Thursday, August 28, 2025
Home Blog Page 1597

Report appears to exonerate Sen. Wilson

5

READ THE REPORT HERE

A report completed by the Legislative Affairs Agency in November backs up what Sen. David Wilson has been saying for months: The dispute between him and a legislative aide working for House Speaker Bryce Edgmon did not amount to sexual harassment or even a hostile work environment.

That report was released by the Senate Rules Committee today.

“In conclusion, this event did not fit the definition of hostile work environment sexual harassment. Senator Wilson’s conduct did not violate the Legislative Council Policy on Sexual and Other Workplace Harassment.”

“While my investigation did not find a violation of the Legislative Council Policy on Sexual and Other Workplace Harassment, this was nevertheless an uncomfortable situation, and one that was made more uncomfortable for HSE because of the unequal status, in the legislative workplace, of legislative staff and legislators.”

The dispute in question arose in June when the staffer asked Sen. Wilson to leave the hallway in front of the Speaker’s Chambers. He challenged her authority to order him from the area. The media became involved when KTVA reporter Liz Raines stated that Wilson put a cell phone between the staffer’s legs, an account that he disputes.

In fact, the report states the cell phone was never closer than one to two feet from the aide, something that Wilson has asserted for weeks.

Wilson was quickly accused by Speaker Edgmon and Rules Chair Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux of sexual harassment, but neither has retracted their statements.

Senate Leadership issued the following statement:

“The Alaska State Senate will responsibly and transparently investigate all issues that potentially compromise a safe and respectful workplace. The Senate takes very seriously the protection of all legislative employees.

“Further, Senate Leadership has heard House Speaker Bryce Edgmon’s concerns of potential retaliatory actions in this matter. We also take allegations of retaliation very seriously, and are in the process of investigating to determine if additional action is necessary.”

The Senate Leadership is referring to a press release from Rep. Edgmon, which accused Wilson of castigating people who came forward. He felt the press conference held by Wilson last week violated the harassment policy.

“Senator Wilson crossed the line of appropriate behavior by using a press conference to chastise individuals who came forward as witnesses to an alleged incident of harassment. I believe this is a violation of the legislature’s harassment policy and warrants a serious investigation by the Senate,” Speaker Edgmon said on Dec. 7.

“I’m happy the report came and I’m requesting the video be released as well to show clear and convincing evidence,” Wilson said. “I disagree with some of the statements, but I’ll leave it be for right now.”

Alaskan joins Trump administration in FEMA role

1

Joining the Trump Administration in a capacity that directly impacts Alaska is Mike O’Hare, who has been employed by the State of Alaska since 1996, most recently as the director of the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management.

O’Hare yesterday was named Administrator for Region 10, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He will oversee disaster preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation across four states: Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho.

Other Alaskans tapped to join the Trump Administration include Joe Balash, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Interior; Drue Pearce, Deputy Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, part of the U.S. Department of Transportation; Tara Sweeney, head of the Bureau of Indian Affairs; and Chris Hladick, who heads up Region 10 for the Environmental Protection Agency.

 

Devon out, Hanson in for Senate Dems press secretary

Jeanne Devon has given notice that after two years she’s leaving as the Alaska Senate Democratic Minority press secretary. Long-time legislative aide Noah Hanson, a confidante of Sen. Berta Gardner, will be taking her place.

A press release from the Democrats said Devon will return to “new opportunities in her writing career.”

Devon, whose actual name is Jeanne Chilton, is the founder of The Mudflats, a liberal opinion blog that was anonymously written for years, and which has been maintained by Anchorage Daily News columnist and Devon friend Shannyn Moore for the past two years, while Devon worked for Senate Democrats.

Devon is also the coauthor of the memoir “Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin,” by Frank Bailey. She also co-wrote Blood of Patriots, with Bill Fulton.

“It has been a joy to work with Jeanne for the past two years,” said Sen. Gardner. “She has brought a unique and valuable political perspective and message that have supported our caucus well. We are very sad to see her leave, but wish her all the best in her new endeavors.”

Hanson will be transitioning into the new job in January. Hanson has been Sen. Gardner’s Chief of Staff for 10 years, and caucus staff for the past three.

“I have appreciated Noah and his dedication for the past ten years,” said Sen. Gardner. “He has been an integral part of my team, our caucus, and its messaging. He will continue to do an excellent job with that in his new role.”

The press secretary before Devon was Frank Ameduri, who lasted six months and dropped a blistering letter onto the Democrats upon his departure, accusing them of mealy-mouthed complacency and cowardice. Ameduri said the job was more suited for an entry-level employee.

The Alaska Senate Democratic Caucus consists of Senators Berta Gardner (D-Anchorage), Bill Wielechowski (D-Anchorage), Donny Olson (D-Golovin), Dennis Egan (D-Juneau) and Tom Begich (D-Anchorage).

In other opinion-writer news, Dermot Cole has launched his own opinion blog, dermotcole.com, where he wasted no time criticizing Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan for helping the cruise ship industry avoid higher taxes.

Sullivan-Leonard: ‘Independent investigator needed’

1

Rep. Colleen Sullivan-Leonard of Wasilla is asking for a formal and independent investigation of all harassment claims in the Legislature. In a letter to Rep. Sam Kito III, the Juneau-based Democratic chair of the Legislative Council, Sullivan-Leonard says it’s evident the House Majority is not capable of taking appropriate action:

“It has become clear that the Alaska House Majority Coalition and its Leaders have ignored or not properly processed sexual harassment reports to bring protection and ultimate relief to the victim,” she said in a statement. “Although we may be encouraged to have Legislative Council look at updating policies and procedures now, this provides very little relief for those that filed claims of harassment prior to this. No more hiding behind poor policy or processes that have not provided swift and thorough relief for the victim. Those in authority should be held accountable for their lack of action to protect those that have been harassed and not felt safe or protected in the workplace. It’s time for an external investigation.

“Therefore, I ask for a formal, independent investigation by an external legal firm with personnel expertise to look at complaints from January 1, 2017 to December 11, 2017 to see if proper protocol was followed and for those that ignored it, to be held accountable. I ask for Legislative Council to take immediate action on this matter.

“This approach takes away the stigma from employees who may believe that they will not get a fair and impartial review from those in political power who report to HR and HR in turn reports back to the person in political power. It is an unfair position for the employee and legislator to be in,” Sullivan-Leonard wrote.

HOUSE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY TAKES ACTION — REMOVES WESTLAKE FROM GROUP PHOTO

House Democrats told Westlake to hit the road. They quickly changed their Facebook cover photo to a pic that excludes him. Westlake told KTVA he will hold a press conference on Monday.

One of the allegations against Westlake involves a dirty note about an aide that he wrote last spring and passed to another legislator. That legislator is pictured above.

Dean Westlake

Casey Steinau, the chair of the Alaska Democratic Party, said Rep. Dean Westlake must quit, (ignoring the even-worse harassment record of her own Alaska Democratic Party Executive Director, Jay Parmley.)

Senate Democrats were not to be outdone. They issued a statement applauding the House Democrats’ decisive leadership, while ignoring the sexual impropriety record of one of their own members with various aides over the years.

The Senate Democrats also used the opportunity double down on Sen. David Wilson, a Republican and the only African-American in the Senate (or House):

“Senate leadership should follow in the courageous footsteps of the House, and hold its members accountable. It was with terrible disappointment that we watched yesterday as Senator Wilson blamed everyone but himself for his actions, equivocated, evaded, and called the multiple eyewitnesses to his latest incident of harassment liars, including a respected journalist and the victim herself.”

Except for one thing: There is no victim. No report has been filed in the incident referred to by the Senate Democrats. 

Speaker Bryce Edgmon did not file a report about the dispute between his legislative aide and Sen. David Wilson, which happened in June when Edgmon’s aide decided to tell Sen. Wilson to vacate a public hallway, and he had the nerve to talk back to her.

With the negligence of Majority Leader Rep. Chris Tuck and Speaker Bryce Edgmon, how can any staff member feel safe in the halls of the Capitol?

Meanwhile, House Minority Leader Charisse Millett has called for policy and due process for Westlake or whomever else is accused of impropriety. Millett says everyone is entitled to be heard — victims but also the accused. She is not satisfied that the process adequately protects victims and she may suggest remedies.

The Republican Party of Alaska has not asked for Westlake’s resignation, but for due process.

“The real problem is that a woman complained in March, and the Democratic leadership has done nothing about it. It’s inexcusable. How many other people have suffered because nothing was done?” said Tuckerman Babcock, chairman of the Alaska Republican Party.

The quest for more taxes, bigger government

9

HAVEN’T WE CUT ENOUGH? ISN’T IT TIME TO PONY UP TAXES?

BY SEN. SHELLEY HUGHES
GUEST CONTRIBUTOR

Calling on all Alaskans! If you don’t read anything else political between now and the next legislative session in January, please bear through the numbers and read this piece. You will be shocked, but you also will be well-equipped to answer the questions above.

What does it all mean? If we’ve really cut 44 percent (we haven’t), then we must be down to bare bones (no, we aren’t).

Consider this: Although our state has unique challenges, it is larger than the state of Idaho, has fewer local governments chipping in, and yet our per capita spending is four times that of Idaho. You read that right: four times.

The truth is, we can still make reductions without sacrificing excellent, essential services and in doing so, avoid asking Alaskans to pull hard-earned dollars from their wallets to pay for inefficiencies and nice, but unnecessary programs.

So back to that 44 percent. 

The governor has touted that 44 percent has been cut, but you should know that this claim doesn’t at all tell the true story. It just refers to one category of funding (unrestricted general funds or UGF), doesn’t account for increases in other funding categories, includes capital dollars (that were extremely generous a few years ago) and also includes a one-time $3 billion payment into the retirement system.

Obviously, the 44 percent claim is very misleading.

What most of us care about is the year-after-year operating budget – the total annual cost of the daily operations of all the departments. Perhaps you’ve heard another claim of the governor: that “total state spending on the operating budget has been cut $1.9 billion since fiscal year 2015 – a 27 percent decrease in three years.”  Let’s look at this closely. Twenty-seven percent sure sounds like a lot.

What makes up that $1.9 billion in cuts, that 27 percent? Operational dollars to programs and to the departments? Hardly.

According to Legislative Finance, $582 million out of the $1.9 billion is due to the reduction to Alaskans’ PFD checks last year.

$508.6 million is due to the reduction in what we’re paying to small companies, the little guys, for oil tax credits owed to them by the state.

Those two items totaling about $1.1 billion were not hardcore reductions to programs and departments, but were actually cutbacks to Alaskans and to small businesses. Not a penny of the $1.1 billion required any belt-tightening in state offices or to state services.

So what makes up the difference between the $1.1 and the $1.9 billion? On the surface, it sounds like a solid $790.6 million decrease in spending for agency operations over three years. Is there a catch? I’m afraid there is.

The truth is that this $790.6 million less in UGF spending is offset by an increase of $450.6 million in spending in other funding categories (federal, designated and other) in the operating budget.

So the real decrease in agency operations spending over those three years? $340 million. Let that sink in. Not $1.9 billion. $340 million.

This equates to less than a three percent reduction* in the overall state budget over three years. Not 44 percent, not 27 percent — just 3 percent.

Now let that sink in too. Less than three percent over three years.

We need honesty and transparency, not spin, when we talk about the budget.

Here’s some straight talk: Politicians who lead the public to think programs and departments have been cut to bare bones are simply trying to convince you that we can’t cut anymore, that it’s time to tax you,  time also to take half your PFD this year and a greater share of it in the future. Please know that I’m not one of them.

I’ll be #telling_it_like_it_is every chance I get for your benefit.

*The $340 million is a 2.9 percent reduction to the total state budget (operating and capital). It is 3.4 percent reduction to the operating budget.

* * *

Senator Shelley Hughes, District F represents Chugiak, Peters Creek, Eklutna, Fairview Loop, Butte, Lazy Mountain, Gateway and Palmer.

Juneau football is textbook case of how population matters

5

DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES HAVE CONSEQUENCES

By WIN GRUENING
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

Recent dissension over sports programs in our two high schools is dominating social media websites.

The issues involved dovetail with the release of a report by Rain Coast Data (RCD), a Juneau-based research firm specializing in Southeast Alaska economic analysis. In that report, RCD owner and director, Meilani Schijvens, detailed recent trends in our local and regional economy.

According to Schijvens, jobs, earnings and population all declined in Southeast Alaska in 2016 and Juneau’s population has decreased by nearly 400 people since 2014.

Perhaps most concerning is the decline in state government jobs. From 2014 to 2017, Alaska lost 720 government jobs, a decrease of 14 percent with three-quarters of those jobs exiting Juneau.

With declining oil revenues and further state economic contraction, we can expect continued downward pressure on municipal finances. As our population, municipal revenues and economy decline disproportionately to our spending, painful choices seem inevitable.

Indeed, we needn’t look back very far to see what happens when we don’t pay attention to demographics.

The construction of Juneau’s new high school in the Mendenhall Valley in 2008 is a classic example.

In 2004 when a second high school was being discussed, questions about enrollment and capacity at Juneau-Douglas High School (JDHS) drove the debate. Underlying that debate was uncertainty surrounding Juneau’s future population.

Proponents of a new high school maintained JDHS was overcrowded at 1,578 students. They relied on projections showing Juneau’s future population growing despite consistent decreases in population growth and birthrate over the previous twenty years.

Opponents of building a new school cited a study projecting an eventual decline in total high school students. It concluded a “bubble” in the school population would pass through JDHS and enrollment would ultimately drop off.

That the demographic trend was clearly headed downward and that new school boosters didn’t separately examine the school age population should have given everyone pause.

The public vote in May 2004 was close but voters rejected construction of a new high school. Newspaper accounts then attributed the vote to objections focused on the school’s design, overall cost, added operational expenses (including support for duplicate sports programs) and diluted academic offerings at two separate schools.

After voting down the $62 million in bonds for a 1,080-student school, five months later in October 2004 Juneau voters approved $54 million in bonds to build a reduced-sized high school with a capacity of 840 students.

Three years later, an additional $17 million was authorized to complete the auditorium and provide turf fields and additional equipment. Concerns about costs of maintaining two high schools with duplicate sports programs were apparently forgotten as was the final $71 million price tag.

FAST FORWARD

Under-utilization of the two schools and the proliferation of so many different sports programs has created controversy as families became burdened with extremely high activity fees charged for sports team participation.

Today, combined enrollment at both high schools is slightly over 1,300 – 15% less than it was in 2004. Due to lower enrollments, state funding for our schools has declined. Yet, both schools offer numerous varsity sports including very expensive football programs which reportedly are having difficulty even attracting enough players.

Discussion about merging both schools or some of their various academic and sports programs began several years ago. Much like the controversy about building a new school in 2004, emotions run high and confusion surrounds the claims and counterclaims made by the parties involved.

Most recently, the school district decided to merge the two high school football teams and their associated cheer teams. Not surprisingly, “merging” team names, mascots and identities has created an uproar.

Much of this could have been avoided. If school officials and city leaders hadn’t selectively ignored the demographic data available in 2004, it’s doubtful we would have built the second high school.

And, unfortunately, a concerted effort to produce the jobs and economic development required to stabilize Juneau’s population hasn’t happened.

Today, we face a similar choice in the proposed $26 million downtown Juneau Arts and Culture Center. Where will the increased number of patrons needed to support a facility of this size come from if our population is shrinking?

A road connecting Juneau to Haines, Skagway, and Whitehorse would be a prudent start. A strategic plan to increase jobs in mining and tourism certainly would help. But predictably, vocal opposition to most proposed economic expansion continues.

Until we recognize that serious economic development is healthy for our community, our shrinking population will be saddled with paying for under-utilized, inadequately funded community facilities. We will also likely see reduced city services and/or increased local taxes.

Paying attention to demographics would have prevented the strife we are experiencing today and it will help us avoid it in the future.

When will we learn?

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Who has filed lately? New crop of conservative candidates

2

LEKANOF FOR HOUSE DISTRICT 18, MIDTOWN ANCHORAGE: Last weekend, Anthony Collin Lekanof filed to run against battle-hardened Rep. Harriet Drummond in District 18, a very liberal district. Drummond is a fierce campaigner, but Lekanof, a young Republican, has youth and diversity on his side. He’s 20 years old.

He also has a life story that won’t quit. In 2016, he received AFN’s Roger Lang Youth Leadership Award.

According to his bio, Lekanof was born in Anchorage and raised in St. George Island. His parents are Phillip and Desiree’ Lekanof and his grandparents are Stefanida Lekanof and Anthony “Bone” Lekanof.

He attended Mt. Edgecumbe High School and Embry Riddle Aeronautical University.

Lekanof was an intern for Sen. Lisa Murkowski, and has served on the Board of the Alaska Association of Student Governments as a Region V Representative. He is a director of the St. George Tanaq Corporation.


AARON WEAVER, HOUSE DISTRICT 15, EAST ANCHORAGE: Aaron Weaver has filed against Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux, who has been shown the door by Alaska Republicans. He was a news photographer/videographer but left his job to run for House. He is a Republican.


Stephen DuPlantis

STEPHEN DUPLANTIS, HOUSE DISTRICT 24, SOUTH ANCHORAGE: This is a primary contest for Rep. Chuck Kopp, who is midstream in his first term in office for South Anchorage. Duplantis is a Republican. The challenge appears to be in response to crime and SB 91 and SB 54, both crime bills. DuPlantis is an outreach pastor at Anchorage First Assembly church. Earlier, he filed for Assembly, but withdrew.


Jerry Nankervis

JERRY NANKERVIS, HOUSE DISTRICT 34, JUNEAU: Challenging Democrat Justin Parish is Jerry Nankervis, a long-time public servant who is on the Assembly and was a police officer for 24 years. He has a degree in conservation and is past president of Juneau Police Department Employee Association, Alaska Police Officers Association Capital City Chapter, past board member, C.I.S.M. team Juneau, and past board member, Juneau Douglas Ice Association. He’s a hockey coach, too. Nankervis, a moderate, switched from unaffiliated to Republican in October.


Marcus Sanders

MARCUS SANDERS, HOUSE DISTRICT 17, ANCHORAGE: Sanders ran for Anchorage Assembly in 2017, coming in third to union-funded Felix Rivera and former Assembly member Don Smith. Born in Anchorage, he attended East High School and is an associate pastor at the Greater Friendship Baptist Church, Sanders has served on the Fairview Community Council Executive Board, Shiloh Community Housing Executive Board, Rogers Park Community Council, Anchorage Community Police Relations Task Force, and as chapain for the Anchorage Police and Fire Departments and Department of Corrections. Sanders is challenging Rep. Andy Josephson.


ANDY MURR, HOUSE DISTRICT 8, BIG LAKE: Filing against incumbent Republican Rep. Marc Neuman is retired math teacher, coach and principal Andy Murr, a Republican.

10 questions for Alaska Gasline Development Corporation

5

Alaska Gasline Development Corporation President Keith Meyer updated the House Natural Resources Committee last week on the status of the gasline project, which is in a new incarnation under Gov. Bill Walker: It has gone from a private sector project to a state-owned one, and is now proposed to be a Chinese-led project that will send 75 percent of the gas to China, and the rest to other countries in Asia.

Must Read Alaska asked questions before that meeting, and some of those were answered by Meyers’ presentation. Others were not, especially involving who takes the risk on the state-owned project.

But the presentation raised new questions:

  1. How much can AGDC promise the Legislature it will actually generate for the State to spend on actual State services once gas is flowing? Is it $250 million?
  2. If the gasline is going to make “payments in lieu of taxes” (PILT) to local communities — worth $450 million or so, as Meyer indicated — how does that work, since the State is not a taxpaying entity? It has nothing to pay in lieu of, does it?
  3. Why would the State make PILT payments on a gasline asset but not some other state-owned asset, such as the State Office Building?
  4. How much of the expected revenue will go into the cost of operations? Is it $1.1 billion?
  5. Will the employees operating it be state employees? Managed by executives from China?
  6. If the Chinese are going to finance 75 percent of the $43 billion project, how is the State going to come up with the $10 billion or so that it will need?
  7. Which entity is bearing the risk for cost overruns or catastrophes?
  8. Meyers said there would be numerous agreements that would need to be completed by May and December. What is the list of agreements that need to be done by May? By December? Who are the lead staff members, and who are their team members?
  9. Why do these negotiations have to be secret, when governor said three  years ago that all AK-LNG documents had to be made public? These will be the similar documents, just different owners.
  10. If the governor isn’t planning on using the Permanent Fund to pay for the State’s share, where will the State’s investment come from?

Gov. Bill Walker is planning on a 2024 start date for shipping gas. Here are 10 points relating to the status today:

  1. No investors.
  2. No funding.
  3. Nothing beyond conceptual designs.
  4. No significant permits.
  5. No export license.
  6. No right of way through federal, private or Native land.
  7. State does not own land where LNG terminal would go.
  8. Project has not procured any steel, or entered into a queue for facilities or pipe fabrication.
  9. Project does not have an engineering or construction firm for the gas treatment plant at Prudhoe Bay, the pipeline itself, compressor stations, LNG plant or any other component.
  10. AGDC does not have significant competent staff with project management experience on a similar project.

Earlier this year, the governor’s anchor tenant, REI of Japan, left the project without comment.

Gasline anchor tenant signs ‘Dear John’ letter to Walker

From Rogoff to riches: A tale of bankruptcy and divorce

2

IS ALICE ROGOFF NOW THE WEALTHIEST PERSON IN ALASKA?

Timing is everything. Two events happened this week in the life and times of Alice Rogoff, the once-publisher of the former Alaska Dispatch News.

They relate.

Rogoff and David Rubenstein are divorced. That became official on Friday.

Meanwhile, in bankruptcy court in Anchorage, lawyers filed arguments about whether Rogoff’s personal finances should be examined.

The Trustee appointed by the court wants to see if Rogoff was running the Dispatch out of her own personal bank accounts, mixing business and personal finances to the extent that her personal checkbook should be included when a settlement is reached with all of the Dispatch’s hundreds of creditors to whom she owes millions of dollars.

Among those creditors is her former business partner Tony Hopfinger, who says she has stiffed him for at least $900,000. That case is pending, but others, such as Northrim Bank and even her former employees, are  hoping they get made whole before that goes to trial in March.

Rogoff claims she, too, is a creditor of the Dispatch. And she wants to be paid first.

But the settlement in her divorce from Rubenstein is a new twist. With his net worth estimated to be about $2.8 billion, it could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. No one knows, and she likes it that way.

Creditors are likely to fight hard to find out. Rogoff has added more lawyers to her team to prevent that.

Since 1983, Rogoff had been married to Rubenstein, the billionaire hedge fund founder of the Carlyle Group who is also a flashy philanthropist and one of the world’s richest men.

The couple has been apart for over a decade, and the divorce was granted in Montgomery County, Maryland, where the couple had a lovely 9,600-square-foot home valued at $3.42 million, with a guesthouse next to it.

The financial terms of the divorce are private, according to the lawyers of the divorcing parties.

The Washington Post printed a joint statement from the once-feted Washington power couple: “Alice and David Rubenstein have decided to formalize a divorce following a lengthy separation. The parties continue in support of one another and their respective endeavors. They are and continue to be devoted parents and their love and respect for their family is most important to each of them. They wish each other nothing but the best.”

REWIND

Rogoff came to Alaska in 2002 and became an influential person almost immediately, a champion for the arts, Native culture, progressive causes, and enjoyed celebrity status as the darling of the liberal elite.

Alaska is a state where a person like her, with money, connections, and panache, can make a big splash. Others have seen the same opportunity in Alaska, and some have succeeded, while others crashed spectacularly as a result of their own hubris.

Rogoff opened The Alaska House in Manhattan, and an art gallery in downtown Anchorage. The Alaska House closed, unable to pay its bills without getting $600,000 in state money that she requested from the Legislature. The Anchorage art gallery also folded after the Parnell Administration cut the spigot of state money.

The shell foundation she created to launch the Anchorage gallery gave the remaining art to the Sealaska Heritage Foundation, but no paper trail has ever been produced for the transfer. It was another State boondoggle, although a small one compared to the Delta Barley Project, for example.

Rogoff purchased majority ownership in the Alaska Dispatch News and eventually the Anchorage Daily News and combined the two, and became a part of Gov. Bill Walker’s inner circle, using her influence through the  Dispatch to ensure his election in 2014.

She became a member of his “kitchen cabinet,” a business roundtable group he convened regularly. As one of that group of business leaders, she encouraged the governor to leverage the Permanent Fund by using it to borrow money in order to pay state bills. She editorialized on April 11, 2015 about using this method of funding state government:

“Borrowing against that wealth at favorable terms, we could sustain a reasonable economy with quality state services in education, public safety and sound development. In short, there’s no reason to suffer. We are still wealthy. We just need to leverage our wealth,” she wrote.

“There’s nothing radical about this. Think of it as the home-mortgage concept many of us use in our personal lives.

“We get 30-year mortgages for our homes and repay them slowly, building up equity over many years. That way, we can use the rest of our income to achieve what we think is most important — investing in our children and our own futures. We take out student loans that we repay when we have steady employment. Car loans and credit cards allow us make purchases that we finance over time. For most of us, well-managed debt is a handy tool to improve our circumstances. It frees us from being held back in our lives by providing us “cash flow” when we need it.”

Rogoff was advising the governor she ushered into office to borrow against the Permanent Fund. Borrowing is what she was doing to finance her lifestyle and newspaper ambitions.

In August of 2015, she hosted President Barack Obama at her Anchorage home. In 2016, she crashed her airplane into Halibut Cove while on the way to visit former Sen. Clem Tillion and attend the wedding of former Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell.  Pilots said it was a miracle she was able to swim away from the crash.

In the summer of 2017, Rogoff filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sold her newspaper to the Binkley Company, and later this year saw her remaining entity, the defunct limited liability company, go into Chapter 7, which is when the court decides there is no way to repair the finances of the bankrupt entity.

LATEST IN BANKRUPTCY

Earlier this month, Rogoff’s lawyers objected to a section  “2004” bankruptcy hearing in which her personal finances would be examined. Rogoff’s lawyers wrote they fear it would lead to her being personally liable for her debts.

But the lawyer for the Bankruptcy Trustee responded to the court on Dec. 5: “That concern does not form the basis of a legitimate objection to the Trustee’s request, actually obligation, to examine the Debtor nor does it provide any basis to limit the scope of the examination.”

The next bankruptcy hearing for Rogoff will be Dec. 15, when the judge will decide whether her personal finances — now possibly with million of more dollars at stake — can be examined.