Saturday, August 1, 2026
Home Blog Page 1660

Board of Fisheries appointment cuts out Anchorage anglers, dip-netters

4

Friday night, without an announcement, Gov. Bill Walker nominated a commercial fisherman from Kodiak to replace a sport fishing representative from Anchorage on the Board of Fisheries. The governor quietly slipped his nominee’s name to the House and Senate leadership after business hours.

If the nomination of Duncan Fields is confirmed by the Legislature, there will be no Board of Fisheries representative from Anchorage.

But the appointment of Fields has another purpose, besides being an unwelcome assault against dip-netters and anglers of Alaska, particularly Southcentral. The appointment would keep Fields from running against Rep. Louise Stutes, a Kodiak Republican who has fallen out of favor with Alaska Republicans and who joined the Democratic-run House majority.

Either way, the governor has put Fields in a lose-lose position, because if he keeps his name in for consideration and is denied confirmation, he’ll have gone through a reputation-bruising battle that will damage his chances of unseating Stutes in August.

By the same token, it’s a win-win for the governor: He can poke a stick in the eye of gubernatorial candidate Mike Dunleavy, who has the support of one of the biggest sport fishing advocates in Alaska, Bob Penney.

If Fields wins confirmation, Gov. Walker then takes him out of circulation as a candidate and preserves that Kodiak seat for someone who is in Walker’s camp: Stutes. It’s an easy choice for Walker.

SPORTS FISHERS ARE LIVID

The sports fishing community is up in arms. There was no public announcement that the governor is changing the board balance from being weighted evenly between sports and commercial, with one seat for subsistence to what would be a clearly commercial fisheries board, with four seats.

“This appointment will unbalance the Board and we strongly oppose the nomination,” said Kenai River Sportfishing Association Executive Director Ricky Gease. “Past governors have for years kept the Board balanced in regional representation and between commercial, sport, personal use and subsistence user groups. By stacking the Board with a majority voice of commercial fishing interests – and with no one from Anchorage – the governor is threatening Alaskans’ opportunity to harvest fish.”

When Walker was elected, Karl Johnstone was the chair of the Board of Fisheries, representing the sports fishing seat for Anchorage. The governor said he would not reappoint him, so Johnstone left on his own terms, and Walker appointed Roland Maw.

Maw became caught up in various scandals involving taking Permanent Fund Dividends while not actually residing in Alaska, and is still in court over those and related allegations.

[Read Craig Medred’s account, the story that was spiked by the Anchorage Daily News when Alice Rogoff was publisher, which led to Medred leaving the ADN.]

FIELDS FOR HOUSE

In 2016, Fields ran against Louise Stutes, after she had joined with the Democrats, and he took Kodiak by about 150 votes.

However, he had run without a party affiliation and had little name recognition in Cordova and other communities outside of Kodiak. This year, he was planning to run as a Republican to take on Stutes in the August primary. Being on the Board of Fisheries would end that plan, and Republicans would have to search for someone else to challenge Stutes.

Born in Kodiak, Fields has served as the president of the Kodiak Island Borough School District. He has a law degree from the University of Oregon, is married, and has six children.

He has served on many fisheries boards and councils:

UH-OH: EMERGENCY ORDERS CLOSE FISHING AREAS

On Tuesday, the Department of Fish and Game closed commercial salmon fishing with set gillnets in all waters of the Northern District of Upper Cook Inlet for the 2018 directed king salmon fishery. The fishing dates affected by this closure are May 28, and June 4, 11, and 18.

The Division of Sport Fish also closed the entire Susitna River drainage to the harvest of king salmon. Sport fishing for king salmon will only be allowed in the Deshka River and Yentna River system. These drainages will be restricted to catch-and-release only for king salmon; no harvest will be allowed.

“The objective of these restrictions and closures is to achieve all Susitna River escapement goals by eliminating sport and commercial harvest of these stocks. Based on inseason information, fishing opportunity may be restored where and when possible while ensuring escapement goals are achieved,” the department explained in its emergency order.

 

Justin Parish, Sam Kito vote against Juneau Access

When the chips were down, Reps. Justin Parish and Sam Kito of Juneau voted against the Juneau Access Project, which would have brought hundreds of jobs and better ferry service for all of Southeast Alaska.
On the House floor on Monday, Reps. Lance Pruitt, Charisse Millett, Chris Birch, and Dan Saddler, of Anchorage, and Tammie Wilson of North Pole, spoke powerfully about the importance of building a long-awaited 48-mile road that would allow for a short ferry crossing to Haines. They advocated for access to the capital and the importance of building infrastructure in a part of the state where populations is dropping and ferry usage is down by one quarter.
The $570 million road project would be paid for with 90 percent federal funding, and the 10 percent matching funding from the state, which could be allocated in increments over the life of the several-year project.
The Walker Administration, in cooperation with Juneau Rep. Sam Kito, had transferred a major portion of the funds that had been designated for the projects to other communities around the state. But the funding could have been be transferred back to the Juneau Access Project in the supplemental budget.
More than half of Juneau residents favor the road, but many in Kito’s District 33, which is the most liberal district in the state, remain opposed to it. In the Mendenhall Valley, represented by Parish, more people favor the road.
Rep. Pruitt offered an amendment to the supplemental budget that would return some of that money to the Juneau Access Project. The amendment failed, 20-19, with both Juneau representatives — Parish and Kito — voting against the road. Had either one of them voted yes, the funding for the project funds would have been restored.

Alaska’s Department of Transportation and Public Facilities calls for extending the road along Northern Lynn Canal from its current dead end at Echo Cove to Katzehin River, where a new ferry terminal would be built.

From there, smaller ferries that are under construction in Ketchikan would take vehicles and passengers to Haines and Skagway on short routes with up to eight trips a day. Ferries used in Northern Lynn Canal could be deployed to other communities, such as Sitka, Hoonah, and Petersburg.

Proponents of the road project believe that it is key to saving the ferry system. Right now, ferries are so old and they are missing more and more sailings due to repairs.

STRANDED TRAVELERS ACROSS SOUTHEAST

Earlier this month, six basketball teams were stranded in Sitka when one of the ferries suffered a breakdown, something that is now a common occurrence.

The M/V LeConte needed parts that needed to be flown in from Illinois but meanwhile Allen Marine, a private ferry company in Sitka, was able to fill in and get the students back to their home communities of Angoon, Kake, and Hoonah.

In April, some 400 students and parents from around Southeast were not going to be able to attend the regional music festival in Juneau in April because of ferry system breakdown, but the Alaska Marine Highway System has adjusted its schedule to ensure the students and chaperones can attend. But that means other communities will sacrifice their expected runs.

Proponents of the Juneau Access Project argue that by funding and building the road, the aging ferry system can be more efficiently used for other island communities that will never have road access.

Republican lawmakers in the House voted for greater access to Juneau, while all Democrats and Indie-Dem Daniel Ortiz of Ketchikan voting against it.

Monday’s floor vote was one of the clearest demonstrations yet of the divide between those who want to grow good-paying jobs and access to the Capital City, versus those who want Juneau to remain “just as it is.”

Or as the old joke goes, “a quaint little drinking town with a government problem.”

Escaped from halfway house, robs and assaults again

10

Charles Sadler, who has been on the lam since walking away from a halfway house in mid-February, was back in the assault and robbery business on Friday, according to police, who searched for him and arrested him after he brandished a weapon, struck a man, and stole his bike and his cell phone.

Sadler is 19 years old. Last year, he was arrested for armed robbery after following a man into his garage and firing shots while attempting to rob the man.

On Friday, he was said to be on the 400 block of Turpin Street in East Anchorage, where he was meeting someone who was trying to sell a cell phone through Craigslist.

The victim had received a text from someone he thought was a buyer, and arrived by bicycle at the agreed upon address. As he reached into his pocket to retrieve the phone, he was struck on the face by a man identified as Sadler, who also pulled a gun on him during the assault.

The victim’s glasses were broken, and as he ran off to call for help, Sadler allegedly stole the bike and fled. Police searched the area and found Sadler on the 300 block of Donna Drive. He was identified as the perpetrator and a gun was found nearby.

Sadler is charged with Robbery I, Assault III, Assault IV, Misconduct Involving a Weapon III, Theft III, and Criminal Mischief V.  He also had an outstanding felony warrant for Escape.

Read our original story about Sadler’s arrest in October for armed robbery in the Fairview neighborhood, his assignment to the Cordova Center halfway house, and his escape.

SB 91 Poster Child: Charles Sadler

Sara Rasmussen: No better reason, no better time

8

By SARA RASMUSSEN
CANDIDATE HOUSE DISTRICT 22

She’s just a mom. And pregnant – how could she ever be successful legislator? Her hormones must be going crazy. Look at her, with that blonde hair – she looks like a pageant w**re. She’s just a stupid little girl.

Those words, spoken about me since I stepped out to run for office, are written on sticky notes, attached to my bathroom mirror. Every morning, they motivate me to press on and remind me that nothing worth doing is easy.

She’s a Republican and I won’t vote for her. (Kind of closed-minded, but predictable.)

She’s too young. (Not as true as I might like to think, but I get it.)

She’s conservative and I’m not. (A fair reason not to give me your vote.)

She’s a mom. Seriously?

My name is Sara Rasmussen. I’m a residential real estate appraiser, a lifelong resident of my district, a wife, an entrepreneur, and I also just happen to be mother of a sweet little boy with a little girl on the way. When my husband and I made the decision that I would run for public office, I knew that the path would be riddled with obstacles and difficulties.

To newcomers, the financial and time commitments to a campaign create barriers to entry that are high and unforgiving; this reality all too often keeps many good men and women from running for office at all.

I expect, given the current nature of our country’s politics, to have a door or two slammed in my face. But, I have to admit that I find it alarming — at a time when politicians from across our state and our nation stand accused of sexual harassment and assault, extramarital affairs, and corruption – that any person would dismiss my candidacy simply because I’m a mother of small children.

I mean really, what better reason could I possibly have to run for office?

Moms possess an amazing ability to solve complex problems. They’re among the best negotiators in the world (have you ever tried to convince a toddler to do something?) and they’re naturally inclined to protect everyone around them. Moms are observant, dedicated, and passionate – the qualities that just about everyone, of every political affiliation, wants in their elected officials.

Being a mom shouldn’t be seen as a handicap to accomplishing great things in society.

Anchorage’s Kikkan Randall just won a GOLD medal for team USA, and she’s a mother of a toddler.

Marie Curie, who won a Nobel Prize and whose work led to the development of the X-ray scanner, did so as a single mom of two daughters.

Kathy Headlee, a mother of seven, started Mothers Without Borders to help orphaned children around the world.

I could go on and on. Moms are a cornerstone of a healthy society, and we can’t continue to force them out of the public square.

I can’t stomach any more news stories about people being shot on our streets or kids hit by stolen cars. My heart still aches for families of Alaskans who have been made twice a victim; first, by the crime itself, and then, by the injustice of watching the perpetrator walk away without penalty because of a bad bill called SB 91.

I can’t stand by while the leaders of our state take away the PFD bit by bit, stealing away parents’ opportunity to invest in their child’s college education, and then threatening new taxes in the very next sentence.

I won’t sit quietly while the budget deficit continues to grow and grow, forcing ordinary, hardworking people to bear the weight of a government that is addicted to spending money.

These aren’t abstract problems. They’re right in front of our faces and we can’t ignore them any longer.

We need new, strong, and independent leaders to break the cycle of bad government, and I want to earn your trust as one of those leaders.

I don’t want to talk bad about my opponents – I know them both and they’re nice people. But they’ve also both already had a shot to solve problems in Juneau, and honestly, I don’t think either of them have earned another term by their actions. It’s nothing personal, but I feel less safe today than I did before they were elected, and judging by the messages I’ve received so far in my campaign, I’m not the only one who feels that way.

Being a legislator and a mother isn’t going to be easy – I know that. But I’m willing to make whatever adjustments necessary to give my neighbors, my family, and my friends a representative in government who has their best interests at heart. I am so fortunate to have an amazing and supportive husband to serve alongside me on behalf of our community, and our family is so excited for the opportunity to go to Juneau together to fight for all Alaskans!

Chances are, you may catch me waddling down your street in the coming weeks, before my daughter’s birth.  I’ll be back out as quickly as I can after she’s born, as I’m committed to getting out there and learning what issues matter to you.  I’d love the chance to meet you and your family.

I’m only going to make one campaign promise this year, and I hope it’s a strong start on the journey to earn your vote: I will fight with everything I have, as only a mom can, for my children and for yours.

And if that commitment makes me a “stupid little girl” – well, I’m okay with that.

Sara Rasmussen is a candidate for State Representative in District 22 (Sand Lake, Anchorage). You can learn more about her and her campaign at SaraForHouse.com.

 

Murkowski: Gasline construction costs will be impacted by tariffs

7

Higher steel tariffs imposed on China by President Donald Trump will add up to a half a billion dollars to the proposed AK-LNG project, said Sen. Lisa Murkowski last week.

Murkowski was on a panel with Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who is Senate Majority Whip. The two spoke during CERA Week, a Houston energy conference.

Murkowski was asked if her constituents had raised a concern about the unavailability of certain kinds of steel.

“This is a big deal up north, as we’re trying again to build out so much of this that we’ve been waiting for. Again, whether it’s actual  pipe itself or the infrastructure that is going into these drilling operations…A lot of discussion about Alaska’s LNG and the opportunities that we will have, looking to build an 800-mile pipeline. Where are we going to get that pipe?

“The back-of-the-envelope numbers is that with these tariffs, we might be in a situation where it’s not only hundreds of millions, it might be as much as a half a billion dollars added on to the most expensive infrastructure project that we have seen in this country. So these are real numbers. This has real impact,” Murkowski said. “This is not coming at a good time for us.”

Last week, Keith Meyer, the head of AGDC, brushed off reporters’ questions about the impact of increased tariffs, saying it would not add much to the massive project, which is estimated to cost between $43-60 billion.

[Watch the panel discussion about energy and trade]

Also last week, Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan joined six other Senators, including John Barrasso of Wyoming, Joni Ernst of Iowa, and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, who signed a letter to Trump in which they asked him to consider alternative measures and withdraw his tariff order.

[Read the letter to President Trump]

More job losses, population leaving state

0

Alaska’s employment was down 0.5 percent in January, 2018 compared to a year ago.

That represents another 1,600 jobs the state has lost, or an average of 133 jobs lost per month, according to the Alaska Department of Labor.

Oil and gas employment was down by another 5.9 percent, with a loss of 600 jobs, and the construction sector lost 2.5 percent, or 300 jobs.

Federal employment was down 2.1 percent, or 300 jobs, while state government was down by only 0.8 percent, or 200 jobs, and local government by 0.5 percent, 200 jobs.

The only two industries to add jobs were health care, which was up  3 percent,  or 1,100 jobs, and transportation, warehousing and utilities with an increase of 0.5 percent, or 100 jobs.

Alaska’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased one-tenth of a percentage point to 7.3 percent, up from 6.5 percent in January of 2017. The comparable national rate for January was 4.1 percent.

Alaska’s not-seasonally adjusted rate was 8.1 percent, up eight-tenths of a percentage point from December.

Unemployment rates rose in all areas except Dillingham and the Aleutians, where winter fisheries buoyed employment. Aleutians East and West also had the lowest unemployment rates in the state, at or near 3 percent. Rates were highest in areas that depend on summer tourism, such as Denali Borough and Skagway, and rural areas with few jobs, such as the Yukon-Koyukuk and Kusilvak census areas.

In January, the state released estimates showing that over the past two years, Alaska has lost nearly 9,000 people, and 2017 was the fifth year in a row for net migration loss, the longest losing streak ever for the state.

Alaska has the highest population turnover of any state. Forty one percent of the population of Alaska was born in the state, compared with 32 percent in 1980, but the population is highly migratory, according to the Department of Labor.

In Alaska there is a remarkably stable out-migration rate as people leave the state for jobs, higher education, military transfer or other personal reasons. What varies most is the in-migration rate, which plummets during economic downturns and does not sufficiently offset the steady annual outflow. Conversely, in-migration leaps during times of strong job growth, which combined with the natural birth rate leads to periods of overall population growth.

[Read former Gov. Sean Parnell: Alaska needs to bring jobs back]

Should the PFD be enshrined in Alaska’s Constitution?

HOUSE DEMS SAY YES, GOVERNOR SAYS MAYBE, SENATE GOP SAYS ‘SLOW DOWN’

The Alaska House Democrat-led majority is looking at enshrining the Permanent Fund Dividend into the Alaska Constitution.

But not a full dividend, just some portion of what it might have been under the original formula.

Public testimony will be taken on HJR 23 at 1:30 pm on Monday, March 12, and again on Tuesday. 

[Read details of HJR 23 here.]

Paul Seaton, co-chair of House Finance, is likely to reveal more details of the plan this week. HJR 23 is sponsored by Rep. Chris Tuck, Gabrielle LeDoux, Bryce Edgmon, Paul Seaton, Neal Foster, Scott Kawasaki, Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Harriet Drummond, Ivy Spohnholz, Justin Parish, Geran Tarr and Andy Josephson, all Democrats.

Democrats face an uphill climb, as they’ll have to have two-thirds of the House and Senate approve the proposed constitutional amendment. Then it would go to the voters. 

But the mood of the Republican-led Senate is to not create a constitutionally protected payment until there’s a solid fiscal plan for the state.

The Senate majority has so-far declined to advance a bill by Sen. Bill Wielechowski, an Anchorage Democrat. Wielechowski has asked the Senate to bypass the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is holding his PFD Constitution bill. 

The Permanent Fund is currently in statute, and is not constitutionally guaranteed. The constitutional language dating from 1976 that established the Permanent Fund calls for all realized cash earnings to be deposited in the state’s General Fund.  Later, in the early 1980s, the Alaska Legislature created the dividend program in statute.

Now, for the first time, the Walker Administration is also thinking about the idea of putting the PFD in the Constitution. Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott signaled that the Administration is open to discussing it during an interview on APRN’s Talk of Alaska on March 2:

“The Dividend absolutely needs to be a key aspect of the Alaska economy into the future. And that was the reason that the governor made his veto. It was to protect the dividend going forward and to remove it hopefully from legislative table such that they would then act to protect the dividend. And whether or not it should be placed into the constitution is a valid policy debate — very much so,” Mallott told the host of Talk of Alaska.

The Alaska Republican Party State Convention delegates debated a similar measure over the weekend, but in a close vote ultimately rejected adding it to the party platform.

It may turn out that the most vigorous policy debate centers not on whether the dividend should be constitutionally protected, but rather, at what level?

Should it be set near Gov. Bill Walker’s politically set level of approximately $1,200, or should the formula the legislature adopted in the early 1980s be retained?

The so-called “original formula” would yield dividends for Alaskans above $2,500 initially.

The language of HJR 23 would have 33 percent of the income of the fund available for distribution as dividends to residents, as provided by law. The remaining income would be deposited in the general fund and the distribution of dividends would bypass the legislative appropriation or gubernatorial veto process.

Gov. Walker famously vetoed the dividend in 2016, and the Legislature did not fully fund it in 2017. The amount that would be guaranteed by the Alaska Constitution would be not less than $1,250 each year.

HJR 23 contains a provision to recalculate how money is used from the Permanent Fund Earnings Reserve Account, and adds a “Percent of Market Value” provision that would tap the fund in the same way and at a level similar to that of other large foundations such as large university endowments and sovereign wealth funds.

Parnell: Alaska needs to bring jobs back

In remarks to a banquet hall filled with Alaska Republican delegates and guests, former Gov. Sean Parnell delivered a strong message on Friday night: Alaska needs to bring jobs back. Here’s an excerpt from some of his keynote address:

Before I address Alaska’s economic challenges, let me answer another question. Why am I speaking now, when I’ve been mostly silent for the past three years on state policy issues?

[Parnell then told the story of how he and Sandy were at a meeting with President George W. Bush and heard him describe why he refrained from criticizing his successor for a time, out of respect for the will of the people and respect for the office.]

We both thought George Bush was a class act in the years following his departure from office, and Sandy and I both told each other after hearing him, that when our turn came to leave office, that we were going to follow his example, for the same reasons—out of respect for the voter’s choice and out of a desire to give the new administration a chance to succeed.

Now that they’ve had a chance to succeed, and need a help out … the time has come for me to re-enter the public discussion, as an Alaskan, and as an American, because staying silent is not an option where Alaska is so far off-track.

I say, let’s fix Alaska.

Number one on that fix it list — Let’s bring back our jobs.

In the last three years, about 11,000 jobs have gone away. Driven by our economic losses, job losses, GDP losses, and our shrinking population, Alaska came in dead last in a new ranking of state economic stability by U.S. News & World Report and McKinsey & Company. Both U.S. News and 24/7 Wall Street listed Alaska at 50th–out of 50 states for crime and public safety.

Thousands of jobs were lost first in the oil industry, and it took some time for the job losses to spread, but spread they did. Alaskans and companies began leaving the state.

We’ve said good bye to many stores—both large and small. In the oil patch, Apache’s, gone. Pioneer, gone, Shell, gone. StatOil, gone. In the Mat-Su Valley, we have seen the mom and pop businesses under strain, pulling up stakes and leaving.

In 2014, after leaving office, I had 20 years of commercial law experience in my past, and I still work in that area–representing buyers and sellers of businesses. I see the erosion of Alaska’s economy every day in the stories of my clients. It’s a tough time to be in business in Alaska.

But it does not have to be this way.

Alaska’s economic wounds have been self-inflicted and can be undone.

Let’s start with the oil industry and the governor’s decision not to pay tax credits that were earned.

Let’s say you and your spouse saved some money and you want to earn some interest on it.  You decide that one particular bank offers the best rate of interest on your savings, so you go into the bank, sign a contract, open an account, and deposit your money. A year later, you go back to the bank to collect your money plus interest, but here’s the thing. The bank says you can’t have it. Neither your original deposit nor any interest.

That’s what happened to the small oil explorers.  They sank, in some cases, $150 million or more into their first exploration wells, thinking that they would get the tax credit payments back—because that’s what Alaska law said.  When they didn’t, some went into bankruptcy and some postponed further exploration, killing off thousands of Alaska jobs across the last three years of missed exploration seasons, because they didn’t have the money to go forward.

So, you say, what’s the big deal?

Well, let me ask it this way…in my story, the next time you have some money you want to earn interest on, are you going to park it in the same bank—the one that didn’t pay back your money or the interest you had earned on your initial deposit.

Alaska has, in the last three years, earned a deservedly bad reputation among job creators.  People and companies with money are unwilling to make significant investments in Alaska due to the risk and uncertainty.

Other states work hard to get new business. Our state punishes business—we’ve become more like California in this sense.

The administration’s motto seems to be, “We love jobs, but we hate business.” The truth is, Alaska needs more businesses, large and small, because we need the opportunities and jobs they create.

These herky-jerky policies have eroded the ecosystem creating Alaskan jobs—and Alaskans are worse off today because of it.

Policy matters to jobs.

Stability matters to jobs.

And, credibility matters to jobs.

The good news is that we’ve faced similar challenges in the past, and we have overcome them. We have the resources and the people—many in this room—to bring back the jobs we’ve lost and rebuild our economy. We understand that a healthy economy matters to Alaskans’ future.

So, what are our guiding principles to foster a healthy economy?  How do we bring back Alaskan jobs?

  1. First, we bring Alaskan jobs back by restoring stability. Put the state’s budget on a firmer foundation, get spending under control; and, when you use the earnings reserve, make sure there are side boards and dividends. Measure every state fiscal policy change by whether it replaces uncertainty with stability.  Stability’s byproduct is opportunity for Alaskans.
  2. Second, bring Alaskan jobs back by restoring the state’s credibility. Don’t pay the tax credits in part; pay off the state’s debt in full. Don’t let the state be the debtor that didn’t make good on what it owes. Choose to restore the state’s credibility.
  3. Third, bring our jobs back by telling the world that Alaska is once again open for business—and implement policy to prove it; Because we want a future here for our children and grandchildren, we know who we are fighting for…and we know why. Policies that bring Alaskan jobs back, keep our children meaningfully employed here, and, they keep our families close. More Alaska jobs get created when we have a competitive investment climate, rather than a punitive one. More Alaska jobs get created when we reduce the cost of doing business. [State and local government property taxes have gone up on certain properties by 133% in one case I know of, 160% in another—the notices just came out.] Bring our jobs back by competing well.
  1. Fourth, we bring Alaskan jobs back by fostering entrepreneurialism and welcoming start-ups. We support a friendly environment for job creation among start ups by repairing infrastructure, by incentivizing the build-out of tech solutions, by streamlining government tax and fee collections and by addressing the high cost of health care and health insurance.

The next governor and this legislature need to be laser-focused on growing Alaskan opportunity by bringing back Alaskan jobs. Every policy must be measured by whether it will create Alaskan job opportunity or destroy it. If a proposed policy before legislators even leans in the direction of job destruction, even one scintilla—stop it!

That’s my message: Restore stability; restore our credibility; and, fix Alaska by bringing our jobs back!

So how can you help? What’s your part in all this!

  1. Our greatest need…we need good candidates in the state house and senate races. If you have ever thought that one day you might serve, then I’d ask you to consider that this could be the hour. [I’m willing to talk with you, to counsel you, to tell you what to expect.]
  2. Attend public forums and ask every candidate what they will do to create jobs and keep us safe. Do not cede those two issues. We have the high ground and the right policy answers to get our economy on track and to keep us safe.
  3. Volunteer on campaigns – in our first campaign for the State House, when I was 29 years old, it was my House District 17 Republicans and the Republican women who were vital to our victory – a victory that ultimately led to four years in the State House, four in the State Senate and ultimately to Lt. Governor and Governor.

You, here, have the ability to fix Alaska, and to bring our jobs back.  Together, we will do that!

(Excerpt from a speech delivered by former Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell on March 9, 2018, to delegates and guests at the Alaska Republican Party Convention in Anchorage, Alaska.)

Legislative: No regs in place for catch-and-release tool

2

The pretrial risk assessment evaluation being used by the Department of Corrections to let prisoners walk free while awaiting trial has no regulatory framework to support it.

A memo from Legislative Research Services says that the Walker Administration has not adopted required regulations to govern the new pre-trial assessment tools, and will probably not adopt them until December, 2018, a year after the tools have been in effect.

According to the memo, “regulations would be in place one year following the start of the program to work out issues, make adjustment, and validate the program and tools being used for Pretrial Services.”

The pretrial tools being used by the Department of Corrections have become known as “catch-and-release,” as violent and repeat offenders are being released immediately by judges who say their hands are now tied.

The lenient arm of the law: More ‘catch-and-reoffend’ car thievery

In the case of repeat offenders Shane Muse, 28, and Crystal Tui, 25, who were nabbed in Anchorage earlier this month for yet another car theft, the new bail system qualified them for release, although as of this writing they are both housed in prison — Muse had also been on the lam for a prior forgery case where he skipped his court date. He is housed at the Anchorage jail, while Tui is at Hiland Mountain Correctional Center.

BACKGROUND

In 2016, Alaska enacted SB 91, a comprehensive criminal reform bill, which, among other things, adopted “evidence-based pretrial reforms” and created a pretrial services program (AS 33.07).

A key part of SB 91 is a new pre-trial unit called the Pretrial Enforcement Division in the Department of Corrections. The Division required an additional 40 state workers and supervises defendants placed in the community while waiting for a resolution of the charges against them.

Pretrial officers perform a risk assessment for each defendant who is arrested and booked in jail. Known as the “Alaska 2 Scale” or “”AK-2S,” the new pre-trial system became effective on Jan, 1, 2018.

In the Muse and Tui case, Muse scored a 2 on a scale of 1-10, and Tui scored 0, meaning she is no risk for reoffending.

RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL IS BEING BETA TESTED

But if Legislative Research is correct, then the pre-trial scoring system being used today isn’t based on solid evidence; the risk profile tool is essentially undergoing testing this year on real offenders.

“The DOC has not adopted any regulations for the pretrial program at this time,” wrote Susan Haymes, manager of the Legislative Research Services.

The Correction Department said in the fiscal note on SB 91 that the regulations would be in effect by Dec. 31, 2017.

Gov. Bill Walker is asking for further changes to SB 91, jumping over the regulatory process to fix aspects of the assessment tool that are letting dangerous felons back out on the street.

Under SB 91, the AK-2S tool doesn’t take into account a person’s out-of-state criminal history.

HB 295 would give the court flexibility to consider that criminal history for some of those being arrested.

A memo from Attorney General Jahna Lindemuth has asked the House and Senate Judiciary Committees to hasten hearings on HB 295. Neither has held a hearing on the bill.

[Read the full text of HB 295 here]

Criminal round up, release, repeat

In the story linked above, Shannon Perkins is still out on community supervision, and yet another of the suspects has been released, bringing the total to six out of eight who are not in jail.