Friday, November 14, 2025
Home Blog Page 176

Murkowski says Trump cuts to a few dozen federal jobs in Alaska do ‘more harm than good’

Sen. Lisa Murowski is apparently not on board with DOGE — the Department of Government Efficiency.

On Friday she said dozens of Alaska — up to 100 federal workers — in Alaska lost their jobs due to the Trump Administration’s reduction-in-force of the federal workforce.

“Many of these abrupt terminations will do more harm than good, stunting opportunities in Alaska and leaving holes in our communities. We can’t realize our potential for responsible energy and mineral development if we can’t permit projects. We will be less prepared to manage summer wildfires if we can’t support those on the front lines. Our tourism economy will be damaged if we don’t maintain our world-class national parks and forests,” she wrote on X.

Not including military personnel, Alaska has 15,200 civilians in federal jobs. If Murkowski is right that there are up to 100 jobs that have been discontinued, that’s less than 1/2 of a percent.

“I share the administration’s goal of reducing the size of the federal government, but this approach is bringing confusion, anxiety, and now trauma to our civil servants—some of whom moved their families and packed up their whole lives to come here. Indiscriminate workforce cuts aren’t efficient and won’t fix the federal budget, but they will hurt good people who have answered the call to public service to do important work for our nation,” Murkowski said.

In fact, Murkowski has never made the size of the federal workforce an issue. Her history in the Senate has been dedicated to bringing more federal money and jobs to Alaska. President Trump is trying to reduce the $36 trillion national debt and cut government waste, fraud, and abuse. Murkowski has never mentioned these topics during her nearly two decades in the Senate.

“My staff and I are in close touch with agency and department officials, trying to get answers about the impact of these terminations. Our goal is to forestall unnecessary harm—for people and Alaska’s federal priorities—but the response so far has been evasive and inadequate,” Murkowski said.

Through a series of executive orders, federal workers have known this was coming. And it’s not the first time that a president has reduced the workforce due to budgetary constraints.

During the administration of Democrat Bill Clinton in the 1990s, Clinton eliminated 426,000 federal jobs in an effort to rein in spending.

The actual number of Alaska-based federal workers who have lost their jobs in this 2025 round of government job cuts is unclear, with Murkowski giving the only number that’s been revealed publicly, and she offered no documentation. But if it’s 100, it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the 10,000 federal workers across the country given their walking papers on Friday.

The Trump Administration has also offered buyouts to many federal workers; if they accept and leave, they’ll still get paid through September. Federal labor unions sued to stop the buyouts, but a judge has ruled the buyouts are legal.

Trump has also ordered that for every federal employee hired, four must be released, the same formula he used to reduce regulations during his first term in office.

The first tranche of federal employees that are being let go are still in their probationary period, not as protected by the federal workers’ unions as those who are entrenched in federal civil service.

In Alaska, the Sitka-based Alaska Outdoor Alliance, has used the mainstream media to object to the federal workforce reductions. That group, however, is funded by the Alaska Venture Fund, which gets its funding through a pipeline of money that starts with liberal billionaires George Soros and others, coming through dark-money network of Arabella Advisors and the New Venture Fund, which funds many liberal causes in Alaska.

The Alaska Outdoor Alliance, a group that is not transparent about its finances, is not to be confused with the Alaska Outdoor Council, which receives no funding from George Soros.

Will Anchorage School District comply with federal demand to ditch DEI programs or will it increase funding for them?

16

The US Department of Education sent letters to all school districts in America on Friday saying they must ditch their DEI and critical race theory programs or lose federal funding. DEI is “diversity, equity, inclusion,” a new way of discriminating.

That federal directive could mean that instead of Anchorage School Superintendent Jharrett Bryantt boosting the District DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) programs by his proposed 20%, that money could be used to support actual learning in classrooms, or the activities that he has cut from the proposed 2025-26 budget.

“Institutions that fail to comply with federal civil rights law may, consistent with applicable law, face potential loss of federal funding,” Craig Trainor, acting assistant secretary for civil rights in the Department of Education, wrote in the letter, adding that “overt and covert racial discrimination that has become widespread in this Nation’s educational institutions,” and is not acceptable in this administration. The letter notified districts that they have 14 days to comply.

On Page 87 of Bryantt’s 471-page proposed budget, he and School Board President Andy Holleman ask for $724,000 for the DEI program, which is described as “The Office of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Community Engagement, formerly Equity and Compliance, coordinates ASD efforts to ensure equity in educational programs and employment for the benefit of all students and all employees. The EC office provides civil rights compliance guidance across ASD departments in an effort to remove barriers to educational and employment opportunities. The office also facilitates the Superintendent’s Multicultural Education Concerns Advisory Committee which is comprised of stakeholders from Anchorage’s diverse communities united by the goal of educating all students for success in life.”

Screenshot

Bryantt says the district has a $100 million deficit that can only be made up by the Legislature dramatically increasing the level of per-student funding, called the base student allocation.

School Board President Andy Holleman said the school district faces a stark reality and requires the Legislature to also fund the lavish retirement plan known as defined benefits, or pensions, rather than the current defined-contribution plan.

“The long-standing failure to adjust education funding to meet the actual costs of operating our schools has led us to this point. While we remain committed to producing a balanced budget, we must also prioritize long-term investments in our students, educators, and school communities. Our efforts go beyond simply closing a budget gap—we are focused on securing a stable and sustainable future for public education in Alaska. To that end, ASD is advocating for key legislative priorities, including a permanent increase in the BSA, investments in the recruitment and retention of high-quality educators, and the establishment of a competitive retirement plan. Addressing the statewide teacher shortage is not just an ASD challenge—it is a collective responsibility that demands immediate attention,” he wrote on behalf of the board in his letter introducing the budget.

The proposed Anchorage budget cuts out many after school activities, including all middle school sports programs, swimming, gymnastics, and hockey.

Read the proposed budget at this link.

Instead of student programs, the Anchorage proposed budget seeks to boost the DEI program from $603,821 to $724,122. This could put millions of federal dollars at risk.

Under the Biden Administration, the state was threatened with a withholding of funds by the Department of Education because the state didn’t meet the Biden test for “equity” in distribution of funds, even though the funds (which were Covid-era dollars) were distributed to districts based on Alaska’s long-used and legally tested formula.

The Biden Administration said then it would withhold $17.4 million from the state and put it on a “high-risk grantee” list unless the state distributed the funds according to the Biden equity formula, which would have violated state law.

In the end, the Biden Administration backed down.

This new order from the Department of Education is not just a complete reversal of former policies. It is in response to a presidential executive order to end all DEI programs, which supporters say help underrepresented groups, while critics say it does not align with American merit-based values.

Only a small amount of the district’s budget comes directly from the federal government. In the 2024-25 budget, the Anchorage School District received 1.57% of its general fund revenue from the federal government directly.

Most of the other federal funding is funneled through the State Department of Education and Early Development and is distributed by the Legislature during annual budgets. That makes up to 14% of the budget. Local taxation on property owners pays the lion’s share of the cost of running local schools.

The proposed Anchorage School District budget takes the overall operating budget up from $638 million to $651 million, while student head count has dropped more than 1% year over year and is expected to continue falling, as people start pulling their children out of the failing district, where only 32% of third graders are able to read at grade level.

Michael Tavoliero: Will the Anchorage public hold the district accountable for failing our students?

By MICHAEL TAVOLIERO

In what appears to be yet another bait-and-switch ploy, Anchorage School Superintendent Jharrett Bryantt recently informed parents that the district is preoccupied with reviewing presidential directives on immigration, as if this were the most pressing issue facing our community. 

Meanwhile, our students are drowning in an academic crisis manifested and managed by the Democratic Party and the public education unions who routinely siphon public education dollars away from the progress of children’s education. 

The Anchorage School District is experiencing a catastrophic decline in performance: Only 35% of elementary and middle school students are testing proficient in reading, and math scores are even lower.

At the high school level, the situation is even more alarming. Just 26% of students are proficient in math, leaving nearly three-quarters of our youth unprepared for the demands of adulthood, as reported by USNEWS.com for the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 school years.

While Dr. Bryantt proudly proclaims that every school is a “safe, welcoming, and supportive space for all students and families,” one cannot help but suspect that this is little more than a convenient smokescreen. It distracts from the district’s glaring failures: Anchorage school district students are not proficient in the core subjects of reading and math. 

One must ask, what kind of future are we preparing for our children if we continue down this path? 

How long will we allow bureaucratic inefficiency, spiraling budgets, and the corrupting influence of special interests to strangle the very institutions meant to nurture and empower our children? 

Why is top-down management and administration the right of the state when the results are abysmal and not relegated to democratic legitimacy where parents, teachers and administrators are free to institute educational and operational improvements on the local level without the oppression of Leftist politicos and special interest?

As Thomas Sowell stated in Charter Schools and Their Enemies: “If we are serious about the education of children—and there are few things more important to be serious about—we need to pay far more attention to specific facts and far less attention to slippery words and phrases that obscure those facts.” 

Inspirational rhetoric is hollow when it is not backed by meaningful, targeted action to address the stark inadequacies of our education system.

Yet, there is a counterpoint that must be considered. While immigration officials are being barred from stepping onto campuses—a move some interpret as a politically charged distraction—the district insists that its focus on safety is part of a broader strategy to create an environment where all students can thrive. This is a logical fallacy designed to insist that a secure and welcoming school environment is a necessary foundation for academic success. While I agree with this, it is a distraction from Dr Bryantt’s apparent incompetence.

While he contends that policies addressing immigration and campus safety are intended to protect our children from external threats, why does he not ensure that Anchorage schools are sanctuaries for learning, growth, and preparation for a productive future?

Why are we not asking, are we satisfied with such justifications? We must demand that we honor the federal and state funds earmarked for educating our children and condemn the use of these resources to advance the personal agendas of adults driven by special interests.

Anchorage taxpayers—whose hard-earned dollars contribute through what now appears as a misuse of our property taxes—deserve nothing less than complete accountability. It is unacceptable for public funds to be diverted to initiatives that serve the interests of lobbyists and political cronies rather than addressing the critical educational shortcomings that are documented by the data.

Ultimately, this debate is not merely about policy priorities—it is a crisis of values and leadership. The district must choose between continuing to invest in measures that do little to arrest the academic decline, or redirect its focus toward the pressing need to raise student proficiency and ensure that every dollar spent has a direct, positive impact on classroom outcomes.

The stakes are high. If we are to truly honor our commitments to the future of Anchorage’s children, then our actions must reflect the urgent need to improve academic performance and financial accountability. Our schools must be transformed into institutions that not only provide a safe space but also deliver a robust education—one that prepares every student for the challenges of tomorrow. Only by holding our elected officials and education administrators accountable can we reclaim the promise of our public education system and ensure that our children are not the unwitting victims of political subterfuge, fiscal mismanagement and rampant fraud.

While Dr. Bryantt distracts with misinformed politically charged issues, the reality remains: If policymakers choose to base decisions on ideological frameworks like “inclusion” or “diversity” rather than proven academic strategies, they must accept full responsibility for the declining student performance. With this responsibility, will the Anchorage public hold them accountable? Will the public replace them with performance results managers who focus on our children’s education and an improved future for all Alaskans?

In Anchorage’s public schools, unionized teachers are held accountable for credentials and seniority—not for the actual learning outcomes of their students. Dr Bryantt is the poster boy for this ridiculous attempt to provoke and justify civil disobedience. He cannot and must not be taken seriously.

Whether or not one supports linking teacher performance to rewards, separating these input metrics from real educational results sacrifices our children’s futures, favoring the entrenched self-interests of the education establishment, the selfishness of the public education union and the degradation of our children’s future over genuine academic success.

Michael Tavoliero writes for Must Read Alaska.

Round II: Repeal of ranked-choice voting petition approved

The first phase of the second attempt to repeal ranked-choice voting has passed its first big hurdle — getting the language of the petition approved by the Alaska Division of Elections.

A group of Alaskans submitted the application for the petition in December, and the division had until Friday, Feb. 14, to give them an answer. The answer came on Friday afternoon — it’s a “go.”

This repeal is similar to the last attempt in 2024, which nearly passed, even though the Outside dark money poured into the state to preserve the jungle primary and ranked-choice general election system that has been used in Alaska since 2022.

In this new petition, the language is a straight repeal of the 2020 ballot measure that put the unusual voting method in place. The petition describes it as:

An Act to repeal a nonpartisan and open top four Primary election system and ranked-choice General election system; and to reestablish a partisan political Primary and change necessary and related appointment procedures; reestablish special runoff elections; and repeal and amend independent expenditure group requirements.”

The prime sponsors of this new petition are Ken McCarty, Judy Eledge, and Bernadette Wilson, three seasoned Alaska political activists. Wilson is the person who helped win the last conservative voter initiative that passed in Alaska — Alaska’s parental notification law in 2010, which said that if a minor was going in for an abortion, the parents or guardians must be notified within 48 hours of the procedure being done. It overwhelmingly passed and was overturned in 2019 by the Alaska Supreme Court.

The petitioners are hoping to have the petition booklets and begin gathering signatures by the end of March. After they get the booklets, the signatures will need to be turned back into the Division of Election a year later and the question would then be on either the Primary or General Election ballot in 2026. They’ll need to get about 34,000 signatures of qualified Alaska voters from all over the state.

“Ranked choice voting disenfranchises far too many voters. We believe that Alaskans will stand strong in their resolve to not be lied to again,” said Bernadette Wilson, who is spokeswoman for the group. “This is a full and complete repeal and will ensure that Alaska returns to a more transparent and timely election process.”

Ranked-choice voting was installed in 2020 by allies of Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who was unable to compete in another Republican primary election after her work to defeat President Donald Trump. 

With the use of Outside money from liberal billionaires, the proponents convinced Alaskans that year they would have more choice in elections. But voters haven’t enjoyed the new scheme and, in fact, elections seem to be less secure, with results not being announced for more than 15 days after all votes are cast. Critics say it has made the state a laughingstock of the nation.

The people who want to retain it — mostly Democrats — had over $15 million in dark money the 2022 cycle to defeat the grassroots’ attempt to repeal ranked-choice voting. They fought hard, even telling voters that if they didn’t preserve ranked-choice voting, they wouldn’t be able to have an abortion.

Meanwhile the repeal proponents had less than $100,000 to work with to get their side of the story out, and had to fight off multiple lawsuits and threats from ranked-choice advocates like lawyer Scott Kendall.

The repeal in 2024 failed by a hair; 160,973 voted against repealing, while 160,230 voted to get rid of it.

Move on: Democrats shop Mary Peltola around for new hubby

It’s Valentine’s Day and everyone celebrates it in their own way. Love is love, right?

Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, arguably one of the wittiest senators in the country, posted a video of him cleaning his revolver as he says he believes “love is the answer, but you ought to own a gun just in case.”

The Alaska Democratic Party had their own spin on Valentine’s Day: They want to get former Rep Mary Peltola married off — again. Her husband Buzzy Peltola died in a plane crash in 2023, and evidently she is back on the singles scene.

According to Alaska Survey Research, Peltola might be a candidate for governor in 2026, so having a new husband could be a political asset. Or she might be signed with a lucrative lobbying firm in D.C., as has been rumored around the Capitol. Either way, she’s in play.

The Democrats’ Valentine’s Day messages on X/Twitter showed some of their favorite lawmakers (and the former representative) featured on gift tags. Next to Peltola, shown on the left above, was House Rep. Carolyn Hall, Democrat for House District 16, Turnagain, Spenard, and Sand Lake in Anchorage.

Congressman Begich launches efficiency-in-research bill to get NASA and Dept of Energy coordinating

6

From propulsion research to new power systems, the congressman from the Last Frontier wants to make sure Alaska is ready for the Final Frontier.

That’s the intent of Congressman Nick Begich’s most recent bill to ensure two government agencies — NASA and the Department of Energy — are working together on mission-critical energy technology.

Begich introduced the “DOE and NASA Interagency Research Coordination Act,” which will be of particular interest to scientists and energy researchers.

“For decades, the Department of Energy has played a pivotal role in supporting NASA’s mission—powering our spacecraft, developing advanced propulsion technologies, and enabling America’s dominance in space,” said Congressman Begich. “By formally establishing this partnership in federal statute, we can strengthen research collaboration, provide necessary congressional oversight, and ensure that the United States remains the global leader in space exploration and energy innovation.”

The Energy Department and NASA have indeed collaborated through time, with DOE and its predecessor, the Atomic Energy Commission, making significant contributions to America’s space program at NASA.

The development of systems that powered the Apollo missions and more than two dozen other space expeditions are an example of how Energy Department can work to advance space exploration. The agencies work together on cutting-edge technologies such as nuclear thermal propulsion systems and fission surface power technologies — critical components for future missions.

But there’s room for improvement to make sure agencies are not working on the same thing without coordinating their efforts.

The legislation would establish a structured and efficient research relationship between the two departments, which will help Congress direct resources toward groundbreaking technological advancements.

The bipartisan legislation is co-sponsored by Congressman George Whitesides (D-CA), who is a former NASA employee.

One thing the bill does not do is authorize additional spending. It mandates that DOE and NASA operate within their existing budgets and that both agencies submit a comprehensive report to Congress within two years of enactment, outlining how structured collaboration is working.

The legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives and will be referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology for further consideration. Begich is a member of that committee.

Alaska’s Charles Manson? Mysterious transgender wanted in nationwide search, linked to ‘cult’ murders

42

In a case that has confounded law enforcement across the nation, Jack Amadeus LaSota, a transgender man-to-woman former Alaskan who was once declared dead, has re-emerged at the center of a sprawling and violent saga, with murders from California to Vermont linked to a cult LaSota is said to be part of under his pseudonym, “Ziz.”

A boating accident in 2022 began to unravel the web of cult-like extremism, murder, and deception that has left investigators scrambling.

On Aug. 19, 2022, LaSota was declared missing after falling overboard in San Francisco Bay. Despite an extensive Coast Guard search, his body was never recovered.

By Sept. 7, 2022, a short obituary had been published in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, mourning the loss of the adventurous and highly intelligent 31-year-old.

Screenshot of Legacy.com obituary

It seemed like a tragic end for LaSota, who had moved from Alaska to the Bay Area to work in the tech industry.

Three months later, in November 2022, he/she was found alive—under suspicious circumstances.

It was that November when an 80-year-old man was brutally attacked in Vallejo, Calif. The assault left the man blind in one eye, and the assailant plunged a Samurai sword into his chest. Among those detained at the scene was none other than Jack LaSota, back from the dead.

Two years later, in 2024, an attacker returned to finish the job, slashing the now-82-year-old man’s throat in broad daylight. By then, LaSota’s name had surfaced in connection with other violent crimes.

On New Year’s Eve 2023, an elderly couple in Pennsylvania was executed in their home.

And on Inauguration Day 2025, a shootout in Vermont between suspects and Border Patrol agents left an agent and a suspect dead.

These seemingly unrelated cases all had one thing in common—connections to LaSota and a radical group known as the “Zizians.”

The so-called “Zizians”—a loose network of highly educated, mostly transgender, vegan individuals—have been described as a cult with extreme beliefs. Their ideology appears to be an offshoot of what is called the rationalist movement, which emphasizes logic and reason as the ultimate sources of knowledge.

LaSota goes by the name “Ziz,” and is believed to be the group’s leader. According to Open Vallejo, the Zizians subscribe to a bizarre philosophy that involves a conflict between the two hemispheres of the brain, with only one hemisphere being “good.” The sides of the brain are trying to kill each other. Their belief system has been described by some as a “death cult.” Only Ziz says both hemispheres of his own brain are good.

LaSota’s background is in Alaska. He was the son, but now the transgender “daughter” of an instructor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. LaSota interned at NASA and Oracle and worked at Google, as well as at the Machine Intelligence Research Institute and the Center for Applied Rationality.

Now, LaSota is a wanted fugitive in multiple states. Law enforcement agencies are working to unravel the complex network of individuals associated with the Zizians and their potential involvement in multiple homicides.

Screenshot

Major news stories explain this bizarre case in greater depth. This news story is a summary of original reporting found at national media websites and does not represent original MRAK reporting.

Read the NBC story at this link.

Read the Daily Mail story at this link.

DOGE Alaska: Federal grant creates a ‘pipeline of NextGen food policy workers’ for feds

14

A grant made by the U.S. Department of Agriculture is an $18.5 million expenditure of taxpayer dollars that was given to the University of Alaska Fairbanks, Hawai’i Pacific University, University of Guam, Arizona State University to “build a diverse pipeline” of new federal workers for the USDA.

The grant was made during the Biden Administration and is intended to build out the federal workforce with those who have been groomed into a certain ideology.

Now, the Trump Administration is working hard to cut the federal workforce dramatically — and without delay.

In fact, on Thursday, President Donald Trump’s Office of Personnel Management notified agencies they must lay off most of their probationary employees who have not yet worked long enough to obtain civil service protection.

The grant’s project start date was May, 2023, with an end date of June, 2028. Over five years, the grantees will focus on educating and preparing the next generation of “food policy leaders” for careers in the USDA and related federal agencies. Over the grant lifespan, 9,000 young people in Alaska, Arizona, Hawai’i, and Guam are to be put into the pipeline of food policy jobs.

Key activities in the program include role-playing simulations, “curated” internships, a “talent pipeline ladder,” USDA service gap analysis, and climate and food symposia. A trip to the nation’s capital for the young people in the program’s first year culminated in a professional photo of them taken with the Capitol Dome in the background.

The project seeks to demonstrate the importance of federal service in addressing climate and equity challenges and to strengthen the USDA workforce by increasing the number of diverse, food, agriculture, and nutrition-knowledgeable employees.

Although 9,000 “NextGen” students are to go through the program in five years, after the first year, only 91 had done so.

One of the courses offered in this program is “How to Land a Federal Job,” attended by 71 students.

From the grant report, it appears this grant is actually about climate and equity and recruiting into federal service a certain kind of federal worker — one who adheres to a certain ideology.

More regs? Washington Democrats want to curtail self-checkout at grocery stores

19

Another day, another proposed law limiting freedom in Democrat-run Washington state.

Democrats in the Washington State House of Representatives want to regulate the use of self-checkout machines at grocery stores.

A bill that has 10 Democrat sponsors, introduced in January, had its first committee hearing on Wednesday. House Bill 1739 would limit self-checkout use to times when at least one traditionally human-staffed checkout lane is open.

In addition, store employees who are assigned to monitor self-checkouts would be restricted to overseeing no more than two machines at a time. The law would apply to stores like Fred Meyer, where many goods are sold other than groceries. In many stores, the self-checkout monitors oversee about six stations.

Customers would would be allowed to scan only up to 15 items per transaction.

The proposed regulations would apply to grocery stores larger than 15,000 square feet but would exempt bulk goods stores requiring memberships.

The Department of Labor and Industries would be responsible for enforcing the rules, with penalties for noncompliance. Representative Fosse said the bill addresses concerns about automation and understaffing affecting grocery workers across the state.

A similar bill was offered in California, another Democrat stronghold, but failed to pass both houses of the legislature in 2024.