Monday, August 25, 2025
Home Blog Page 108

David Boyle: What is the pupil-teacher ratio in your Alaska school?

By DAVID BOYLE

We have heard some teachers complain that they have more than 40 students in their classes. This may be true for a few certain required classes. But this is the exception rather than the rule. It does make for good chanting by the teachers’ unions.

There has been much discussion in the Alaska Legislature regarding capping the number of students in a classroom. This is called the pupil-teacher ratio (PTR).

Several bills have been filed to cap the number of students per classroom.  Rep. Zack Fields (D, Anchorage) has filed HB 98 in an attempt to limit the pupil-teacher ratio in public schools. But his bill only applies to a district that has more than 40,000 students — the Anchorage School District. It seems that class sizes don’t really affect student learning anywhere else in Alaska. 

Rep. Julie Coulombe (R, Anchorage) filed HB 165, which also caps the number of students per classroom. But her bill only applies to a district that has more than 35,000 students. It appears as if Rep. Coulombe recognizes that the Anchorage School District is quickly losing students to home schools and private schools.  Interestingly, Rep. Fields signed onto her bill as a co-sponsor.

Rep. Coulombe is in a swing district and has to heed the K-12 education industry’s power in the next election.

The Anchorage Teachers’ Union wants to also limit the number of students per classroom. It reinforces this policy by charging the district for every student that exceeds the PTR. It is apparent that the union is very concerned with the declining number of students and the resultant loss of teacher union members.

Here’s where the data get very, very interesting. The Department of Education and Early Development submitted its Annual Progress Report to the legislature as required by AS 14.03.078. This report contains the PTRs for all Alaska K-12 schools.

Here are some Pupil-Teacher Ratios in selected school districts: 

School DistrictPupil-Teacher Ratio
Anchorage17.95
Fairbanks19.10
MatSu18.89
Juneau16.46
Kenai15.92

Granted, the above are averages across the entire district. Some classes will have a large number of students; other classes will have very few students; and the district correspondence schools (home schools) will have extremely large classes. But the average gives one the big picture of the PTR district wide.

Drilling down into the data shows more precise information. Here are some of the Anchorage class sizes:

Anchorage SchoolPupil-Teacher Ratio
Aquarian Charter School17.67
Alaska Native Cultural Charter School13.05
Bartlett High School20.16
Clark Middle School16.48
Eagle Academy15.83
Goldenview Middle School19.76
Inlet View Elementary School16.70

Except for Anchorage’s correspondence schools, all the schools have a PTR ratio of less than 23 students per teacher.

Here are some class sizes for the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District:

Fairbanks SchoolPupil-Teacher Ratio
Anderson Crawford Elementary School19.21
Denali Elementary School16.82
Lathrop High School18.53
West Valley High School18.57
North Pole Middle School15.88
Ryan Middle School16.35

Except for the Fairbanks correspondence schools, all the schools have a PTR ratio of less than 21 students per teacher.

Here are some class sizes for the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District:

Kenai Peninsula Borough SchoolPTR
Aurora Borealis Charter School16.02
Homer Middle School13.80
Kenai Central High School18.10
Seward High School16.03
Soldotna Elementary School12.20
Skyview Middle School14.18
Sterling Elementary School11.18

Except for Kenai correspondence schools, all Kenai schools have a PTR ratio of less than 19 students per teacher.

Here are some class sizes for the Mat-Su Borough School District:

MatSu Borough School Pupil-Teacher Ratio
Academy Charter School13.24
Colony High School20.60
Colony Middle School22.26
Cottonwood Creek Elementary School15.86
Knik Elementary School15.46
Wasilla Middle School18.47
Palmer Middle School18.29

Except for its correspondence schools, all Mat-Su schools have a PTR ratio of less than 24 students per teacher.

Here are a few select smaller school districts with their PTRs:

Bristol Bay9.83
Juneau  16.46
Ketchikan12.43
Kodiak Island 13.95
Lake & Peninsula8.57
North Slope11.45
Pelican7.50
Sitka 12.32

Several people from the education establishment have testified to the House and Senate education committees that their classrooms are overflowing with students such that some don’t even have desks. But the data provided by the various school districts belies those testimonies for the most part.  

Class sizes are important. But it is not the most important factor in student success. I attended a one-room rural schoolhouse that had one teacher and 26 students in 8 grades.  When I went into the big city school, I was more than six months ahead of my classmates in virtually every subject.

Class size does matter but it is not nearly as important as the culture in the classroom. That culture includes respect for the teacher. Respect for one’s fellow students to learn. And respect from the school administration for the student and parents.

If you want to find what the Pupil-Teacher Ratio is in your child’s school, you can find the Pupil-Teacher Ratio for every Alaska School here beginning on page 88.

Navy vice admiral fired for insubordination, after refusing to display portrait of president and secretary of defense at NATO headquarters

94

Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield, the US military representative to the NATO Military Committee, was relieved of her duties over the weekend following reports that she refused to hang portraits of President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at NATO headquarters.

She reportedly told military staff that they would wait out the Trump Administration, an indication of passive resistance to the commander in chief.

The dismissal was confirmed by the Pentagon on Tuesday.

Chatfield, 59, has had a 38-year career in the Navy. Born and raised in California, she graduated from Boston University in 1987 with a degree in International Relations and French, later earning a Master’s in Public Administration from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and a Doctorate in Education from the University of San Diego.

She was commissioned through the Naval Reserve Officers Training Corps and qualified as a naval helicopter pilot, flying aircraft such as the Boeing Vertol CH-46 Sea Knight and Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk during deployments in the Pacific and Persian Gulf. She was commanding Helicopter Combat Support Squadron HC-5, a joint reconstruction team in Afghanistan (for which she earned a Bronze Star), and Joint Region Marianas.

In February 2023, she was promoted to vice admiral and assigned to the role at NATO, representing the US on the alliance’s 32-member military committee.

She has been a vocal advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion, notably stating in a 2015 Women’s Equality Day speech that “our diversity is our strength” and emphasizing the empowerment of women in the military.

According to posts on X, Chatfield refused to display official portraits of President Trump and Secretary Hegseth in her office at NATO headquarters in Brussels.

The conservative American Accountability Foundation had previously listed Chatfield among “woke” officers to be purged, citing her diversity-related comments as evidence of misplaced priorities.

Chatfield delivered a speech at a Women’s Equality Day event in 2015 where she bemoaned male dominance in Congress, where she claimed at the time, 80% of lawmakers in the House of Representatives were males. 

“It seems a bit unequal what issues go forward,” she said. Chatfield also attended a Commander, Naval Air Forces DEI summit in 2022.

Sources said she held an “all hands” meeting and she told staff, “We will wait them out four years,” implying a strategy of passive resistance to the Trump administration’s policies. These details are unconfirmed by official Pentagon statements.

Sources familiar with the situation suggest that her refusal to hang the portraits—combined with her prior advocacy for diversity initiatives—made her a target of Defense Secretary Hegseth, who has vowed to eliminate “wokeness” from the military.

Chatfield’s ouster is the ninth firing of a senior military officer—and the fourth woman—since Trump’s return to office in January 2025. It follows the dismissals of figures like Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first female Chief of Naval Operations, and General Timothy Haugh of the National Security Agency, signaling an intensifying purge of leaders perceived as out of step with the administration’s agenda. With NATO allies already notified of her removal, the incident raises questions about U.S. credibility within the alliance at a time of heightened global security challenges.

As the Pentagon prepares to name Chatfield’s replacement, her dismissal underscores a deepening divide between military tradition and political pressures, leaving observers to wonder how far this reshaping of the armed forces will go—and at what cost to its unity and effectiveness.

Department of Health layoffs were expected, due to end of Covid funding

The Alaska Department of Health has laid off 30 employees, a move attributed to the expiration of federal Covid-19 grants that funded their positions.

The department confirmed that all 30 roles were either fully or partially supported by these temporary funds, which were allocated during the height of the pandemic to bolster public health efforts.

According to DOH officials, the grants were never intended to be a permanent funding source. Most were set to expire in 2027, and are just expiring early due to the need to reduce federal spending.

The department had developed a strategic wind-down plan to align with the grants’ original termination date, ensuring a smooth transition as the extra resources phased out.

The layoffs come at a time when the Alaska Department of Health is grappling with a 12% vacancy rate across its workforce. The department is encouraging affected employees to apply for other open positions within the agency for which they are qualified.

To support the impacted employees, the DOH is collaborating with the Division of Personnel and the Department of Labor and Workforce Development. These agencies are offering job placement services, unemployment assistance, and additional resources to help the laid-off workers navigate their next steps.

Nick Begich is on Democrats’ newly released campaign target list

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has released its latest target list of Republican incumbents in the US House of Representatives who will be marked for attack. Alaska Congressman Nick Begich, a Republican, is on the list.

“Today, we’re unveiling our offensive target list for 2026. Democrats are poised to retake the House — and defeating these vulnerable House Republicans will be key to doing that,” the DCCC said in its notice.

The unveiling of the list follows the March announcement of the “DCCC’s 2026 Frontliners,” 26 incumbent House Democrats seeking re-election in competitive districts.

Along with Tuesday announcement, the DCCC launched nominee fund pages to raise the funds for the eventual Democratic nominee. In Alaska, there is no announced Democrat nominee to take on Begich, who bounced Mary Peltola out of office after her first term. Democrats have not indicated that Peltola will try for that seat.

The DCCC is the same group that put Peltola on its “at risk” list in 2023, and then spent millions of dollars to try to save her, to no avail.

In 2026, the center-left Cook Political Report puts Begich in the “driver’s seat” for keeping the seat, as of February, 2025. But that’s without knowing who the possible contender might be.

Recent polls indicate that the Democratic National Party’s approval rating has reached historic lows. An NBC News poll conducted from March 7-11 found that only 27% of registered voters view the Democratic Party favorably, marking the lowest rating in NBC News polling since 1990.

DOGE: Alaska Humanities Forum loses federal funds

The Alaska Humanities Forum has been informed that its federal funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities has been terminated. The decision, communicated this week, is part of a shift in federal priorities under the direction of President Donald Trump. The NEH notified state humanities councils and other grantees that their funding is being cancelled immediately to align with “a new direction in furtherance of the president’s agenda.”

The Alaska Humanities Forum promotes events like “drag aueens for kids” events and “whites not allowed” conferences.

The president of the Alaska Humanities Forum is Anchorage Assemblyman Kameron Perez-Verdia. He may be looking for another job soon. The organization posted a notification on its website, asking the community to help get its funding restored. It says:

“Late on the night of April 2, the Alaska Humanities Forum received a letter from DOGE officials informing them that their NEH operating grant approved by Congress had been illegally terminated effective immediately. NEH funding constitutes a significant portion of the Forum’s budget that their core programs rely upon to operate,” the notification said.

“The Forum and all humanities programming in Alaska are under dire threat. This means potential loss of:

  • 28 Years of Cross-Sector Leadership Development(Leadership Anchorage)
  • Youth Mental Health Support in Schools (Story Works)
  • 24 Years of Youth Cultural Exchange Programs (Rose Urban-Rural Exchange, Take Wing Alaska)
  • Veteran & Community Conversations that foster understanding across sectors and regions
  • Writers & Filmmakers Programs that provide economic opportunity for emerging storytellers and entrepreneurs across Alaska
  • Governor’s Arts & Humanities Awards, co-hosted with the Governor’s Office since 1968
  • Vital Grants to Local Community Organizations for cultural, educational, and civic projects across rural and urban Alaska

“The Forum is required to match every dollar of federal funding, but they leverage that funding to raise at least $1.50 in additional investment for every $1 of federal support. They are able to do this because Alaskans value the humanities. We value the Forum’s work building connections across the urban-rural divide; creating partnerships across different perspectives; supporting youth to be mentally resilient and successful after high school; and developing leaders who deeply understand and are invested in the communities they serve. 

“Without action, Alaska will lose a 50-year-old institution that has built local leaders, preserved our cultures and languages, and served tens of thousands of Alaskans. 

Without action, Alaska will lose the Forum, and the community-strengthening projects it supports. As an Alaskan, I ask that you take action to restore funding to the Alaska Humanities Forum and the National Endowment for the Humanities,” the group says on a notification on its website.

In 2022-23, the Alaska Humanities Forum reported $2,826,160 in revenues, nearly all from federal grants matched by grants from the state. Perez-Verdia is paid $181,164 a year to run the nonprofit.

Video: Anchorage Assembly to hold hearing on ordinance making parents criminally liable for deadly weapons in the hands of their offspring

The Anchorage Assembly is set to hear public testimony Tuesday night on two proposed ordinances that could significantly reshape local gun laws, placing new responsibilities on parents and gun owners, while at the same time running afoul of existing state laws.

The first proposed ordinance, introduced by Assemblywoman Karen Bronga, would hold parents or guardians criminally liable if a child in their care brings a gun or other deadly weapon to school grounds or school-related events. Introduced as a response to growing concerns over youth access to firearms, the proposal stipulates that liability applies if the weapon was originally in the possession of the adult.

Click here to read: Ordinance No. AO 2025-25, an ordinance of the Anchorage Municipal Assembly amending Anchorage Municipal Code Section 8.25.060 to expand principal liability to parents and guardians of minors possessing deadly weapons on school grounds or at school functions. Assembly Member Bronga.

Critics argue that the broad language — potentially extending liability to foster parents, grandparents, or even temporary caregivers like babysitters — could unfairly penalize adults for actions beyond their control.

The second ordinance under consideration requires gun owners to report a lost or stolen firearm to law enforcement within 48 hours of discovering it missing. Modeled after similar laws in other states, this proposal goes far beyond the federal mandate reporting for licensed firearms dealers.

Click here to read: Ordinance No. AO 2025-28, an ordinance of the Anchorage Assembly amending Anchorage Municipal Code Section 8.25.070 to require the report of lost or stolen firearms within 48 hours of discovery. Assembly Member Bronga.

One of the issues these ordinances face is that, by state law, local gun laws cannot be more restrictive than state laws.

Citizen and activist Cale Green produced a video explaining some of the problems with these ordinances:

The meeting, held on the ground floor of the Loussac Library, starts at 6 pm and usually runs until 11 pm.

Ten charged in Whittier for voter misconduct and perjury: All defendants are US nationals, not citizens

A group of American Samoans living in Whittier is in trouble for voting when they were not legally allowed to do so.

The State of Alaska has announced criminal charges against 10 residents of Whittier in connection with alleged voter misconduct and perjury. The charges, filed on April 4, follow an investigation conducted by the Alaska Bureau of Investigation and are being prosecuted by the Alaska Office of Special Prosecutions.

All 10 are US nationals born in American Samoa, but they are not US citizens, a legal distinction that plays a central role in the charges. Under Alaska law, only US. citizens are eligible to vote in federal, state, and local elections.

“Everyone who is eligible to vote and properly registered to vote is encouraged to vote,” said Alaska Deputy Attorney General John Skidmore in a statement. “To be clear, you must be a citizen to vote in Alaska in any election — federal, state, or local.”

The accused individuals allegedly registered and voted despite not meeting the citizenship requirement, prompting charges of voter misconduct, perjury, and other related offenses. Authorities say the investigation began after concerns were raised regarding the eligibility of several voters in the small port town of Whittier.

“We will aggressively investigate any report of voter misconduct we receive and work with our partners to hold those who violate Alaska law accountable for their actions,” said Colonel Maurice Hughes of the Alaska State Troopers.

In September, roughly 25 American Samoan residents of Whittier reported being questioned by Alaska State Troopers about their immigration status and voting activities. This stemmed from an investigation by the Alaska Bureau of Investigation, which was looking into potential voter misconduct. The residents, including Michael Pese and his family, claimed they were unfairly targeted, with troopers arriving at their homes in Begich Towers—where most of Whittier’s population lives, and workplaces, armed with lists and photos. They asserted their status as US nationals, not illegal immigrants, and felt the scrutiny was unwarranted.

Tupe Smith, Michael Pese’s wife, faced five earlier voter misconduct charges after running unopposed for a school board seat in 2023.

Smith is American Samoan national. She won the election, but her participation triggered scrutiny from the Alaska Division of Elections, which marked her records as “suspicious” and referred the case to investigators.

Her attorney argued that any voting was due to confusion, not intent to break the law; Smith reportedly believed she could vote in local elections as a US national, although Alaska law requires citizenship for all elections. A grand jury declined to indict her on several charges, and a dismissal motion for the remaining ones is still pending.

The names are:

Elisapeta Tauta Pese

Grace Tuie Galea’i

Jan Miriam Talia

Mark Pese

Mathew Pese

Michael Pese

Miliama Suli

Nelson Vaimoa

Salvation Mikaele

Chelsea Talia

The cases in Whittier, small and close-knit community of less than 300, bring renewed attention to the legal status of US nationals, particularly those born in American Samoa and Swains Island, who do not automatically receive US citizenship at birth, unlike individuals born in Puerto Rico, Guam, the US Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

Anchorage homelessness consortium, run by Anchorage Assembly member Zaletel, got some bad news on its audit

The Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness, the cornerstone of the Anchorage homelessness industrial complex made up of several nonprofits, is not doing a good job with its financial reporting and accountability, according to an independent audit of the group for 2023.

The audit uncovered significant problems with the group’s internal financial and governance controls, raising concerns about its ability to manage funds and maintain accountability as it works to combat homelessness.

The audit identified two primary issues: a material weakness and a significant deficiency in the organization’s internal controls. The material weakness points to a serious flaw that could undermine ACEH’s ability to reliably track and report financial data. According to the findings, this deficiency increases the risk of failing to prevent or correct noncompliance with regulatory or operational requirements, potentially jeopardizing the nonprofit’s credibility and effectiveness.

In addition, the audit highlighted a significant deficiency, less severe than the material weakness but still notable, indicating another gap in financial or governance controls. While this issue is not considered as critical, auditors emphasized that it warranted immediate attention from ACEH’s management to ensure the organization can fulfill its mission without further complications.

These findings were first reported by ProPublica.

ACEH, which serves as the lead agency for the Anchorage Continuum of Care and collaborates with local “stakeholders” to implement the Anchored Home 2023-28 plan, has a goal of making homelessness “rare, brief, and one-time.” But in fact, homelessness has worsened during its existence.

Between 2019 and 2024, annual point-in-time surveys show an increase in the number of people experiencing homelessness. The annual count recorded a 54% rise in Anchorage’s homeless population over five years. In January 2024, the year after the audit, Anchorage’s count identified over 1,700 people experiencing literal homelessness—living in shelters, transitional housing, or unsheltered—compared to a more stable range of around 1,800 to 2,000 statewide in the years prior to 2019.

ACEH receives funding from various sources, including the Municipality of Anchorage, the State of Alaska, and millions of dollars of federal taxpayer-funded grants.

“ACEH received 66% and 44% of its support and revenue from government support for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. A significant reduction in this support would have a substantial impact on ACEH,” the audit says.

Total government grant revenue for 2023 was $2,637,770.

The material weakness, in particular, could have far-reaching implications. Such deficiencies often signal a need for stronger oversight, improved financial tracking systems, or enhanced staff training. If unaddressed, it could hinder ACEH’s ability to secure future funding or maintain trust among donors and partners.

Among items deficient were accounts payable, property depreciation, and financial reporting. The items were scheduled to be resolved in 2024.

“During our testing of payroll transactions, we noted a substantial number of transactions which we were unable to verify pay rates or a personnel action form indicating approved coding, as required by the Organization’s policies and procedures. The finance department lacked the necessary supervisory capacity to determine and approve personnel information essential to determine the accuracy of payroll expenses. For each of the major programs listed above we attempted to test four payroll transactions and management was unable to provide supporting documentation of pay rates or personnel action forms for nearly all transactions tested,” the audit noted.

More alarming is that the head of the agency is a member of the Anchorage Assembly — Meg Zaletel, who is the Assembly’s vice chair. The Anchorage Assembly has awarded millions of dollars to Zaletel’s group over the past few years.

Dig into the audit at this link.

Barbara Haney: Are Trump tariffs unconstitutional or congressionally authorized? An economist’s view

By BARBARA HANEY

I am writing in my capacity as a private citizen and as an economist to respond to some comments from a recent event titled, “Bridge the Divide” held at the Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly Chambers. As a former faculty who taught political economy at UAF, I was unable to attend due to Open Meetings Act constraints. It would have been nice to be able to attend and directly address issues raised, but alas, state statute restricts the number of elected officials that can attend an event, and other assembly members had indicated to me that they were going. 

However, it is my understanding, based on media reports, that at that meeting an argument was advanced that President Trump’s tariff policies are unconstitutional. At first blush, that seems correct, but a bit of research and experience suggest the President is acting within his legislative authority. 

In 1890, Congress passed a tariff act that delegated authority to the President to establish tariffs on selected goods. In 1892, Field v. Clark, challenged the authority of the Congress to delegate powers to the president under the Tariff Act of 1890. The Supreme Court upheld the 1890 Act and the President’s role in fulfilling a Congressional mandate. 

In 1934, Congress delegated additional authority to the executive branch through the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934. This act gave the president the ability to change tariffs rates by 50% and negotiate bilateral trade agreements without additional approval from Congress.

There are also other statutory provisions that allow the President to engage in unilateral tariff authority. Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 allows the President to modify tariffs if they compromise national defense.  These tariffs could be implemented without a sunset date. 

Then there is the Trade Act of 1974.  Section 122 allows the president to enact temporary tariffs to address large and serious balance of payments deficits or other situations that present fundamental international payments challenges.  Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the president to implement an 8-year tariff if the International Trade Commission determines a domestic industry issue is threatened by a surge of cheap goods. Section 301 of the 1974 act allows the President to act on recommendations by the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to authorize tariffs, up to 4 years, on foreign countries that restrict U.S. commerce in “unjustifiable,” “unreasonable,” or “discriminatory” ways. There are other provisions available to the president under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977.

Thus, it seems that the President is operating under the authority granted long ago by Congress. Of course, tariff law is hardly the bailiwick of a gender studies faculty that were presenting. That is something an economist would be most likely to have some familiarity. Too bad there wasn’t one on the panel. 

Barbara Haney received her PH.D in economics from the University of Notre Dame and formerly taught in the economics department at UAF.  Her opinions are her own.