Tuesday, October 14, 2025
Home Blog Page 12

Suzanne Downing: Europe’s speech police seek to censor Americans too. What it means for Alaskans

14

By SUZANNE DOWNING

In August, US House Judiciary leaders went abroad to investigate firsthand how Europe regulates speech online. What they found should worry every American who values the First Amendment — especially Alaskans, who travel widely, whether for work in the resource industries, military service, or just to see family and friends.

This isn’t abstract policy talk. What Europe is doing across the Atlantic could soon dictate what you can post, read, or share on Facebook, Instagram, X, or any other major platform. Vague laws written and selectively enforced by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels and London are already pressuring American tech companies to censor political speech — not just for Europeans, but for us.

Last year, during a Judiciary Committee investigation, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg admitted something shocking: Biden administration officials leaned on Facebook to censor Americans, including jokes and satire about Covid-19. He called it “wrong,” promised not to repeat it, and rolled back some of Meta’s censorship policies, which impacted news and opinion leaders, including here at Must Read Alaska.

Thanks to Americans winning that fight, robust debate has returned to the digital town square and dissent is permitted once again.

But now, Europe is trying to drag us backward.

The European Union’s Digital Services Act and Britain’s Online Safety Act give regulators broad powers to punish platforms that don’t scrub undefined “disinformation” or “hate speech.”

In practice, that means censoring political debate. What’s worse, these governments want the rules applied globally, which means your posts in Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Wasilla could vanish because a bureaucrat in Brussels decides it offends “European values.”

Consider this: In the heat of the US 2024 election, the EU warned Elon Musk about hosting an interview with Donald Trump on X, claiming it could cause “spillovers” into Europe. This was the case of one European official openly threatening an American platform over American political speech in an American election. It was just an interview. That’s not just wrong — it’s dangerous.

And what if tech companies don’t comply? Europe threatens them with fines of up to 6–10% of their worldwide revenue. Let’s be clear: That money would come mostly from American consumers and businesses. It’s a backdoor European tax on Americans, dressed up as “safety regulation.”

Alaskans, who travel more than most Americans, may feel the chill of these laws firsthand. Whether you’re checking in with loved ones from overseas, posting a hunting photo, or weighing in on US politics while on a tour of Europe, you could suddenly find yourself muzzled by regulations you never voted for. The ripple effect doesn’t stop when you return home: If companies adjust their global content policies to appease Europe, the same restrictions will apply to your account right here in Alaska.

Europe’s own economy is stagnant. Its leaders, rather than fixing real problems like immigration and growth, have doubled down on censorship. They want to silence critics and export their broken policies to us. We cannot let that happen. This is an opportunity for our own delegation in Washington to weigh in, in order to protect our constitutional rights.

Free speech is the foundation of America. It’s why our ideas thrive and our democracy endures. The Trump Administration is right to put this fight at the top of the agenda, and Congress must keep up the pressure.

The First Amendment doesn’t stop at the water’s edge — and neither should our defense of it.

Suzanne Downing is founder and editor of Must Read Alaska.

Suzanne Downing: Arabella still pulls the strings as left-wing money machine controlling Alaska

Suzanne Downing: ‘We didn’t vote for Musk,’ the Left said. Turns out, he was never in charge

Trump signs Sullivan’s VA accountability bill into law

5

President Donald Trump this week signed into law the Protecting Regular Order (PRO) for Veterans Act, legislation authored by US Sen. Dan Sullivan, which tightens oversight and accountability at the Department of Veterans Affairs after calamitous failures of the Biden Administration..

The new law is a response to events like the historic $15 billion budget shortfall in 2024 that was followed just two months later by a multi-billion-dollar surplus.

The PRO Vets Act is not a critique of the current VA administration but will ensure that n the future, regardless of who is in charge, the VA delivers quarterly, in-person budget reports to Congress for three years, and withholds bonuses for senior VA and Office of Management and Budget leaders in the event of fiscal mismanagement.

Sullivan, a member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, said the law is designed to restore confidence in an agency that exists to serve America’s veterans.

“America’s veterans, who’ve served and sacrificed greatly for our country, deserve a Department of Veterans Affairs that is held to the highest possible standard of accountability,” Sullivan said. “The shocking budget debacle last year made clear that this agency was falling short of the standards our veterans deserve.”

Other Senate Republicans who supported the measure said the law ensures transparency and prevents VA leaders from rewarding themselves amid financial mismanagement. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) pointed to the Biden-era shortfall and subsequent bonuses as a “slap in the face” to veterans and taxpayers, while Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) said the VA should be held to the same standards as working families who must balance their own budgets.

The legislation had broad GOP backing, with cosponsors including Sens. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, Steve Daines of Montana, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, as well as Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

The timeline for the new requirements started in 2024:

Summer 2024 – Veterans Benefits Administration announced $15 billion shortfall, seeks $3 billion to cover immediate needs.

July 31, 2024 – Sullivan and Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota demanded an immediate hearing.

September 18, 2024 – Senate Veterans Affairs Committee held a hearing; Sullivan introduced the PRO Vets Act.

September 19, 2024 – Sullivan attempted to add the bill to a VA funding package; Senate Democrats blocked it.

November 18, 2024 – Sullivan and 15 colleagues demanded more VA accountability in a formal letter.

February 5, 2025 – Sullivan reintroduced the PRO Vets Act with 10 cosponsors.

April 10, 2025 – Senate passed the PRO Vets Act.

July 22, 2025 – House passed the bill.

September 2025 – Trump signed it into law.

Video: Sullivan leads Senate in honoring Korean War 75th anniversary, veterans who served in ‘Noble War’

Jamie Allard: Happy Veterans Day to the next generation

Sen. Mike Shower: Lies told about veterans by the ‘No on 2’ coven should fire up Alaskans to vote ‘Yes’

Kevin McCabe: Trail funding must remain fair and accessible

By KEVIN MCCABE

In Alaska, trails are not just for recreation. They are essential for subsistence, transportation, and keeping communities connected. Yet the Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation has quietly changed the rules for the federal Recreational Trails Program, cutting out municipalities, tribes, and nonprofits that have long built and maintained the backbone of Alaska’s trail system.

Under the new policy, eligibility for the FY26 Recreational Trails Program is restricted to projects on state park lands and their access routes. Nonprofits can apply only if they partner with state parks, while local governments and tribal entities are told to look elsewhere. The suggestion is to apply to the Land and Water Conservation Fund. But that fund is geared toward land acquisition, not trail maintenance, and has neither the scale nor the flexibility to replace the Recreational Trails Program. This shift is not about efficiency. It is about centralizing power, money, and control.

The Recreational Trails Program is federally administered by the Federal Highway Administration and funded by the gas taxes paid by off-highway users. It is based on the user-pay, user-benefit principle and requires a fair distribution of funding: 30% to motorized, 30% to non-motorized, and 40% to diversified projects. This balance has kept Alaska’s trail system strong and equitable.

The Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation’s decision threatens to upset that balance. Motorized users are the largest contributors to the fund and the biggest users of our trails, and most of that activity takes place on borough and tribal lands, not within state parks. If Recreational Trails Program money is limited to state park lands, there is a serious risk that the federally mandated motorized allocation will go unspent or be misdirected. That is not only unfair to users who pay in, but also inconsistent with federal intent.

Despite EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s assurances during a recent roundtable in Alaska that he is working to make the NEPA process less restrictive, the state division has justified its new restriction by pointing to federal environmental review requirements and claiming that limiting eligibility will “streamline” oversight.

When you strip away the language, it amounts to consolidating roughly $1.5 million in expected FY26 Recreational Trails Program funds under direct Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation control. Past fiscal maneuvers make one wonder if this is yet another attempt to steer money toward the Alaska Long Trail, a project that looks glamorous on paper but comes with price tags that should give any fiscally honest policymaker pause.

According to a 2025 feasibility study, developing just 233 miles of identified gap segments between Seward and Fairbanks would cost between $16.3 million on the low end and $35 million on the high end, with annual administration and upkeep alone adding up to $1 million to $4.4 million each year. State capital budget filings also show proposed Alaska Long Trail projects topping $9.5 million for just 14 segments, mostly in Anchorage, and another package of nine projects approved by lawmakers that could cost up to $3.7 million.

At a time when rural Alaskans rely on trails for daily life, harvest routes, school access, and emergency transport, diverting trail dollars into a costly, monument-sized project that benefits a few is not smart stewardship. It is political theater.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s Administrative Order No. 359 asked state agencies to seek efficiencies. But real efficiency means doing more with less for all Alaskans, not cutting out the communities who need trails the most, nor sidelining the volunteers and nonprofits who have carried the load for decades.

This new policy undermines collaboration, reduces fairness, and turns a user-funded program into a tool for state bureaucracy. It raises important questions: Was the State Recreational Trail Advisory Committee consulted? Did the division solicit public input from communities most impacted? And has the Federal Highway Administration even approved this narrowing of eligibility?

Alaskans deserve transparency and accountability. The Recreational Trails Program was never meant to be monopolized by one agency or one flashy project. It was designed to serve all users across the breadth of Alaska, in a way that reflects how we live, travel, and recreate.

It is time for the Department of Natural Resources and the Governor’s Office to step in, reverse this decision, and restore broad eligibility. Our trails are not political props or monopolized funding streams. They are a shared heritage that belongs to every Alaskan.

If we let this policy stand, we risk losing the very partnerships and volunteer energy that have kept Alaska’s trails open. Alaskans should speak up now. Contact your legislators and the Department of Natural Resources and demand that Recreational Trails Program funds remain fair, balanced, and accessible to all.

Rep. Kevin McCabe serves in the Alaska Legislature on behalf of District 30.

Kevin McCabe: The next governor must make Port MacKenzie a priority

Kevin McCabe: Ranked-choice voting cheats voters, but Alaskans are fighting back

Kevin McCabe: The intentional delay of a Senate bill leaves revenue reform in legislative limbo

Kevin McCabe: Putting Alaska’s students first in 2026

Northern Edge exercises wrap up for another year

0

Northern Edge 2025, a large-scale, multi-domain joint field-training exercise, wrapped up this week after demonstrating the military’s expanded capabilities in Alaska and the northwestern Pacific theater.

Led by US Indo-Pacific Command and conducted across multiple Alaskan locations, including the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex and the Aleutian Islands, the exercise involved more than 6,500 service members, roughly 125 aircraft, and seven US and Canadian naval vessels.

Historically focused on high-end air combat training, this year’s iteration emphasized Alaska not just as a training ground but as a defensive position and a hub for power projection into the northern Indo-Pacific region.

Operations featured a combination of fourth- and fifth-generation aircraft, including F-35A Lightning II variants, along with command and control, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platforms, aerial refuelers, mobility transports, and maritime assets. The USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group participated in the exercise in the Gulf of Alaska.

Northern Edge 2025 ran concurrently with Arctic Edge 2025, conducted by U.S. Northern Command, providing an opportunity to strengthen coordination across combatant commands. Marines flying F-35B Lightning IIs from Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 533 supported multiple Northern Edge missions, demonstrating cross-service integration and operational flexibility.

The exercise concluded on schedule, with leaders confirming that the mission objectives were met.

Spotted: Northern Edge exercises have brought a drone to Alaska

What’s up with the jets? Northern Edge 19

‘You’re full of s—’: JD Vance torches Senate Democrats in viral post

Vice President J.D. Vance broke new ground Thursday with an unusually blunt social media post aimed at Senate Democrats, who were attacking the secretary of Health and Human Services.

During a Senate Finance Committee hearing, Democrats sharply criticized HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with several Democrat members calling for his resignation or removal. In response, Vance took to X to defend Kennedy and attack the senators questioning him.

“When I see all these senators trying to lecture and ‘gotcha’ Bobby Kennedy today, all I can think is: You all support off-label, untested, and irreversible hormonal ‘therapies’ for children, mutilating our kids and enriching big pharma. You’re full of shit and everyone knows it,” Vance wrote.

The post marked the most confrontational use of social media by a sitting vice president, breaking with the traditionally restrained and backset style of the office. Past vice presidents have typically relied on formal statements or surrogates to deliver such sharp political criticism.

Vance’s willingness to use such language to frame his defense of Kennedy wins him points with conservatives who want the Trump Administration to fight the Left and highlights the growing role of social media as a direct platform for top officials to bypass traditional media channels and even their own communications teams.

His post quickly gained traction online, with supporters praising his bluntness and Democrats accusing him of degrading the dignity of his office — another irony that has not gone unnoticed, since they supported Kamala Harris for vice president and for president, and Hillary Clinton before that.

Is Trump’s DoJ planning to try to block transgenders from buying firearms? Daily Wire reports.

In the wake of the latest deadly attack on a school by a transgender-identifying individual, President Donald Trump’s Justice Department is considering blocking trans-identifying people from buying firearms, The Daily Wire is reporting.

“Individuals within the DOJ are reviewing ways to ensure that mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to obtain firearms while they are unstable and unwell,” one source inside the Justice Department told news organization.

It may not be what it seems. It’s just as possible that the Trump Administration is merely trolling the Left to see if it will mount a strong defense of the Second Amendment. A ban on an entire category of citizens, after all, would not likely pass constitutional muster, although it’s true that the Trump Department of Defense no longer allows transgenders to enlist in the military.

But after a disproportionate number of mass shootings have been perpetrated by transgenders, the White House’s national security team may be including transgender violence in its overall probe into domestic terrorism.

Many commentators have raised concerns that mass shootings, especially at schools, are increasingly the work of mental unstable individuals who have taken psychotropic drugs or hormones to change their gender appearance.

The news comes the same week that a 25-year-old man who identifies himself as a she/her in Ontario, Canada, was charged with breaking in to a family’s home and sexually assaulting their toddler.

“The fact that the DOJ is considering blocking trans-identifying individuals from owning guns suggests that the Justice Department views the situation very differently. A review by The Daily Wire found that the Annunciation school shooting and the Covenant Christian school shooting are just two examples of a steady stream of transgender-related violence over the past decade,” the Daily Wire wrote.

In a statement sure to trigger transgenders and Democrats,”Democrats have called for common sense gun laws for a long time,” the DOJ source shared on Thursday with the Daily Wire, adding, “This seems pretty common sense to me.”

Read the Daily Wire story at this link.

David Boyle: Anchorage School District must revise its transgender guidelines to protect all students

NEA pushes transgender agenda and ‘inclusive’ sex ed with new teacher kits for school year

Breaking: Supreme Court rules states can curb the medical transgendering of kids

Breaking: Supreme Court says Trump Administration can ban transgenders from military

Suzanne Downing: Arabella still pulls the strings as left-wing money machine controlling Alaska

10

By SUZANNE DOWNING

It should come as no surprise that Outside nonprofit groups have an oversized interest in controlling Alaska. With our vast oil reserves, strategic Arctic location, and undeniable influence on national resource policy, Alaska is prime real estate for those who want to push a political agenda. What is surprising, however, is just how tangled and well-financed these efforts have become.

An important new report from Defending Education reveals that the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA) have funneled more than $40 million into progressive causes. Read about it at this Must Read Alaska report:

But that is just one corner of a much larger web. A sprawling network of “dark money” outfits are tied to Arabella Advisors, groups that include the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the New Venture Fund, the Hopewell Fund, the Telescope Fund, the Windward Fund, the Impetus Fund, and the North Fund. These nonprofits are not required to disclose their donors, yet they wield enormous power.

In 2022 alone, Arabella’s empire raised more than $1.3 billion, with money from megadonors like George Soros, Hansjörg Wyss, and Warren Buffett. The Sixteen Thirty Fund alone spent $141 million during the 2018 midterms to influence the Supreme Court, launch “grassroots” campaigns against Republicans, and bankroll ballot measures across the country. Arabella has become such a political juggernaut that even the Gates Foundation has recently distanced itself, even after having donated $450 million to Arabella-administered nonprofit funds over the past 16 years.

Alaska has become a proving ground for nonprofit activist groups. The Sixteen Thirty Fund poured $35,000 into “Building a Stronger Anchorage,” a failed bid to elect Forrest Dunbar as mayor.

In 2022, it teamed up with the NEA to spend $1.4 million opposing a constitutional convention—more than doubling the opposition’s war chest. The following year, it bankrolled over $800,000 for the “Better Jobs for Alaska” initiative to raise the minimum wage, plus $65,000 to the Alaska AFL-CIO.

This pattern isn’t just a coincidence. Arabella’s web of nonprofits has a clear goal: to reshape Alaska’s politics and economy in ways that align with the national left. They have systematically funded anti-development initiatives—chief among them the 2018 “Stand for Salmon” ballot measure, designed to tie up oil, gas, and infrastructure projects in new red tape. The New Venture Fund contributed more than $263,000 in in-kind support to that campaign.

The New Venture Fund itself is a financial powerhouse, reporting $669 million in revenue and $895 million in spending in 2023, with nearly $593 million handed out in grants. Much of that money fuels Alaska’s environmental and political movements.

For example, the New Venture Fund bankrolled early efforts to change Alaska’s voting system—pouring more than half a million dollars into automatic voter registration, without proof of citizenship required. It also channels millions each year into local-sounding fronts like SalmonState and the Alaska Venture Fund.

SalmonState alone takes in about $2 million annually, supported by heavy-hitter foundations like Gordon and Betty Moore, Hewlett, Wilburforce, and the Wild Salmon Center. The Alaska Venture Fund was seeded in 2021 with $10 million from Jeff Bezos’ Earth Fund.

Not one of these funders is based in Alaska. They are Outside billionaires and foundations with left-wing priorities—abortion expansion, anti-fossil fuel activism, and election reforms that benefit Democrats. By laundering their money through local-branded groups, they make it appear as though these are grassroots Alaskan efforts. They are not.

The strategy is clear: Arabella’s New Venture Fund and its affiliates bankroll environmental lawsuits, anti-oil and gas campaigns, and election rule changes. Each one of these “investments” chips away at Alaska’s economic future while cementing a progressive political infrastructure.

The revelations about teachers’ unions pouring dues into these networks are only the latest reminder. Alaskans should be asking hard questions—not just about who is funding these campaigns, but about what the endgame is. At stake is nothing less than Alaska’s sovereignty over its resources, its economy, and its future.

Outside billionaires should not be allowed to dictate what happens in Alaska. And yet, they’ve been doing so unchecked for decades.

Suzanne Downing is founder and editor of Must Read Alaska.

Rick Whitbeck: More Arabella dark money slithers into Alaska with ‘New Energy Alaska’

Video shocker: Sen. Jesse Kiehl aligns with George Soros, Arabella Advisors, New Venture Fund in trying to take down Alaska’s economy

Randy Ruaro: Exposing the shadowy grip of Arabella Advisors, New Venture Fund in Alaska

Top down control: Arabella Advisors runs New Venture Fund, which controls liberal groups in Alaska

Congressional ‘watchdog’ or partisan hit job? Dark money 907 Initiative is at it again

Trump targets unethical law firms, including one that notoriously shapes Alaska political outcomes

Biden to award Medal of Freedom to George Soros, Hillary Clinton, David Rubenstein

Listicle: Follow the money at the ‘No on 2’ campaign, which has $12.3 million — most tracing back to the John and Laura Arnold

Alaska Permanent Fund hits record $85 billion, even as Alaskans see smaller dividends

92

The Alaska Permanent Fund has reached a historic milestone, surpassing $85 billion for the first time in its more than 45-year history, a remarkable achievement that highlights the state’s unique approach to managing its oil wealth.

Established in 1976 by a voter-approved constitutional amendment, the Alaska Permanent Fund was designed to convert a portion of the state’s oil royalties into a permanent endowment, with earnings distributed annually to residents as dividends. Over the decades, the fund has grown steadily, benefiting from investment returns and ongoing contributions from oil revenues. Today, the fund underpins a larger share of Alaska’s government budget than oil royalties themselves, making it a central pillar of the state’s fiscal health.

When Gov. Mike Dunleavy took office, the fund stood at roughly $60 billion. Since then, it has grown to more than $85 billion, which generates an additional billion dollars annually that could fuel Alaska’s economy. Unfortunately, much of that new wealth does not flow directly to Alaskans through their Permanent Fund dividends. Instead, legislative changes over recent years have siphoned billions from Alaskans’ dividends to government spending, even as the governor has sought to moderate overall state spending increases.

Still, $85 billion is a major milestone for Alaskans for a fund that has weathered volatile oil prices, economic downturns, market swings, and pressure to invade the corpus, to become one of the largest state sovereign wealth funds in the world.

Since the Legislature passed the Percent of Market Value formula in 2018, the state has only been allowed to spend a set percentage of the fund’s value annually. While the POMV formula was designed to provide predictable, sustainable payouts, it also means that much of the fund’s earnings, held in the earnings reserve account, remain off-limits for government spending.

The fund’s current growth comes amid renewed debate over its structure. Some Democrat and even Republican lawmakers have floated proposals to consolidate the earnings reserve account with the fund’s principal, a move that others warn could be a first step toward draining the corpus itself to pay for ongoing government operations. Such a change would mark a sharp departure from the fund’s original intent: To preserve Alaska’s oil wealth for future generations.

The Permanent Fund dividend, this year set by the Legislature at $1,000 per eligible Alaskan, will hit bank accounts around Oct. 2 for direct deposit, and Oct. 23 for paper checks.

Robb Myers: Why we should not combine Alaska Permanent Fund accounts

Win Gruening: Juneau taxpayers pay the price for no-growth mindset

By WIN GRUENING

Municipal election ballots will begin arriving in Juneau mailboxes this month and voters will have to make choices. Will they continue to allow a good portion of their tax dollars to be spent without regard for the wishes of the public? Are they going to tolerate ever rising taxes and fees to make Juneau an even more unaffordable place to live?

There is a better way. Outmigration and the continuing decline in school enrollment will only be stemmed by economic growth and a corresponding drop in Juneau’s cost of living.

Economic growth, measured by an increase in income, employment, and a broader and thus healthier tax base, would help make Juneau more affordable. 

But the City and Borough of Juneau Assembly, after funding community core needs like public safety, basic infrastructure, and schools, always seems to pivot to discretionary spending on projects and initiatives that few want or need. 

If raising taxes, adding debt, and increasing rates for city services are the only solutions the CBJ Assembly is willing to consider, community affordability will continue to suffer. It follows that seniors on fixed incomes and working-class families will leave for less expensive places to live.

Reversing this trend requires a focus on balanced economic growth coupled with restrained spending. 

The Assembly’s enthusiasm for spending millions of dollars for new city offices, a new arts and culture “civic” center, and unnecessary voting schemes like vote-by-mail and ranked-choice-voting is the most visible evidence of their lack of regard for taxpayers’ real needs.

Hidden in the city budget is also an ever-growing list of discretionary city grants that have little relation to core government services. The annual cost of these services has tripled in size and amounts to over $91 million in the past 12 years.

Pumping more government money (your taxes) into the economy isn’t the answer. This rarely creates durable jobs and is subject to the whims of government bureaucrats and elected officials.

Creating permanent jobs and expanding Juneau’s tax base are the province of the private sector. Government’s role in fostering economic growth is to keep taxes low, cut bureaucracy, and generally make it easier to design and develop revenue-producing projects.

But it isn’t clear that Junueau’s city leaders understand this.

One only needs to look to the Aak’w Landing project, a proposed new cruise ship terminal and uplands development in the Subport area, that has undergone the most rigorous and demanding public process in recent CBJ history. 

The $200-million project languished for years, dating back to when the property was purchased in 2019. It faced a never-ending array of bureaucratic challenges and delays to reach a point where the Juneau Assembly finally decided on a necessary tidelands permit last March. Yet, the owner, Huna Totem Corporation, is still waiting for the tidelands lease to be finalized so it can begin construction.

Other projects that could bolster Juneau’s economy could be in the offing if the city would promote less restrictive and burdensome requirements for developers. Streamlined permitting, creative zoning, deleting unnecessary parking requirements, for instance, are all ways to encourage and support entrepreneurial development.

What is clear is that based on the deluge of comments on social media, recent spending decisions by the city have struck a nerve with Juneau taxpayers. 

This has resulted in two citizen initiatives being placed on the ballot to limit the property tax millage rate to 9 mills (slightly above where is was last year) and to exempt food and utilities from sales taxes.

The city has responded by placing a seasonal sales tax proposal on the ballot that is being presented as a way to offset revenue reductions. In reality, however, a seasonal sales tax likely would increase the tax burden for many residents, especially seniors.

Voters’ only recourse is to pass the two ballot propositions limiting property tax increases, adding a sales tax exemption for food and utilities, and voting against the seasonal sales tax proposal.

By doing so, voters will send a clear message to city hall that “We want this city to be responsive to voters, and we want it to grow, because it’s the only way it will be affordable to live here.” 

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Win Gruening: Juneau seasonal sales tax proposal is a permanent tax increase

Win Gruening: Sullivan’s actions speak louder than his critics

Win Gruening: Nick Begich III is hitting it out of the ballpark in Congress

Win Gruening: Juneau leaders lose the plot on affordability, but voters may push back in October

Win Gruening: Homeless, not helpless, Part 2

Win Gruening: Juneau Assembly set to mandate another complicated, cumbersome voting system