Tuesday, October 14, 2025
Home Blog Page 1719

Hearing voices: People moving on, moving up, taking over

Wade Rathke, founder of ACORN, is now the head of a mental health advocacy group in Juneau. YouTube Screen Shot.
Wade Rathke, founder of ACORN, is now the head of a mental health advocacy group in Juneau. YouTube Screen Shot.

DISGRACED ACORN CHIEF IS ORGANIZING IN JUNEAU

A notorious national organization’s founder is now leading a local mental health advocacy group in Alaska’s capital.

Wade Rathke was the founder of ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

ACORN sucked down millions of dollars of taxpayer money and was on tape committing voter registration improprieties. The scandal-laden organization was investigated by the FBI for a “coordinated national scam” of voter registration fraud.

“ACORN is not an organization that should be subsidized by taxpayers’ hard-earned money,” Speaker John Boehner wrote in 2008.  “ACORN, which for years has been closely connected with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, appears to have played a key role in the irresponsible schemes that led to the recent financial meltdown that has already cost Americans trillions of dollars in the form of government bailouts and lost retirement savings.  Congress has not yet held investigatory hearings to examine the details of ACORN’s involvement in these schemes.  Until credible oversight hearings are conducted and completed in a manner that clears ACORN of wrongdoing, the organization should not receive taxpayer money.”

It gets worse. In 2008, The New York Times reported that Rathke’s brother had embezzled $948,607 from the group and its affiliated charitable organizations. An employee of ACORN’s accounting firm told Rathke that an investigation had led to discovery of the embezzlement.

“Clearly, this was an uncomfortable, conflicting and humiliating situation as far as my family and I were concerned,” Wade told the New York Times, “and so the real decisions on how to handle it had to be made by others.”

ACORN decided to cover it up, and not inform staff, law enforcement or even members of the board.

Wade Rathke told the Times  that  “the decision to keep the matter secret was not made to protect his brother but because word of the embezzlement would have put a ‘weapon’ into the hands of enemies of ACORN, a liberal group that is a frequent target of conservatives who object to ACORN’s often strident advocacy on behalf of low- and moderate-income families and workers.”

He was forced to resign from ACORN but still has leadership ties to the ACORN International network. In a message to his supporters, he noted that ACORN International launched a group in South Korea and in Prague. The Prague group was called the “ACORN Comrades Club.”

Rathke now runs the newly formed Juneau Mental Health Consumer Action Network, or MCAN. What can possibly go wrong?

MOVING ON

Bruce Tangeman, former deputy Revenue commissioner under the Sean Parnell Administration, is gone from his job as CFO at the Alaska Gasline Development Agency.

He exited suddenly last week as the Walker Administration continues to conform the gasline agency to his purpose. The gasline agency is supposed to be independent of the Governor’s Office, but as reported here earlier this year, the two have become indistinguishable.

Also hitting the door is external affairs director Miles Baker, who is taking a month off to travel and unwind before pounding the pavement for work.

Others leaving their positions include Deputy Legislative Director is Lacy Wilcox.

Nathan Butzlaff is leaving the DC Office of the Governor, heading to the Midwest.

MOVING UP

Sarah Palin has found a buyer for her Arizona house, according to the Washington Post.  That means Alaskans are likely to see more of her, unless she secures a spot in the Trump Administration. Just sayin’.

Craig Fleener is now top lobbyist for the State of Alaska, and is house hunting in Washington, D.C.  He will be known as the governor’s director of state and federal relations, and is possibly the highest paid employee of the state. Facing a real learning curve in DC without Nathan Butzlaff to help him, Fleener will also remain the Arctic advisor to the governor.

‘Cut to the bone’ means different thing in government

0
Gov. Bill Walker says state government is cut to the bone.
Gov. Bill Walker says state government is cut to the bone.

REDUCTIONS HAVE LARGELY BEEN THROUGH ATTRITION

BY WIN GRUENING

Screen Shot 2016-08-06 at 1.54.24 PMThe Walker Administration and a supportive legislative minority have struggled mightily to persuade Alaskans the budget really has been “cut to the bone” and it’s time to restructure the Permanent Fund and implement taxes to balance the budget.

As part of their campaign to convince Alaskans the budget has been substantially reduced, Pat Pitney, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, is making presentations around the state. At a recent Commonwealth North meeting in Anchorage, she explained state employee numbers have dropped by 1,700 – from 26,500 two years ago to 24,800 today.

These reductions have happened mostly through attrition as only 70 employees actually received pink slips. It should be noted this includes the University of Alaska, Legislature, and Court System and other entities outside the purview of the executive branch.

Meanwhile, over 3,000 Alaskan oil sector workers will have lost their jobs by the end of 2016 with more to come next year. Alaska now has the highest unemployment rate in the nation at 6.7 percent.

Claims by administration officials notwithstanding, the public has been confused by conflicting information regarding what and how much has been cut. Accounting gymnastics allow money to be moved around, appearing to reduce the operating budget only to have the expense appear somewhere else. Comparisons with expenditures in the past may not tell the whole story.

Even though most Alaskans realize Permanent Fund restructuring and increased taxes are inevitable, many remain skeptical that sufficient steps have been taken to reduce government and are reluctant to pay new taxes and sacrifice part of their Permanent Fund dividend to subsidize government largesse. That’s why many legislators returned to their districts without considering new tax measures, knowing they would face many voters this fall who feel this way.

FIT, FAT OR FIDDLING

How “fat” is measured is largely in the eye of the beholder. The number of reduced state employees may or may not have included Craig Richards, who was Gov. Bill Walker’s Attorney General until he abruptly resigned last month. He was replaced shortly thereafter but re-hired on a contract and is no longer counted as a state employee.

Richards’ contract calls for payments of up to $25,000/month — over twice what he made as Attorney General. (His contract is limited initially to $50,000 but can be amended at the discretion of the State). One might ask how many other positions have been replaced under some contractual arrangement and whether this distorts the actual number of reductions cited by the Administration.

Assuming the number of reduced employees is correct, one wonders why total employee compensation hasn’t decreased accordingly. The biggest reason, of course, is attributable to state salaries and benefits that are primarily determined by union contracts.

Alaska is now experiencing, in the words of many, the worst fiscal crisis it has ever faced. Yet, many of the expense reductions undertaken by the private sector have been overlooked or minimized by the State. In addition to layoffs, it is commonplace in the private sector to freeze employee pay, eliminate overtime pay, forgo merit increases and bonuses, reduce or forgo contributions to health insurance plans, and temporarily furlough employees in order to reduce costs when faced with severe budget deficits.

So why is the State still signing off on union contracts containing salary and benefit provisions that offset savings from employee reductions and only worsen the deficit?

The State concluded negotiations this year with the Alaska State Employees Association (ASEA) that represents 8,125 employees – 51.3 percent of the total executive branch workforce with a yearly payroll of $466 million. It called for continued merit/step increases that automatically give raises to employees over the life of the contract. However, freezing merit/step increases in currently pending contracts then could potentially have saved $70 million in the executive branch alone.

Union negotiators also succeeded in getting the State to cover ASEA employee healthcare premiums at the same level as 2016. That exceedingly generous contribution will eventually top $17,000 per employee annually without requiring state employees to contribute anything.

Alaska remains one of a handful of states reimbursing 100 percent of premiums for employee health coverage while across the United States, municipal employees contribute an average of 20 percent of their health care costs.

Surely state employees are hard-working dedicated people but with a benefit package around 50 percent of base pay, it’s much richer than comparable private sector employees. Isn’t it time to consider some sharing of healthcare costs?

Employee salary and benefits containing these kind of “stealth” provisions, if modified, offer potential savings that must be considered in light of sacrifices being made by workers in the private sector.

Unfortunately, as long as examples like this are ignored, Gov. Walker will have a difficult time making the case the budget has been cut to the bone.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations. This opinion first appeared in the Juneau Empire.

 

 

Book Review: Crisis of Character

0

CRISIS OF CHARACTER: A White House Secret Service Officer Discloses His Firsthand Experience with Hillary, Bill, and How They Operate. By Gary Byrne.

Screen Shot 2016-07-29 at 7.21.21 AMGary Byrne was the Secret Service agent who stood guard as the last defense before someone could get to the president.

He saw it all and heard it all, including the comings and goings of Monica Lewinsky, the expletive-laced haranguing by Hillary Clinton, her merciless berating of Vince Foster, her volcanic temper. He even was the first to see the black eye she gave Bill Clinton during one of their many violent arguments that involved a shattered vase.

Now Byrne is telling all that he knows, so that if America chooses Hillary as president, it’s doing so with eyes wide open.

Why tell now? “I want you to hear my story. It’s about the men and women risking their lives to protect this nation.

“And more importantly, it’s about how the Clintons must never again be allowed to put them—or you and your children—at risk,” he writes.

State suspends Medicaid inflation adjustments

0
Gov. Bill Walker expanded Medicaid in 2015.
Gov. Bill Walker expanded Medicaid in 2015.

 SLOW-ROLL MEDICAID EXPANSION MELTDOWN

The Alaska Department of Health and Social Services has, for the second year in a row, suspended inflation pay increases to Medicaid providers.

Payment rates remain frozen at the FY 2015 level.

Medicaid providers are feeling frozen out as they absorb what amounts to a 5 percent cut in pay across two years. Several small providers report that they haven’t been paid by the State for work performed over a year ago.

Medical inflation is substantially higher than inflation in other areas of the economy. The US health care inflation is 5.41 percent annually, higher in Alaska. For example, the national average for a doctor’s visit is $105.03, but it’s $169.40 in Anchorage and $173.50 in Fairbanks.

“This will hit hard on the most needy population,” said one State of Alaska health systems expert who asked to remain anonymous. “The care providers are dropping out in droves because some of them are getting 24 cents on the dollar for some of the services they provide.”

Last year, the total loss of funding for the Medicaid program was nearly $100 million. Last year’s freezing of inflation payments robbed providers of $8 million in uncompensated care costs; this year it may be higher.

“It’s the second big ‘I told you so moment’ on Medicaid expansion,” she said.

According to the department’s notification, the freeze in payments to Medicaid providers is a result of budget shortfalls:

“While the department hoped that this suspension would only be necessary for one fiscal year, significant fiscal challenges continue to exist. Accordingly, DHSS has determined that it must again implement cost containment measures under AS 47.07.036 and will need to suspend inflation adjustments for Medicaid rates in state fiscal year 2017. ”

Another way of looking at it is  this: The automatic step pay increases for public employees, which costs the state $70 million a year, has eaten away at funds that could have been available for Medicaid providers, who are mainly in the private and nonprofit sector.

The department will need to issue emergency regulations to implement this suspension of payments.

Screen Shot 2016-08-05 at 4.20.23 PM

ONE YEAR SINCE EXPANSION ANNOUNCED BY WALKER

Last July, Gov. Walker unilaterally expanded Medicaid in Alaska to include regular working age adults who earn up to 138 percent of the federally established poverty level.

By 2020, the State of Alaska will pay 10 percent of the exploding health care costs cost for the expansion population, which could be as much as 40,000 Medicaid recipients in Alaska.

But even in Year 1, with 19,000 new enrollees in Medicaid under the expansion, the governor had to come up with a huge patch for the health care boat over in the private health insurance pool, a disaster caused by Obamacare.

Gov. Walker introduced HB 374, which bailed out the state’s high-risk health insurance sector to the tune of $55 million. Without the patch, it was likely the entire Alaska health insurance market — down to one provider now — would sink.

The $55 million comes from taxes levied on most insurance policies in Alaska, including those that are not health care policies.

That bailout is seen as a harbinger of what to expect as the state picks up more of the costs of Medicaid.

Recent federal studies show the average cost of Medicaid expansion enrollees was 49% higher in fiscal year 2015 than Health and Human Services had projected.

REFORM COULD HELP

Senate Bill 74, sponsored by Sen. Pete Kelly of Fairbanks, could save the state $75 million a year. It was signed into law by Gov. Walker and includes:

  • more telemedicine
  • more primary care case management and health homes for people who have chronic health conditions and behavioral health needs
  • reforming the behavioral health system
  • enhancing a public/private partnership to reduce non-urgent use of emergency room services
  • setting up better protections to prevent opioid dependence
  • enhancing fraud detection measures

 

Shoddy reporting on immigrants, taxes

0

56719601 - 3d illustration of "immigrat issue", "2016" scripts and on ballot box, with us flag as a background. election concept.

REPORT AND REPORTERS STUDIOUSLY IGNORE FACTS

The Partnership for a New American Economy report released this week breathlessly touting the financial contributions of immigrants to our national economy.

A report was issued for each state and it was taken at face value by the Alaska Dispatch News, without an iota of critical thinking applied by either the report or the reportage.

The Alaska report itself is a fluffy piece of propaganda favoring open immigration laws and regulations, which is why the benefits of immigration are glowingly detailed at length.

Yet the report carefully avoids reporting any of the costs of legal immigration, illegal immigration, and refugees. It is a dishonest “study,” and readers are being hoodwinked when the newspaper falls for it as gospel.

According to the report, immigrants in Alaska grew by more than 19 percent between the years of 2010-2014, while the immigrant population nationally grew by under 6 percent.

With immigration occurring in Alaska at more than three times the national rate, readers deserve a critical look at both sides of the social and economic equation.

The report claims: “In 2014, immigrant-led households in Alaska earned $1.8 billion dollars—or 8.2 percent of all income earned by Alaskans that year. With those earnings, the state’s foreign-born households were able to contribute more than one in every 13 dollars paid by Alaska residents in state and local tax revenues, payments that support important public services such as public schools and police.”

Some $60.7 million went to state and local taxes from immigrants, the report says. This is a remarkable assertion, since residents pay no state taxes and few local taxes. There’s no mention of whether immigrants pay property taxes, since there’s no mention of home ownership. And yet, the Dispatch passes this information along to the unsuspecting reader as solid data.

If the report is correct that immigrant-led households earned $1.8 billion, and paid $435 million in combined taxes, that is an extraordinary deal for immigrants, in the less than 25 percent tax range. Most tax-paying Americans (at least the 49 percent who pay federal taxes) give the government more than 33 percent in total taxes.

The report continues on to say immigrants are more likely to work than “native-born” Alaskans. The report fails to mention that this is not unusual at all, and has always been the case, since immigrants tend to be more able-bodied, and that very few disabled, aged, very sick, or mentally ill people are admitted to the country, and those same disabled, aged, very sick, or mentally ill populations also don’t have the stamina to survive the trip that most illegals must make. Those allowed legal entrance are somewhat screened for their abilities to work.

OTHER FACTS GO UNREPORTED

Illegal immigrants, in fact, are not properly separated out in the report, but a quick peek at data available from the Heritage Foundation shows that illegal immigrants use more in benefits than they contribute in taxes. This is not a criticism, but a statement of fact as presented by a credible research organization.

The Heritage Foundation study discovered that illegal residents contribute about $10,000 in total taxes (federal, state and local taxes) but use $24,000 in entitlements and social services. Thus, the average illegal immigrant costs $14,000 more than he or she contributes through taxes.

Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, says the cost per illegal immigrant is actually much higher than that.

His analysis shows that 62 percent of households headed by illegal immigrants were clients of at least one significant welfare program, according to a statement he made to Investors Business Daily. 

“Bottom line, illegal immigrants have a 10th grade education on average,” he said. “In the modern American economy people with that level of education tend to make modest wages and as result pay relatively little in taxes, at the same time they tend to use a lot in public services, regardless of legal status. In the case of illegals, they often receive benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born children. If you had to put it in a bumper sticker it would be: ‘there is a high cost to cheap labor.’ ”

Camarota published his own “native” vs. “immigrants” employment statistics last month. In his usage, “native” means “American born.” His study did not receive the kind of coverage that the propagandists received in the media, but is worth a look because it shows remarkable stability through time.

Screen Shot 2016-08-04 at 9.42.05 PM

Immigrants may offer many benefits to our society and our state. There is no doubt they enrich our lives and our communities and help us understand the world.

But let’s see the facts, rather than a romanticized, scrubbed version of them packaged to push an agenda — at least if it’s front-page material offered up as news.

Fish and Wildlife takes 77 million acres

0
Areas in the Aleutian chain that are subject to the new rule preventing predator control by the State of Alaska.
Areas in the Aleutian chain that are subject to the new rule preventing predator control by the State of Alaska. More than 77 million acres have been taken away from State predator management by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

STATE STAYS SILENT WHILE FEDS TAKE CONTROL

It’s our land, the feds say. And with the swoosh of a pen, another 77 million acres is now off limits to State of Alaska wildlife management practices.

The final ruling came yesterday from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The State remained silent as it yielded the sovereignty it was guaranteed at Statehood to federal control.

By taking management of fish and wildlife away from the State, the federal government broke another of its Statehood Act promises, and rural Alaskans lost even more access to subsistence.

The State of Alaska stood by and kicked at the dirt.

Fish and Wildlife’s action came on top of the 20 million acres already taken by the U.S. Park Service just a few months ago. In October, the Park Service overrode Alaska regulations pertaining to fish, wildlife and, specifically, to predator control. The Bureau of Land Management jumped in on the action and took yet another million acres in the Fortymile Area last month.

Nearly one hundred million acres gone from state management in six months.

The State of Alaska has fought this in the past because comprehensive management of fish and game is, quite clearly in law, a State right promised by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA).

But in 2016, the State seems to have lost its will to fight the federal government on just about anything. Under the Gov. Walker Administration, the federal bureaucracy has moved in, and State sovereignty has stepped back.

Strangely, the final rule by Fish and Wildlife Service applies only to Alaska refuge land, not to other states. While the congressional delegation had asked FWS for an exemption for Alaska, what the agency instead did was make an example out of the state. Similar rules in other states will likely follow.

The Walker Administration remained mute. Why not file an injunction? Attorney General Craig Richards, who stepped down in June, said that no one had been harmed by this rule, therefore no legal action could be taken. One would need another John Sturgeon to step forward and file a lawsuit, he implied.

Another John Sturgeon will be hard to find. Most people aren’t willing, nor do they have the resources, to fight the federal government all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Brown bear sow with cub at sunrise in Kodiak Photo Credit Lisa Hupp/USFWS
Brown bear sow with cub in Kodiak. Photo, Lisa Hupp/USFWS

THIS PREDATOR, NOT THAT PREDATOR

Alaska has more than half of the wildlife refuges in the nation. When ANILCA was written, it was done so in such a way that refuges encompassed huge ecosystems. The priority, as intended by ANILCA, was to ensure that wildlife remained abundant and subsistence hunting could continue. And that management would be comprehensively run by the State of Alaska.

But under the new FWS rules, the interpretation is to prioritize preservation without human intervention. With no predator management, the equilibrium will now shift in favor of wolves, coyote, and bear. Their population will take priority over human subsistence. The State can no longer intervene to manipulate a population, such as thin a pack of coyotes so that more Dall sheep lamb will survive to reverse the currently declining sheep populations in large areas of Alaska, or thin a wolf pack to ensure more moose or caribou.

Alaska game managers know that without predator control, the moose and caribou populations will actually decrease.

The new rules say that if a population wanes for whatever reason, including too many wolves or global warming for example, the federal government will end subsistence hunting.

WHY SO SILENT, GOVERNOR WALKER?

Gov. Bill Walker
Gov. Bill Walker

Within the last six months, 100 million acres has been simply taken away from hunters by the three federal agencies: Park Service, BLM and FWS.

Alaskans expect their government to defend State’s rights. They expect a maverick like Gov. Walker to throw down the gauntlet and actually engage in civil disobedience himself to stand for State’s rights. Wally Hickel would have.

But the governor didn’t bother to beat his chest. He didn’t even shoot out a press release.

The reason Gov. Walker is silent is simple: He needs the cooperation of these very agencies to get federal permitting for the gasline he is attempting to build, which crosses vast areas of federal land. He cannot afford to irritate the Washington bureaucracy that will rule on his access.

And so, with the gasline as the No. 1 priority for Walker, Alaskan hunters and subsistence users are watching federal control encroach into the majority of our fish and game management areas, because our governor is too fearful to challenge Washington, and too obsessed with his one big plan for Alaska.

DELEGATION REACTS

Congressman Don Young issued a swift rebuke to the ruling yesterday:

“Make no mistake – the size, scope and impact of this rule is enormous. With over 76.8 million acres of wildlife refuges in Alaska – an area equaling the size of New Mexico – this unilateral power grab fundamentally alters Alaska’s authority to manage wildlife across all areas of our state.

“Not only does this rule undermine promises made in the Alaska Statehood Compact, it violates the law by ignoring provisions Senator Stevens and I secured within the Alaska National Interest Lands Claims Act (ANILCA) to protect Alaska’s sovereignty and management authority.

“This newest attempt to exert federal authority over Alaska has not gone unchallenged and I will continue to work every angle in Congress to strike this rule, and a similar proposal by the National Park Service, from the federal register. If this rule is allowed to stand, we could see an opening for future jurisdictional takings by the federal government – transforming a cooperative relationship between Alaska and the Fish and Wildlife Service to one of servitude.”

Senator Lisa Murkowski weighed in:

“The Fish and Wildlife Service has once again decided that it knows what is best for us, and is trampling Alaska’s long-standing right to manage wildlife in refuges,” Murkowski said. “What we know, from experience, is that this will not end well for anything but predator populations. I find it shocking that this administration’s policies are pointing to a future where we can fill our freezers with genetically engineered salmon, but not the moose and other game we have traditionally harvested in a sustainable manner from our refuges.”

“The FWS rule was accompanied by an unusual opinion piece written by Director Dan Ashe, which attempts to make a case for the new rule but does not contain a single statistic to demonstrate that state wildlife management practices are ineffective. The piece is titled ‘Keep Public Lands Public—And The Wildlife They Protect!’ – which is ironic, as the agency initially sought to extend the maximum length of temporary closures from 12 months to three years, and in its final rule extended the maximum length of emergency closures.”

Earlier this year, Sen. Dan Sullivan described the rule change this way, as he introduced an amendment to try to block the takeover:

“These proposed regulations, as currently written by the Fish and Wildlife Service, would fundamentally alter not only how we now manage wildlife refuges and the Fish and Wildlife habitats on them. [They] will also change the relationship between Fish and Wildlife and individual states from one of cooperation – which it should be – to subservience.”

The final rule will be available for public inspection today, August 4, and will publish in the federal register Friday, FWS will post the website links. Here the draft final rule, which goes into effect on Sept. 6.

Uh-oh: LNG heading for China from Louisiana

0
Screen Shot 2016-08-02 at 8.58.54 AM
The first LNG tanker transits the expanded Panama Canal last week, heading for China.

HOW WILL THIS IMPACT ALASKA’S LNG MARKET?

As Alaska ponders the quickly changing global market for liquified natural gas (LNG), Asia has always been the obvious customer.

Alaska has a geographic advantage with its direct shipping routes to Japan and its steady, uninterrupted supply to that island nation for decades. The relationship with Japan remains strong, and Japan’s energy requirements are steady.

But nearby China is the big prize, and that prize is being claimed early by Cheniere Energy. Last week, a ship loaded with LNG exited the newly expanded Panama Canal and headed for China.

Shell’s Maran Gas Apollonia loaded up at the Sabine Pass LNG plant on the Gulf Coast of Louisiana early last week and by Friday had  transited Panama. Shell does not publicize where its ships are bound. The industry, however, has determined the destination is China and according to real-time maritime tracking software, that’s in the neighborhood.

Screen Shot 2016-08-02 at 8.46.37 AM

The expanded Panama Canal reduces transit time from the Gulf Coast from 16,000 miles to 9,000 miles. For comparison, Nikiski, Alaska to Japan is about 3,000 miles.

Sabine Pass, a Cheniere property, has been exporting from its first terminal since February to South America, India, the Middle East and Europe. But the game is changing with Panama.
A surge in U.S. gas production from shale in the Lower 48 has prompted massive investments in export terminals on the Gulf Coast. Sabine Pass, for example, is expected to start shipping from its new second terminal this month.

ALASKA’S NATURAL GAS CHIEF’S CONNECTION

The Alaska Gasline Development Corp. recently hired an expert in Gulf Coast exports, and that may turn out to be a big advantage to Alaska’s understanding of global trends.
Keith Meyer was previously the president of Cheniere LNG, where he headed up the development of the Sabine Pass receiving terminal.  He also was president of LNG America, a natural gas logistics company he founded.
AGDC, over which he is now president, carries the State of Alaska’s interest in a hoped-for natural gas project that would ship 20 million tonne per year to Asian markets from Prudhoe Bay via an 800-mile line. It’s the largest project in North American history.
The controversial project is completing its preliminary front-end engineering (pre-FEED) phase this year and will face a decision point about  moving forward. The pre-FEED work has been managed by ExxonMobil and will provide a new cost estimate, which is expected to be higher than the initial $50 billion projected price. Observers speculate that Gov. Bill Walker is positioning the agency to take over the lead position in the project and turn the gasline into a state-owned and state-run entity.
If the project proceeds, the next step would be the full engineering of the project, which could cost as much as $2 billion. The private sector partners in the project — ExxonMobil, BP and ConocoPhillips — have indicated they may not be ready to move ahead now, because of the long-term economics of the project don’t pencil out due to competition and lower gas prices.
Exxon reported a 59 percent decline in profit for the second quarter, while CP reported a loss of close to $1 billion.
Companies are repositioning themselves for a long-term period of low prices, making decisions based on that assumption.
And that’s where the new Sabine Pass terminals in Louisiana factor in, along with the expanded Panama Canal. This is a major sea change for Alaska LNG.

Bright, shiny objects: Public Assistance office closes

0

FLOODING CLOSES OFFICES…INDEFINITELY

As of Aug. 1, the Muldoon Office of Public Assistance at the Muldoon Mall in Anchorage, has been closed until further notice. The closure notice went up on the Alaska.gov web site today, but no explanation was given and the phone message gave no clues.

The offices were closed last week due to flooding and clients were referred to the Gambell Street offices at 400 Gamble Street and at the Frontier Building, at 3601 C Street.  The statewide toll-free line is  1-877-326-5551.

Treasury warrant that purchased Alaska from Russia.
Treasury warrant that purchased Alaska from Russia.

THE CHECK WAS GOOD

We can’t let the day pass without noting the check signed Aug. 1, 1868 for $7.2 million for the purchase of Alaska from Russia. On July 7, 1958, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Alaska Statehood Act, allowing Alaska to become the 49th US state. But the land had been purchased nearly a century before.

In 1866, the Russian government offered to sell the territory of Alaska to the United States. The deal was struck the following year and for 2 cents an acre, the United States grew by 600,000 square miles.

ALASKA AIRLINES PASSENGERS GET ANOTHER RARE SIGHT

Earlier this year, passengers on an Alaska Airlines flight to Hawaii were treated to seeing a solar eclipse. The airlines shifted its path and even its departure time so passengers could see that once-in-a-lifetime astronomical event.

But this may top it. Today, the Blue Angels Navy flying crew sought and got permission to descend to 28,000ft so that passengers aboard Alaska Airlines Flight 80 could see them refueling mid air as they headed down to Seattle for Seafair. The video is here. Better than Board Room privileges.

 

 

Marijuana Control Board member dumped by Walker

0

BRUCE SCHULTE SHOWN THE DOOR

Screen Shot 2016-08-01 at 3.11.43 PM
Bruce Schulte, commercial pilot, architect, stand-up comedian and now-former member of the Marijuana Control Board.

Republican activist, pilot, and marijuana legalization advocate Bruce Schulte received his pink slip from Gov. Bill Walker on Friday.

Schulte is not only no longer the chair of the Marijuana Control Board — he was voted out of that seat a couple of months back; now he’s off the board altogether.

Schulte was appointed to the board by Gov. Walker a year ago, and serves in a seat reserved for someone intending to go into the business. As a professional pilot, he doesn’t use marijuana, but he’s thought it would be a great business opportunity and he has been making plans for starting a retail store.

Now, with his departure from the board, he’s not so sure. He doesn’t think he’d ever be able to get a license in the political climate of the day.

“The governor has decided that voters be damned. They’re going to slow-roll the regulations until next year when the governor can propose legislation to repeal legalized marijuana operations. They’ve already tried to delay implementation by six months,” said Schulte. “The board interceded and kept that from happening. Then they tried to give the executive director more control over the board to prevent implementation. Then they got rid of me.”

Asked his advice to those who are preparing to start commercial operations in Alaska, Schulte said: “My advice would be to save your money. Put your money someonewer else, because you cannot trust this administration.”

Schulte’s open position was posted today at the governor’s Boards and Commissions home page. The appointment by the governor requires legislative confirmation.

Screen Shot 2016-08-01 at 3.04.23 PM

New board chairman Peter Mlynarik, who is Soldotna’s chief of police, has been actively working to get signatures on a petition that would put a commercial marijuana prohibition on the borough’s fall ballot.

While he has been working to ban pot on the peninsula, Schulte has been working on starting a commercial operation.

Several localities including the Mat-Su Borough, Wasilla and Palmer have already opted out of commericalized pot. The Kenai Peninsula ban would only pertain to areas outside of city limits.