Sunday, December 28, 2025
Home Blog Page 1436

Dunleavy is making the hard decisions

LET’S TRY THE DUNLEAVY APPROACH: SPEND WHAT WE HAVE MORE EFFICIENTLY

By ANN BROWN
GUEST CONTRIBUTOR

Although it is not unusual for political adversaries to call each other “Chicken Little,” Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s opponents calling his budget “a manufactured crisis” should be forced to eat crow. After all, let’s not forget that former Gov. Bill Walker referred to the state deficit as “the gravest fiscal crisis in history.”

Gov. Dunleavy is not shying away from making hard, unpopular decisions, which require sacrifices from all Alaskans. Correspondingly, he is being criticized as “anti-worker and anti-Alaskan,” and his budget as “a disaster for Alaska.”

But is that fair criticism? I do not think it is.

Gov. Walker was praised for taking a “holistic approach” to budgeting, mainly through the capping of Permanent Fund dividend payments, the institution of new taxes and accepting the Democrats’ $200 million increase to government spending in fiscal 2019.

By contrast, Gov. Dunleavy’s proposed budget attempts serious reforms to government spending. What he calls “honest budgeting” is largely based on the simple concept of spending within our means.

If Gov. Walker’s fiscal crisis was so bad that he felt entitled to 1.5% of Alaskans’ overall income, it stands to reason that the shortfall might equally require some cuts. And, sadly for the past administration’s acolytes, such an income tax would not fill the gap.

Here’s a fact opponents of Gov. Dunleavy’s budget perhaps do not want highlighted: Alaska is ranked second out of all 50 states in the highest welfare spending per capita (New York is No. 1). That’s more than progressive California, poor Mississippi and high-taxing Massachusetts.

Here’s another fact: Alaska is ranked dead last among all 50 states in fourth-grade literacy. Alaska, however, was ranked squarely among the top five states nationally for the highest amount spent on education per student. Some argue that “pooling” health benefits among the school districts would help solve the ridiculous cost of education, but that is a term that means “government-run health care” to those who can understand progressive-speak. Further, as reported by KTOO, none of the schools mentioned said they planned to spend a proposed $20 million in cuts on employee health care benefits.

How about a third fact: The University of Alaska Anchorage frantically pushes current students to call legislators to protect its funding. Yet it lost accreditation for its School of Education because it couldn’t be bothered to fix its data correction practices. This was despite multiple warnings over the two-year accreditation period. This leads to the question: What does the university do with its funds if it can’t even respond to those evaluating its accreditation?

While the elite class quakes at the possibility of losing control over its inefficient fiefdoms, perhaps we can all take a step back and review the findings: Overspending as much as the State has does not seem to be reducing economic dependency or improving educational achievements.

Rather than continuing to waste funds, let’s allow Gov. Dunleavy to try it his way. The governor wants to spend what money we have more efficiently, while accounting for assured cost increases in the future. If we do not get our spending under control, the government will forever be turning to the pocketbooks of Alaskans, hand out expectantly.

Gov. Dunleavy’s budget eliminates duplicative programs, prevents additional savings from being frittered away, limits public servant salaries, reduces government-approved travel and accounts for the projected increase in spending due to inflation.

If his opponents were honest with Alaskans (or even with themselves), they’d know that his approach is warranted.

Ann Brown is the vice president of the Alaska Policy Forum. She is a retired attorney in Anchorage, where she moved after living 30 years in Fairbanks.

MRAK Almanac: Last chance for Denali Road Lottery

The MRAK Almanac is your place for political, cultural, and civic events, events where you’ll meet political leaders or, if you are interested in getting to know your state, these are great places to meet conservative- and moderate-leaning Alaskans.

May 29 is the 149th day of 2019. Here is a sampling of day-length data from across the state:

Juneau will receive 17 hours, 38 minutes of official daylight.

Anchorage will receive 18 hours, 32 minutes.

Fairbanks clocks in with 20 hours, 16 minutes.

In Utqiagvik, the sun will shine all day.

Mt. Denali Update: According to the National Park Service as of May 27, a total of nine summits of Denali have been completed this season. Out of the 112 completed climbs, this makes a “summit percentage” of about eight percent– pretty steep. As of Monday night, the weather on the mountain was “nicer than it had been, but still not flyable”. Detailed report here.

May 1-31: The month of May is the application period for the road lottery in Denali National Park. Winners of the lottery (notified in mid-June) are granted special permission to drive the entire park road (92 miles total) during a four-day window in September. Application fee is $15, and your chances of getting it are around 1 in 7. Link to apply here.

May 29: House Finance takes up HB 1005, the Permanent Fund dividend bill, at 10 am. This meeting was also scheduled for Monday but delayed to the call of the chair.

May 29: Fairbanks Paddlers’ Association annual Chena River Cleanup. Bring your canoe or kayak and help clean up the banks of the Golden Heart City’s beloved waterway. Details here.

May 29: Farewell Mass for Anchorage Archbishop Etienne, who was tapped by Pope Francis to serve as the new coadjutor archbishop of Seattle. The farewell ceremony will take place at Our Lady of Guadalupe Church in Anchorage. Details here.

May 29: Alaska Criminal Justice Commission’s Behavioral Health Standing Committee will meet in Anchorage at 9 am. Open to the public, more info here.

May 29: Alaska Marine Policy Forum conference call. Listen in for updates on marine policy in Alaskan waters. Call-in logistics here.

May 29-31: Alaska Board of Public Accountancy quarterly board meeting in Anchorage. Public is welcome to attend. Agenda and location here.

May 30: Alaska Oil & Gas Association (AOGA) will hold its annual conference. Gov. Mike Dunleavy, as well as leaders of Alaska’s oil and gas industry will be speaking. Details here.

May 30: Fairbanks Housing & Homeless Coalition meeting from noon to 1 pm in the City Council Chambers.

May 29-30: Alaska Housing Finance Corporation offers a free course for prospective homebuyers in the Mat-Su. 6-9 pm Wednesday and Thursday at the MTA Building – Large conference room.

May 30: The City of Seward will be holding a bid sale of properties on First Avenue. Minimum bid of $17,500 per lot is required. Details here.

May 30: Fairbanks North Star Borough Know Your Property seminar. This free master class will enlist industry professionals to teach you how to take advantage of available information about your property and be a more informed homeowner.

May 30: UAF Arctic Research Building open house. Hear first-hand from scientists working on climate science, arctic food production, and cold-weather living. Details here.  

May 31: Pacific Island Festival at Cuddy Family Park in Anchorage. Come to celebrate pacific island history and culture, and enjoy some great food and art from local vendors. Runs from noon to 9 pm.

ALASKA HISTORY ARCHIVE:

May 29, 1939: Eighty years ago today Mount Veniaminof erupted in a fury of ash and flames. A passing U.S. Coast Guard Cutter reported an ash cloud of over 20,000 feet, with flames reaching nearly 1,500 feet above the stratovolcano’s summit. More Alaska volcano history at this link.

May 30, 1778: The exploration vessels lead by Captain James Cook discovered Cook Inlet’s Turnagain Arm. According to lore, Captain Cook gave the stretch of water its name when he and his men were forced to “turn again” after realizing that they hadn’t yet found the famed Northwest Passage of their dreams.

Honoring of war dead looks different south of the Mason-Dixon Line

4

By ART CHANCE
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

I didn’t grow up honoring Memorial Day on the last Monday of May.

In the South of the 1950s and 1960s, Memorial Day was April 26 in most states; that was the day that Johnson surrendered the Army of The Tennessee to Sherman.

I remember people turning their backs to “Battle Hymn of The Republic” because we knew whose vineyards those Yankees SOBs were bragging about trampling.

I have plenty to remember about America’s wars. My fifth great-grandfather, Pleasant Crump, died in British service in the French and Indian War, leaving a widow and two young sons from whence cometh I.

My ancestral lands in Georgia came from a Captain John Durden who served with Virginia Militia troops in the Southern campaign under Greene in the Revolution. His forebears had come to Virginia in 1640 and he made his way to Georgia in the Creek Cession Lottery of 1795; I’ve never figured out whether he got land in the lottery or on headright for Revolutionary War service, but anyway; he got a good chunk of Georgia.

Family stories have my first Chance ancestors named LaChance, which simply means “luck” in French, who came as adventurers or mercenaries during The Revolution.   The odds are pretty good that they were outlaws, bastards, or both.  Despite a lot of pretentious claims, that RS is really hard to document unless your ancestor was formally enlisted in either the Continental Army or a colonial militia.

Most of the men who fought in The Revolution in The South were just common men who grabbed their gun and answered the call of local leaders, so there is little or no record of their service. My gg/grandfather John M. Chance made it through The War with the 51stGeorgia Infantry but left Georgia in the 1890s one step ahead of the sheriff, who wanted to talk to him about a man who’d been killed in a dispute over just who owned some cattle.

My grandfather suffered through winters in a wood-heated house due to lung injuries from gas in WWI and ultimately met an early death due to pneumonia.  My father was draft-exempt in WWII because of a disability but spent his war building Liberty Ships for the US.

I only know some of my family; the Durdens were old family in the South and pretty well off. The Riners, my mother’s side, were old hill country, North Carolina and South. They had a family clan community in Eastern Emanuel County, Georgia that they got in the Creek Cession Lottery.

The Rowells, Curls, and Chances I know much less about; there is little record of common rural Southerners other than memories and surviving memorabilia.   If you want to wade through Census records be prepared to work out all the different permutations of spelling your family’s names that semi-literate Census workers could come up with.

All of my lineal male ancestors served in the Provisional Army of the Confederate States, Army of Northern Virginia, some were captured, some died of disease, some died of wounds, some survived to return to shattered lives.   Ten members of the Riner clan “volunteered” for service on March 4, 1862.

On April 12, 1865, the day the ANV surrendered, three were still alive; one a paroled POW, one on “French leave” as he had heeded the family’s entreaties and come home to take care of the place after Sherman’s visit in late November 1864, and one who after the ANV’s debacle at Saylor’s Creek on April 6, 1865 decided to “study war no more” and deserted to the Yankees to get a meal.

They all lived peacefully in the South in the first half of the 19th Century. They lived the lives of subsistence farmers; they didn’t have much, but they had enough. My great-great grandfather Joseph Sherrod seemed to have done the best.  Somewhere along the way he got something of a university education, as that had meaning in those days, and became a teacher in a plantation academy.  He and my great-great-grandmother had a pretty nice farm from what I can tell, and a pretty nice life.  They’re also the only ones of my ancestry who owned slaves; they owned a family of slaves who lived with them and worked the place with them.

My great-great-grandfather Sherrod was educated and somewhat political. He was opposed to secession and went so far as to go to appeal to Georgia Gov. Joe Brown to try to get an appointment to Georgia service to avoid service in the Confederate Army. His entreaties failed and on March 4, 1862, like so many reluctant Southern men, he “volunteered” for service in the Army of the Confederate States.

Because he was an educated man, he managed to get detailed to service in Confederate hospitals for much of the war. He was in the ranks at Chancellorsville. I have a letter he wrote home. After Chancellorsville, he was detailed to a Confederate hospital in Tallahassee, Florida.

My great-grandfather, Amos Riner, my mother’s side, wasn’t so fortunate as to get a detail. He advanced with Wright’s Brigade late in the evening of the second day of Gettysburg. He took a .58 ball in his shoulder in Wright’s Brigades withdrawal from Cemetery Ridge.

Since he was walking wounded he was treated in a field hospital and got to walk back to Richmond. Sixteen days later he made it to Chimborrazzo Hospital in Richmond.  After treatment there he was given 30 days leave to recover. His wife had died, so he married a much younger woman, from whence commeth I, a generation closer to most descendants of Confederate veterans.

My great-great-grandfather remained on his administrative detail until the spring of 1864.  By this time the Confederacy was robbing both the cradle and the grave for men.  I have many of Joseph’s letters home and he clearly doesn’t want to return to the ranks, wants to purchase a substitute, the going price of which was around $10,000, and he apparently has the money. It is equally clear that my gg/grandmother is having none of her husband lying abed while others are still fighting, though I don’t have her letters to him.

He returned to the ranks with the 48th Georgia for the Overland Campaign of 1864. He made it through The Wilderness, Spotsylvania, Cold Harbor, and the battles around the Petersburg perimeter.  His luck ran out in Mahone’s counterattack at the Battle of The Crater. He was probably killed by friendly artillery fire. His grave isn’t marked but he probably lies in the mass grave of thought-to-be Georgia soldiers buried in the mass grave at Blandfield Church at Petersburg, Virginia.

I have a copy of his lieutenant’s letter to my great-great grandmother informing her of his death.  It is remarkably cold and impersonal, but by that time there had been a lot of dying.  I have many of his letters to my gg/grandmother, which were always closed with, “Kiss my children.”   I also have the blood-stained Testament that was in his breast pocket when he was killed.

By January of 1868, my great-great-grandmother and her children were on the “Indigent Soldier’s Widows and Orphans Relief List” for the county.   The county courthouse has conveniently burned a couple of times in the ensuing 150 years so I’ve never been able to figure out just how she lost the place when her late husband’s lawyer brother was the executor of the estate.   The South was a cruel place after The War.

I don’t know how we work this out; there are Yankees who think that Confederate soldiers are traitors who deserve no recognition.

Some are destroying or removing monuments and even gravestones.

Others think of them as just men who were fighting for hearth and home.

My ancestors fought for hearth and home. Confederate State companies were raised from a community or county, and regiments mostly from a geographical region of a state. Every man knew or knew of almost all the men in his company and regiment. The officers below Brigade, 10 regiments, command were all elected.

In his Civil War series Ken Burns asks author Shelby Foote how Lee’s Army could have made what all the men knew to be a desperate charge on the Third Day at Gettysburg.  Foote replied, “Because it would have taken more courage not to.”

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon. 

U.S. Attorney General William Barr in Alaska this week

U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr is in Alaska this week to speak to leaders around the state regarding public safety and justice issues.

He arrived late this afternoon at Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson.

Barr will begin his speaking tour in Anchorage at the Alaska Native Justice Roundtable at Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium on Wednesday at 1:45 pm.

Barr is also expected to visit the Alaska State Crime Lab on Thursday.

Must Read Alaska has learned that Barr is expected to appear on the Fairbanks show “Problem Corner” show hosted by Dave Pruhs on KFAR 660 between 11-12 am on Friday. But his schedule has been a closely guarded secret.

Last month, Sen. Lisa Murkowski invited Barr to visit Alaska to witness the state of tribal justice on the Last Frontier. In response, Barr said he had already planned a trip to look into the problem of violence against Native women, a topic that Murkowski and Sen. Dan Sullivan have been highlighting lately.

The visit is being coordinated with Murkowski’s and Sullivan’s offices and Barr is expected to spend most of Wednesday with Sen. Sullivan. Must Read Alaska has not confirmed that Gov. Michael Dunleavy or Alaska Attorney General Kevin Clarkson will be meeting with Barr.

Dunleavy is speaking at the Alaska Oil and Gas Association annual meeting in Anchorage on Thursday, the same day Barr will also be in Anchorage.

Supreme Court rules against Arctic Man attendee who mouthed off

2

The U.S. Supreme Court said today that Russell Bartlett’s First Amendment rights were not violated and that his arrest was not a retaliatory action by Alaska State Troopers at the 2014 Arctic Man.

Arctic Man is the annual spring break snow machine, skiing/snowboarding, and drinking party in at Summit Lake in the Hoodoo Mountains. It is attended by thousands of outdoor enthusiasts and partiers, many of whom are known to be rowdy.

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the 7-2 opinion, which was agreed to in part by most members of the court, although Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas disagreed with parts of the ruling; Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion and was joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Last year, when the court heard the case, Roberts said the event was a challenge to law enforcement because it is “10,000 mostly drunk people in the middle of nowhere” and few officers are on hand.

Bartlett was arrested by Alaska State Troopers Luis Nieves and Bryce Weight after he at first ignored Sergeant Nieves and refused to talk to him. Nieves had requested that Bartlett stow the keg of beer in his RV, but Bartlett refused to acknowledge the Nieves, because it’s not illegal to have a keg sitting outside. Bartlett knew that Nieves had no cause to suspect him of criminal activity, so he ignored the request.

A little while later, Trooper Weight had been attempting to determine the age of a young person who was consuming alcohol, when Bartlett intervened and told him to stop talking to the young person. Nieves noticed the confrontation was escalating and started to arrest Bartlett, who was slow to comply with police commands. Whether he was drunk has been a point of contention.

After he was arrested, Bartlett said that Nieves said to him, “Bet you wish you would have talked to me now.” That was the evidence in the case concerning retaliation.

The State charges against Bartlett were dropped. But Bartlett sued, saying his first First Amendment rights were violated and that he was arrested in retaliation for refusing to initially speak with Nieves, who had earlier told him to put his alcohol inside of his recreational vehicle.

The District Court ruled in favor of the officers, and the Ninth Circuit Court reversed that ruling, holding that probable cause does not “defeat” a retaliatory arrest claim.

But the court did leave room for further rulings on retaliatory arrests, giving an example of a jaywalker who had been complaining about police conduct prior to being arrested or ticketed. The justices said that if the person could prove other jaywalkers were not being arrested, he or she might have a case regarding retaliatory arrest.

Bartlett had been supported by First Amendment and media organizations, including The ACLU, the National Police Accountability Project, and Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center.

Today’s ruling can be read at this link.

Don Young pays respects in Normandy

0

VISITS AMERICAN CEMETERY IN ADVANCE OF 75TH ANNIVERSARY OF D-DAY

Congressman Don Young visited the American Cemetery in Normandy, France over the Memorial Day weekend to honor American troops who died in Europe during World War II.

Accompanied by his wife Ann Young, Alaska’s congressman traveled to Normandy without making a public announcement in advance, and only posted a brief note on Facebook about his visit upon his return:

“It was an incredibly humbling experience to spend part of the Memorial Day weekend on the beaches of Normandy, and later in the day, to pay respects to the fallen at the Normandy American Cemetery. Scores of American service members were lost at Normandy during one of World War II’s darkest days, and we will forever be indebted to their sacrifice and memory.”

June 6, 2019 marks the start of the 75th anniversary of the D-Day landings and the Battle of Normandy; the date this year in locations around the country is expected to be the last large gathering of World War II D-Day veterans, all of whom are advanced in years.
President Donald Trump and other world leaders will travel next week to Normandy to mark the anniversary of the invasion that led to the freeing of France from Nazi occupation.

House, Senate agree to sue governor over forward funding of education

The House and Senate today agreed to delegate authority to the Legislative Council to proceed with a lawsuit that should determine if forward appropriating education is constitutional, when money is not actually set aside for that purpose.

In other words, is a Legislature’s promissory note for future fiscal years something that holds water in constitutional terms?

Alaska does not have a biennial budget, like some other states. It does its budget every year; the 2020 fiscal year starts July 1. The FY 2020 budget is so far, unfunded because the operating budget has not passed. But last year, the Legislature forward-appropriated funding for the FY 2020 education budget.

But the governor says that action is not legal. He has asked the Legislature to put the FY 2020 appropriation into this year’s budget. And his Attorney General has backed him up on the assertion.

What happens next? The Legislative Council will meet and direct the Legislature’s attorney Megan Wallace to file a lawsuit against the governor. The Attorney General will defend the governor’s position.

Meanwhile, the courts may decide that education must be funded while the question is decided.

The last time the Legislature sued the Office of the Governor was in 2015, when Gov. Bill Walker expanded Obamacare-Medicaid via executive order, after the Legislature had balked on such an expansion. The case was dropped by the Legislative Council after losing in Superior Court. The case cost the Legislature $300,000 and cost the Walker Administration $137,000 in legal expenses. It dragged on for months.

In that lawsuit, lawmakers framed it as a constitutional question of who had the power to appropriate — the Legislature or the governor.

In this lawsuit, Rep. Tammie Wilson, co-chair of House Finance, said it was the governor who had picked a fight: “That’s on them,” she said. “We fund our budget this way all the time.” She made it a point to criticize Dunleavy on the House floor.

But Sen. Gary Stevens sees it differently.

“This is no attempt to poke the governor in the eye,” said Sen. Stevens, co-chair of Legislative Council. “This is a separation of powers issue. We will not do anything until the governor withholds the money for education.”

House Speaker Bryce Edgmon explained that the governor has invited the question to be decided, and that since the governor does not have the ability to sue the Legislature, the Legislature must initiate the lawsuit.

“Let’s settle this issue. Does the authority of the legislature include forward funding of the Legislature?” said Senate President Cathy Giessel.

Rep. Lance Pruitt, who leads the House Republican Minority, said the consequences are monumental if the Legislature wins the case, as it will allow the body to appropriate for as many years ahead as it wishes and for as many departments as it chooses, with no funding or budget projections to back up the promise.

The governor has said numerous times he would not veto the education budget but wanted it to be actually appropriated in this year’s budget. At this stage, there is no budget for him to veto since it has not been transmitted to him, but he’s likely to veto the entire budget if it does not contain education funding.

Letter to the editor: Alaska has a spending problem

3

Editor,

I would like to thank Karl Monetti for giving me credit for the fact that Alaskans have not had to pay state income tax for the last 39 years.

That has left approximately $50 billion in the pockets of Alaskan families to spend or invest as they saw fit, a fact of which I’m very proud to have had a significant part in achieving. If the political system had kept that $50 billion, it would have been used to build an even bigger unsustainable bureaucracy and we would be in a deeper hole then we are now.

Contrary to Karl’s other so-called fact, Alaska does have and has had a major spending problem since the advent of immense surplus wealth going directly into the public treasury and being allocated politically, not subject to rational market forces.

This has left us with by far the most expensive state government per capita in the United States. The State of Alaska has a surplus of wealth of roughly $80-$90 billion, and the people are struggling to pay their bills. There is something wrong with this picture.

I do of course also disagree with another of Karl Monetti’s so-called facts: Socialism or Democratic Socialism to use a more current vernacular is bad and up until recently the vast majority of Alaskans and Americans knew that and were aware of the untold suffering those systems ultimately lead to.

The only way that the socialistic programs that exist in the United States today can survive is because of what’s left of our traditional capitalistic, free-market system which supports them. Ask yourself; what wealth does socialism produce? All socialistic programs spend money, they do not create it. Margaret Thatcher’s famous quote;” Socialism works only until you run out of other people’s money” fits our circumstances perfectly.

Another question to ask yourself: After spending incalculable billions of dollars what has the current Alaska system created that is economically sustainable once the oil money is gone? The bottom line is that capitalism/free markets create wealth, while Socialism, of all stripes, spend wealth.

Richard (Dick) Randolph

Fairbanks

 

Supreme Court upholds abortion for eugenics

6

MOM CAN END BABY’S LIFE DUE TO GENDER, RACE, DISABILITY

The U.S. Supreme Court today let stand a ruling that allows mothers in Indiana to terminate the life of a baby due to a genetic disability such as Down Syndrome, gender, or race preference.

The nondiscrimination law had been signed by then-Gov. Mike Pence, who is now the vice president.

Indiana had requested that the high court review the decision of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which had ruled against the state’s anti-discrimination abortion laws.

The Supreme Court declined to review the 7th Circuit’s decision on that portion of law, writing briefly:

“Our opinion likewise expresses no view on the merits of the second question presented, i.e., whether Indiana may prohibit the knowing provision of sex-, race-, and disability- selective abortions by abortion providers. Only the Seventh Circuit has thus far addressed this kind of law. We follow our ordinary practice of denying petitions insofar as they raise legal issues that have not been considered by additional Courts of Appeals.”

In other words, another appeals court must take up the question of eugenics — whether a mother can abort a child if it is not her desired gender or race, or if it has a genetic disability.

In the same decision, the court ruled that Indiana could enforce its law that requires aborted fetuses to be treated with dignity, and not as merely medical waste.

The Indiana law was passed after it became known that a medical waste firm was disposing of fetuses the same way it handled medical waste, via an incinerator mixed in with other medical waste. The Indiana law requires either burial or cremation of the fetus.

The case is Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Public Health vs. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky.