Donlin gold mine clears big hurdle; permits come next - Must Read Alaska
Connect with:
Wednesday, December 8, 2021
HomeThe 907Donlin gold mine clears big hurdle; permits come next

Donlin gold mine clears big hurdle; permits come next

gif ad for must read alaska donations

THOUSANDS OF JOBS ASSOCIATED WITH DONLIN

In one of the most impoverished areas of Alaska, where residents live a subsistence life that is heavily subsidized by government checks, two government agencies on Monday issued a joint record of decision for the Donlin Gold project.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District Commander Col. Michael Brooks and Assistant Interior Secretary Joe Balash signed the decision in Anchorage, signaling the end of an environmental impact statement phase for Donlin that started in 2012. The planning for the project has lasted 20 years.

The decision includes key permits to move forward, with the BLM issuing an “offer to lease” for the pipeline right of way to Donlin Gold, which will provide natural gas to power the project.

More than 10 Native villages in the area have passed resolutions opposing the mine in recent weeks. The latest village to sign the resolution was Chevak, where unemployment is 23 percent and rising.

The project would take four years to build and employ up to 3,200 workers during the peak construction, with $300 million annually into workers’ pockets. The construction phase would need 2,500 workers for the mine site and transportation facilities and 650 workers to build the natural gas line that would connect to a line from the North Slope.

Project construction jobs would be seasonal and include heavy equipment operators, site engineers, construction managers, laborers, electricians, pipe fitters, and iron/steel workers.

During operations, some 434 jobs would be filled in the first year, increasing to 1,000 jobs annually for the life of the mine, which is estimated to be 27 years. Total payroll would be $98 million per year.  Mine closure and reclamation would require fewer workers.

Calista Corp. is the owner of the subsurface mineral rights and is estimated to earn $1.5 billion over the life of the project. The royalties it receives would be shared with other ANCSA corporations under the provisions of ANCSA Section 7(i). Other payments to Native-held corporations, such as Kuskokwim Corp. and CIRI for rights-of-way leases and other considerations are included in the partnership agreements.

The issuance of the Donlin Gold decision and the initial project permits are significant milestones for the project, providing the foundation for the 100 or more permits required to build what will be one of the world’s largest and highest grade gold mines, with a total yield of 33 million ounces of gold.

YES FOR SALMON COULD KILL PROJECT

The ballot initiative that has been approved for November’s General Election could kill the project, however.

Ballot Measure 1 would designate all bodies of water in Alaska as salmon habitat, unless proved otherwise. It would require tougher standards for any development in areas that are considered to be part of salmon habitat, including entire watersheds and uplands.

Opponents of Ballot Measure 1 say that the measure is so strict it will bring any development in Alaska to a halt and dry up private investment in the state.

Donations Welcome

Share

Written by

Suzanne Downing had careers in business and journalism before serving as the Director of Faith and Community-based Initiatives for Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and returning to Alaska to serve as speechwriter for Gov. Sean Parnell. Born on the Oregon coast, she moved to Alaska in 1969.

Latest comments

  • A wonderful day for this state. After two decades of exploration, planning and permitting Donlin is now on final approach. They will bring thousands of good paying jobs that will positively impact many lives. Do the right thing and vote NO to Ballot Measure 1. Make Alaska Great
    Again.

  • When the Army Corps rolls the Trump EPA on the 404 permit, we know we really need the Stand for Salmon initiative to bring some balance to fish habitat management:

    MINING
    Army Corps shrugs off EPA, approves Alaska wetland damage
    Ariel Wittenberg, E&E News reporter
    Published: Thursday, August 16, 2018Donlin Gold mine. Photo credit: Joseph/Flickr
    The proposed Donlin Gold mine site is located in a region of Alaska between the Yukon and the Kuskokwim rivers known in mining circles as the historic Kuskokwim Gold Belt. Joseph/Flickr

    The Army Corps of Engineers’ approval this week of the massive Donlin Gold mine project in southwestern Alaska disregarded EPA concerns about how the project should offset damage to wetlands and streams.

    As the Clean Water Act permitting agency for development in wetlands, the Army Corps is supposed to require “compensatory mitigation” — restoring or preserving water resources to offset damage done by projects.

    The agency’s Alaska District is requiring Donlin Gold to preserve thousands of acres of wetlands and restore several streams to compensate for damage caused by the open-pit mine, which would sprawl over 2.2 square miles and require nearly 5,000 acres for tailings and waste rock disposal.

    But the district hardly required any mitigation for the 316-mile pipeline that would supply natural gas to the mining project.

    While the pipeline would permanently destroy 200 acres of wetlands and 1,363 linear feet of streams, the Army Corps will require Donlin to offset only 4 acres of the damage by purchasing credits from a third-party mitigation provider.

    The Alaska District also is not requiring any mitigation for temporary damage to wetlands and streams from pipeline construction, which could last longer than five years, because the construction “would not impact more than 0.03 percent of any watershed it crosses.”

    That decision disregards comments EPA filed in May on an earlier version of the project’s mitigation plan that criticized the lack of pipeline offsets.

    “The current [plan] does not propose to offset all of the aquatic resource functional loss associated with the project,” EPA wrote.

    The Alaska District didn’t respond to requests for comment.

    The Donlin mine is the first major project approved by the Alaska District since EPA and Army Corps headquarters strengthened requirements for when offsets are required for wetlands impacts in Alaska (E&E News PM, June 18).

    In June, the two agencies signed a new memorandum of agreement in the wake of an E&E News analysis that the Alaska District had required mitigation for only 26 percent of permits since 2015 (Greenwire, May 29).

    The memorandum didn’t change mitigation requirements in Alaska but took aim at justifications the Alaska District had been using to allow unmitigated wetlands impacts by clarifying when and where offsets are required.

    Jettisoned by that memorandum were two agreements between the Army Corps and EPA from the 1990s that the Alaska District had been misinterpreting to justify its decisions. The district often argued that even large projects that would destroy hundreds of acres of wetlands could have minor environmental impacts, allowing a “less rigorous” project review under current regulations.

    Under the new agreement, “less rigorous” permit reviews are allowed only if projects are “small in size,” would cause little direct impact or only temporarily affect the watershed, or would only affect wetlands and aquatic resources that provide limited environmental benefits.

    The Army Corps’ record of decision approving Donlin’s project makes no mention of that memorandum, instead justifying mitigation decisions by citing the 1994 Alaska Wetlands Initiative the agreement specifically replaced.

    “Donlin Gold has evaluated all available and practicable options to assure compliance with the provisions of the 2008 Mitigation Rule and the 1994 Alaska Wetland Initiative,” the decision says.

    The memorandum would also allow impacts from a single project, like a pipeline, to be mitigated in just one of the watersheds that project affects. That means the district could have required Donlin to pay other third-party mitigation providers near one segment of the pipeline.

    Instead, the Alaska District has required Donlin to pay just one of two nearby third-party providers to offset just 4 acres of impact from the pipeline.

    Mitigation consultant Gail Terzi, who once oversaw the Army Corps Seattle District’s mitigation program, said the Alaska District’s mitigation decision for the pipeline showed “egregious disrespect and disregard for the unique environment of Alaska.”

    “I just don’t understand how you can have an impact that is significant enough to require an environmental impact statement and not require mitigation for hundreds of acres of impact,” she said.

    The Alaska District ignored some other comments from EPA on the project, including a suggestion that the mine draw its water from the Kuskokwim River rather than Crooked Creek. Donlin had calculated that using the creek could result in up to 10 percent of water flow loss there.

    EPA also warned that flow reductions in Crooked Creek could result in the creek going completely dry during the winter, but that sourcing water from the much larger and nearby Kuskokwim River could “avoid flow losses,” a suggestion the Alaska District did not heed.

    Although EPA criticized the mitigation plans for the Donlin project, the agency also wrote that it believed small changes to the plans could bring the mine into compliance.

    “The EPA sees a clear path forward, where Donlin Gold can incorporate changes to the current proposed action and augment the record to demonstrate compliance with Guidelines,” the agency wrote.

    “Our comments in the enclosure are intended to articulate that path.”

  • Soybean Farmers are waaaaay more subsidized than the native american villages why would you open with that.

%d bloggers like this: