Liz Cheney colluded with and coached at least one witness on J-6 committee testimony: Report

By
Suzanne Downing
-
146

Former Congresswoman Liz Cheney colluded with at least one witness during the Jan. 6 Select Committee investigation that she oversaw before she was removed by Wyoming voters from office in 2022.

Cheney should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for possible criminal activity, the Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight report concludes.

“Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the subcommittee report says. “Evidence uncovered by the Subcommittee revealed that former Congresswoman Liz Cheney tampered with at least one witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, by secretly communicating with Hutchinson without Hutchinson’s attorney’s knowledge. This secret communication with a witness is improper and likely violates 18 U.S.C. 1512. Such action is outside the due functioning of the legislative process and therefore not protected by the Speech and Debate clause.”

The report, at this link, calls for the FBI to investigate, as federal law prohibits any person from procuring another person to commit perjury.

“Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, Hutchinson committed perjury when she lied under oath to the Select Committee. Additionally, Hutchinson was interviewed by the FBI as part of its investigation into President Trump. This Subcommittee sought a copy of the FBI report 302, documenting this interview and Hutchinson’s statements, but the FBI has refused to produce this vital document. The FBI must immediately review the testimony given by Hutchinson in this interview to determine if she also lied in her FBI interview, and, if so, the role former Representative Cheney played in instigating Hutchinson to radically change her testimony,” the report says.

All of this may be moot, as President Joe Biden is providing cover for thousands of criminals and may pardon Cheney before he leaves office. Sen. Bernie Sanders has called for preemptive pardons for Jan. 6 committee members and reports have confirmed that Biden is considering pardons.

An investigation by the FBI may be fraught, since the agency has recently admitted that it had one two dozen agency assets on the ground and in the crowd when the Jan. 6, 2021 protest got out of control and some protesters entered the Capitol, while others become violent outside, fighting with Capitol Police.

FBI had sources on ground, but no actual agents embedded in Jan. 6 crowd at Capitol: Report

146 COMMENTS

  1. War Hawk Cheney is headed to the pin where she belongs. She can take her dad with her. Be fun to see actual facts on 9/11. Crooked bastards. In the end these type of people fall on their own swords. Always.

    • 76-days between the election and transfer of power? Really? That gives so much time for these corrupt players to get Biden’s signature exonerating all their crimes. Furthermore, to do so much damage on the domestic and world stage. Examples: launching missiles from Ukraine into Russia, exonerating their criminal-political class (such as Cheney), appointing communist operatives at all levels. An historical travesty of epic proportions.

    • Actually it was Hutchinson who approached Cheney first. Maybe unethical as an attorney but she was functioning as a member of Congress and provided information. Trumps drilling a dry hole.

      • Sadly you are again mistaken. The Lady from.the view put Lizard in touch with the Hutchinson gal. Why exactly did the 1/6 committee only take her testimony which was hearsay at best, she wasn’t in the limo. why didn’t they actually take testimony from the secret service operators inside the limo? Oh that’s right those files were destroyed.

  2. Well no wonder she needs a pardon from “The Big Guy”.
    Being on the investigating committee and facing criminal charges.
    We know the DOJ and FBI was in on the J6 scam so they all need pardons as well.

    Maybe it is time for a blanket pardon for the entire work force of the federal government and fire all of them so they can all just “work” from home without pay.

    Start over with a clean slate with new employees that show up for work just like the working class who are footing the bill for their paychecks.

  3. Yeah, it would a waste of everyone’s time at this point. Why waste the taxpayers dollars to investigate? With Biden pardening everyone possibly including the president elect, the only one clean anymore is Pence but he was too clean for DC, and most of America. The country sees that as a fault these days

    • Well worth the price for the American people to know the truth about 1/6. Judas Pence is as dirty as the 30 pieces of silver he accepted on that day. You honestly don’t believe he wasn’t bought by Nancy and the establishement.

    • I’m not sure about “waste of time”. More like “seek the truth”. Coaching a witness to perjury is against the law. Kind of like a DA in Palmer coaching his witness. He did not like getting called out for what it was.

        • Well.. The truth I’m interested is not the same as your “truth”. Ironic that you support pouring millions into investigating Trump for something congress does all the the time. For a troll, you come a long ways just to say “Hee Haw”.

        • Oh Greg thanks for the laugh!
          That is just pathetic…..you really want to sell “move along nothing to see here” when you have been screaming for months that the taxpayer not spare a dime to investigate, condemn and malign our next president. Sorry, it has always been abundantly clear to those without TDS that the J6 commission was political kabuki theater and propaganda. When the members were hand-picked for their lefty loyalties and dislike of the Donald, while several more pragmatic members were rejected out of hand, I stopped watching, as the outcome was a forgone conclusion with no basis in actual events.
          Donald Trumps greatest mistakes was to not file a criminal complaint under the espionage act against Hillary Clinton and her use of the bathroom server and destruction of emails. Director Comey in his famous press conference all but admitted that they had enough evidence. Hillary got away with it, so I guess Liz, Jamie and Adam think they can too! It is time to hold people accountable.

        • No it’s tampering plain and simple. Her texts to Hutchinson and the view lady prove this point. Wrong again forkker

    • Does Pence have vocal cords? I’ve never heard him speak. Way overshadowed by Trump with an uninspiring and bland personality.

        • You’re always calling for people to be killed or disappear from america. I’ve kind of come to except that it’s just your way. Another thing is you’re always deciding on whether someone is a good pick for a cabinet position based on your perspective if they would be a fun date or not rather than their merits.
          I think you have a pretty closed mind there pard.

    • If they all get pardons congress can then question them without 5th amendment protection and at least the truth about the Biden family corruption will be out in the open for all of to see. Then we will watch the liberal media tuck their tails and run.

        • You sir are once again incorrect. Just like Hunters pardon predicament. Once pardoned one may not be tried, but if they are called to be questioned by congress they may not use the 5th ammendment. They have to answer or be in contempt of congress, which can be jailable until they decide to answer. It must suck to be so ill informed.

          • Silly boy, a person although pardoned can still be charged on a state level or future charges from that investigation. The 5th still applies to those future and as such, unknown charges on a state level. The 5th still applies. Hate to keep doing it to you but you keep bending over.

                • Listen to your dad son. The 5th amendment applies to federal crimes only. I have researched a plenty, it doesn’t apply to to state or local charges. Thus if your buddy hunter has a state or local charge, 5th doesn’t apply. Can you even read or just look at the pictures? Now go tell mom to make me a sammich

            • What you don’t understand dodo is that hunter can come in to congress and his pardon nullifies the 5th ammendment, he cut be charged, but will be held to answer questions. If he committed a state related crime he can be brought up on charges. OMG you really don’t know what’s going on. He was pardoned on federal charges, that doesn’t automatically make the 14th apply.

        • Once pardoned for the crimes in question, the need for protection from self-incrimination no longer exists, as there are no longer consequences attached. Ergo the 5th amendment no longer applies.

            • A presidential pardon covers federal crimes and states have no jurisdiction over those. You are comparing apples to oranges here Greg.
              The 5th amendment when considering his FEDERAL crimes for which Hunter received a pardon, render the it moot on ALL those specific crimes.
              State and local crimes (like if he would have been caught driving drunk/high, for example) are separate and his rights for those are unchallenged.
              We are ONLY talking about the crimes for which he received a pardon. But you know that, you just like to be difficult and contrary! Sad!

              • I’m saying that he can’t even be questioned for the case that you’re talking about, the 14th amendment guarantees
                That his federal rights, as protected by the fifth amendment, are also protected at the state level. Show whether it’s the fifth amendment or the 14th amendment. The boy doesn’t have to talk if he doesn’t want to. Because even though it currently might be questioning on the federal level who knows at some point, some future charge may crop up at the state level. And they would use this against him. I don’t know how I can make it any clearer, but I will sure try if you needed to.

                • Greg, it would be really nice if you actually admitted when you are wrong instead of mixing and matching jurisdictions willy-nilly to fit your narrative. Hunter Biden was pardoned for FEDERAL crimes. From my reading, since the pardon protects him from prosecution in FEDERAL misdeeds, he no longer requires the 5th and therefor can be compelled to testify.(similar to someone who received immunity from prosecution and then testifies against co-conspirators)
                  To my knowledge he is not accused of any state crimes, so his rights under the constitution are intact for STATE offenses. He did not get a life-long pardon (get out of jail free card) for future crimes and if in the process of an investigation he is accused of state crimes, then he certainly retains his rights for those. Since the pardon he received covers ANY AND ALL federal crimes in the last 10 years, he can only be charge for past state offenses. (and of course all federal and state crime he may commit in the future)
                  But we are not talking about that. We are talking about the shenanigans of Hunter and Burisma his dad pardoned him for.

            • Well the news says different. He can be brought up on state or local charges. He was pardoned on Federal charges. Nothing to do with state or local. The legals even know this, yet you seem to think you are wiser. Have you been watching to many reruns of matlock down in shady pines?

          • Wrong again. It was not throughly thought through, when the pardon wash pushed through. Kinda like your comments.

        • With that on the back-and-forth legal mumbo jumbo here, it is, in a nutshell. The fifth amendment doesn’t allow for him to incriminate himself in a federal court and the fourteenth amendment allows him not to incriminate himself in a state court because the fifth amendment
          Is guaranteed. So he doesn’t have to talk in a federal court
          Based on what a future state court may do. His rights are protected no matter what.

          • Well the landlord he stiffed out of 300k can still go after him. Pardon doesn’t cover that only Federal charges.

              • You can’t plead the 5th in a civil case. You either testify or lose.your case. Hunter can be sued for unpaid rent. I am sure he can be brought up on the kiddy porn on his laptop by Delaware if they chose to do so. He was pardoned on a gun charge and tax evasion. Both are federal. Joey, James and the rest of the family can Still be investigated and more than likely will. Hunter can face public humiliation just like his family.

          • “The fifth amendment doesn’t allow for him to incriminate himself….”
            The way I read it the 5th does not prohibit you from talking to the police, prosecutor etc.. It is a shield law and you can disregard it by waving that right at any time. In his case there is nothing to shield.
            Also the 14th amendment simply acknowledges that the rights guaranteed under the constitutions to each citizen apply in any and all jurisdictions.

            But we are both non-laywers and just reading the text here, so maybe we can have an actual legal scholar weigh in here. Anyone??

            Out of idle curiosity WHY is this so important to you? What are you afraid of, should Hunter be compelled to testify?
            Greg, what is this really about? Aren’t you interested in the truth of what actually took place and where the corruption lies?

    • Waste of time? Hardly. I’ll remind you of your democrat mantra during the last 8 years: Nobody is above the law. Liz is about to get what she wanted. Good and hard. Note that accepting a pardon is essentially an admission of guilt, which puts both of you in an interesting position. Cheers –

  5. AND(!!!) …
    What does Lisa have to say about this egregious action?
    Does Lisa plan to get to the bottom of this and report back to us?
    Did Lisa know about this and/or play a hands-off part in this?
    As Lisa works for us, she should answer for her actions // inactions!

    • First, the actual definition of treason:
      18 USC Ch. 115 Section 2381. Treason
      Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

      Second, the last time the death penalty for treason was administered was in 1953 when Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were put to death for passing nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union. Their execution was controversial, even at the height of the Cold War.
      The death penalty for treason is would rarely, if ever, be applied today.

  8. The best joke ever to start the day is our sold out politicians, after years of conducting Stalinist style kangaroo court hearings, in the Congressional Subcommittee determining that: “Cheney should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for possible criminal activity”!

    Everyone knows it was an “insurrection” against our “democracy”, justifying the persecution of hundreds of political prisoners, most of whom were ushered into and given tours in the capitol building by federal police.

    What about the federal prosecutors and judges who went along with the charade. Which destroyed so many lives and families, to perpetuate the power, wealth and careers of lowest lifeforms in our country, like Liz Cheney.

    The FBI agent instigator plants know all the details, ask them to investigate, and we see hundreds of more preemptive pardons to be distributed like candy on Halloween.

    • Here’s a joke… this, from one smoker to another:

      “Aren’t you afraid of getting cancer”?

      – “No, I only smoke the low birth rate kind”.

      Conversely, Ms. Cheney is a disgrace.

  10. Detain Dick’s daughter, and make Dick bail her
    out. Then Dick can go back to his undisclosed bunker somewhere in Jackson Hole.

  11. Liz also destroyed 117 federal documents, each of which carries a penalty of something like 5 years and some sort of monumental fine. If I had done it, I’d be in prison. She walks around scott free.

  13. Liz is a criminal by destroying government documents and tampering with evidence by coaching Cassidy Hutchinson to perjure herself. Hutchinson should be indicted and prosecuted for that perjury as well.

    The crimes of the left should not be ignored.

    No one is above the law…..right?

  14. And on cue, Lizzie came out swinging, claiming Rep. Loudermilk was lying. Trouble is the text record between her, Hutchison, and The View’s gal clearly reveal he is not. All 3 of these in on the scheme should be in prison.

  15. No one is above the US Constitution except God. People think their variously trained consciences and wild imaginations supercedes the limits of their emoluments if any and the the US Criminal Code written in conjunction with the US Constitution as an immutable safeguard of our liberties and the republic form of government.

  16. Nothing will happen. Biden will pardon Cheney, as he will Swalwell and Schiff. Perhaps even Peolosi. He will grab the roll off the wall next to the commode and wipe the slate clean as he walks out the door of the Oval Office one last time waving his middle finger in the air and singing, “I did it my w-a-y..” Him and Corn Pop.

  17. For any who would like to see just how crooked congress is, read this ‘https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20241216/CR.pdf
    Specifically pages 236 – 240. This was written to protect congress from the constitution and anyone who would be bold enough to try to take these crooks out.

  18. Are not Pelosi and Cheney politically synonymous? Reckon Pelosi needs uh ‘deep dive’ also or perhaps start with her as a MAGA New Years gift,,,
    Ah shucks, throw in Murkowski for fun!

  20. Pardon the J6 patriots!
    an act which will be emblematic of our government: much to do (and expense) about nothing (I.e., no product).

Comments are closed.