KYUK: Two more villages oppose Donlin mine - Must Read Alaska
Connect with:
Friday, June 18, 2021
HomePoliticsKYUK: Two more villages oppose Donlin mine

KYUK: Two more villages oppose Donlin mine

KYUK public radio in Bethel reports that two more Native villages voted to oppose the proposed Donlin Mine in Western Alaska.

The station, without attributing it to a specific person or providing a link to a supporting document, said the villages of Napakiak and Kongiganak passed resolutions last week against the mine, claiming it would damage their subsistence way of life.

KYUK has been providing information to listeners on how to get involved in protesting the mine.

Both tribal councils, and two that passed resolutions earlier this month, live on subsistence, government checks, and dividends that come from their Native Corporations. The biggest employers in these villages are typically the public schools. The villages are relatively primitive in nature, with weather-worn housing and bucket toilets called “honey buckets” instead of western-style sanitation. Many in the area speak Yup’ik.

The population of Napakiak and Kongiganak are 354 and 439 respectively. The two other villages that passed resolutions were Tuluksak Native Community Village Council and Orutsaramiut Native Council.

[Read: Two tribes oppose Donlin mine.]

In April, Gov. Bill Walker issued a statement praising the proposed mining project at Donlin, and lauded its “engagement, commitment to highest environmental and regulatory standards.”

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is due to issue its record of decision in August on the environmental impact statement, which will outline any mitigation needed to protect the watershed.

“This is great news for Alaska, a major step toward development of a gold mine that would bring jobs to the Yukon-Kuskokwim region and help utilize Alaska’s vast natural resources,” Gov. Walker said in April. “The Donlin Gold project still has a long way to go in the permitting process before construction and operations can begin, but the company has already proven its commitment to engage local stakeholders and make sure all development is responsible and minimizes impacts on nearby communities and the environment.”

Walker has, however, opposed the proposed Pebble Project, a couple of hundred miles away, which is still in the permitting process. Walker said that the review process for Pebble should be suspended altogether due to the lack of economic feasibility studies, which drew a public statement from the company’s CEO Tom Collier, who said, “We find it incredibly disappointing that the governor’s request to suspend the NEPA process is nearly identical to that brought forward by the anti-Alaska, anti-development Natural Resources Defense Council. We expect this type of stall tactic from ENGOs opposed to any kind of development but not from the Governor of Alaska and especially when the project is on Alaska land. Frankly, the governor does not make a compelling case to suspend the NEPA process.”

In April, the Natural Resources Defense Council indicated it has Donlin on its action list, writing, “Although Donlin Creek has received less public opposition than the controversial Pebble Mine project near Bristol Bay, indigenous communities and state environmental groups are speaking out against the mine.”

At that point, no community had spoken out against the proposed mine, which is estimated to provide thousands of jobs during construction and over 1,000 jobs during its operations, which is expected to last for decades.

Donations Welcome

Share

Written by

Suzanne Downing had careers in business and journalism before serving as the Director of Faith and Community-based Initiatives for Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and returning to Alaska to serve as speechwriter for Gov. Sean Parnell. Born on the Oregon coast, she moved to Alaska in 1969.

Latest comments

  • Of course Native governments oppose large-scale mining.
    .
    Imagine the effect of sudden economic independence on residents in an area where government has been the only cottage industry for generations and government largesse is a staple of rural life, right along with the rest of Nature’s bounty.
    .
    Imagine, for example, what might happen to shacks like that pictured above when residents find out they can afford something less rustic or when the smattering of tourists turns into a flood of customers ready to hit the brand new Yup’ik casinos.
    .
    Yes, there’s a downside: Local governments will have to adapt or go extinct.
    .
    A seismic shift in political thought –and vote– may well occur when younger generations realize what they see on satellite television means life has much more to offer them than an aboriginal existence and honey buckets…
    .
    and the means for obtaining what life has to offer is in their back yard.

  • Then the state and federal government should stop subsidizing these villages if they want to oppose development and jobs.

  • Agree with JB there. AK is the only state to get the PDF payout and you have many communities where running water, and plumbing is non existent, electricity is exorbitant and the drum banging Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere And Not Anytime, because we have our fish. But yet if the fishing is down, then the Gov declares a state of emergency and dole money out to businesses and whoever else affected. Stop the nonsense, mining can be done safely now with new technology and regulations, in harmony with the environment and the wildlife. If this is not acceptable then AK needs to become the 3rd world country it wishes to be and cut off from the Fed umbilical cord. Thanks Suzanne for your website and real common sense views!

    BigJet

    • With respect, you did not mention the tax-free Native Corporation checks and the subsidized medical service.

%d bloggers like this: