Thursday, May 8, 2025
Home Blog Page 946

Gov. Mike Dunleavy: If we’re going to save the dividend, it will have to be this year

By GOV. MIKE DUNLEAVY

Support for protecting the Permanent Fund dividend in the Alaska Constitution has reached unprecedented levels. Nearly 100 Alaskans called into the House Judiciary Committee hearing to voice their support and thousands more have sent letters of support.

The “let them eat cake” crowd comprised of the Anchorage Daily News editorial board and once-powerful former state senators are clearly getting nervous as they lash out at our increasingly bipartisan plan. To top it off, 17 out of 20 senators have now voted yes on a $2,350 PFD – the highest PFD amount in Alaska’s history. 

This support couldn’t come at a more critical juncture. Last year, the Legislature “gifted” Alaskans a $992 dividend. This year, the House proposed just $500, but ultimately, it failed to pass. Since my days in the Senate, I’ve consistently warned that the PFD is facing an existential threat from those who would rather see every penny of Alaska’s shared wealth used up by state government. The point of no return is rapidly approaching, and if we’re going to save the PFD, it must be this year.

That’s why Alaskans must be given the chance to vote on protecting the PFD in the constitution. A majority of the Legislature has made it abundantly clear that following the law is not an option, and in fact, the full statutory dividend failed to pass in both legislative bodies this year. As I’ve said hundreds of times before, we must follow the law or change it with a vote of the people.

That also means enshrining the PFD in the constitution so that it can never be tampered with again, and to ensure government cannot spend more from the Permanent Fund than what is owed to the people. A 50-50 split is not perfect, but it presents a path forward in a Legislature where most members are openly hostile to the dividend. The resulting $2,350 dividend is expected to increase to $3,263 over the next decade based on a conservative growth rate of 6.25%, and because the PFD will be in the constitution, that money can never again be touched by lawmakers without a vote of the people.

Some have rightly wondered why 50-50? Anyone who knows me is aware that no one has worked harder since 2016 to save the full PFD. But as I’ve said since my Senate days, without constitutionalizing the PFD, the shrinking dividends are a clear precursor to the ultimate end of the PFD program.

As a consistent defender of the PFD, I truly believe this may be our final chance. Last year’s $992 dividend represented only 20% of the Permanent Fund draw. If some in the Legislature had their way, your share would fall to about 10% or less this year. This is what’s driving me and many defenders of Jay Hammond’s vision to ask for your support of SJR 6. A $2,350 PFD in exchange for a guaranteed, and ever-increasing amount is something I can make peace with to secure the future of the PFD for our grandchildren, and most Alaskans I talk with feel the same.

Ultimately, Alaskans’ voices are the only ones that matter. As I’ve consistently stated, you must have the final say when it comes to making changes to your shareholder rights. This basic tenet of our democracy was ignored by the previous administration, and if we’re going to protect the Permanent Fund and the PFD, we must return these decisions to the hands of the people just like Alaskans did 45 years ago when they chose to establish the Permanent Fund in the constitution. This is exactly what SJR 6 does.

While recent history has demonstrated that hoping the Legislature does the right thing is a fool’s errand, we are fortunate now that there is a growing consensus among legislators that the Permanent Fund and the dividend must be preserved through a constitutional amendment and a vote of the people. This fickle window of support will not last forever. The time to act is now. 

Politicians have been saying for years, “We’ll get to this next year.” Enough is enough. We save the PFD now; we save it forever. Give the people a chance to solve this with a constitutional amendment so we never have to wonder if there will be a PFD this year.

If you’ve come to the same conclusion, I encourage you to contact your legislators and let them know that you support putting the PFD in the constitution forever. You can do so with our easy-to-use tool at akgov.us/pfd or by visiting gov.alaska.gov/pfd.

Regardless of your position on the plan, it’s been an honor serving as your governor. I will always fight for Alaskans to have the opportunity to vote on your Permanent Fund and PFD so that we can constitutionally protect them for generations to come. Thank you for all your support and prayers and I look forward to moving our state forward together. 

Mike Dunleavy is the 12th governor of Alaska.

Voting right denied to Anchorage man because ‘signature didn’t match’

For one Anchorage super voter, his vote for mayor in the recent mail-in runoff election wasn’t counted, even though he went to great lengths to “cure” his ballot.

And even though his signature matches the one that is on file with the State of Alaska, the same signature that is on his driver’s license.

And even though he has been a super-voter since at least 2012, only missing one municipal election and having missed no state or federal elections.

Must Read Alaska is protecting the voter’s name, but has verified his story through reviewing official documents he received from the Anchorage Division of Elections / Municipal Clerk’s Office. For the purpose of this story, we’re calling him Sig Signer.

Signer voted the Anchorage mail-in ballot, as he did in 2018 and 2019, when he didn’t run into trouble with his signature. He used the same signature in 2021.

A conservative, Signer is an avid voter. So when he received an email from the Municipal Clerk saying his ballot needed to be “cured” because the signature on the outside of the envelope did not match the one on file, he acted quickly.

On May 13, Signer sent an email back to the Division of Elections with a photo copy of his driver’s license, and the proper form requested by the Elections Office. The signatures matched.

That same day, he received an email from Brandy Yeates of the Election Office, stating that “We have received your Voter Declaration and ID and will get your ballot processed.” Signer assumed his civic work was done and that he had cured his ballot.

On June 4, the Election Office sent Signer a letter letting him know he had not been able to vote because his signature didn’t match. Municipal Clerk Barbara Jones suggested that he register a new signature with the State of Alaska.

Must Read Alaska has reviewed all of Signer’s email and printed communication from the Municipal Clerk’s Office, which had given him a deadline of May 21 to submit his “voter declaration” to “cure” his ballot. The election was certified on May 25. The Election Office had eight days to let Signer know that his ballot was still not accepted.

The story illustrates an unresolved problem with the mail-in balloting system used by Anchorage, which relies on a left-leaning Election Commission to review questioned ballots and make a final determination. It’s the kind of situation that would not have occurred if Signer had gone to one of the three in-person voting locations during the weeks leading up to the election, had shown his driver’s license, signed the register, and then voted a traditional ballot.

The story also illustrates that even as aggressive as the Bronson campaign was in looking over the work of the Election Office, and as much criticism as Municipal Clerk Barbara Jones lobbed at Bronson’s volunteer election observers, there was at least one vote that was not allowed to be cast due to a human decision that a signature didn’t match.

Read: Municipal Clerk insults election observers and Washington Post picks up story, blames Bronson volunteers

From the election observers’ perspective, they said they felt bullied by the Municipal Clerk, and that they were kept at such a distance, they could not clearly see what was going on during the adjudication of ballots.

Must Read Alaska wants to hear from readers who had a similar experience. If you were denied the right to vote by the Municipal Clerk’s Office and Election Commission, let us know in the comment section below.

Murkowski to vote no on controversial bill that could lead to more election fraud

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski is reported to be a “hard no” for a radical overhaul of U.S. election law, known as the For the People Act, according to the Associated Press.

The proposed law, supported by President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, passed the House along party lines. The bill would make voter fraud easier and change campaign finance laws. Every state would be required to set up 15 days of early voting and absentee ballots would have to be issued for any reason. All states would be required to provide same-day voter registration for federal elections, and allow voters to change their registration at the polls.

The bill would require automatic voter registration for all, vote by mail for all, and even though it would require vote by mail, it would make Election Day a federal holiday. It would require all states to adopt online voter registration (now adopted in 39 states), and require states to allow all 16- and 17-year olds to pre-register to vote in advance of becoming eligible to vote at age 18.

Under the bill, states would be greatly restricted in their ability to clean up their voter rolls, as the law would prevent purging of names six months before an election. The bill restores voting rights to felons who have completed prison terms.

HR 1 was originally introduced by Rep. John Sarbanes in 2019, as on behalf of the Democratic majority that took control of the House of Representatives in the 2018 election. It was the first official piece of legislation for the 116th United States Congress, but was blocked by the Republican-controlled Senate.

Now, the Senate is split but the Democrats are in charge because they control the White House, and the bill is said to be heading for a floor vote the week of June 21. It appears all Republicans are against the measure as is Sen. Joe Manchin, the West Virginia conservative Democrat.

A separate bill, called the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, would reauthorize provisions of the Voting Rights Act and is more likely to get bipartisan support.

Murkowski and Manchin wrote to the leaders of both the Senate and House on May 17, urging the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act, and arguing that voting rights has “not been a partisan issue” since the bill was first passed 1965 and “we must not allow it to become on today.”

The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would reestablish Justice Department oversight over voting laws in states with a history of discriminatory practices. Those states that were once under Justice Department oversight included eight Southern states plus Alaska.

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down key provisions of the Voting Rights Act in 2013, lifting federal supervision of Alaska’s elections. The 5-4 ruling said that the VRA method for identifying states needing federal election oversight was unfair and arbitrary.

Republican Women of Fairbanks’ summer salad spectacular returns

After a year off, the annual Summer Salad Spectacular returns this year from 5:30-7:30 pm, June 10, at the home of David and Aldean Kilbourn. It’s a fundraiser for the Republican Women of Fairbanks, which uses the funds to help elect Republicans.

Art Chance: Ashes of our fathers, the Normandy invasion, and the soy boys

By ART CHANCE

Let us transport ourselves back 80 years:  On Dec. 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy all but destroyed the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, and launched a war against America and other Western interests in the Pacific region. 

Fast forward: In December of 2019 a biological weapon was launched against the US and Western interests from China.   

We don’t need to determine whether the release of the Covid-19 virus was accidental or intentional, we only need to look at the reaction to the release. Once the release was discovered, the Chinese closed off all internal transportation and communication with the Wuhan province, yet it allowed Wuhan to maintain communication with the Western world.  Every Chinese citizen who traveled to the West from Wuhan, whether it was an act of war, or simply serendipity, was a biologically armed cruise missile aimed at the Western World.

This isn’t 1941 or 1962; there is no FDR or JFK who will pronounce it a day that will live in infamy or who will promise to pay any price and bear any burden to set it right.  

We live in the World of the Beltway wimps and the soy boys.   We still have some warriors in our military but the Left is doing its best to extirpate them, just as they are trying to eliminate police on our streets.

I’m writing this in the evening Alaska time on June 5, which is 5-ish am English time on June 6.   At this time on June 6, 1944, there were about 150,000 men crammed into landing craft approaching the French coast. Few of the troops were veterans. The command tried to somewhat leaven the force with men who’d seen combat in North Africa or Italy, but most were raw recruits who, while well-trained, had never seen combat.   

There is an argument for this from the Civil War, when commanders learned that troops who had assaulted fixed works and survived were very reluctant to do it again, see, e.g. Cold Harbor.

Although the Germans didn’t really expect the Allied invasion to come on the Normandy Coast, it was nonetheless very heavily defended. That said, most of the German frontline troops were not veteran fighters; other than a few SS tank units and Panzer Grenadiers called to the Western Front, most were rear echelon troops.  The primary Allied objective was to prevent the seasoned SS Panzer units and Panzer Grenadiers from reinforcing the troops on the front line.

The Allied troops who assaulted that line were in high school a couple of years before; their officers were at most a couple of years older. If you’ll recall that scene in “Saving Private Ryan” when the camera pans the horizon crowded with ships, it is important to know that the only things in that scene that existed on Dec. 7, 1941, were two WWI battleships and the men themselves who were in high school. Everything else had been built by American industry in scarcely three years.

We have been cowering behind our desks and staying in our homes for almost two years because of a threat that may well be nothing more than a scam, a psy-ops operation. Funny how influenza and pneumonia disappeared as causes of death during the “pandemic.”

Our fathers were better than this.

“Then out spake brave Horatius,
The Captain of the Gate:
To every man upon this earth
Death cometh soon or late.
And how can man die better
Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his fathers,
And the temples of his gods” 
― Thomas Babington Macaulay, Lays of Ancient Rome

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon. 

Read: Art Chance: When you wish upon a star.

Breaking: Former Anchorage Mayor Tom Fink has passed

Anchorage former Mayor Tom Fink has passed, according to family members. He had a serious fall last Sunday, his health deteriorated from there, and he died peacefully in his sleep on Friday night. He was 92. A service will be held at 2 pm on Friday, June 11, at Holy Family Cathedral.

Fink was born Aug. 26, 1928, in Peoria, Illinois. He earned a Bachelor of Science from Bradley University in 1950, and a J.D. from the University of Illinois Law School in 1952, and then moved to Anchorage that year, where he worked in life insurance for his entire career. Fink and Don Schroer owned the Schroer-Fink Agency for many years and Schroder was involved in Fink’s political campaigns.

Fink was mayor of Anchorage from 1987 to 1994, and was in the House of Representatives for from 1967-1976,  
serving as speaker of the House from 1973 to 1975. He left the Legislature when the new Alaska campaign laws (APOC) would have required him to list all of his insurance clients, something he felt was detrimental to his customers.

Fink ran for governor in 1982 and lost to Democrat Bill Sheffield, but he remained active in politics and civic matters all his life. He was very active in the school choice movement even in recent years and attended political events up until the pandemic hit in 2020.

He was married to Pat, and the couple had 11 children. Fink was a devout Catholic and went to Holy Family Cathedral nearly every day to pray, friends said.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy offered the following statement:

“Tom was a talented public servant and driven leader who worked diligently for his constituents both as a Representative and as Anchorage’s Mayor. There is no question that Tom lived a full life and left a lasting impact on those he knew and faithfully served. Rose and I offer our deepest sympathies to the Fink family for their loss.”

Flags will be flown at half-staff on a day of the family’s choosing, he said.

Mayor-elect Dave Bronson issued a statement:

“Deb and I extend our heartfelt sympathy to the family of Tom Fink, who was a genuine leader for Anchorage and Alaska, but most importantly, he was a husband to Pat and father of 11 children, and the loss is profound to all of them,” Bronson said.

“People in Anchorage remember Tom as plain spoken, with a wonderful sense of humor and a firm hand on the budget. His trademarks were his hat, pipe, bow tie, and his warm smile,” Bronson said. “Tom was a true public servant who always worked to make Anchorage a better place for all.”

This story will be updated as details become known.

Will all Anchorage Assembly members have to run for their seats in 2022? A big ‘maybe’

The April, 2022 Anchorage Municipal ballot could be a barn-burner.

The Anchorage Municipal Charter says that after the state redistricting process is complete and the final report is issued, if the Anchorage Assembly determines that Assembly seats are malapportioned, it must reapportion itself within five months.

In addition to the redistricting process that must occur, Anchorage voters accepted a proposal by Assemblyman Chris Constant to add a 12th Assembly seat, which will be located in downtown Anchorage. That alone forces changes to some of the 11 existing districts, happening the same time the decennial redrawing of lines happens; there is a legal requirement for equal representation.

Although still unclear, it appears that all seats on the Anchorage Assembly could be up for reelection as a consequence, if the Assembly gets its work done. That’s a big “if.”

Some seats were already set to be on the ballot in April, 2022:

  • District 2, Eagle River, (Crystal Kennedy, incumbent)
  • District 3, West Anchorage, (Kameron Perez-Verdia incumbent)
  • District 4, Midtown, (Meg Zalatel, incumbent)
  • District 5, East Anchorage, (Forrest Dunbar, incumbent)
  • District 6, South Anchorage, (John Weddleton, incumbent)

As the Assembly begins its work on redistricting and wedging in the 12th seat, the changes put District 1, Downtown, represented now only by Chris Constant, into the mix, which could have a domino effect in the West Anchorage seats, and that could reverberate through to Midtown and South Anchorage.

If all the seats end up on the ballot, some would be for full their usual three-year terms, while others would be partial terms, requiring those serving to run again in 2023, if they chose to continue in public office.

The Assembly has a work session scheduled for June 25 from 11 am to noon to continue preparing for the realignment of Anchorage Assembly districts. Their redistricting schedule for the year depends on when the federal Census Bureau releases its data to the State Redistricting Board. In years past, that would have been done by this past April, but with the pandemic, the work has been delayed and now the data is not expected until the end of August.

The delay may mean the State Redistricting Board won’t finalize its work until November, casting uncertainty among both incumbents and those who may wish to run for the Assembly. Generally, those running in April would want to start their door-knocking in the previous summer, because winter campaigning is a slog.

It could be argued that the Assembly simply doesn’t have time to reapportion Anchorage in time for the April election. The charter gives them one month to decide if reapportionment is needed and five months to get develop the plan, which at this point puts them past the April, 2022, if they end up in boundary disputes among themselves, almost a certainty.

With so much uncertainty about whether all 12 seats will be up for grabs in 2022, it makes sense that Eagle River Assemblywoman Jamie Allard has already filed a letter of intent to run for reelection, even though her seat is technically not open until 2023. She’s apparently betting that the Assembly will be able to get its work done on reapportionment, and that the April 2022 ballot will be epic.

In addition to Allard, Midtown’s Meg Zaletel has filed for reelection, and Randy Sulte has filed as a candidate for the South Anchorage District 6 seat held by John Weddleton. Rachel Ries has filed a letter of intent to run for Assembly District 6.

Alexander Dolitsky: A political refugee reflects on significance of the American flag

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

Through history, people have used rock drawings, language, a smile or handshakes, music, songs, legends, national flags, and national anthems to communicate ideas, cultural values, national ideals and norms of behavior.

Culture is passed down by intentional teaching these symbolic systems and shared values. As one generation imparts these ideas and values to the next, faith, ideals, moral values and local customs continue from one era to the next.

Culture is an ongoing process which changes gradually. It is important to remember that culture evolves through time not as a biological process, but through learned behavior and inherited practice. 

We receive biological and physical characteristics from our ancestors: the color of our hair, our blood type, the shape of our face and body. However, there is no gene for speaking English or Native languages, making baskets, hunting caribou, kinship terminology, or fishing for salmon. Yet, generation after generation does these things by learning them through a process that is separate from biology.

Language, religion, education, economics, technology, social organization, art, and political structure are few of many categories that fall under culture. 

In traditional society, the youth show their respect to the elder generation and generally inherit that generation’s skills, behavior, faith, philosophy, knowledge, and imperative symbols, such as national flags and anthems.

As a political refugee who arrived to the United States from the Soviet Union, a country with its entirely different socio-economic and political system, I had to learn about American culture and traditions through observation, participation and daily exposure to the American way of life, its traditions, customs, and symbols.

For me, as for other immigrants in a foreign land, cross-cultural miscommunications and misunderstandings were unfortunate and unavoidable, especially in understanding uniquely American cultural symbols.

I learned a memorable lesson in the early 1980s, when I was a PhD student in the Anthropology Department at Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania. At Bryn Mawr, the academic scholarship and stipend could cover only my immediate necessities. So, to supplement my $400 per month stipend, I worked as a security officer in the nearby Saint Joseph’s University, situated along the City Line Avenue of Philadelphia. 

Then, Saint Joseph’s was a medium-size private Catholic school, well-known for its basketball program, competing in the Atlantic 10 Conference. The school was also known for its Saturday night students’ parties on campus, followed by Sunday Mass and confession by most students at the Saint Joseph’s University Chapel. To my recollection, some 120 to 140 Catholic priests on the campus provided counseling to students and faculty members.

About 15–20 unarmed security officers, including myself, were employed by the University and were on duty 24/7 during different shifts. Among the officers were five supervisors—two sergeants, lieutenant, captain, and a big boss—the chief of security. He was a retired high-ranking Philadelphia police officer. Most officers were black, but there was one Filipino and four or five Caucasians. I appreciated a multi-cultural environment of the group and I learned a great deal about race and America’s ethnic diversity from this group.

One night, I was assigned to lower an American flag at the central location of the campus and bring it to headquarters. As I was performing my duty, the chief of security walked by, suddenly stopped, looked at me like an eagle at its prey, and commanded me to follow him to headquarters. I was lost in my thoughts of what I had done wrong. Once at headquarters, he ordered all officers on duty to report there, immediately. 

When everyone arrived, he pointed his index finger at me and firmly commanded, “ I want this officer to never ever touch the American flag again. Do I make myself clear?” and he marched out of headquarters without further instructions and clarifications.

The room was silent. I was absolutely confused, puzzled and embarrassed by the scene, questioning myself—”Why me? What have I done? Will I be fired?”

The officers were confused about the incident, too. They quietly approached me one by one, friendly clapping on my shoulders and expressing the empathy with concerned faces. That day, I mentally wanted to go back to my former country—the Soviet Union. There, I at least knew what was culturally acceptable and what was not.  And I questioned myself, “Is freedom worth all of this humiliation and prejudice?”

The next day, when dust had settled, the lieutenant called me to his office and explained the nature of my mistake.

“You know, when you lowered the flag, it touched the ground,” he said.  “And it is a big no, no in our country. The chief is a Korean vet—he is a proud American.”

My ignorance about the treatment and respect of the essential U.S. symbol—the American Flag—was a critical experience for my understanding of its cultural significance. No grudges, no excuses, no going back to my former country.

Lesson learned, lesson appreciated, and lesson respected.

Alexander B. Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine, in 1977; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and was enroled in the Ph.D. program in Anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also a lecturer in the Russian Center. In the U.S.S.R., he was a social studies teacher for three years, and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukranian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He lived first in Sitka in 1985 and then settled in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was a U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education from 1988 to 2006; and has been the Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center (see www.aksrc.homestead.com) from 1990 to present. He has conducted about 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky has been a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, andClipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. He was the Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. He has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology, and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka; Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia; Old Russia in Modern America: Russian Old Believers in Alaska; Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During WWII; Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East; Living Wisdom of the Far North: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska; Pipeline to Russia; The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in WWII; and Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers; Ancient Tales of Chukotka, and Ancient Tales of Kamchatka.

Read: Old believers preserving faith in the New World

Read: Duke Ellington and the effects of Cold War in Soviet Union on intellectual curiosity

Bronson team has two parties planned to celebrate new direction for Anchorage

Two festive community events are planned to celebrate the inauguration of Anchorage Mayor-elect Dave Bronson and the new direction for Anchorage.

  • A thank you party for volunteers and supporters of the Bronson for Mayor campaign takes place June 7, from 5-7 pm. That party is at La Mex Restaurant at 8330 King Street.
  • The official Inauguration Day party, which will take place on July 1, just after Bronson is sworn in and becomes mayor of Anchorage. The event will be on the Delaney Park Strip downtown, with a band, food trucks, activities for kids and places for families to spread out on the lawns with their picnics. More details are coming, organizers said, adding that they wanted it to be festive, informal, open to everyone, and multicultural to reflect Anchorage’s diverse community.

The celebration phase of the transition to a new government in Anchorage is being paid for by donors through a nonprofit 501(c)(3) set up by the Bronson camp. The nonprofit website is the place where people can donate funds to help offset expenses for the festivities. Donations are tax deductible. Anchoragemayor.com