Tuesday, October 14, 2025
Home Blog Page 9

Bob Bird: The Blood of Martyrs

32

By BOB BIRD

The Church’s foundation is built upon the blood of martyrs. So said Tertullian, in the 2nd Century. It converted not only the pagan Roman Empire, but also, much later, the Norsemen.

The unintentional martyrdoms have already begun, in Nashville and Minneapolis. It comes because the teachings of religious institutions of authentic Christianity are well known, and therefore angers those who have been victims, not of Christianity, but of the unnatural values of a soulless and hopeless culture.

That is what I wrote in my last column. What I meant by “unintentional” martyrs were the innocent children killed in Nashville and Minneapolis, like the children devoured by lions in the Roman era. They were killed because their parents were bearing witness to Christ, themselves too young to fully understand what they were dying for. They were in Christian education because of the love their parents had for them, as they were only beginning to learn what it meant to be a Christian.

But now we have an authentic martyr, Charlie Kirk. He did not die because he wanted to, but because he loved his enemies, and considered them worth the risk for the sake of their eternal souls.

The word “martyr” means “witness”, and this man was bearing witness to Christ, overtly, persistently, charitably … and annoyingly. The word “annoying” usually means that someone was getting under the skin of someone else, and bears the blame because of their personality.

But not so fast. The Pharisees and the Romans found Jesus overt, persistent, charitable … and annoying. That His was the most perfect life ever lived meant that He was annoying not because of a whiny voice or abrasive personality, but because He proclaimed the Truth.

All Christians are called to perform An Imitation of Christ.  The Thomas à Kempis classic booklet by that name is still as popular as ever. Charlie Kirk’s “crime” was to imitate Christ. He waded right into hostile territory and had the cost counted beforehand. Very likely he had discussed the possibility with his wife of someday being a victim of murder.

Riley Gaines had faced an overt and dangerous hostility simply for declaring the most glaring and obvious truth about being a woman. Locked inside a “safe room” for hours, her life was endangered every moment that she dared to speak at San Francisco State. That she came away with only minor physical harm does not diminish her courage.   

An excerpt from Kempis is quite telling:

My son, thou art never secure in this life. As long as thou livest, thou hast need of spiritual arms. Thou art in the midst of enemies, and are assaulted on the right hand and the left.

Moreover, if thou dost not fix thy heart on me with a sincere will to suffer all things for my sake, thou canst not support the heat of this warfare, nor attain the victory of the saints.

Thus wrote author Kempis, who although spoke fictionally on behalf of Christ, certainly was inspired to capture the very essence of self-denial and … martyrdom.

But now let us take Christ’s very words as applying to our times:

 “Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

“You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot.

“You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.’

Charlie Kirk embodied this godly advice, and waded fearlessly into the very nest of trouble. Yet he did not scold, he engaged. He reminded his adversaries that, like him, they bore the image and likeness of God, and thus deserved respect — a respect that they often did not return.

It did not matter. Christ did not say to go hide if things got ugly. Christ first delivered His unpopular messages, and then withdrew — to pray and rest elsewhere — until His time was fulfilled.

Kirk was in mid-sentence, delivering a message, when the Crown of Martyrdom was awarded him — likely by a professional assassin, acting on behalf of the Deep State.

I recall a political cartoon from 1968, from the immortal Bill Mauldin, after Martin Luther King was cut down by an assassin. King had his flaws which are still largely suppressed by courtier historians, but his message was godly. Mahatma Gandhi also was a flawed human being, but was also senselessly murdered. I do believe that what I heard from a Christian pundit, embodies Mauldin’s cartoon. He said, “A million new Charlie Kirks were created today.”

Bob Bird is former chair of the Alaskan Independence Party and the host of a talk show on KSRM radio, Kenai.

Jon Faulkner: Why Senator Robb Myers is Right About the Permanent Fund

25

By JON FAULKNER

Joshua Church is likely a great investment advisor. His writing is clear. But his rebuttal to Senator Myers fails to account for several core expectations Alaskans have of their elected representatives.  

First among these addresses why Alaskans created the Permanent Fund in the first place: to prevent the legislature from robbing every penny of revenue from the people. Alaskans are tired of our wealth being squandered. Inadequte inflation proofing is a prime example.    

 Second, Mr. Church ignores the majority of Alaskan’s desire—and defensible right–to a FULL PFD under the original statutory formula.

Third, he dismisses a vital concept underpinning the Permanent Fund. It is not an endowment belonging to a board of money managers or to Government. It is a sovereign wealth fund deriving from, and serving the interests of, all Alaskans.  

These ideas need to sink in. Those who oppose these concepts use all manner of deception to obtain control over the Permanent Fund. It is time to shine a bright light on our elected officials and the factions who influence them.   

Alaskans need to know Governor Jay Hammond’s purpose for creating the Fund.  Youth need to read Governor Walter J. Hickel’s book “Who Owns America?” to understand that our citizens are sovereign entities whom he described as shareholders in an “Owner-State”. Native sovereignty and land claims derive from an identical proposition: That government of, by and for the people does not own our resources, or decide by its ultimate authority our rights. Such rights and titles derive from the people whom government serves. Government is not the originator of sovereignty; it is the custodian and protector of it.

The concept of taking annually a “percent of market value” (PMV) sounds wonderful to politicians who want more of our hard-earned income. But recent history proves it doesn’t work. The simple truth is that the concept obligates the people to pay out money for government that it may not have.

Historic market returns may indeed be net positive over time, but a policy based on a certainty that our economy will grow and average a fixed return is dangerous. Who among us takes—regardless of our annual income—a fixed percent of our total wealth annually to fund our living expenses? This concept is a ruse to spend more money than we should.  

Alaskans embrace sustainability—especially our youth who inherit the future , and our Native brethren who rely on the land.   And yet, nothing is sustainable about POMV and our current level of spending. Contrast POMV with the original statutory formula for the PFD that is 100% sustainable because it takes for dividends only 50% of what was actually “earned” from only 25% of natural resource revenues. This equates to a 12.5% royalty on our income—a formula used by oil and gas producers to pay land owners that has proven sustainable for 100 years. 

Once Alaskans understand the simple–who is taking from whom, how and why—other things become clear. Those who wish to protect the Fund and the original PFD want to keep two accounts—the constitutionally protected Principal and the separate Earnings Reserve Account (ERA). Senator Myers is right that merging them into one account weakens legislative safeguards and invites overspending.

Those who wish to syphon 100% of fund earnings into government generally favor merging the two accounts, bypassing legislative compromise, and avoiding budget cuts.   

Alaska’s youth and Native community should wake up to this systematic pillaging by the Legislature of the Permanent Fund Dividend. Back only candidates for office who promise to protect Hammond’s unprecedented gift to all future generations.

The same greed that robs Alaskans of their royalty share fuels the impulse of politicians to spend at unwise and unsustainable levels. This is already eroding our democracy, our middle class and free enterprise.  

The argument that our Permanent Fund doesn’t function like most “model” endowments or trusts misses the point completely. This is OUR money—the peoples fund. We accept the uncertainty that opposition party politics provides. We accept fluctuating dividends. What we don’t accept is duplicity, and select power-brokers, funded by unions, undermining the will of the people. Alaskan’s PFD is being re-directed into wasteful programs and entitlements that undermine our economy.  Politicians complain about revenue uncertainty and “last minute” budgeting. And yet, few embrace forward-based budgeting based on proven income—which, were politicians serious about it—could be easily structured.

The majority of Alaskans embrace a “hands off” policy for the Fund, and full dividends, and yet our representatives reject a popular vote on these issues. Unions intervene to frustrate the will of Alaskans.  We should question those who favor RCV-like referendums, fueled by outside money, but who deny Alaskans a voice in their own Permanent Fund.

To address Mr. Church’s conclusions directly:     

Concern 1: “The Fund hasn’t been managed well enough to deserve more trust.”
This is not a separate issue; this is the main issue. The Board needs to hold open meetings and feel accountable to all Alaskans.  

Concern 2: “A 5% draw is too high.”
Most Alaskans agree, but the reality is, there is no completely “safe” number. Being conservative means basing Fund draws—and the PFD—on actual earnings.

Concern 3: “We should only spend earnings, not principal.”
As to Mr. Church’s chicken and eggs analogy: First, live on only the eggs the chickens lay each month. Next, grow more chickens; finally, never eat more chickens than are necessary to sustain your egg diet.   Further, there is no “outdated” method of investing. Alaskans want to limit spending by government, and not unduly restrict Fund managers from investing in the long term.   

Senator Myers is right. Mr. Church’s prescription will cut the dividend and the value of the corpus, and lead to more government spending because legislative checks and compromise will be removed.    

Jon Faulkner is the president of Alaska Gold Communications, the parent company of Must Read Alaska.

BREAKING: New Alaska AG Cites “Compelled Speech” as Basis For Objection to Chugach Plan

11

Alaska’s new Attorney General, Stephen Cox, asked the Regulatory Commission of Alaska today to intervene on behalf of Chugach Electric Association (CEA) ratepayers in the matter of Chugach’s new “Cents of Community” program.

Although fewer than ten percent of Chugach’s members proactively opted into the program, the rollout automatically signed up all 90,000 members and then required members to take additional steps to opt out.  Such requirements cannot substitute for positive affirmation, according to the AG.  

Cox asked the RCA to force CEA to redesign the program to avoid violations of constitutional rights.

“This is a compelled-subsidy problem,” said Attorney General Cox. “Because Chugach’s members are captive customers, the automatic round-up requires them to fund speech they may not agree with. That raises serious First Amendment concerns. Alaskans should not be put in the position of supporting organizations or advocacy they disagree with just to keep the lights on.”

A press release issued by the Dept. of Law cites the Janus v. AFSCME case as authority supporting the RCA request, which “makes clear that compelled subsidies of private speech are inconsistent with the First Amendment and that opt-out mechanisms do not cure the problem”

 One element of the controversial plan is CEA’s yet-to-be disclosed plan on who will manage CEA’s newly formed Charitable Foundation, and how proceeds in the Trust will be distributed.  Ratepayers are thus deprived of information to make an informed decision. According to Cox, this could lead to ratepayers subsidizing undisclosed causes they do not support.

“Protecting Alaskans’ First Amendment rights is central here,” AG Cox said. “Voluntary generosity is commendable, but giving should be a matter of choice. Opt-in programs like Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility’s ‘Coins Can Count’ show that member donations can be encouraged without compromising individual rights.”  

Chugach retains the option to re-design the program voluntarily, or to risk RCA action to compel such a move. According to Chief Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Waller, a lead attorney for the Regulatory Affairs & Public Advocacy Section,  RAPA has historically opposed automatic enrollment programs by utilities.

Here is the link to the full filing:  https://law.alaska.gov/pdf/press/250910-Comment.pdf

Jon Faulkner is the president of Alaska Gold Communications, the parent company of Must Read Alaska.

Joshua Church: Why Senator Robb Myers is Wrong About the Permanent Fund

25

By JOSHUA CHURCH | Investment Adviser Representative, Arbor Capital Management

I like Senator Robb Myers. He cares about Alaska and he’s thoughtful about policy. But on the Permanent Fund, he’s wrong.

Robb argues we should keep two accounts—the constitutionally protected Principal and the separate Earnings Reserve Account (ERA)—because that structure supposedly creates a “hard floor” of protection. He says merging them into one account would weaken safeguards and tempt the Legislature to overspend.

Here’s the truth: merging the accounts, with a constitutional Percent of Market Value (POMV) rule, would actually make the Fund stronger, more efficient, and better protected.

Right now, Alaska manages the Permanent Fund in a way that almost no serious endowment or trust in the world does. We keep “earnings” in a side account, separate from the principal, and let the Legislature draw directly from that pot. This creates uncertainty. Because lawmakers don’t know how much they’ll need until the last minute, fund managers are forced to keep billions in short-term, low-yield holdings to cover potential withdrawals. That drag reduces long-term returns and prevents the Fund from growing as much as it could.

In money management, this is the opposite of best practice. Many major endowment—from Ivy League universities to the largest sovereign wealth funds—use a single-fund model. All assets remain invested together in one pool, and a fixed percentage is withdrawn each year. That structure allows the portfolio to stay fully invested, which maximizes compounding returns over decades. It also stabilizes withdrawals so policymakers can budget with confidence.

This isn’t theory—it’s how the most successful funds in the world operate. Commonwealth North, Alaska’s most respected nonpartisan civic group, studied the issue in detail and unanimously recommended merging the accounts into one endowment with a fixed, constitutionally protected draw of 4–5% per year.

Still, some Alaskans are understandably cautious about change. Let’s take their concerns seriously.

Concern 1: “The Fund hasn’t been managed well enough to deserve more trust.”
That’s a separate issue and if the fund isn’t managed well enough than the legislature needs to hire new managers and do a better job on their reviews. This reform doesn’t give up accountability. In fact, it adds more structure. A single-account model removes the guesswork, locks withdrawals to a predictable rule, and allows managers to focus on long-term growth instead of short-term liquidity. And nothing prevents us from demanding stronger oversight or performance reviews. Those are separate conversations.

Concern 2: “A 5% draw is too high.”
I agree. While 5% may be nice, it’s aggressive if we want to protect long-term value. A safer number is 4% to 4.5%. That’s still high enough to support services and the dividend, but conservative enough to ensure the Fund’s purchasing power is preserved for future generations.

Concern 3: “We should only spend earnings, not principal.”
This one sound sensible, but it reflects an outdated view of investing. Many of the best investments today—think Apple or Amazon—don’t pay large dividends. Their value comes from growth, not “earnings.” By contrast, companies like Ford or Sears returned plenty of dividends but delivered far less wealth over time. Limiting ourselves to only what shows up as “earnings” is like tying one hand behind our back.

A better way to think about it is like a farmer with chickens and a cornfield. Should he only live on the eggs the chickens lay each month? Or should he also plan for the annual harvest, budgeting carefully so it lasts until the next season? The Permanent Fund works the same way. With smart management, we can responsibly draw a small, fixed percent of the Fund’s total value each year, regardless of whether those returns are labeled “earnings” or not.

This reform doesn’t cut the dividend. It doesn’t grow government. What it does is modernize the Fund, align it with global best practices, and lock in protections that keep politicians from raiding “extra” cash.

A unified endowment model brings three benefits:

  • More reliable growth – less idle cash, more strategic investing.
  • Stable, predictable budgeting – lawmakers can plan with greater confidence.
  • Stronger long-term protections – the Fund stays intact and continues to grow.

The Permanent Fund is Alaska’s crown jewel. We owe it to future generations to manage it wisely. Fear of change should not keep us from making improvements that every other successful endowment in the world already uses.

I respect Robb, but on this one, he’s wrong. Merging the accounts under a constitutional draw rule won’t weaken the Fund—it’s the best way to protect it for decades to come.

David Eastman: Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated Today

51

By REP. DAVID EASTMAN

Today, I saw a great American, Charlie Kirk, assassinated live on camera while taking questions from students at Utah Valley University. He was 31. His wife Erika, their 4-year-old daughter, and 2-year-old son, now get to pick up the pieces. I do not recommend watching the video. It was a public execution.

I was proud to know Charlie as a peer. We were each Claremont Institute Fellows and were classmates in Claremont’s Telos Academy. Viriginia legislator Nick Freitas, another great American I am proud to know, put it this way:

“Charlie was the best of us. They didn’t murder Charlie Kirk because he was an extremist or a fascist or a threat to democracy or inciting violence, or any of the other reasons that they are now trying to put out on X and TikTok and everywhere else. They murdered him because he was effective. He was effective. The man made incredible arguments while at the same time always trying to seek out common humanity. He might have disagreed with arguments but he didn’t hate anyone. And they murdered him. That’s what happened.”

It now goes without saying that Charlie stood courageously on the front lines in today’s political scene. His wife and kids are now without a husband and father because he did so. We rightly honor our military veterans who served honorably on our behalf in our nation’s military. We do well to bestow similar honor on those few brave souls currently putting themselves in harm’s way by standing on behalf of their fellow countrymen in the political sphere.

Do not hear me to say that politicians are deserving of honor. Being elected is not a mark of courage in 2025. If anything, it is the mark of someone who has no courage. People get elected for many reasons, courage is not usually one of them. Those few who do have courage, and are standing on behalf of others, instead of themselves, are easy to pick out in 2025. I expect this to only be more true in the coming years.

Our current political establishment bears them unending antipathy. To have courage and to stand for someone or something other than yourself is incredibly destabilizing in a political environment like Juneau or DC where an honest politicians is one who, when he’s bought, stays bought.

In 2025, no political figure deserves honor who does not bear the mark of the antipathy that the reigning political establishment, both Democrat and Republican, invariably dish out.

Charlie bore that mark before he was assassinated. Do not honor him because of the manner of his death. Honor him because he was so courageous and so effective that they could find no better way to shut him up than to murder him. Rest in peace Charlie.

Rep. David Eastman represented the Mat-Su Valley in the Alaska House of Representatives from January 2017 to January 2025. Visit davideastman.org for more information.

Joe Geldhof: Juneau’s affordability depends on “yes, yes, and no” votes for October’s ballot measures

5

By JOE GELDHOF

And so, it begins. The City and Borough of Juneau Assembly has embarked on a fear campaign to convince Juneau voters to vote against their obvious financial well-being.

Assembly members are floating the notion that passage of the initiative that would eliminate sales tax on groceries and utilities will hurt their ability to provide essential city services. They also suggest that capping the millage rate on property taxes will somehow cause fiscal chaos down at city hall.

None of these fears is true.

The best way to make Juneau more affordable is to adopt the two sensible ballot measures put forward by the Affordable Juneau Coalition. These common-sense proposals to make Juneau more affordable were endorsed by a large segment of Juneau’s population who had finally had enough idle talk about affordability and petitioned to put real change on the ballot.

Having failed to make Juneau more affordable, the mayor and Assembly decided to put a gimmicky shape-shifting seasonal sales tax proposal on the ballot. This ill-conceived measure will actually increase local sales taxes. Not only that, it makes permanent a portion of the tax that was up until now subject to periodic voter approval.

The current Assembly has failed to deal with our community’s fiscal realities. Juneau is a great place to live but faces challenges. We are a community with a decreasing population and one that is increasingly elderly. Transportation and freight rates also make it expensive to live in Juneau.

There is no question that Juneau needs to maintain essential services. We do. And we can and will continue to meet our public safety requirements, provide clean water, and take care of sewage. That’s a given, although how we do this efficiently is an open question.

Everyone is facing rapidly rising utility bills for water and sewer in the next few years. It’s fair to ask why those rates are suddenly rising and why wastewater was not a higher priority than other less-important budget items.

Why is it that the CBJ Assembly created a situation where utility costs are skyrocketing? It’s simple. Because they keep fooling around with discretionary funding and handing out grants for activities far removed from taking care of core governmental tasks.

Juneau has excellent access to the outdoors and all it offers a myriad of recreational activities, some of which are facilitated by CBJ. That need not change. But our community also wastes a significant amount of public funds on organizations and for activities that provide the average citizen with little to no benefit.

The CBJ Assembly routinely ignores public sentiment when it comes to spending. Twice, the Assembly has ignored the public mandate not to go big for a new city hall.

The recent acquisition of the Burns Building using millions of your tax dollars is but one example. The renovation and outfitting for this new acquisition and the need for more parking at the new city hall will cost millions more from all of us.

Or how about spending upward of 10 million local tax dollars to rip down housing on Telephone Hill? This destruction takes place with no plan to actually redevelop this historic area in Juneau. Any sensible person would ask how we can afford this kind of silliness.

It’s time to make Juneau more affordable. In fact, it’s past time. There is not much any of us can do to fix the obvious disconnect between Assembly actions or inaction and an affordable Juneau. What we can do is vote for affordability this October. Vote YES on Ballot Measure 1 that keeps property taxes from being jacked up by the CBJ Assembly without your vote.

Vote YES on Ballot Measure 2 that will eliminate sales tax on your groceries and essential utilities.

And definitely vote NO on the wacky Ballot Measure 3 that creates a shifting seasonal sales tax formula that only politicians and the bureaucracy could cook up. YES, YES, and NO is the way to go this October.

Joe Geldhof has been a resident of Juneau since 1979. He is the principal author of the local cruise passenger measure and the statewide cruise ship taxation initiative that were both enacted via citizens’ initiatives, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars flowing into Juneau’s local government coffers. Joe isn’t averse to taxation, but he’s wearied of the waste and wanton spending habits exhibited by the CBJ in the last decade.

Dave Donley: Why I Am Running

25

By DAVE DONLEY

I am running for the Anchorage Assembly Midtown District 4 in the April 2026 election. I grew up in Spenard/Midtown and served sixteen years representing Midtown Anchorage in the State House and Senate. After nine years on the Anchorage School Board, I am term limited from running again. The Assembly seat I am running for is currently held by Assembly Member Felix Rivera and he is term limited from running for re-election, so it is an open seat.

I am running to make the lives of Anchorage families better. To do that I will work to restore common sense to local government by focusing on three key basics of local government: SAFETY – SCHOOLS – ROADS.

SAFETY:

I will work for safer homes, neighborhoods, and schools by prioritizing the numbers and effectiveness of our police, ensuring prompt emergency fire and medical response, and protecting our neighborhoods and families from criminal homeless activity. The current remedies and responses to Anchorage’s homeless problem are wasteful, failing, and unaccountable. As a first step, Anchorage needs a homeless Navigation Center – such centers are proving highly successful in the lower 48 – to comprehensively provide services to transition the willing out of homelessness.

SCHOOLS:

I will continue to support our students and teachers through assisting schools with transportation, safety, and sports program funding. I advocate fully staffing the School Resource Officer (APD) program which is essential for protecting our children attending schools. As I successfully did as a State Senator and Anchorage School Board Member, I will continue to advocate for fair state funding of Anchorage schools. I will work for greater co-operation between ASD and the city with maintenance services to increase efficiency and reduce costs.

ROADS:

As a State Senator I successfully championed multiple key road projects and transportation reforms for better and safer Anchorage roads. Better snow removal and basic maintenance can be accomplished. A good primary road system protects our neighborhoods from short-cutting speeders.

I have spent my entire career serving the citizens of Anchorage and Alaska. This is my twenty-fifth year of serving in elected office representing my hometown of Anchorage. After nine years on the Anchorage School Board, my twins will be graduating in April 2026, at the same time my School Board term ends.

As a School Board Member, I proposed budget reductions, greater efficiency, patriotic activities, and even fairer pay for teachers. I advocated parental rights and common-sense reforms.  I held the Board accountable and proved I will not be intimidated from calling for “Common Sense on SAFETY – SCHOOLS – ROADS” in the Assembly.

My website is donley4alaska.com and I ask for your support now and your votes this April.

Former Senator Dave Donley served 16 years in the Alaska Legislature, is in his third and final term on the Anchorage School Board and has twins in public high school.

Greg Sarber: Alaska’s Untamed Call

14

By GREG SARBER

This fall, my daughter drew a sheep hunting permit in the Tok Management Area (TMA), an area reserved for trophy sheep hunting. In preparation for the trip, we discovered that the sheep population had declined due to a recent harsh winter; however, we decided to go anyway. My daughter said that at least it would be a fun camping trip, and if nothing else, climbing hills would be good training for her legs, as she had an audition coming up for the Homer Nutcracker Ballet.

On the second day of the trip, while busting through a hillside of alder bushes to reach the high country, I had some time to contemplate what a peculiar group we residents of Alaska are in how we choose to live and recreate, and that extends to our kids.

Except for those in the military who are posted here, every resident chooses to live here. We have the freedom to move somewhere else, but for some reason, the residents of this state decide to live in Alaska. Our reasons might be for the fishing and hunting, the scenery, a job opportunity, or just to have a little elbow room, but all of us give up easier living outside the state to make our homes here.

However, to do so, we pay a price. Alaska challenges you. Tasks that should be relatively routine become difficult when you add in the Alaska factor. Even residents in our large urban cities face challenges that their counterparts in the lower 48 never have to consider. If you are a gardener, you’d better build a fence that is moose high and porcupine tight before you plant the first seed. Even getting the kids off to school or going to the grocery store can be a challenge with deep snow in the driveway, frost-covered car windows, slippery winter driving conditions, and the potential of encountering a moose in the street or parking lots.

Rural residents face even greater challenges due to the high cost of fuel and groceries. Things that the lower 48 Americans consider essential, become expensive luxuries in much of our state. Throw in long, dark, and cold winters, and you can understand why living here isn’t for the faint of heart. Yet we all choose this place to live.

As I mentioned, I was having these thoughts while walking up through an alder thicket on a steep hillside. If you have never had the opportunity to enjoy that particular pleasure, it isn’t possible for me to adequately put it into words. Let’s put it this way: if alder thicket walking were a potential criminal sentence, the ACLU would sue to have it declared cruel and unusual punishment. It wouldn’t be allowed for even our worst criminals.

It was when we finally got through the alders and above the last of the willow and berry bushes, arriving at the high country, that I remembered why I chose to live in Alaska and wanted to share it with my child. The beauty and solemnity of parts of this state are beyond description. In the high valleys of the Alaska mountains, it feels like you are in one of the magnificent cathedrals of Europe and are standing in the presence of God. My words are inadequate to express the feeling. I wish I were a poet so I could do a better job of describing what it is like.

Reflecting on my trip helped me answer the question of why some of us choose to live here. To do so, we face brutal challenges, like my fight with the Alders. However, the rewards go far beyond the struggle.

Greg Sarber is a lifelong Alaskan. He is a petroleum engineer who spent his career working on Alaska’s North Slope. Now retired, he lives with his family in Homer, Alaska. Greg serves as a board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., the publisher of Must Read Alaska.

Suzanne Downing Resignation

173

Dear Readers,

Our Board of Directors is saddened to announce the sudden resignation of our esteemed editor, Suzanne Downing, as she embarks on a new journey.

Suzanne has been an integral part of our organization, bringing unmatched passion and dedication to her role. Her commitment to delivering insightful coverage of Alaska’s news and issues has profoundly shaped our publication and earned the trust of our readers.

We extend our deepest gratitude to Suzanne for her tireless efforts and the lasting impact she has made on our team and the community. We wish her all the best in her future endeavors.

As we wish Suzanne every success in her next chapter, we remain committed to prioritizing the high-quality, independent journalism that our readers rely on. The Board of Directors at Must Read Alaska is dedicated to promoting and protecting a free press and to delivering comprehensive reporting on issues that affect Alaska and our communities.

Looking ahead, watch for new content sections that will focus on rural issues, faith, and family, alongside the stories we have consistently covered. This refined focus is a direct response to feedback from our readers, ensuring that we cover stories that resonate with our audience. As we strive to enhance our service, we invite our readers to share their suggestions and feedback by reaching out to us at [email protected].

Must Read Alaska is committed to providing in-depth reporting on issues that impact Alaska and our communities. We appreciate your ongoing trust and support as we continue our dedication to excellence.

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

Todd Lindley, Vice President

Alaska Gold Communications, Inc., publisher of Must Read Alaska