Saturday, August 1, 2026
Home Blog Page 1662

This changes everything: LNG imports ahead for Kenai

NOT PART OF WALKER GASLINE PLAN

Last month, Andeavor (the company formerly known as Tesoro) purchased the Kenai Liquefied Natural Gas facility from ConocoPhillips.

The Nikiski plant, which had previously operated as an LNG export facility since the late 1960s, came at an attractive price: $10 million. This is the believed transaction price for what is a massive waterfront property with potential to make substantial sums of money — an enterprise with a view. Andeavor said it would strengthen the “integrated value chain” and “provide low-cost fuel for our refinery to produce the fuels that consumers in Alaska need to keep their lives moving.”

Where would Andeavor be getting this low-cost fuel?

One hint is that the company allowed an important export license to expire, because Cook Inlet natural gas is not competitive for export. That can only mean one thing: Andeavor plans to import LNG to bring down the cost of its refinery operations, not export it as the plant has traditionally done.

At a time when Gov. Bill Walker has pinned his legacy on building the largest infrastructure project in North American history, the AK-LNG project, Andeavor has quietly done what the private sector does best: optimize. Andeavor found a way to lower the cost of operations at its refinery by responding to market conditions. Clearly, they see it as a risk worth taking.

WHY DID CONOCOPHILLIPS SELL?

ConocoPhillips scaled back operations in 2015 and started looking for a buyer for the Kenai LNG plant in 2016. The operation was transferred to Andeavor on Jan. 31, 2018, allowing ConocoPhillips to exit its footprint in Cook Inlet and direct all of its efforts to the more profitable North Slope oil fields, where it has been investing heavily.

The Kenai LNG plant began operations in 1969 but has been in “warm shutdown” mode since 2015. It can liquefy 0.2 bcc per day of gas, or 1.5 million m/t per year of LNG.

WHAT WILL ANDEAVOR DO WITH IT?

That 1.5 million m/t of gas can be used to operate Andeavor’s refinery, which produces 62,700 barrels of product a day — jet fuel, diesel, gas, butane, and propane, for example.

In fact, Andeavor makes nearly all of the fuel used in Alaska except in Southeast.

The natural gas likely will be purchased on the international spot market and stored in tanks at Nikiski. The company will also have the ability to sell imported natural gas to customers from the Kenai to Fairbanks.

It would be a small operation in the global scheme of things, but in fact Andeavor could make a tidy profit selling gas on the side.

“We are still considering our options,” a spokesman for Andeavor told Platts, an energy publication.

WHAT ABOUT WALKER’S AK-LNG PROJECT?

The AK-LNG project envisioned by Gov. Bill Walker is, many experts agree, at least a decade away. That project has three major components:

  • A gas treatment plant on the North Slope
  • An 800-mile gas pipeline
  • A liquefaction facility in Nikiski on the Kenai Peninsula, along with docks and an export facility for shipping to Asian markets.

The AK-LNG project filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to start the permitting process last April, but has been rebuffed by FERC, which sent a scolding letter in January to AGDC, Alaska’s publicly owned corporation, saying its application falls well short of acceptable.  In effect, FERC gave it a classroom grade of “Incomplete”.

AGDC wants to be on a schedule to get gas to the market by 2025 and would like to start construction next year. But things are dicey now with FERC. The governor and AGDC President Keith Meyer have been conspicuously silent since receiving the letter from FERC.

All last year, Walker and Meyer worked to establish a relationship with China. They desperately need a buyer for the large of Alaska North Slope natural gas, and even more urgently they need money to build the project.

The AK-LNG project is the platform Gov. Walker ran on in his bid for governor in 2010 and was again the center of his platform in 2014 when he won office. He felt the companies were going too slowly. He sold himself as the leader who would get the AK-LNG project done soonest and most certainly.

“The State needs to ensure completion of a large volume gas line to tidewater at Cook Inlet for shipment of LNG to Asia. No company should be able to halt progress while demanding concessions from the state,” he wrote in 2014.

Once he actually took office, Walker pushed the private sector out and made it a State-owned and State-managed enterprise that has since spent hundreds of millions of dollars to develop the $45+ billion project. Since the private sector partners exited, AK-LNG has struggled to gain traction on any front, ranging from markets to permit applications.

Gov. Walker, with support from his well stacked AGDC board, recently made agreements in principle with China to take over major components of the project, and last month, Walker’s supplemental budget included language to cut out the Legislature as the appropriator for the project, consolidating his authority over it as he goes to his new funding source: China.

However, these agreements with Chinese state enterprises are not binding and are most accurately seen as a willingness to discuss certain ideas further.

[Read: Storm clouds gather for AGDC]

COMPETITION FOR THE WALKER GASLINE?

Long-term state project aspirations aside, a company like Andeavor is stuck in the present with Cook Inlet prices for natural gas, and those are just not competitive due to the high cost of operating in Cook Inlet.

While Andeavor may not want to upset the Walker Administration’s gasline efforts by importing gas to Alaska, it’s simply cheaper to get it from elsewhere, and the Kenai plant can be up and running in just two years.

That would mean Andeavor could provide more affordable fuel to Alaskans and also to the air carriers that stop over at Ted Stevens International Airport to refuel. The cargo jet refueling capacity at Ted Stevens represents a major part of the Alaska economy that must remain competitive, and Andeavor is likely aware that it needs to be nimble with its jet fuel prices, or air carriers will look elsewhere.

LNG coming into Alaska could also allow the fertilizer plant in Nikiski to restart and bring back dozens of jobs on the Peninsula, which urgently needs them.

Agrium, the fertilizer company that is now called Nutrien, cannot manufacture fertilizer without economical access to the raw material — natural gas. It’s been in shutdown mode for years, as a result.

And then there’s Fairbanks: A source of natural gas coming on line in the next two years is going to be of great interest to the Interior Energy Project (IEP), where tens of miles of gas delivery lines have been laid around the Fairbanks business core but, as of yet, stand devoid of actual gas. They built it, but the gas has yet to come. But with Andeavor’s LNG plant acquisition and apparent business plans, that could conceivably change.

Construction of the new LNG storage tanks in Fairbanks could be fast-tracked and come online by 2020, which would allow the IEP to get $15 million in state tax credits that would help cover some of the facility’s cost.

With its own storage capacity, Andeavor will likely be able to sell its excess natural gas to these and other projects. All it has to do is bid on cargo that is floating around the Pacific looking for a home. The recently growing spot market for LNG has given Andeavor a new possible line of business and a leg up as an energy provider in Alaska. Hilcorp, you’ve got company.

SPOT MARKET CHANGE EVERYTHING

The LNG spot market started originally in the late 1990s as new projects came online and old contracts expired. LNG began to be sold on an as-needed/as-available basis. If winter was less severe somewhere, for example, the excess LNG is sold at a cheaper price elsewhere. That market has grown exponentially in recent years with the emergence of a gas glut in the Pacific Basin.

As a result, long-term contracts are not in fashion in the LNG market in this era, with so many competing LNG projects coming online.

Sen. Shower opts not to join majority

7

Sen. Mike Shower, just one week into his term in the Alaska Senate, is following in the steps of his predecessor Mike Dunleavy, and has decided not to join the Republican-led caucus.

His concerns and his decision involves budgeting issues and the growing size of the State budget. Caucus members stick together on the budget. Without being a caucus member, he will likely have just one staff person assigned to him and will not be included in important caucus meetings.

“As the budget stands today, and with a governor and House majority wanting increased spending, it’s likely there’ll be a budget increase more than our district would support at the end of the process,” he said on Facebook today.

“All members of a majority caucus must agree to vote for the budget no matter its size. For this reason, I’m unable to commit to be a member of the Senate Majority caucus at this time. I believe we need additional cuts, not an increase in government spending. I appreciate the Senate Majority members who have been very gracious and welcoming. However, I need to focus on the priorities of District E.”

The governor’s proposed operating budget is $4.7 billion, larger than what he proposed last year and the same budget he signed off on at the end of last year’s budget wrangling.

But with more than $200 million in supplemental requests, Gov. Bill Walker’s budget actually is pushed to nearly $5 billion in this fiscal year.

Shower, who was chosen by Walker to fill out the term of gubernatorial candidate Dunleavy, is concerned that the House Democrats and the governor will overpower the Republican Senate and force spending even higher, like they did last year. Another Valley Senator, Shelley Hughes, also stepped out of the caucus last year and remains out because she can’t support a growing budget during a time when revenues are not meeting expenditures.

Surviving abortion: What do you do with the baby?

SB 124 – BORN ALIVE BILL

The goal of abortion is to end a pregnancy and extinguish life in the womb.

But while abortion ends the pregnancy in all cases (and on occasion the life of the mother), some babies escape the womb still alive. What happens to them when the are breathing, making sounds, when their arms and legs are moving or their heart is beating? Does the abortionist kill the baby or provide help to a living person in need of aid?

SB 124, whose sponsor is Sen. Cathy Giessel, addresses that. It’s a bill that provides medical professionals with clarity on the issue of abortion survivor babies. The bills’ next hearing is in the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 7 at 1:30 pm, and again March 9 at 1:30 pm.

The bill is “An Act relating to the duties of physicians and health care practitioners when performing or inducing abortions; providing that a child removed from a pregnant woman’s womb alive after an abortion may be surrendered and found to be a child in need of aid; and providing for an effective date.”

The ACLU of Alaska opposes SB 124, saying that the measure would “chip away at a woman’s right to control her body by forcing her to undergo a dangerous medical procedure risking her fertility and even her life. SB 124 is also an unconstitutional infringement on a woman’s fundamental right to privacy.”

But the bill specifically says that if in the doctor’s judgment, which the bill’s language acknowledges is subjective, a child can survive outside the womb and there is not a serious risk to the life or health of the mother, the doctor should use the abortion method that is less likely to kill the child. That might mean bringing the baby out head first, or not severing the spinal cord or head prior to abortion.

FETUS, PARENT?

Pro-choice advocates struggle to avoid using the word “baby” or “infant” to describe these tiny humans who emerge live from a failed abortion. That difficulty was displayed by Sen. Tom Begich on Feb. 19, when during a Senate Health and Social Services Committee, Begich asked Sen. Giessel a question where he referred to the surviving child as a “fetus,” yet referred to the mother as a “parent.”

“The bill specifies the ‘form to best survive,’ the process to best survive, and this is the conflict that I might have with this legislation,” Begich said. “Would this restrict the choices available then to a doctor which might be much less risky to a parent if it is more viable for a fetus at that point to survive?”

The answer, Giessel said, is no. The decision lies with the physician, who would be in in the best position to know which method of abortion would or would not be risky for the mother.

But the description given by Begich was left unaddressed — is the survivor with a beating heart still a fetus or is it a human being? Begich seemed uncomfortable with being precise.

The initial presentation of SB 124.

Giessel, the bill sponsor, is also a nurse practitioner and through her bill is hoping to preserve some infants’ lives, even in an era when the Alaska Supreme Court has made it all but impossible to put sideboards on abortion laws. SB 124 seems to take a “reasonable” approach to at least save a few lives.

HOW MANY MIGHT SURVIVE?

Planned Parenthood is the largest provider of abortions in Alaska, performing 1,300 of the 1,334 abortions that are on record for 2015. Some 65 percent of Alaska women having abortions were in the first eight weeks of their pregnancies.

The number of babies aborted after 20 weeks in Alaska is variable and it’s not always easy to say exactly what week a baby is in utero.

In 2014, 44 were aborted between 17-20 weeks and 15 were aborted at 21-24 weeks. But in 2015, only 2 were aborted between 17-20 weeks and 1 was aborted at 21-24 weeks. Reporting by abortion providers may be purposefully inaccurate.

Most babies who are born at 24 weeks can survive, if cared for by modern neonatal medicine. The second trimester to a pregnancy extends to about week 27, similar to the infant in the photo illustration above.

[Read Alaska Department of Health and Social Services 2015 statistical report]

BORN-ALIVE BILL IN CONGRESS

This is a movement that has national momentum. The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (H.R. 4712), would give congressionally mandated protection to newborns who survive abortions. The bill says that if the baby survives, he or she is entitled to the same care that any other baby would be given. It also creates criminal penalties of up to five years in prison for health workers who don’t provide the life-saving care.

WASHINGTON STATE TO MAKE INSURERS PAY FOR ELECTIVE ABORTIONS

While Alaska Senate Bill 124 would have medical professionals provide aid to Alaska children born live during failed abortion procedures, Washington State Senate is moving in the opposite direction: It’s requiring all who pay for health insurance to pay for the elective abortions of others.

The Washington Senate has passed a law requiring all health insurance providers to cover both birth control and elective abortions. The Senate passed the bill by 27-22 on Saturday; the House had already passed its version.

Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, is expected to sign the bill.

Dunleavy gets a big endorsement from …

2

In the days leading up to the Alaska Republican Party’s State Convention, former Anchorage Mayor Dan Sullivan has made his choice, and it’s Mike Dunleavy for governor.

The video endorsement released in advance of the convention can be seen here.

The 77-second endorsement was posted on Facebook this morning by the political action committee “Dunleavy for Alaska.” It features “Mayor Dan,” the man who ran for lieutenant governor in 2014 and won  74 percent of the Republican vote — 74,000 votes statewide.

Sullivan has at times considered his own run for governor. But that time is not now, evidently: “I’ve thought a lot about this upcoming governor’s race. This next decade is going to be critical for Alaska,” Sullivan starts out, as he looks out a window on a snowy Anchorage day, his back toward the camera. Then he turns to the camera and launches the endorsement: “And that’s why I’m supporting Mike Dunleavy for governor of the great state of Alaska.”

The Republican State Convention is March 8-10 and all candidates who have announced for the Republican ticket are likely to attend, including Dunleavy and his competitors, Mike Chenault, Scott Hawkins, and Michael Sheldon.

Mr. Smoldon goes to Juneau? Not just now

By TODD SMOLDON
GUEST CONTRIBUTOR

For years, I approached politics the way most Alaskans do.  I paid very little attention to the legislative process and then complained about the decisions that were made.  Essentially, I used my undeclared voter registration status as a political “safe space.”  Gov. Walker’s election in 2014 on “the unity ticket” proved he would do anything to get elected, and I started to pay more attention.

It is difficult to make political changes if you don’t join a party. As a fiscal conservative who believes in small government, becoming a Democrat was never an option, but I was very frustrated with some of the Republicans in Alaska. Over the years, I had watched too many of them vote and legislate in a way that did not honor the platform they claimed to support.

Then, in 2016, Representatives LeDoux, Seaton, and Stutes caucused with the Democrats and gave them control of the House. That was the tipping point for me, and I felt compelled to get involved.

I registered as a Republican and fought to get my local district organized, but I never imagined that I would submit my name to replace Senator Dunleavy.  I had no desire to change what I was doing.  I love my teaching job. The opportunity to be a teacher and a positive male role model for teenage girls dealing with mental health issues has been an incredible blessing. Disrupting my family, career, and taking a pay cut made the decision even more difficult.

A conversation I had with a friend changed everything. While speaking about our choices to fill the empty seat he said, “It sounds like you want a clone.” At that moment, my own political action rhetoric raced through my mind.

I heard what I had told my students and others many times about getting involved: “One person can make a difference,” “You have the power to change things,” “If you want to make a difference, stop complaining and do something.”  So, to honor the state that I love and out of respect and appreciation for the people of Senate District E and Senator Dunleavy, I submitted my application.

The good news is that I get to spend time with my family, continue in a job that I love, and motivate people to get politically active so that we can elect a new governor in November.

I was a bit shocked when I made the short list. I had only been a registered Republican in District 10 for 14 months. But in hindsight, it makes sense. I am “entrenched in conservative values” and I believe the district party leaders thought I was the most like Senator Dunleavy.  (Albeit with a mullet, about a foot shorter, and not as good looking.)  But despite their desire to have me seriously considered as a replacement, Gov. Walker continually refused to consider me.

Why?  Because I have been a strident opponent of the governor’s agenda. I openly criticize the governor in op-eds and on the radio. I remind people that his partial veto of the PFD took 120 million dollars out of the Mat-Su economy.  I criticize him for not filling empty State trooper positions that are desperately needed to protect us from an explosion of crime exacerbated by SB 91.

I bombastically question why he would continue to fund a gas pipeline project that is not economical. And I continually highlight the many campaign promises that he broke almost immediately after taking office; to protect the dividend, to cut the operating budget by 15 percent, and to not support any new taxes.

At some point in the process, Gov. Walker must have asked his staff, “Would it be better for Mr. Smoldon to be in Juneau where he has to be more diplomatic, or should I just declare him unacceptable?”  He chose the latter.

Many people have asked me why he summarily rejected me as a candidate without explanation.

The answer is simple. There is no reasonable explanation. How could he tell everyone that he would not appoint me because I have exposed his terrible policy and the harm he has caused to the economy and people of Alaska?

Mr. Smoldon goes to Juneau? No, not right now. But the good news is that I get to spend time with my family, continue in a job that I love, and motivate people to get politically active so that we can elect a new governor in November.

Todd Smoldon has lived in Alaska for 30 years, is a resident of Willow, and a high school economics teacher.

With AK-LNG, China is not just interested in gas supply

6

By SCOTT HAWKINS
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

After sidelining three of the world’s premier energy companies in order to “go it alone” on an Alaska LNG line, the Walker Administration is now looking to China to salvage the troubled project.

The latest sign of this is in the Governor’s supplemental budget for 2018, where he has asked for an open-ended appropriation allowing him to accept and spend investments on the project – including from China — without further legislative oversight. It is similar in a legal sense to some of the state’s revolving loan funds.

There is much about Walker’s proposal that is troubling. He is asking for carte blanche authority to essentially sell the AK-LNG project to a foreign entity.

And not just any foreign entity, but one that is the main global rival of the U.S. The project Walker wishes to sell, which is the practical effect of his proposal, would be the largest energy project in the history of the U.S.

For a moment, let’s suppose that the Alaska Legislature gives Walker that carte blanche authority. How would that look?

The next big step for the project, besides getting its troubled FERC permit applications in order, is to enter into a project phase called FEED – “front end engineering and design.” This is where much of the heavy lifting takes place from an engineering standpoint.  It is massively costly, well north of a billion dollars.  It is what Walker hopes he can convince the Chinese to underwrite.

WHAT’S IN IT FOR THE CHINESE?

What would Chinese state interests want in return? Management control. Contracts for engineering and construction entities in China favored by Premier Xi Jinping’s regime. Strong influence over project economics, which could influence the netback value of Alaska’s gas resources. Financing packages from preferred Chinese financial institutions. In other words, de facto hegemony over a large part of Alaska’s economy and an important national U.S. energy asset.

Those who pay the tab name the tune.

Make no mistake about it, Chinese state interests will not make a major investment in an LNG project simply to lock in a gas supply. There are too many options in the Pacific basin for supply, including Canada, Australia, Indonesia, and even the Middle East.

If supply was the main consideration, far better to commit to several medium sized projects, thus diversifying risk. Many or all of these would be lower cost projects, too, thus improving the competitiveness of Chinese industries. Indeed, this is the most likely course of action for China.

A REALITY CHECK

As unsavory as the idea of Chinese state interests controlling Alaska’s next generation energy project may seem, it is not a very likely scenario. There are several reasons for this.

First, China’s appetite for new energy supply is likely to come in below current expectations over the next 20 years.  Indeed, GDP growth has been slowing in China since 2010, when it peaked at 10.5 percent.  In 2017 it stood at 6.8 percent, and is expected to ease back further from there.

A second and related reason is that the government of Xi Jinping is exerting ever-heavier control over the economy.  While this is good for favored state investment projects, it is not good for the economy and will push growth even lower.

A harbinger of where all this is headed is the recent approval of a rules change within the Chinese communist party allowing General Secretary Xi to hold his office for life. He now stands as the most powerful Chinese leader since Mao Zedong. One can safely say that the natural temptations of power to seek ever more power will be increasingly alive and well with China’s authoritarian regime in the years to come.


Indeed, as The Economist magazine noted in the cover article of its most recent edition, China has crossed over from an authoritarian regime to an outright dictatorship.


This phenomenon of an Asian country bursting upon the world scene, appearing invincible and seemingly headed for ever great power, reminds me of the overwrought fears about Japan in the 1980s.

While Japan had indeed rebuilt and re-industrialized on an impressive scale up through the 1980s, it took only one financial crisis, triggered by a small real estate development group called Recruit Cosmos, to lay bare the country’s structural economic flaws. Japan has never fully recovered its vitality since then.

Today, nobody worries about Japan ruling the world. Instead, we worry about China. Yet, the structural imbalances there are even more profound than those that faced – and continue to face – Japan.

Having traveled extensively in Asia on business, I have had the opportunity to witness these sorts of transitions first-hand. While China is a large, powerful country and will be for generations to come, her best days may very well be behind her.

The final reason not to worry about the Alaska – China Syndrome coming to pass is the most simple:  China has not yet expressed any real interest in the project.

The memorandum of understanding that Gov. Walker and his executives at AGDC waved proudly over the holidays after President Trump’s visit to China is little more than a photo opportunity.  If you actually read that very fluffy 4-page memo, it is nothing more than an agreement to talk about the project further. Possibly over tea.

In the meantime, Alaskans should sleep easily, worrying not about a Chinese takeover. Those of us who care greatly about the AK-LNG project should worry a lot more about the very wrong turn the project took when Gov. Walker decided to “go it alone.”

Yet, a gentle word of caution to legislators would be in order, if for no other reason than to avoid piling further errors upon past misjudgments, making the AK-LNG project even harder to salvage when the day for doing so finally arrives.

Scott Hawkins is an economist, business owner, candidate for governor of Alaska, and 35-year resident of the state.

Opting out: REI takes aim at guns

COMPANY IS PICKING OFF BRANDS

Recreational Equipment Inc. is not in the firearms business. The closest you can get to weaponry in the camping and outdoor company is a can of bear spray or Gerber fixed-blade knife.

The 154-store company, which styles itself as customer-owned, sells recreational equipment and clothing, bikes, kayaks, climbing gear, and snowshoes. Members get a rebate at the end of the year, which is about 10 percent off of everything they purchased. They get coupons and catalogs in the mail.

But now, REI is on a mission go kill what it calls assault rifles. The company, whose Anchorage store is one of the busiest in the nation, jumped on the gun-ban bandwagon.

It’s cutting off inventory that comes from subsidiaries of Vista Outdoors, the owner of a number of companies that include Savage Arms, a Massachusetts firearms maker of rifles that include semi-automatics.

But since REI doesn’t sell firearms, it looked for the next target, and Vista owns companies such as Camelbak, a hydration backpack maker; and Giro and Bell, which make bike helmets. Vista’s stock dropped 8.44 percent on Friday, closing at $15.42.

Vista had been targeted by an online petition at Change.org, and REI was responding, publishing this statement on Thursday:

REI does not sell guns. We believe that it is the job of companies that manufacture and sell guns and ammunition to work towards common sense solutions that prevent the type of violence that happened in Florida last month. In the last few days, we’ve seen such action from companies like Dick’s Sporting Goods and Walmart and we applaud their leadership.
 
This week, we have been in active discussions with Vista Outdoor, which has recently acquired several companies that are longtime partners of REI. These include Giro, Bell, Camelbak, Camp Chef and Blackburn. Vista also owns Savage Arms, which manufactures guns including “modern sporting rifles.” 
 
This morning we learned that Vista does not plan to make a public statement that outlines a clear plan of action. As a result, we have decided to place a hold on future orders of products that Vista sells through REI while we assess how Vista proceeds.
 
Companies are showing they can contribute if they are willing to lead. We encourage Vista to do just that.

WHAT REI SUPPORTS

Around the nation, REI has long opposed personal protection in its stores and has signs posted prohibiting firearms or weapons (including knives) on its premises.

And while those Bell bike helmets are made in the USA, the vast majority of REI inventory is made in China, with Vietnam as a growing contributor.

REI, with its ban on Vista products, is willing to lead in some areas, such as killing a company that has any association with the NRA, but is not leading in others, such as allowing communist slave labor to produce high- and moderate-end clothing, shoes and equipment to REI elite members.

In 1997, a group of co-op members led an effort to get the recreation behemoth to stop trading with China, due to its human rights violations.

The co-op’s board refused, and said that China would not be affected by a boycott, and such an action would make REI uncompetitive. Besides, the board said it would be better for geopolitical relationships to keep China’s commercial sector growing.

China, according to the U.S. State Department, is in the worst tier for human rights. It has made no meaningful change to halt human trafficking, and end forced labor.

[Read the State Department’s annual human trafficking report.]

Apo Leong, a labor activist in Hong Kong said China’s 4 million apparel workers, mainly women, are “economic prisoners” who work up to 90 hours a week, live in rooms with 10 other people, and are fired if they become pregnant. They often do not even get paid in the government-owned factories.

[Read Washington Post story on Chinese sweatshops]

But REI also has a habit of shipping jobs south of the border. In 2000, REI closed its Seattle clothing manufacturing plant and relocated it to Mexico, where the 325 workers were paid $50 a week.

WHAT CAMELBAK SUPPORTS

Camelbak, one of the products REI will no longer carry due to its parent company, is located in Petaluma, Calif., and has an extensive program to work with responsible manufacturers around the globe. It has a supply chain transparency program with a zero tolerance for slave labor, and trains its workers to be on the lookout for child labor, exploitive labor, and human trafficking.

[Read Camelbak’s supply chain transparency statement.]

This week, Camelbak was pushed into publishing its own statement about the boycott of its parent company:

As you may know, in the wake of the recent tragic shooting at a Florida school, there have been calls on social media for a boycott of CamelBak products because of its association with Vista Outdoor, a company that also owns separate businesses in the shooting sports industry. A major concern for the boycott centers around the incorrect assumption that the purchase of any of our products may support a cause that does not fit the mission/values of our brand. That is not the case. Our brand falls within the Outdoor Products segment of our company, which operates separately from Vista Outdoor’s Shooting Sports segment. Since 1989, CamelBak has been committed to forever changing the way people hydrate and perform. Our passion and love for the outdoors is unchanged. We are deeply committed to the individuals and communities we serve and we proudly partner with organizations to promote the enjoyment of the outdoors.

We recognize, support and respect the right of every individual to decide for themselves what brands they will purchase based on whatever criteria they believe are important. As we drive to make positive change, it is our hope that you stand by our nearly 30-year reputation as we maintain our promise to obsess on what we make, how we make it, and the way it impacts people’s lives and the environment.

CUSTOMERS HAVE CHOICES

REI has picked its battles. It gives lip service to human rights, doesn’t support American jobs or pay its retail workers enough to live on, and is now punishing a company that owns responsible brands — brands that are either made in America or are made with strict adherence to workers’ health and safety. This is the company that former Secretary of Interior Sally Jewell ran before she joined the Obama team and worked to shut down Alaska’s economy.

At this point, REI is looking for a certain kind of customer — the kind that doesn’t support the National Rifle Association and the kind that believes in gun control.

Perhaps REI will get what it wants in Alaska: Alaskan outdoor enthusiasts can pick their battles too.

‘Trust us’ is not enough on ML&P sale

2

ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET EDITORIAL

There are at least two things that stand out about the proposed $1 billion sale of Anchorage’s Municipal Light & Power utility to the Chugach Electric Association: the secrecy involved in initial talks and reducing the vote required for passage from 60 percent to 50 percent.

It is unsettling that the city and Chugach were in talks for weeks, if not months or longer, while other utilities and interested buyers who signed on late were given no real attention.

It is bothersome how the city went about hooking up with Chugach. There were no requests for proposals; no bid requests, no bids, no nothing. Mayor Ethan Berkowitz and the Assembly decided it was time to sell ML&P and they started a secret process to do so. The public was kept in the dark until Dec. 21, when Berkowitz announced the sale. The city’s ML&P Commission was not even told until the day before.

Sale proponents say the due diligence and public hearings and detailed information that should have been public already – and would have been with a proper bidding process – will be forthcoming after the election in which, with only a 50 percent vote, a sale is approved. They seem to be saying, “Trust us.”

[Read more at the Anchorage Daily Planet]

Flags down for Rev. Billy Graham

At the close of business on Thursday, Gov. Bill Walker issued the order to lower the U.S. and Alaska flags today in honor of the late Rev. Billy Graham.

Walker’s flag order was accompanied by a spare 38-word statement in recognition of the contributions of Dr. Graham, who passed away on Feb. 21:

“Billy Graham’s faith and legacy touched millions around the world, including many here in Alaska. First Lady Donna Walker and I continue to be inspired by his work, his spiritual journey, and his devotion to his fellow man.” 

All governors and government properties lowered the flag on Friday per an order from the White House.

[Read what Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas wrote]

[Read what Gov. John Bel Edwards of Louisiana wrote]

[Read what House Speaker Paul Ryan wrote]

The Rev. Graham’s life and ministries influenced generations of Americans and people across the world, and he is the first religious leader in U.S. history to lie in honor in the U.S. Capitol, where his casket has been for the past two days.

Only three other civilians have been given that honor: Civil rights leader Rosa Parks in October, 2005 when Republican Sen. Ted Stevens was Senate President Pro Tem;  and two Capitol police officers who died in the line of duty in 1998.

Graham’s casket was returned to North Carolina after two days in the Capitol Rotunda.

TRUMP, GOVERNORS INVITED TO FUNERAL

President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump are attending the services for Rev. Graham on the grounds of Graham’s namesake library in Charlotte, N.C. Sitting governors have also been invited.

Former Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell was seen traveling to the funeral on Thursday, but Gov. Bill Walker was not expecting to attend, as he is at an event in Anchorage. The attendance is by invitation only and is capped at 2,300. Security will be tight since it’s expected that much of the nation’s leadership will be present, including Vice President Pence.

Graham’s casket, shown above in a picture shared by his son Franklin Graham, is made of simple plywood and was built by convicted murderers at Angola Prison in Louisiana.

[Read: Parnell recalls meeting with Billy Graham, Alaska legacy]