By WIN GRUENING
Repeatedly, the City and Borough Assembly has missed opportunities to mitigate the rising costs of living in Juneau. While paying lip service to the importance of affordability, substantial increases to the budget have been passed on to residents through higher taxes and fees.
Here are some eye-popping numbers from the City and Borough of Juneau FYE 2014 vs FYE 2024 Financial Statements:
- Juneau’s Population: 2014 – 33,064. 2024 – 31,549 (-1,515)
- CBJ Government Employment (not including Schools or Hospital): 2014 – 485, 2024 – 530 (+45)
- General Government Expenditures: 2014 – $110.6 million, 2024 – $179 million (+62%)
Yes, while the community population shrinks, the city budget and employee count continues to expand.
It’s no wonder that taxpayers had enough and launched two petition campaigns.
One petition would constrain Assembly spending by capping the property tax millage rate to 9 mills, slightly above last year’s rate. While this wouldn’t immediately affect Juneau’s cost of living, it will help prevent any precipitous rise in the future.
The second petition would exempt food and utilities from sales taxes for Juneau families and individuals. This will reduce the cost of the most basic necessities for Juneau’s working families and lower income individuals.
Both petitions received sufficient voter signatures to qualify as ballot measures for Juneau’s October municipal election, sending an urgent message to assembly members that the city should live within its means – just as individual residents must.
These ballot measures sparked a predictable narrative from city officials, who insist that, if passed, everything from ball fields to bus service will suffer. According to some, every single city service or program is at risk.
This is a fear tactic, plain and simple.
If the city ‘s financial condition is so fragile, how can it afford tens of millions of dollars in new city offices and $60 million for an arts/culture/civic center? Various renditions of these projects are afforded priority despite rejection by voters. Calls for more moderate proposals are ignored while costs escalate.
What city leaders also cannot explain is why discretionary spending has expanded exponentially over the last 10 years.
The three-year average of expenses from the FY2014-2016 budgets to operate the Mayor’s Office and Assembly, which include Special Contracts, Assembly Grants, and Community Projects, was $5.1 million annually. This more than doubled to $11.8 million annually for FY2024-2026. These expenditures are largely discretionary, and the increase cannot be blamed entirely on inflation. Several of the grants and community projects appear year after year, some with substantial increases, with little or no review of efficacy. These grants should be limited in scope to help “jump-start” projects and initiatives and not become a perennial source of operational funding with no accountability for results.
Telephone Hill re-development is a project I support. But I was dismayed when the city allocated a staggering $9 million to demolish 13 residences, build a road, and prepare the site, even though no plan or developer has been identified.
The millions add up. I have only mentioned a few examples. But city leaders apparently consider them absolutely necessary expenditures, presumably to be spared, while threatening to cut basic services.
The Assembly also keeps monkeying with Juneau’s voting system. Several years ago, they replaced traditional precinct polling locations with an expensive, unnecessary, and wasteful mail-in voting center and system. Now, they are considering mandating a ranked-choice voting scheme that will add additional expense. Why?
There seems no limit to projects and initiatives the Assembly will consider regardless of cost at the expense of basic affordability.
Questions voters might ask themselves:
- Why are water/sewer rates increasing 60-80%% over the next five years?
- Why have solid waste disposal and the potential closure of the landfill reached a crisis stage?
- Why do city employees require pricey new offices if existing buildings can be re-purposed?
- Why aren’t civic center upgrades being considered that are affordable to operate and maintain into the future?
- Why do our city leaders seem more focused on wants, not needs?
Ignoring essential basic services while spending money on projects and services that few want or need doesn’t make Juneau more affordable.
An opportunity for Juneau voters to be heard will be at the next municipal election in October.
After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.
I used to live in Juneau. Over the years I realized how expensive it was to live there and how, by comparison, life is less expensive and much easier in Anchorage where I live now. Juneau’s declining population is not surprising.
I agree that the Juneau City and Borough Assembly is clearly out of touch. I have observed that they and CBJ “leadership” have no regard for property tax payers. My former Juneau residence is now a rental property and the rising CBJ property taxes are driving me out of the rental market. The matter is only made worse by my belief that I am not getting my money’s worth!
In the last three months, I called the city manager three times and asked her to call me back; she did not. Then I called the assistant city manager twice and asked him to call me back; he did not. Then I called two assembly members and asked both to call me back; they did not. Then I called the mayor and asked her to call me back; she did not. My concern involved a concern, based on my recent personal experience in Juneau, that reflected a significant health and safety problem. None of these people had the professional demeanor, sufficient interest, or basic consideration to call me back!
From this, I discovered that CBJ property tax payers are insignificant to CBJ “leadership” and the Assembly. This is completely unacceptable. But there very little the average person or tax payer can do. Those of you who can vote out the CBJ Assembly members and mayor should do so.
Naw.
Nothing will change.
LibTards do, what LibTards are.
Juneau fatigue…
100%
Agree
65+ years in Juneau and it has not changed in the management aspect.
Flew in 1962, raised family and had a home.
Meth,alcoholics,drug abundance and mental midgets,along with all the
SODOM /GOMMORAH MENTALITY.
Sold out and moved to central alaska way away from the idiots.
If they want to bother me.
Good luck, it’s a long trip.
We must deal with reality. The spending must stop.
Well written. I too am one of the 1500+ that have moved out of Juneau. Now living in Mat-Su Valley am enjoying the lower cost of living and senior property tax breaks.
Borough recently chose to spend $200,000 on tour guides at Mendenhall Glacier to replace USFS layoffs. Why are we providing what the tourship companies should be providing?
Juneau financial maleficent activities sound like standard operating procedure. This will not change! The only way to stop this kind of activities is to change the makeup of the legislature. There needs to be a large percentage of Democrats replaced by fiscally responsible Republicans.
You know that Independents are just Democrat lights. Until that change happens, don’t expect anything different, from that legislative body.
Democrats love spending taxpayers money. They love pork! Free money is always attractive. The only problem is when it’s time to pay the bill. Free isn’t free, the tax payers get stuck paying for it every time.
You want to see real change, move the legislators to Anchorage or Wasilla. Where there’s no per diem, and their are on the road system. Where they are accessible to 80% of the tax payers.
There always seems to be less shady deals, and activities, when they have more eyes on them. More accountable for their actions, is a good thing.