Win Gruening: We pay, they spend, as Juneau Assembly rejects property tax relief - Must Read Alaska
Connect with:
Saturday, October 16, 2021
HomeColumnsWin Gruening: We pay, they spend, as Juneau Assembly rejects property tax relief

Win Gruening: We pay, they spend, as Juneau Assembly rejects property tax relief

gif ad for must read alaska donations

By WIN GRUENING

In a recent City and Borough of Juneau Finance Committee meeting, a majority of Assembly members rebuffed an attempt to provide tax relief to local property owners.  

The proposal by Michelle Hale, supported by Greg Smith and Wade Bryson, would have lowered the mill rate from its current 10.66 mills to 10.56 mills. After some discussion, it was defeated on a 6-3 vote. The decision to maintain the current mill rate (a reduction from the previously proposed .20 mill increase) was forwarded for final approval at the next regular Assembly meeting on June 14.

While the proposal would not have provided a substantial reduction in taxes at the individual level, it would have sent an important message to residents and businesses that their elected Assembly was cognizant of the past and future economic hardship caused by the pandemic.

If anything, the proposed reduction was woefully short considering the significant property valuation increases experienced by Juneau commercial property owners.  Consider that many Juneau businesses are struggling after experiencing their second year of minimal to zero revenue and, even with the prospect of some cruise arrivals by August, may not fully open this year.  According to City Manager Rorie Watt, the city was “way behind” on updating commercial assessments as required by state law.

The severe jump in assessed land values caught commercial property owners off guard and will result in major property tax increases. Predictably, this has provoked a sharp reaction from many downtown business owners.  Some owners that have purchased property in the last several years have reported assessments that have been double their original purchase price.  

Over 300 tax appeals have been filed this year contesting the city’s latest round of tax assessments – triple the number in a normal year.  According to the city, while the new assessments have primarily affected land values, businesses can expect similar increases in building values next year.

While recognizing that property valuation is a complex process with many factors, a cursory review of tax assessments on the CBJ website reflect some odd and outsized disparities.  The unimproved waterfront lot purchased last year by Norwegian Cruise Lines for $20 million is still assessed at $7.5 million which values the land at about $60 per square foot.  

Even if it were assessed at the higher sale value, it would be $161 per square foot. Yet, the Archipelago lot downtown on South Franklin Street is assessed at $300 per square foot.  Some nearby improved properties reflect updated land values of $450 per square foot – all resulting in double-digit increases in their property taxes.

Some Juneau Assembly members believe that continuing the current mill rate is tantamount to “holding the line” on taxes and that’s where their responsibility ends.  But everyone knows that property tax formulation is a combination of the mill rate and property valuation – and both should be considered when budgeting our tax dollars.  

Even amid the pandemic, the Assembly blithely approved some large discretionary expenditures – all while the private sector suffered massive layoffs. City staff never considered serious operating spending reductions.  Last year $1.5 million in scheduled pay raises for city employees were approved along with new hires, longevity pay and merit increases. Additional increases in employee benefits and compensation is expected this year. 

Also funded was a brand-new childcare program that adds millions to future expenses along with a $1.5 million grant to Sealaska Heritage Institute subsidizing their $14 million arts plaza under construction in downtown Juneau.

Why is it that municipal operating expenditures are never reduced but consideration of temporary property tax relief for residents and small businesses is considered a tax break for the wealthy?

The city currently has around $40 million in reserves and unrestricted fund balances.  This is considerably higher than past years and more than enough to absorb a substantial temporary reduction in property taxes. Our economy has begun to recover, and, with declining debt and increased sales tax collections, our municipal revenues will recover as well.

The economic health of Juneau’s families, businesses and their employees should be as important as non-essential CBJ spending. One of the most important ways the Assembly can continue to help existing small businesses and attract new startup businesses is to keep property taxes and overall cost of living low.

The Assembly can still reconsider property tax relief.  The time to act is now when Juneau’s businesses and citizens need it most.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening began writing op-eds for local and statewide media. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations and currently serves on the board of the Alaska Policy Forum.

Donations Welcome

Share

Latest comments

  • Wow, sounds a lot like Anchorage, where the private sector is expected to foot the bill for all the government employees who did not get laid off while businesses experienced mandates prohibiting them from making a living but still were expected to pay property taxes on their commercial property, while the assembly spent the Cares money on their own pet projects. I had to sell all of my toys to make my property taxes last year or forfeit my commercial property to the municipality. I begged for just an extension of the due date, but got no consideration.

  • Juneau is a democrat city, you all have seen what happens to these cities run by the corrupt democrats. Move your business elsewhere, to a business friendly community. Let Juneau fade away.

  • As bad as it is the CBJ Assembly performance is actually much worse. Merchants have been hammered by not only the pandemic but by the structural challenges facing all brick and mortar retail, and by economies of scale challenges inherent in Alaska communities that cannot be reached by road. Local merchants employ local people and pay local taxes but the CBJ Assembly refused to even consider periodic sales tax holidays to both boost sales to locals and attract shoppers from the surrounding villages. Retailers cannot pay their help enough to compete with being on the dole. Meanwhile the city government paid $17 million for a brass whale, was sued by the tourism industry for the misspending and spent $900,000 defending its action to lose on summary judgement! City government also spent some of the CARES Act money on drag queen lessons. They have been building and providing new apartments for the homeless at a cost of $300,000 each, and they wonder why they are attracting homeless people to be relocated here. Yes, I know that the Anchorage mayor sent nude pictures of himself to a news reporter but I think that CBJ government mismanagement surpasses Anchorage muni mismanagement. I am saddened by the contest but Juneau wins in having the worse management in Alaska.

  • Win, during economic hardship a Government body acts like a Human Body does when it experiences Hypothermic shock. That is it pulls its blood from it’s extremities and pools this blood, (money) around it’s heart, (City Workers) This perfectly describes the situation you mention above. Oh, and the best part, that pooling of blood means drawing blood from the BRAIN, resulting in…

%d bloggers like this: