing an obstacle to the enemy forces. Operation Popeye ran from 1967 to 1972 as a covert operation to extend the monsoon season over the Ho Chi Minh Trail and other roads. The goal was to disrupt North Vietnamese military operations by making roads muddy and hindering the movement of troops and supplies. 

Even today, silver iodide crystals are used to facilitate rain in dry agricultural areas.

What are contrails? 

Contrails occur from aircraft exhaust. They are clouds that form when water vapor condenses and freezes around small particles (aerosols) from the aircraft exhaust. The water vapor is from both the exhaust of the airplane and the air around the airplane.  

Contrails only occur at high altitudes. Due to the very cold temperatures at high altitude, contrails are always made from ice particles. We see them in Alaska from commercial jets, but not from lower-altitude bush planes.

The new government web page on contrails explains, in part, that “chemtrails” is a term “some people use to inaccurately claim that contrails resulting from routine air traffic are actually an intentional release of dangerous chemicals or biological agents at high altitudes for a variety of nefarious purposes, including population control, mind control, or attempts to geoengineer Earth or modify the weather.”

It also states the government “is not aware of there ever being a contrail intentionally formed over the United States for the purpose of geoengineering or weather modification.”  

Nevertheless, eight states have introduced legislation designed to ban “geoengineering and weather modification activities.” 

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia is attempting to do the same in Congress.

What is geoengineering?  

Geoengineering covers a large range of activities that deliberately try to cool the Earth or remove specific gases from the atmosphere usually through injecting gases such as sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere to form reflective particles.  

A new EPA web page provides an overview of geoengineering basics, discusses the possible impact of solar geoengineering, and answers frequently asked questions. 

The resource digs into the current state of science and research surrounding geoengineering, to include the possible negative impacts geoengineering might have on the environment and human health, ”including depleting the ozone layer, harming crops, altering weather patterns and creating acid rain.”  The EPA also details what it is doing to identify and track private entities that may wish to engage in such activities.  

separate page about geoengineering notes, “The U.S. government is not engaged in any form of outdoor solar geoengineering testing,” nor “large-scale deployment” of such technology. 

The web page is informative and provides answers to frequently asked questions. As with all things, people have different views on the issue. There are those who look at every contrail as a chemtrail manipulating the weather or dispersing toxins in the air and destroying our atmosphere. Others see them as only water vapor from jet exhaust. 

Can countries affect the weather and put toxins into the atmosphere? That is always a possibility. Some are tinkering with the earth’s atmosphere for the sake of climate change. Bill Gates has convinced the United Nations to inject aerosols into the upper atmosphere or “brighting clouds” to “reflect solar radiation away from Earth” in hopes to lower temperatures and thus to “save our planet.” 

I have some sympathy for England. There aren’t a whole lot of sunny days there already. Now there will be fewer for what may or may not make a difference. 

These new web pages are a step in the right direction. Zeldin  clearly understands Americans want to know the truth. He stated the web pages would give us everything the EPA knows at this point in time. Follow this EPA link if you want more in-depth information. 

Linda Boyle, RN, MSN, DM, was formerly the chief nurse for the 3rd Medical Group, JBER, and was the interim director of the Alaska VA. Most recently, she served as Director for Central Alabama VA Healthcare System.

From Broadway to Spenard: Alaska Gov. Dunleavy trolls NYC mayoral circus with invitation to ‘Go North’

21

Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy just crashed New York City’s mayoral pity party with an invitation to head north.

In a lighthearted-but-pointed op-ed for the New York Daily News, Dunleavy took direct aim at the Big Apple’s latest political drama, where socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani emerged victorious in the Democratic mayoral primary and looks poised to take over the city that is the heartbeat of the international business world. Ranked-choice voting makes him the man to beat.

Dunleavy’s message? If you’re a business owner tired of crime, chaos, and calls to “seize the means of production,” Alaska’s wide open spaces — and wide open markets — are waiting.

Dunleavy wrote that there are two Americas.

“One America, with coastal elites in places like New York City and Los Angeles, who continue to steamroll towards full-on Marxism, and another with ordinary, hard-working Americans across the country, like here in the great state of Alaska, who don’t embrace this extremism,” he wrote.

Spoiler alert: Alaska is the latter.

Dunleavy gleefully pointed out the red flags in Mamdani’s platform, from targeting wealth creators to cozying up to fringe foreign policy ideas. He painted a bleak picture of a Gotham in economic freefall, driven by anti-business rhetoric, rising crime, and suffocating taxes. Then he offered a stark contrast: life without income taxes, government micromanagement, or the perpetual hum of sirens.

But the governor of Alaska wasn’t just throwing shade — he was throwing out a lifeline: Go North, he urged.

“A century and a half ago, New York newspaperman Horace Greeley encouraged Americans to, “Go West, young man.” Today, I’m telling New York’s business owners and entrepreneurs: Go North. Bring your dreams, your hustle, and your vision to Alaska. We’ll welcome you with open arms and the wide-open spaces of the Last Frontier. You have a choice; Alaska is ready to be your new home,” Dunleavy wrote.

Alaska, with its pro-business climate and friendly communities, is ready to welcome New Yorkers sick of the socialist slide into communism.

Of course, there’s no Madison Avenue in Wasilla. You won’t be ordering off a Michelin star menu in Nome. And if you’re attached to your Nordstrom, let alone Bergdorf Goodman, you might want to brace yourself for a wardrobe downgrade to Carhartt chic.

As the locals like to say, in Alaska the odds are good, but the goods are… well, odd.

Still, with New Yorkers reportedly eyeing the exits amid political upheaval, skyrocketing costs, and crime headaches, Dunleavy’s lighthearted pitch might just strike a chord. Not everybody wants to go to Florida.

Alaska’s taxes are low, and nobody’s threatening to nationalize your grocery store.

“We’re not about tearing down historic statues or chasing away wealth creators; we’re about building opportunity and defending the American Dream. Whether you’re running a small shop or a big corporation, Alaska has a home for you. We have incentives for companies willing to set up shop here — a business-friendly environment and a community that values and supports the entrepreneurial spirit,” he wrote.

“Imagine operating your business where the sun shines 24 hours a day. Where the air is clean, there are endless opportunities, and the state is not trying to run your store for you. You’re the boss, and the government stays out of the way. In Alaska, we’re rolling out the welcome mat for tech startups to family-owned businesses,” Dunleavy wrote.

So if your startup, hedge fund, or bagel shop needs a new home — and you don’t mind swapping subways for snowmachines — the Last Frontier says: welcome aboard.

Just don’t wonder where the nearest Chanel boutique is.

What Nat Herz missed about the Peltola speculation

Nat Herz’s latest Northern Journal column does a good job summarizing the current parlor game among Alaska Democrats: What office will Mary Peltola pursue in 2026?

Herz details the pressure campaigns from the left, the hopeful remarks from political consultant Jim Lottsfeldt, and the strategic patience Peltola is showing after her 2024 defeat by Congressman Nick Begich. But Herz’s column leaves out some critical context, both on the national ambitions by Democrats for Peltola and the serious hurdles she would face in a Senate or governor’s race.

What Herz doesn’t say is that her possible run for Senate against Dan Sullivan isn’t just idle speculation. Behind the scenes, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is actively recruiting Peltola to challenge Sullivan. National Democrats have been quietly testing the waters in Alaska, commissioning polling to show Peltola a pathway and running a tsunami of negative ads against Sullivan well in advance of any campaign announcement. Schumer is said to be getting quite chummy with Peltola, leading the lamb to the slaughterhouse.

This is a standard playbook for Schumer: Soften up the Republican candidate and lower his favor abilities, try to coax a candidate with “star power,” and use national money to compete in a red state. Alaska is one of the few states where Schumer doesn’t need a Democrat to actually win outright. He just needs to make sure Republicans spend millions defending it.

But Schumer’s pitch ignores one stubborn fact: Dan Sullivan is no pushover. He’s won convincingly twice in a state where Republicans still outnumber Democrats two-to-one, and his cross-party appeal on military and veterans’ issues remains strong. National Democrats may be “salivating,” as Lottsfeldt put it, but local operatives know that unseating Sullivan would be a steep climb, even for Peltola.

Herz also tiptoes around one of Peltola’s key vulnerabilities: Her lack of work ethic is legendary.

Even when she was in Congress, Peltola had a reputation for being checked-out, skipping committee hearings and votes, and limiting her public appearances to friendly venues.

Since her defeat, she’s largely disappeared from the public stage, except for parades and curated social media posts. Her most high-profile event recently was serving as grand marshal of the Anchorage Pride Parade. That may or may not play well with the moderate voters she would need.

It’s the latest example of the political strategy that has worked for Peltola: Heavy reliance on symbolism, low emphasis on retail politics, or tough policy work. That may thrill DC consultants, but Alaskans are already starting to notice.

The truth is that Mary likes parades. She doesn’t like work.

Herz quotes Lottsfeldt floating the idea of Peltola for governor, positioning her as the frontrunner in a wide-open field.

But here’s a reality check: The labor money is now already locked up, with former Sen. Click Bishop — a seasoned, labor-friendly Republican — already in the race. Peltola may have establishment Democratic support, but Bishop will peel off labor votes, especially in Fairbanks and rural hubs where his name ID is strong.

One interesting theory circulating in political circles is that Bishop and Peltola could team up, with Peltola as the gubernatorial candidate and Bishop as lieutenant governor. It would be a bipartisan ticket tailor-made for Alaska’s centrist voters — but it would also risk pleasing no one, alienating conservative Democrats and moderate Republicans alike. It would be a ticket that would attract a lot of Big Labor money.

Alaska has already seen what a unity ticket that is beholden to Big Labor has done: Gov. Bill Walker and Lt. Gov. Byron Mallot tried it in 2014 and eventually flamed out.

Nat Herz paints a picture of a Democratic party eager for Peltola’s decision. What his column glosses over is the messy political reality: National Democrats want her for Senate, local consultants, that group of mercenaries at the state level, want her for governor, and her natural comfort zone seems to be parades and berry picking.

Add in a potential labor split in the governor’s race and the steep odds against unseating Sullivan, and it’s clear her path is far more complicated than Democratic insiders let on with Herz.

The question isn’t just where can she win?” It’s does she have the fire to do the job?

Breaking: The Supreme Court sides with Trump, allowing mass layoffs at the Department of Education

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that President Donald Trump has the authority to move forward with widespread layoffs within the Department of Education, siding with the administration in a high-profile case centered on the limits of executive power over federal agencies.

In a 6-3 decision, the court’s conservative majority granted the Trump administration’s emergency application to lift a lower court injunction that had blocked the layoffs. The ruling allows the administration to proceed with its plan to cut approximately half of the department’s workforce and reassign many of its responsibilities to other federal agencies.

After taking office in January, President Trump announced plans to restructure the federal government with a focus on reducing both the size and cost of federal agencies. On March 20, he signed an executive order instructing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “facilitate the closure of the Department of Education,” in line with his campaign pledge to scale back federal involvement in education policy.

The department has about 4,400 employees and a $68 billion budget.

The administration has indicated that certain programs and functions will be absorbed by departments such as Labor and Health and Human Services, while a significant portion of education oversight will be returned to the states.

The decision is a major for the Trump Administration’s efforts to overhaul the federal government and is expected to set a precedent for future executive actions targeting other agencies.

With the Supreme Court’s ruling in place, the Department of Education is expected to begin phased layoffs within weeks, with the administration targeting a complete closure of the department’s operations by the end of the year.

Sen. Dan Sullivan: Beltway Democrats tried to block Alaska’s progress. They failed.

By US SEN. DAN SULLIVAN

The One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) is one of the most transformative pieces of legislation for Alaska in decades. This comprehensive package is the product of years of relentless, focused work, delivering historic wins for our state.

The legislation contains numerous provisions to unleash Alaska’s extraordinary resource economy, deliver tax relief for hard-working Alaskans and small businesses, make the largest US Coast Guard investment in history, secure the southern border and halt the flow of fentanyl, build up our Alaska-based military, upgrade Alaska’s aviation safety, strengthen Alaska’s health and nutrition programs, protect Alaska’s most vulnerable, and achieve historic savings for future generations.

Due to the hard work of our congressional delegation, I think it’s fair to say no state fared better from this bill. In the coming months, my team and I will be working to better inform Alaskans about this important legislation and dispel the falsehoods being spread in ad campaigns funded by the same far-left interest groups that always seek to crush Alaska’s economy and working families.

This op-ed is a start.  

At its heart, the OBBB is a jobs bill. It will unleash Alaska’s private sector economy, generate billions of dollars in new revenues for the state, and create jobs for hard-working families. The OBBB mandates historic provisions to responsibly develop ANWR, NPR-A, and Cook Inlet.. The bill also increases Alaska’s share of future revenues from these federal lands to 70% and helps accelerate the Alaska LNG project. 

Importantly, these provisions cement in statute regular lease sales to guard against attempts by future Democratic leaders to use regulations to shut down our economy, as was done with President Biden’s 70 executive orders and actions targeting Alaska—the “Last Frontier Lock-Up.”

The bill also dramatically benefits Alaska’s working families, enabling them to keep more of what they earn by extending the 2017 tax cuts and making them permanent, preventing what would have been a $4 trillion tax hike. . We secured an increased Child Tax Credit and standard deduction, small business deductions, no taxes on tips or overtime, and significant tax relief for seniors. The Council of Economic Advisors predicts this legislation will increase take-home pay for an average family by over $7,000.

The OBBB also achieves the most significant spending reductions in history. According to nonpartisan scorekeepers, the bill reduces federal spending by over $1.5 trillion and, using the current policy baseline, will reduce the deficit by $400 billion over ten years. That is before considering the pro-growth elements of the bill.

As Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee overseeing the U.S. Coast Guard, I also fought to secure the largest investment in Coast Guard history—nearly $25 billion. This includes funding for 16 new icebreakers and $300 million to homeport the new Juneau icebreaker. The urgency of this cannot be overstated, with the Russians and Chinese racing to control our Arctic waters. And, with the “Golden Dome” initiative substantially funded by the OBBB, we’re building the next generation of homeland missile defense—Alaska being the cornerstone—to protect the entire country. The bill also commits over $100 million to redevelop existing Arctic infrastructure, like the Adak Naval Base.

This bill secures our southern border with the most robust enforcement package in a generation—$46 billion for the wall, billions more for Border Patrol and law enforcement, and substantial resources to crack down on deadly fentanyl coming into Alaska.

Finally, I know Alaska has been flooded with dishonest ads by far-left groups—at the direction of Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer—scaring Alaskans with false claims that the OBBB will cause them to lose Medicare and Medicaid.

Here’s the truth. Medicare isn’t touched in the OBBB. Not one dollar in Medicaid benefits was cut for Alaskans. This bill actually strengthens health care in Alaska.

The only people who were advocating for Medicaid cuts for Alaskans were Senator Schumer and Senate Democrats. They stripped out a provision I included in the bill to help Alaska’s rural hospitals and increase the federal match for Medicaid for Alaska, which would’ve amounted to hundreds of millions more dollars a year.

Further, Sen. Schumer tried, but failed, to strip out other significant funding—approximately $200 million a year for the next five years—for Alaska’s health care system.

I worked to make sure commonsense 20-hour-a-week work or volunteer requirements were included, ensuring able-bodied Americans utilizing these programs are contributing to our communities. But the bill has important exemptions—for disabled veterans, parents or guardians with children, individuals with disabilities or mental health challenges, Alaska Natives, and those living in rural areas with few economic opportunities.

But Senator Schumer’s anti-Alaska campaign wasn’t just aimed at our health care. He and Senate Democrats sought to specifically kill every single positive provision for Alaska in this bill: ANWR, NPR-A, Cook Inlet, homeporting the Juneau icebreaker, the Adak Naval base, and greater flexibility on SNAP requirements. We successfully fought back, but one thing remains clear: Democrats in D.C. have once again demonstrated they are the anti-Alaska party.

Ultimately, National Democrats didn’t win in this bill. Alaskans did. From growing our economy, to tax relief for working families, to national defense, to securing our border, to strengthening our health care, this legislation reflects years of determined advocacy for Alaska. The final result is numerous historic wins for Alaska that will positively shape our state’s future for decades. 

Sen. Dan Sullivan has represented Alaska in the U.S. Senate since he was first elected in 2014.

Andrew Cuomo announces third-party run against socialist Mamdani for NYC mayor — with an Alaska twist

Former Governor Andrew Cuomo is expected to announce a political comeback bid, launching a third-party run in the New York City mayoral general election against Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani, who trounced him in the Democratic primary earlier this summer.

Sources say the former three-term governor will call on both New York City Mayor Eric Adams and Republican radio host Curtis Sliwa, both also rumored to be eyeing independent bids, to join him in pledging to consolidate support behind whichever candidate is best positioned to defeat Mamdani by mid-September. New York City’s general election will be ranked-choice voting, as is done in Alaska.

The novel political maneuver borrows from an emerging trend in Alaska politics, where ranked-choice voting and nonpartisan primaries have upended traditional partisan battles.

In 2024, Alaska Republican Nick Begich pioneered a similar pledge during his run for Congress, vowing to exit the race if polling showed he was not the strongest Republican contender. The tactic pressured other conservatives, notably then-Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom, to bow out after finishing behind Begich, clearing the path for him to mount a more effective challenge against Democrat Mary Peltola, the incumbent he had lost to in 2022.

Now, Cuomo is attempting to replicate that model in New York’s first-ever high-profile ranked-choice general election for a major city office.

Governor Cuomo believes that if Democrats, independents, and moderate Republicans unite around one candidate, there is a clear pathway to defeat Mamdani’s radical agenda, sources are reporting.

Under the plan, Cuomo, Adams, and Sliwa would monitor polling through the summer and, by mid-September, publicly commit to dropping out if their candidacy risks splitting the vote against Mamdani. The goal: ensure voters can consolidate their rankings behind a single viable challenger to the left-wing incumbent.

Mamdani, who ousted Cuomo in a resounding primary victory driven by young, left-leaning voters, dismissed the idea.

Political observers note that while the pledge strategy helped reshape Alaskan politics, it remains untested in New York’s complex urban environment.

Still, the Cuomo camp is betting on voter fatigue with ideological extremes and a desire for experienced leadership. With ranked-choice voting giving voters the option to rank candidates rather than pick just one, Cuomo hopes to recast himself as a consensus alternative capable of drawing cross-party appeal.

The technique worked in Alaska to defeat a radical member of Congress. But will it work in New York City?

Cuomo’s farewell speech from three years ago when he left office as governor:

Tanana Valley State Fair board says no to drag queens this year

The Tanana Valley State Fair announced in February that it will not host its annual drag performance this year.

Last week, after months of pushback from the drag promoters, it published a statement reiterating its decision.

In a terse statement released Friday, the Fair’s Board of Directors said, “A Glam Show is not scheduled during the 2025 Tanana Valley State Fair.” The board acknowledged that the decision followed months of listening to community members in Fairbanks and surrounding areas, noting the controversy has taken a heavy toll on staff and the broader community.

“This process has been painful for all involved,” the statement read. “Struggles continue with harassment which has taken its toll on the TVSFA, its staff, and our Fairbanks community.”

Harassment has been intense from the pro-drag crowd.

There were many in the community who objected to the ludicrous depiction of females and the burlesque nature of drag at what has traditionally been a family-oriented fair.

Those who criticized the drag performances of the past were routinely harassed and harangued with hateful commentary by the loud-and-proud trans-and-queer segment of the community.

While the board characterized the move as an “operational and logistical decision,” it emphasized that the goal is to create a safe and welcoming environment for all fairgoers.

“Everyone is welcome to the Fairgrounds and we merely wish to present a Fair environment that is safe and responsive to our community,” the board said.

The re-announcement comes after months of back-and-forth between supporters of the drag event, who view it as an expression of inclusion and entertainment, and opponents who raised objections based on the inappropriateness of the performances where children are present.. The growing polarization was felt through public comment sessions, letters, and social media debates, ultimately culminating in the cancellation.

The Tanana Valley State Fair, which draws thousands of Alaskans each summer, will proceed with its other scheduled events. Board members say they hope to refocus the fair’s atmosphere on traditional community fun without the recent “harassment” that has surrounded this issue.

Card shark Alaskan moves up: Adam Hendrix at final table at World Series of Poker Main Event

In a record-breaking year for poker’s most prestigious tournament, Alaska’s Adam Hendrix has reached the final table of the World Series of Poker Main Event, outlasting 9,800 players in a grueling week of high-stakes competition.

Hendrix, already a well-known figure on the professional poker circuit, returns to the table with 48 million in chips and a guaranteed payout of at least $1 million. The final nine players will battle for the title of World Champion and a life-changing top prize of $10 million.

Joining Hendrix at the final table are notable poker names including three-time WSOP bracelet winner Michael Mizrachi, 2016 finalist Kenny Hallaert, and Leo Margets, one of poker’s most respected European pros.

Hendrix, who grew up in Alaska and honed his skills in both No-Limit Hold’em and Pot-Limit Omaha, has amassed $8.2 million in live career earnings prior to this event, according to The Hendon Mob Poker Database. Known for his composure and adaptability, Hendrix has been among the chip leaders through most of the tournament, steadily climbing the leaderboard each day:

  • Day 1b: 184,500
  • Day 2abc: 321,500
  • Day 3: 360,000
  • Day 4: 855,000
  • Day 5: 3,650,000
  • Day 6: 6,900,000
  • Day 7: 33,900,000
  • Final Table Start: 48,000,000

Hendrix’s deepest previous WSOP run was a runner-up finish in 2017 in a $1,500 PLO8 event, leaving him still chasing his first gold bracelet. Hendrix started playing poker as a child at his grandmother’s house in Homer — playing against family and friends.

In an extraordinary twist, fellow Alaskan Joey Padron also made a historic run, finishing 10th for a payday of $750,000. Padron was part of the final 12 players before being the last to exit on Day 8. He almost made the final table It is exceptionally rare to see two players from Alaska — let alone from the same city — reach this advanced stage of the world’s most difficult poker tournament.

As for Hendrix, he may be the first Alaskan to make the Final Table since Perry Green in the 1990s. Only a couple of hundred players entered back in those days, while this year it’s nearly 10,000 entries.

The final table will resume Tuesday evening at the Horseshoe Las Vegas, with poker fans around the world tuning in to watch Hendrix attempt to become the first Alaskan to win poker’s most coveted title. His parents are flying in from Alaska to join him; his father is John Hendrix, owner of HEX/Furie oil and gas company.

Crypto Week puts Alaska Congressman Nick Begich in national spotlight as a Bitcoin policy leader

It’s “Crypto Week” in the US House of Representatives, and Alaska’s Congressman Nick Begich is emerging as one of the nation’s most influential voices on cryptocurrency policy. From July 14-18, lawmakers are debating and voting on sweeping digital asset legislation, with Begich playing a central role as both a legislator and an expert in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.

Begich, already known for his pro-oil, gas, mining, and aerospace stances, has made a name in Washington for his in-depth knowledge of Bitcoin and blockchain technology. His involvement in shaping cryptocurrency legislation comes as the US House focuses on three major bills that could redefine the nation’s approach to digital assets: the GENIUS Act, the CLARITY Act, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act.

Congressman Nick Begich speaks at a national Bitcoin Policy Institute conference with Congressman Tom Emmers.

The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) seeks to regulate stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies pegged to traditional assets like the US dollar. Already passed in the Senate with bipartisan support (68-30), the bill would require stablecoin issuers to maintain full cash reserves, register with federal regulators, and follow anti-money laundering protocols. With President Trump signaling enthusiastic support, the bill is expected to pass the House this week.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) aims to end the longstanding regulatory turf war between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission by clearly defining which agencies oversee different types of digital assets. The legislation promises to unlock innovation while drawing criticism from Democrats concerned about consumer protections.

The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, introduced by House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, would ban the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC). Proponents argue it protects financial privacy, while critics call it premature since the Fed has yet to formally pursue a digital dollar.

Begich is not just a participant in Crypto Week; he is helping lead the conversation. Earlier this year, Begich introduced the BITCOIN Act of 2025, co-sponsored with Sen. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, proposing the creation of a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The ambitious legislation would allow the federal government to acquire up to 1 million Bitcoin over five years using budget-neutral mechanisms like Federal Reserve remittances and gold revaluations. Crucially, the bill includes strong protections for Bitcoin self-custody rights.

Begich’s personal experience bolsters his credibility. He has publicly disclosed holding Bitcoin since 2013, giving him over a decade of firsthand knowledge in the digital asset space. He has been a sought-after speaker at major crypto events like the Bitcoin for America Summit and the Bitcoin Policy Summit, where he has shared the stage with leading policymakers such as Tom Emmer.

Congressman Begich is one of the few lawmakers who deeply understands the technical and economic implications of Bitcoin. With bipartisan support behind the GENIUS Act, passage seems likely within weeks. The CLARITY Act faces tougher odds in the Senate, while the Anti-CBDC Act may struggle to advance. Nevertheless, Crypto Week marks a pivotal moment for America’s digital asset strategy, and Alaska’s Nick Begich is at the heart of it — a national leader helping chart the future of U.S. financial innovation.