By BEN CARPENTER
When I sat in the Alaska House of Representatives for six years, I heard the same refrain every budget season: “We’ve got a teacher recruitment and retention crisis, and the only fix is a defined benefits retirement system.” Superintendents, administrators, and union reps would march into my office, armed with PowerPoint slides and grim statistics, pleading for more money.
It was always about funding—more dollars for salaries, more dollars for pensions, more dollars for infrastructure. And don’t get me wrong, money matters. But after hosting Donna Anderson, Kenai Chapter Chair for Moms for Liberty, on a recent episode of the Must Read Alaska Show, I’m convinced we’ve been missing the forest for the trees.
Our education system isn’t just a funding problem—it’s a competition problem. Parents and students are the revenue stream, and if we don’t start earning back their trust, no amount of cash is going to save our schools.
Let’s start with a basic truth: Alaska’s public schools don’t operate in a vacuum. Parents have choices—charter schools, homeschooling through programs like IDEA, private options, or even moving out of state. Every time a family pulls their kid from a district school, that’s revenue walking out the door. In Alaska, our education funding follows the student through the Base Student Allocation (BSA)—a fancy term for the per-pupil dollar amount the state provides. More students, more money. Fewer students, less money.
It’s that simple. Yet year after year, I’d hear district leaders lament declining enrollment while brushing off the obvious question: Why are families leaving? Donna Anderson gave me a front-row seat to the answer, and it’s not what the suits at the school district want to hear.
Donna taught for 26 years in the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District—30 if you count her time subbing and raising kids in the system. She’s a grandma now, retired last year, but she’s still in the fight because she sees what I’ve long suspected: the system’s failing its customers. Parents and students aren’t just stakeholders—they’re the lifeblood of the operation.
Donna told me about classrooms packed with 30 kids, curriculum that’s either age-inappropriate or flat-out ineffective, and a bureaucracy that’s more interested in checking boxes than listening to the people it serves. “Our students are our revenue stream,” she said on the show, and she’s dead right. But instead of competing to keep them, too many districts act like they’ve got a monopoly—and they’re shocked when families vote with their feet.
Take the curriculum mess Donna described. The district spent millions on a program called Fountas and Pinnell, only to ditch it when the Alaska Reads Act exposed its flaws. Then, in a mad rush, they pivoted to Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA)—a decision made by central office, rubber-stamped by the school board, and shoved down teachers’ throats with two days of training. Donna recounted teaching second graders about the “god of pleasure and wine” and world religions—topics she wasn’t comfortable with and parents didn’t sign up for. When she raised the alarm at school board meetings, alongside colleagues, the district’s response was tepid at best. Her students’ reading scores flatlined under CKLA until she defied directives, added back proven methods, and watched their progress soar.
The district’s solution? “Wait three years,” they told her. Three years! Tell that to a second grader who’s falling behind—or a parent who’s had enough.
This isn’t just a Kenai problem—it’s an Alaska problem. We’ve got charter schools topping national rankings because they control their curriculum and involve parents like it’s their job. Meanwhile, non-charter schools hemorrhage students, and the brass scratches their heads wondering why. During my time in the legislature, I’d ask: “Why can’t we replicate what works in charters?” The answer was always some version of, “Well, not all parents care.”
Hogwash. Donna’s experience tells a different story. In a class of 30, she pegged maybe five or six families as truly disengaged—a third at worst, often tied to deeper societal issues like foster care. That means two-thirds do care. They’re not the problem; the system is. If we’re losing them, it’s because we’re not competing for their trust.
Here’s where policy comes in—and why it’s every bit as critical as funding. Money without smart policy is like dumping fuel into a broken engine. Donna pointed out the district’s refusal to conduct exit interviews with departing teachers. Mat-Su does it. Fairbanks does it. Kenai? Nada. How do you fix retention if you don’t even ask why people are leaving? She told me teachers are burned out—class sizes are ballooning, workloads are crushing, and central office keeps piling on “duties as assigned” with zero compensation. One teacher quit mid-year from stress, and there’s no evidence the district followed up. The union’s no better—Donna said they shot down a proposal to survey teachers before pushing initiatives. Meanwhile, administrators told me in Juneau it’s all about pensions. Where’s the data? They don’t have it because they’re not asking.
Parents are fleeing for the same reasons: oversized classes, shaky curriculum, and a sense they’re not being heard. Donna’s seen it firsthand—families pulling kids to homeschool or charters because the district won’t adapt. I asked her about parental engagement, and she was clear: most want in. When she reached out, they showed up—except for the handful too broken by life to engage. That’s not a majority; it’s a minority that must be better managed. Yet districts treat parents like an afterthought. Donna begged the Kenai school board president, Zen Kelly, for an open forum with teachers—no central office, just honest talk. He said he was “uninterested.” Uninterested! If that’s not a wake-up call, I don’t know what is.
So how do we fix this? First, we’ve got to compete like our survival depends on it—because it does. Parents and students aren’t captive customers; they’re the revenue stream, and they’re shopping around. Districts need funding to hire teachers to cap class sizes—30 kids in a room isn’t learning, it’s chaos. But additional funding is only justifiable if student enrollment increases.
Administrators need to ditch one-size-fits-all curricula pushed by distant committees and let teachers and parents weigh in. It works in charter schools, and parents in non-charter schools can figure it out too. CKLA might work somewhere, but if it’s tanking in Kenai, scrap it. And for heaven’s sake, talk to people—exit interviews for teachers, listen to parents, open forums where the mic’s on and the suits are sidelined. Data drives decisions; we’re flying blind without it and emotional appeal is no substitute.
Second, policy has to lead the funding conversation—not trail it. I fought for fiscal restraint in the legislature because I know throwing money at a broken system doesn’t fix it. Look at Steubenville, Ohio—low-income, single-parent households, and their kids are reading like champs. Why? Small-group tutoring, early education, and one-on-one focus—all without a budget windfall. Alaska’s charter schools prove the same: control what you teach, keep parents in the loop, and kids thrive. We don’t need a billion-dollar bailout; we need leaders who’ll prioritize what works over what’s expedient.
Finally, we’ve got to empower the grassroots. Donna’s work with Moms for Liberty—chapters in Kenai, Anchorage, Mat-Su, and Fairbanks—shows what happens when parents and teachers organize. They’re not waiting for permission; they’re showing up at school board meetings, demanding accountability, and building a movement.
Teachers, here’s where you find like-minded parents and safety in numbers. Common sense can break out in our schools when courageous teachers speak up and are supported by vocal parents. District administrators and union bosses must be reminded that dissent isn’t disloyalty. Schools exist to serve parents, andsome administrators have forgotten this. And frankly speaking, some parents have washed their hands of the responsibility of educating their kids. This too needs to change. You can join them at momsforliberty.org or email Donna at [email protected]. This isn’t about politics—it’s about results.
My focus is now on my grandkids, and like any grandparent, I want them to succeed. I’ve seen the sausage-making in Juneau, and I know the system won’t change unless we force it to. For six years, you and I have heard the funding excuse. Now, you’re hearing the real story from teacherslike Donna. Our education system isn’t doomed—it’s just not competing. Parents and students are the revenue stream, and they’re telling us what they want: smaller classes, better curriculum, and a seat at the table. Policy improvements aren’t a side dish to the funding debate—they’re the main course. Ignore that, and we’ll keep losing the people who keep the lights on. It’s time to listen, adapt, and fight like our kids’ future depends on it. Because it does.
Ben Carpenter is a former Alaska State Representative and the host of the Must Read Alaska Show.
Having experience with Core Knowledge via being a School Board member (Recalled in part for pushing curriculum improvement). I would venture any failure to the extent lightly excused by Mr. Carpenter is lack of depth into the reasons researched, as the curriculum was exited. Tell me in simple terms, the disagreement of learning “Different Religions of the World”?? How else will our students learn if not exposed to the basis of religion. One can not stick one’s head in the sand and remain ignorant of religions, even of those that are contrary or atheistic.
It would be my historical opinion that the root reason this curriculum was removed was teachers not buying into the curriculum. It is a very sequential, but fascinating learning process, however it runs contrary to individual teacher choice of learning which in turn leads to fractured bumpy learning as the topics change in content and worth as grade changes along with retention of selfish teacher’s individual curriculum choices, breaks down the continuity and sequential learning process Core Knowledge projects.
Cheers.
Al Johnson -Ketchikan (Recalled school board member for just this reason in part)
Anchorage is staring down an election in 20+ days. We keep electing non competitors because people don’t vote. The academics, unions, and extreme left leaners vote with the greatest percentage of participation. We have a school board in Anchorage that is bought and told to push the status quo mindset of asking, begging and distorting; the ‘just add money concept’. The 50 to 60% of parents in the middle/nonvoters have not cared enough to recognize they own the product that the status quo education system monopolizes. The fact that we spend close to the most and get close the least product and performance-wise is sinking in, yet ever so slowly. On the national level there seems to be an awakening to the drivel of progressive socialism. The state and particularly Anchorage still have our heads in the sand.
You are 100% correct. As a former teacher in the ASD and Mat-Su I can tell you that the system is made to fail, but it doesn’t have to be. I was raised in the ASD system from the 70s-80s. I can tell you I had great teachers and received a good education in the system back then. I contribute it to the teachers who were knowledgeable and efficient in their areas. Many were former veterans or had real world experience, not fresh from high school and into college. This means they knew how the studies would apply to life after school. Educators today have never stepped out into the real world, and it shows. They just follow the herd and chew the curriculum fodder.
My saying was “I want to be a teacher, not an educator”. Many have asked me what that means. It’s simple, a teacher provides you with tools and information to learn, sometimes by failing and consequences. You gain knowledge, creativity and wisdom this way and you grow. Parents respected teachers. Educators follow a canned plan that fits a mandate, doesn’t allow for growth just following orders to get a test score. This stifles the creativity and individualism that society is now lacking and takes away common-sense thinking. you will never achieve a certain level because people are all individuals and learn at different levels, not just one size fits all. Parents don’t respect educators.
We can change the system, and many teachers wish to do so, but they are shackled by administrators and unions that are not supportive unless it makes them money. Flush out the new stuff and get back to the old basics. Make kids great and get parents back in the school to raise them along with teachers.
More right wing distraction and lies while Rome burns.
Well, get some buckets of water and go save Rome, RINO.
The rest of us are busy saving the soul of America.
If you aren’t going to help, then just stay the heck out of the way.
Thank you Ben Carpenter & Donna – YOU’RE SPOT ON!
Here’s an amendment for HB 69 for the legislators to consider:
Since we’re throwing billions more into education, let’s make sure every Alaskan student gets a chance to learn about our state government. I propose that we require school districts to offer a class on the State Government and Legislature. And of course, each student should get to attend a mandatory week-long training session in Juneau to learn exactly how to access government resources. Naturally, this would be at no cost to the student, with round-trip tickets from anywhere in Alaska and a generous $300 per day per diem—just like the legislators get when they’re in Juneau doing, well, whatever they do.
And we could even hold this training in the State Office buildings, which, shockingly, are mostly empty because so many state workers are working remotely now. If we really want to enrich Alaska (and, you know, actually educate our kids), this could be a great way to do it. The cost would be around $2,500 per student—definitely a small price to pay considering the capital is stuck in Juneau, making it harder for most communities to engage with their government.
And while we’re all busy talking about “No child left behind” and patting ourselves on the back with jargon, let’s not forget that the real action is happening in Juneau, where lawmakers are being wined and dined by the NEA to push their agenda. The kids? Well, they’re just pawns in the game, and that Defined Benefits bill everyone’s whispering about? Yeah, that’s what’s really going on here. Let’s not kid ourselves.