Saturday, November 15, 2025
Home Blog Page 1646

Ninth Circuit decides against Sturgeon on hovercraft use

1

The Katie John case may cost Alaskans their right to navigate rivers and other waterways across the state. Many outdoor enthusiasts predicted it would.

In a case that has gone on for 10 years, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has once again upheld the National Park Service in its decision to ban hovercrafts from the Nation River in the Yukon-Charley National Preserve.

The Ninth Circuit is using the Katie John decision, which former Gov. Sean Parnell sought to clarify through the courts, but which Gov. Bill Walker refused to pursue once he took office in the fall of 2014.

The Parnell Administration said it was a question of authority over navigable waters in the state. Alaska was given the same rights as other states at Statehood, including the right to control state-owned navigable waters next to and within federal land.

The Yukon-Charley Preserve was established by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act and is federal land.

Alaskan John Sturgeon used a hovercraft to get to moose hunting grounds, when he was stopped by Park Service rangers. Sturgeon argued that the Nations River is navigable, therefore is under State jurisdiction.

The case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed with part of Sturgeon’s argument, but remanded part of it back to the Ninth Circuit for further review.

The judges of the Ninth appear to be using another portion of law — the Reserve Water Rights Doctrine — to make all navigable waters in the ANILCA land case subject to federal jurisdiction.

And they are using the Katie John decision to back them up:

According to the Ninth Circuit judges:

“The panel held that under the Katie John precedent – Alaska v. Babbitt, 72 F.3d 698 (9th Cir. 1995) (Katie John I), John v. United States, 247 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc) (Katie John II), and John v. United States, 720 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2013) (Katie John III) – the United States had an implied reservation of water rights, rendering the river public lands. On remand from the United States Supreme Court, the panel again concluded that the federal government properly regulated hovercraft use on the Nation River in the Yukon- Charley preserve.

“Judge Nguyen also separately concurred, joined by Judge D.W. Nelson. Judge Nguyen acknowledged that the panel was bound by case law to analyze this case under the reserved water doctrine, but she would conclude that this case is better analyzed under the Commerce Clause as it is about the right to regulate navigation on navigable waters within an Alaska national preserve.

Under this doctrine, when the federal government “withdraws its land from the public domain and reserves it for a federal purpose,” the government impliedly “reserves appurtenant water then unappropriated to the extent needed to accomplish the purpose of the reservation.” Cappaert v. United States, 426 U.S. 128, 138 (1976). The United States thus “acquires a reserved right in unappropriated water which vests on the date of the reservation and is superior to the rights of future appropriators.

Whether a federally reserved water right is implicit in a federal reservation of public land depends on whether the government intended to reserve unappropriated water. Id. at 139. “Intent is inferred if the previously unappropriated waters are necessary to accomplish the purposes for which the reservation was created.” 

In 2014, retired biologist Ron Somerville of Juneau warned of this outcome in a letter to the Juneau Empire:

Although Katie John’s intentions were to protect her family’s traditional subsistence uses, the resulting federal litigation morass has resulted in making Alaska a second tier State. The federal government is systematically taking away our fish and wildlife management authorities, access to and ownership of land and resources, any hopes of a transportation infrastructure and a unified state.

If you want to see the federal government eventually managing all of our fish and wildlife resources again, including our commercial fisheries, I suggest you vote for Begich and the unity ticket of Bill Walker and Mallott. If you want to see the state lose some or most of its submerged lands and associated resources, I would also suggest you vote for Begich and Walker/ Mallott. If you want to see a reservation system created in Alaska similar to those in the Lower 48 states and you want to see only a Native priority for taking fish and wildlife, look to Begich, Walker and Mallott for relief.

Somerville’s prediction appears to have come to pass.

BACKGROUND

In March, Chief Justice John Roberts agreed with Sturgeon when he delivered the Supreme Court’s opinion, which said in part:

For almost 40 years, John Sturgeon has hunted moose along the Nation River in Alaska. Because parts of the river are shallow and difficult to navigate, Sturgeon travels by hovercraft, an amphibious vehicle capable of gliding over land and water. To reach his preferred hunting grounds, Sturgeon must pilot his hovercraft over a stretch of the Nation River that flows through the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, a 1.7 million acre federal preservation area managed by the National Park Service. 16 U. S. C. §410hh(10).

Alaska law permits the use of hovercraft. National Park Service regulations do not. See 36 CFR §2.17(e) (2015). After Park Service rangers informed Sturgeon that he was prohibited from using his hovercraft within the boundaries of the preserve, Sturgeon filed suit, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. He argues that the Nation River is owned by the State, and that the Alaska National Interest 

Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) prohibits the Park Service from enforcing its regulations on state-owned land in Alaska. The Park Service disagrees, contending that it has authority to regulate waters flowing through federally managed preservation areas. The District Court and the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Park Service. We granted certiorari.

The Supreme Court decision and elegant explanation of the case is here.

The latest Ninth Circuit opinion is likely to be returned to the U.S. Supreme Court once again. Efforts to reach John Sturgeon were not successful. This story will be updated.

Voters will decide on pot, sales tax, Uber, and off-road vehicles

0

Elections in Alaska’s municipalities and boroughs are on Tuesday — except for Anchorage, of course, which votes in April.

In addition to lots of candidates vying for local mayor, assembly, council, and school board seats, there are interesting local propositions to consider. Some of them are:

BETHEL: Considering an increase on the alcohol tax from 12 to 15 percent. Some of that additional money will be used for social services.

FAIRBANKS CITY: Prop A would ban commercial pot establishments. Prop B would increase property taxes and allow the city to collect more than $1.7 million to make up for state revenue sharing which has dropped.

FAIRBANKS BOROUGH: Prop 1 would ban commercial pot establishments.

JUNEAU: Prop 1 extends the temporary additional 1 cent sales tax for repair and improve existing City and Borough of Juneau facilities. Prop 2 gives the CBJ more flexibility in awarding bids, to give a preference to local contractors.

KENAI BOROUGH: Prop 1 would ban the operation of commercial marijuana establishments outside borough cities. Prop 3 would increase the maximum amount of a sale subject to the sales tax to $1,000, except for residential rentals.

KETCHIKAN CITY:  Prop 1 is to ban ridesharing services like Uber and Lyft from within city limits.

KETCHIKAN BOROUGH: Prop 1 is to tax marijuana an additional 5 percent in the borough.

PETERSBURG: Propositions to increase the sales tax exemption cap from $1,200 to $1,500, to permit off-road vehicles to be driven on roads on the island (with exceptions), and to ban fluoride in the borough’s water system.

TALKEETNA: Proposition B-1 is a three percent sales tax for the Talkeetna Sewer and Water Service Area.

DEMOCRATS GETTING THEIR FINGERS INTO LOCAL ELECTIONS

As reported over the weekend, we’re seeing the 24-hour reports at APOC and the Democrats are pouring money into local races that are typically “nonpartisan.”

ADN’s Nat Herz breaks it down even further and shows that the Democrats have a go-big ground game that involves hiring field personnel in targeted communities.

Shocking: Anchorage dump has trove of personal data for the taking

1

Forget Equifax and its massive breach of America’s personal information.

In Anchorage, one only needs to drive to the dump to access the names, driver’s license numbers, home addresses and phone numbers of those who came before you to check out the free paint stash. You can also view the signatures associated with this information.

Anchorage Assembly member Amy Demboski was shocked to see a document sent to her that was a photo of visitor logs at the municipal landfill near Eagle River. Must Read Alaska has pixellated the critical information in the photo:

“The Muni is not protecting private information,” Demboski said. “I was sent a picture by a resident who has seen private info multiple times and was able to take a picture because Muni staff left him alone with the info.”

Demboski said she advised the Solid Waste Services director and City Manager Mike Abbott about the breach, but was unsatisfied with the response, so after several days she sent the information along to Must Read Alaska.

“Public officials have a duty to protect the public and that means your personal info too. If the administration chooses not to take that duty seriously, it is my job as an elected official to try to remedy the situation. Warning the public is a necessary step,” – Amy Demboski

The Muni may be in violation of state law:

Sec. 45.48.010 – .090 – Breach of Security Involving Personal Information.

This section of state law contains provisions that require the notification to consumers when their information is breached. That information is listed as an individual’s name and one or more of several other pieces of information, including a social security number, driver’s license number, account number, password, or other access codes.

Violators, including agencies, are subject to a $500 penalty for each consumer who has not been provided notice of the breach of their information. In addition, people can recover actual economic harm, according to the law.

A summary of Alaska laws protecting consumers’ identity is at the Consumer Protection Unit of the Department of Law website.

Other sites that may be helpful to those who are concerned their identities may have been compromised:

 

Permanent Fund dividend week is here; prepare for crime wave

4

On Oct. 5, Alaskans will start receiving their Alaska Permanent Fund dividends — either deposited into their bank accounts or mailed to them.

The $1,100 being dispersed to qualifying Alaskans is something criminals are preparing for as well.

After all, more than $672 million is about to enter the Alaska economy. People will be shopping, packages will be arriving, and thieves will be on the hunt.

Most Alaskans have already experienced a dramatic increase in crime in their communities, so now is the time to be extra vigilant.

Property crimes in Alaska rose nearly 19 percent last year, according to the FBI. It was the biggest increase in the nation, which has overall seen property crime drop 2 percent.

[Read: Crime town hall brings out frustration, anger]

A reader shared these tips:

“Spend some time thinking about how to be extra safe. Don’t go from store to store and load up your vehicle. Don’t shop alone. If you are going to shop online, avoid doorstep deliveries. It may take a bit more effort, but better to be safe and keep your PFD windfall than succumb to victimhood. Think about it. Do something about it.”

About 640,000 Alaskans will receive a dividend this month. Must Read Alaska wants our 135,000 monthly visitors and their families and friends to be safe.

So spread the word: Please share this post on Facebook and remind your Alaska friends to take extra precautions in coming weeks.

Alaska Democrats try knock out Ted Leonard

1

The Alaska Democratic Party, already involved in other local “nonpartisan” races, have spent more than $800 to support the candidacy of Pat Hogan for Mat-Su Borough Assembly.

Hogan is an unaffiliated candidate. The Democrats financed a mailer supporting her, saying she was approved by “our local Democrats.”

Ted Leonard, the conservative in the race, is the other candidate seeking to fill the seat being vacated by conservative Steve Colligan.

Leonard is the former executive director of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, a billion dollar finance development corporation, for seven years.

Ted Leonard

Leonard was also deputy commissioner for Commerce for the State of Alaska, director of Finance and Administrative Services for the City of Wasilla, and has been appointed to various finance positions for school districts across the state. He also worked in the private sector as a chief financial officer and is a small business owner for accounting and financial services.

But the Democrats went not with the numbers guy, but with the candidate they thought to be more amenable to their agenda: Hogan is a Public Health Nurse, a self-described advocate for homeless youth in the Mat-Su, and participates in the Mat-Su Opioid Task Force.

Alaska Democrats also spent over $700 for a Juneau candidate for the Assembly and over $800 to support Dan Mayfield for Mat-Su Borough Assembly.

[Read Democrats making nonpartisan races partisan]

Quote of the Week: Where are you gonna go?

6

“With [the] proposed tax, still lowest taxed state. So where you gonna go? – Scott Kendall, chief of staff for Gov. Bill Walker, making the case on Friday to Commonwealth North for an income tax. (Hat tip to Lee Leschper)

“We’re at the point where we can no longer be the only state in the nation that doesn’t have a broad-based tax.” – Gov. Bill Walker, speaking at the same event.

Walker neglected to mention that his halving of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend is a broad-based tax.

In addition, nine states do not level a broad-based individual income tax. Some do tax certain forms of personal income. From Wikipedia:

  • Alaska – no individual tax but has a state corporate income tax. Like New Hampshire, Alaska has no state sales tax, but unlike New Hampshire, Alaska allows local governments to collect their own sales taxes. Alaska has an annual Permanent Fund Dividend, derived from oil revenues, for all citizens living in Alaska after one calendar year, except for some convicted of criminal offenses.[7]
  • Florida – no individual income tax[8] but has a 5.5% corporate income tax.[9] The state once had a tax on “intangible personal property” held on the first day of the year (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, money market funds, etc.), but it was abolished at the start of 2007.[10]
  • Nevada – has no individual or corporate income tax. Nevada gets most of its revenue from sales taxes and the gambling and mining industries.[11][12]
  • Tennessee has a “Hall income tax” of 6% on income received from stocks and bonds not taxed ad valorem.[13] The Hall income tax is reduced to 5% for tax year 2016, with legislative intent that the tax be statutorily reduced by one percent annually beginning with the first annual session of the 110th general assembly and potentially eliminated by 2022.[14][15] In 1932, the Tennessee Supreme Court struck down a broad-based individual income tax that had passed the General Assembly, in the case of Evans v. McCabe. However, a number of Attorneys General have recently opined that, if properly worded, a state income tax would be found constitutional by today’s court, due to a 1971 constitutional amendment.[16]
  • Texas – no individual income tax, but imposes a franchise tax on corporations. In May 2007, the legislature modified the franchise tax by enacting a modified gross margin tax on certain businesses (sole proprietorships and some partnerships were automatically exempt; corporations with receipts below a certain level were also exempt as were corporations whose tax liability was also below a specified amount), which was amended in 2009 to increase the exemption level. The Texas Constitution places severe restrictions on passage of an individual income tax and the use of its proceeds.
  • Washington – no individual tax but has a business and occupation tax (B&O) on gross receipts, applied to “almost all businesses located or doing business in Washington.” It varies from 0.138% to 1.9% depending on the type of industry.[17][18]
  • Wyoming has no individual or corporate income taxes.[19]
  • South Dakota – no individual income tax but has a state corporate income tax on financial institutions.[citation needed]
  • New Hampshire – has an Interest and Dividends Tax of 5%, and a Business Profits Tax of 8.5%. A Gambling Winnings Tax of 10% went into effect July 1, 2009 and was repealed May 11, 2011.[20] New Hampshire has no sales tax.[21]

Gattis awarded early cash by District 7 GOP

1

Former Rep. Lynn Gattis, now running for lieutenant governor, was awarded $8,000 by District 7 Republicans, as shown in the latest Alaska Republican Party finance report with APOC.

In the past, the state party has stayed out of primary battles and waits until the nominee is decided upon in August balloting before throwing money toward a statewide race.

Sen. Gary Stevens, Sen. Kevin Meyer, and Stephen Wright, and Edith Grunwald are other Republicans in the race for lieutenant governor. Gattis was the first to file.

Tuckerman Babcock, chair of the Alaska Republican Party, said that the Rules Committee reviewed the transfer request by District 7 and decided that nothing prohibited the district from awarding money from its subaccount to a statewide candidate.

Berkowitz budget: Roll-back taxes prior to April election

2

Anchorage Mayor Ethan Berkowitz has had a tough few months. Crime reached new highs undre his watch, with a murder rate on track to set yet another record this year and a nearly 50 percent increase in auto thefts.

With a liberal-dominated Assembly, Mayor Berkowitz raised taxes on homeowners by 5.3 percent, costing them an average of $250 more per year.

Berkowitz reverted to his old glib self in the media, saying he doesn’t worry about North Korea bombs as much as he worries about bears and moose, and telling people they’re safe as long as they don’t go out after midnight. He had to walk back that statement as insensitive after public backlash.

It was the same foot-in-mouth Berkowitz who, as a candidate once said on the radio: “I support the idea of adults being able to choose who they have a relationship with,” he says. “Father and son should be allowed to marry, if they’re both consenting adults — if you’re defining marriage as the bundle of rights and privileges that’s now accrued to people, then yes.”

The liberal mayor’s homeless initiative has not made a dent on the streets, although he has dedicated significant municipal resources to it. About the same number of people are living in urban encampments as when he took office. This past week it hit another crisis point when one business owner started blaring horns to get homeless people to vacate the area.

Berkowitz has focused more on Anchorage being a “welcoming” city than growing a livable city as he has joined the “resist” movement to rebuke the new president’s campaign against illegal immigration.

But it’s all just not working.

With an election looming in April, Berkowitz is doing what any good politician in trouble would: Scaling back on the property taxes he hiked last year.

He’s going to make up the difference with a gasoline tax to be introduced to the Anchorage Assembly by fellow Democrat and Assembly Chair Dick Traini.

There’s also new revenue from cannabis taxes and other fees.

The 10-cents-a-gallon gas tax is equivalent to a nearly 4 percent tax on gasoline, and would raise as much as $11.7 million. Some of that will come from valley commuters, others from tourists, and still more from the business community.

The 2018 operating budget will be introduced at the Oct. 10 Assembly Meeting, with a public hearing on Oct. 24 at 5 pm.

Berkowitz faces at least one challenger in April: Rebecca Logan, who filed last week as a candidate for mayor. She is the president of the Alaska Support Industry Alliance, a trade organization based in Anchorage and, as such, is seen as a pro-business, efficient government alternative to a struggling mayoral incumbent.

Alaska Democrats making nonpartisan races partisan

1

Dan Mayfield was Democrat, but recently switched to nonpartisan — or as he puts it, independent — although there is no such designation in the plethora of voter registration options.

But even though he’s not officially a Democrat for the Oct. 3 municipal election, the Alaska Democratic Party is backing him all the way for re-election on the Mat-Su Borough Assembly, because he will “fight for our progressive values.”

The Mayfield flyer is sponsored by Alaska Democratic Party.

According to the Democrats’ flyer, which was mailed to non-Republicans in the district, things like infrastructure, public safety, and responsibly managing public funds are progressive values. “Supported by our local Democrats!” the material says.

Mayfield and his family strenuously objected to various negative comments on Facebook after the flyer was posted on social media by campaign consultant Anand Dubey, who is supporting Mayfield’s opponent, Clayton “Mokie” Tew.

“I am an independent,” Mayfield wrote. “Those in the republican party know that but have chosen to state otherwise. I welcome support from republicans and democrats because local government is suppose to serve people on a non-partisian basis. We are suppose to weigh the issues of the day and make decisions that consider the wishes of our entire Borough. I do that. Considering the proven history of the other candidate, I am surprised by this negativity.”

Further south in Juneau, the Alaska Democrats are backing Democrat Rob Edwardson, who is Rep. Justin Parish’s legislative aide, in the City and Borough of Juneau Assembly race. Edwardson is running against Debbie White, the incumbent.

If Parish is a “D,” then Edwardson is a Big Government Democrat. His position on government is:

“As the State Capital, Juneau is a government town and needs to retain government jobs. I have been fortunate to be able to work on that subject during my career. These necessary government jobs fuel the economy of Juneau alongside private sector jobs. Government workers are homeowners, customers, travelers, and their children attend Juneau’s schools,” Edwardson wrote on his Facebook page.

In both cases, the Democrats call their chosen candidates “progressives,” rather than “Democrats” as the pattern of Democrats running away from their party identification continues.  They know if is difficult to get elected as a Democrat, given how far left Alaska’s Democrats have drifted over the years.

The trend started with Rep. Daniel Ortiz of Ketchikan, Gov. Bill Walker, and Rep. Jason Grenn of Anchorage. All “independent” candidates who came into office with the robust support of the Alaska Democratic Party.

The political parties have long been involved in local elections, but they usually do it quietly, with get-out-the-vote efforts. The Alaska Democrats have made it clear that these days there is nothing nonpartisan about local races and they are going to spend money on mailers and social media boosts in these elections.

The Alaska Democratic Party is registered with Alaska Public Offices Commission to participate in municipal races throughout the state. It’s part of a greater strategy to put Democrats in place at the local level, and train up the best of them to run for state office.

Local assembly, school board, and mayoral races take place around Alaska on Oct. 3, with the exception of Anchorage, which holds its municipal election in April.