By OLIVIA MCPHERSON-SMITH | REAL CLEAR WIRE
China is the world’s largest generator of wind power and a team of researchers at the heart of the global wind industry has just discovered an inconvenient truth: weather-dependent sources of electricity are a bad bet when the climate is changing.
In an article published this week in the journal Nature Climate Change, the Beijing and Shenzhen-based researchers find that around 20% of the globe’s wind turbines are located in areas that will become increasingly susceptible to “wind droughts” due to changing climactic conditions. As the name implies, wind droughts are sustained periods of uncharacteristically low gusts that render wind turbines useless. Even with aggressive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, the researchers predict that these acute snaps of atmospheric stillness will become both more frequent and longer in a global geographic belt that stretches north of Houston to just south of Anchorage.
These findings will come as little surprise to utility operators across Western Europe, who are also located within the latitudinal wind lacuna. Germany, which has the largest wind fleet in Europe, was blighted by calm skies in March of this year. Electricity prices soared 48% higherrelative to the preceding March and coal and natural gas plants carried the burden in Europe’s largest economy.
Inept during periods of calm, wind power also struggles in wild weather. The goldilocks requirements of wind were notably evident in Texas, which has the largest wind build-out of any state, during Winter Storm Uri of 2021. Though the storm drove down electricity generation across the board, nuclear, natural gas, and coal proved to be the most resilientsources of electricity during the assault on the Lone Star state’s grid.
The oscillation between erratic booms and busts of renewable electricity generation chips away at the wind industry’s key selling point of reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Coal plants may pick up the slack during wind downturns, but they otherwise operate below their designed capacity due to an influx of federally subsidized renewables into the grid. Yet, operating a coal plant below capacity is inefficient and typically results in higher greenhouse gas emissions on a per megawatt hour basis. The federally induced proliferation of wind turbines thus lock the grid into a twist: dispatchable power is a necessary stopgap for increasingly intermittent wind generation, but a surge in wind generation increases the relative emissions of approximately 20% of America’s dispatchable electricity generation, which leads to progressive calls for a build-out of more wind power that will require a stopgap.
The mounting academic and empirical warning signs of wind power’s shortcoming are lost on the global climate lobby, which continues to recycle decades-old talking points. Just last week, the former president of the Socialist International turned United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres declared that the future must be powered by renewables, in part, because there are “no embargoes on wind.” Given the exacerbation of conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, and Sudan during Guterres’ term as Secretary General, it remains to be seen how the Secretary General will negotiate the end of a wind drought with the skies.
For Guterres and his comrades, recent research on wind droughts should provide another data point that illustrates how today’s renewable technology will fail to propel the world’s economy. Neither citizens nor the environment are well served by constructing rhetorical Potemkin villages, where en vogue technologies are lauded and their drawbacks ignored. Realism around the strengths and weaknesses of various energy technologies is the only sustainable path forward.
Oliver McPherson-Smith, PhD served as the inaugural Executive Director of the National Energy Dominance Council in the second Trump Administration.
There is nothing so frustrating as a blind man who will not see. That’s you, Progressives!
The author omits any mention of the toxic metals emitted by the combustion of coal, which are proven, serious hazards to human health. Mercury, lead, and trace amounts of radioactive uranium are released by coal combustion- as these metals are found as impurities within the coal. Almost all fish now contains mercury. And, a typical coal fired power plant emits more radiation that a nuclear power plant due to the above reasons.
Wind, when combined with proven, safe, reliable hydro-electric power is the future, along with reasonable investments in PV solar, in climates where there is a proven cost benefit.
If Alaska had built Susistna years ago we’d be much better off- not paying close to 35 cents per kWh is GVEA rate payers are forced to do.
Windmills kill birds of prey and disorient ocean life. Production of windmill parts requires slave labor and child labor in third-world countries, countries that don’t have the environmental and occupational protections that we have. In 2013, the National Library of Medicine published the adverse health effects that windmills cause: ‘https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3653647/.
I’ll pass. Thank you.
Hydro isn’t viewed as clean green renewable energy by most of the clean green renewable energy folks; Susitna certainly isn’t. As previously discussed Susitna has its own issues as to how exactly it wouldn’t fit into the Alaskan railbelt due to its lack of ability to provide power when needed and demanded most in Alaska.
We did a study on Susitna if I remember.
I think the ecologist killed it.
Who wudda known?
There will always be wind somewhere, I don’t believe any new coal plants will be built because the wind moves around. Just ask Texans, or Iowans where wind turbines and solar panels are sprouting like weeds
Yeah, Frank. Texans fondly remember the massive contributions, aka failures of wind and solar during the blackouts of 2021. Lots of burst pipes when the blades were frozen and solar was inop in the dark. Repairs went on for years afterwards. Plumbers got rich. But your analogy is more correct than you think. Sometimes things that sprout like weed are truly weeds. Cheers –
Haven’t been to Texas lately have you frank, most of the windmills there barely turn. You should see the piles of the ones hidden away that have been taken down.
It appears that MRAK readers would rather live in an overheated world while choking to death on hydrocarbon combustion fumes, simply to keep their oil-fueled PFDs rolling in.
Manley is right. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Turns out that all the green energy is really green, it’s also not affordable, and it’s certainly not reliable. ‘https://heartland.org/opinion/affordable-reliable-and-clean-an-objective-scorecard-to-assess-competing-energy-sources/’
Gas and oil are kings in the energy sector and always will be.