Sunday, May 11, 2025
Home Blog Page 1560

Furlough Monday: Commerce department closes

There will be no government-wide shutdown, due to the Legislature passing an operating budget this month. But on Monday, July 3, the Alaska Department of Commerce is furloughing all its employees as a cost-saving measure. The entire department will be closed for the day, according to the department’s web site.

With Tuesday a state and federal holiday, the closure means if you have business with the Department, get it done Friday, or wait until next Wednesday.

No other departments have posted Monday as a furlough day their entire department.

According to the Department of Administration’s web site, State offices can be closed only at the direction of the governor or the governor’s designee:

“No other state agency can independently make this determination. The Commissioner of the Department of Administration (DOA) shall be responsible for communicating decisions on office closures to the rest of state government, the media, and the public.”

“All State offices will be open during normal business hours unless closure is specifically directed by the Governor’s Office or the DOA Commissioner for purposes of protecting the safety and health of employees and/or the public. The only exception to this policy is in the event of a state of emergency declared by properly-empowered authorities (e.g. police or fire officials). In such events, employees are to follow the direction of such authorities,” according to the Department of Administration.

SERVICES DISRUPTIONS ‘SIGNIFICANT’ 

On June 8, when the state departments were preparing for a possible government shutdown due to legislative impasse, Commerce Commissioner Chris Hladick issued a warning to the public about services that would be impacted:

“While I am hopeful the legislature will reach a compromise, I feel obligated to provide Alaskans with as much advance notice as possible about potential disruptions in services that they rely upon. We encourage Alaskans, if you depend on one of these services—if your professional license is going to lapse soon, if you are seeking a commercial fishing loan, if you need technical assistance regarding a local boundary issue—consider whether it is something we can help you with before the potential shutdown occurs.”

“Should a government shutdown occur, Alaskans would likely experience significant disruption in services provided by the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, which would impact local governments and the private sector. The following services are potentially at risk of being shut down, delayed, or interrupted if the legislature fails to pass a budget before July 1:

  • Licensing of businesses and professionals that allows them to work in Alaska
  • Licensing and regulation of the insurance, banking, and securities industries
  • Licensing and inspection of commercial marijuana cultivation, testing, retail and alcoholic beverage sales
  • Seafood marketing
  • Issuance of commercial fishing loans
  • Distribution of revenue sharing and community assistance funding to local governments
  • Administration of the loan program that assists communities with the purchase bulk fuel to generate power or supply rural communities with fuel
  • Processing of applications and notices of utility rate changes
  • Onsite technical assistance of rural water and wastewater utilities
  • Technical assistance regarding local government or boundary issues
  • Action on ANCSA shareholder complaints about false and misleading proxy statements in pending ANCSA corporate board elections

 

Death watch for the Dispatch?

 Newspapers in Alaska have come and gone over the years. Above, the April 8, 1917 edition of The Daily Alaska Dispatch.

Few who read this web site really want to see Anchorage without a daily newspaper.

No, really, you don’t. Great cities deserve great newspapers. And Anchorage has the bone structure of a great city.

But recent reports of the Alaska Dispatch News being slow to pay its bills and now having lawsuits filed over nonpayment  issues have many readers wondering: Could it actually happen? It has, after all, been shrinking, and shrinking again.

The promises made by the current owner to expand coverage have been quietly shelved.

“Providing in-depth reporting and diverse public opinion on this topic is one of the main reasons I bought this newspaper a year ago. An honest, informed conversation about our economy is one of the best contributions we can make to Alaska. To that end, we have ramped up our daily coverage of the state fiscal crisis and launched an Economy section that appears on page A-3 every day except Mondays. Look for even more to come,” Rogoff wrote on April 11, 2015.

Now, the Dispatch death watch has captured the fascination of the reading public.

NEWSPAPERS ON THE LAST FRONTIER

Howard Weaver wrote about the newspaper war between the Anchorage Times and the Anchorage Daily News in his book, “Write Hard, Die Free.”

The Dispatch was the mouse that ate the lion, the Anchorage Daily News, once upon a time not so very long ago.

The Daily News had eaten, and spit out the Anchorage Times three decades prior, to the dismay of many conservatives who had reveled in the humor of reworking the words on their newspaper delivery tubes to read, “Anchorage Daily Lies.”

It was their mirthful retribution for what they saw as liberal bias.

Since Alice Rogoff became its owner, the newspaper, now known as the Anchorage Dispatch News, has continued its steady march to the left.

The readers? They just stopped getting the paper. Circulation of the Dispatch edition is now in the 23,000 range, which is a quarter of what it was a decade ago. The online presence is still robust, but has also suffered.  The paper seems to be in a death spiral of declining readership, ever-leftward coverage, leading to more declining readership.

Now that rumors of bills unpaid have turned into searchable court records, the question is, will the Alaska Dispatch News change hands again?

And if so, what kind of shape is it in? Who would buy it? What is it worth? Not the $34 million that Rogoff paid for it, surely.

Morris Communications is owner of the Juneau Empire, the Kenai Peninsula Clarion, the Alaska Journal of Commerce, and several other printed properties in the state. Morris has been a newspaper owner in Alaska since the late 1960s, winning the prize for newspaper ownership longevity in Alaska. The Georgia-based company could make the best go of it, but the problems with the presses and the ADN’s past-due bills might require more cash than Morris would wish to print.

Wick Communications, owner of the Anchorage Press and Frontiersman, might have a shot, but the Arizona-based company would probably turn the Dispatch into a tabloid-sized newspaper. Wick specializes in smaller-format papers in small communities. Buying the ADN would be a stretch.

The Fairbanks Daily News-Miner is, since 2015, owned by a foundation named for the wife of former publisher Charles W. Snedden. The deal included the Kodiak Daily Mirror. Could the Dispatch be given away to a charitable foundation to run? Snedden Foundation assets, around $8 million, might not be enough to keep it afloat.

In any case, giving it away is a long shot, because Rogoff and her former business partner, Tony Hopfinger, are in court over what he claims is his share of the newspaper — a roughly $900,000 obligation that Hopfinger says Rogoff still owes him. That court date is July 11 for oral arguments.

[Read: The summer of Alice Rogoff’s discontent]

[Read: Dispatch founder sues Rogoff]

Is it possible that Hopfinger will get the entire operation back if he wins in court over his contract with Rogoff, which was written on a bar napkin?  (For a picture of the bar napkin, following the “Dispatch founder…” link above)

Earlier this year, Rogoff telegraphed to readers that this would be a year of change for the Dispatch. The paper would soon start charging for access to its online presentation. Soon after she penned that column, the paper stopped its Saturday print edition. Now, it may go to three days a week. At least one newsroom writer has been let go.

Three-day-a-week publication is when it gets rough for a newspaper that has already broken the trust with readers. Once customers lose their addiction to print, they don’t easily return. A newspaper habit is not like a cigarette habit; clearly thousands of Alaskans have decided they can do without daily delivery.

Yet three days a week becomes an afterthought for news consumers, who will search online for the news they want and who have become accustomed to immediacy in this digital age.

Bear maulings? Fishing politics? Iditarod? CraigMedred.news has the mayhem beat down pat.

Looking for a conservative take on political current events? MustReadAlaska.com is fiesty, sassy and unrepentant.

Oil company news? AlaskaJournal.com is killing it.

More energy news? Petroleumnews.com and NorthernGasPipelines.com are authorities.

Alternative lifestyles? Anchorage Press.

There are more. Smaller newspapers are surviving, even where the old-guard large ones are failing.

If the Alaska Dispatch News shrinks to a tabloid size (and there is every indication it’s heading that direction) and prints just three days a week, maybe it can stay afloat like the others, but it seems to require new management. The current management has too much explaining to do to advertisers, creditors and the skeptical public.

And that leaves one very big question: Will David Rubenstein, the husband of Alice Rogoff and reportedly the 123rd richest man in America, bail out the Dispatch before it embarrasses the family name? If so, what will the multi-billionaire Marylander require in return from his runaway wife, who has been living apart from him and mainly in Alaska for the past 16 years?

Likely, a businessman like Rubenstein would have terms, and they might include selling the paper or giving it away to a good home, like a foundation.

Rubenstein is, after all, a philanthropist at heart. But he is also a highly shrewd private equity investor who specializes in distressed properties. He knows a basket case when he sees it.

King Cove road legislation clears committee

A land swap giving the federal government 43,000 acres of State land, and the people of King Cove access to a life-saving airport at Cold Bay has moved out from a key House committee.

For years, an 11-mile gravel road through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge has been blocked by the Department of Interior. Environmentalists had the ear of former Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, who denied King Cove a road to the airport.

On Tuesday, the House Natural Resources Committee passed legislation introduced by Rep. Don Young in January. House Resolution 218, the King Cove Land Exchange Act, authorizes a land exchange to allow construction of a one-lane gravel road.

The committee passage of H.R. 218 comes one day after the Department of Interior issued a permit to the State of Alaska to begin an initial survey on construction of the road.

The land transfer would give 43,0093 acres of State land to the Department of the Interior in exchange for some 206 acres of refuge land to build the road. The refuge exceeds 300,000 acres.

Young’s bill passed 23-14 and now heads to the full House, where it’s expected to pass.

“I remind everybody in this room, 19 people have died because they didn’t have this road. Just put yourself in that position, as you sit here,” said Congressman Young during the Committee meeting to review the bill. “If you’d like to have your mother, or your sister, or your brother or your aunt or someone die because there isn’t a road that’s 11 miles long. And the national wildlife refuge could get 43,000 acres for 206 acres. This is a deal of a lifetime for the Refuge… We are very frankly going to go forth because of the Administration. Sally Jewell was wrong. She actually believed a goose was more important than human life…I want you to understand that this is crucial to human life.”

Young introduced the bill on Jan 3 and identical legislation has been introduced in the Senate by Senator Lisa Murkowski and Senator Dan Sullivan.

The corridor accounts for 0.06 percent of the 315,000-acre Izembek National Wildlife Refuge. Some 131 acres of the proposed 206-acre project are federally designated as wilderness.

“Secretary Jewell’s heartless denial of the King Cove emergency access road was a willful and deliberate dismissal of human life in the name of wildlife; it  represented one of the worst government actions I’ve seen in all my years in Congress.” – Rep. Don Young

“And since that decision, the community has experienced 53 medevacs in often treacherous conditions,” Young said. “This legislation is an important step to ensuring the people of King Cove have safe and reliable transportation during medical emergencies. It’s appalling that this fight has taken decades, but I’m extremely optimistic that under the current administration we can finally resolve this issue and facilitate the construction of this 11-mile, life-saving road from King Cove to Cold Bay ”

King Cove is located between two volcanic mountains near the end of the Alaska Peninsula, about 625 miles southwest of Anchorage. The winds in the area are legendary and keep flights grounded routinely. Nearby Cold Bay’s airport has the fifth-longest runway in Alaska and has far better weather conditions.

The gravel road that is being sought would be just three miles longer than the distance between the Capitol in Juneau to the Juneau International Airport.

In the past, plane crashes have led to multiple fatalities that could have been avoided had road transportation been an option. Without the road, local residents continue to be at the mercy of high winds, dense fog, and strong storms that prevent safe and timely transportation during medical emergencies, Young said.

The Wilderness Society issued a press release saying the road is a boondoggle and said the organization will fight its construction.

The Wilderness Society’s Alaska Regional Director, Nicole Whittington-Evans said: “Like other national wildlife refuges across the country, Izembek is under attack from those who want to take over federal public lands and return them to state control for road construction and resource development.”

Apparently, in the eyes of the Wilderness Society, an exchange of 43,000 acres for a mere 206 acres is not a net plus, but rather, an “attack.”

Donna Walker, gasline consultant to the Chinese?

First Lady Donna Walker, in pink, greets government officials in China, along with her daughter, Lindsey Walker Hobson and daughter-in-law Sabrina Smith Walker.

According to Press Release 17-103, Alaska’s First Lady Donna Walker, and her daughter and daughter-in-law have successfully returned from a junket to China, paid for entirely by the Chinese government.

Staffing them was a member of the governor’s staff, and likely two members of the governor’s security team, as they usually are on such trips.

A business class ticket to Beijing averages about $5,000, according to Orbitz, and in-country travel to the provinces of Heilongjiang and Shaanxi would have added additional costs.

“All travel, lodging and related expenses were paid by the government hosts,” reads the press release from Grace Jang, the governor’s communications director, who made an effort to be transparent about the Chinese-funded trip.

Mrs. Walker, Lindsay Walker Hobson, and Sabrina Smith Walker were invited speakers at the Women and Children Cultural Exchange Conference hosted by the Heilongjiang Women’s Federation and Heilongjiang People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, held on June 21.

An earlier press release included daughter Tessa Walker Linderman on the trip, but it’s unclear if she was part of the actual party. The latest press release makes no mention of her.

The women visited a vocational school, two kindergartens, an afterschool/weekend academy, a women’s arts and crafts vocational development center, the national offices of the All-China Women’s Federation, several historical sites, museums, and cultural programs.

It was part vacation, part cultural exchange, and also part State business. Most curious is that Mrs. Walker held official state business meetings with “a number of high ranking government officials, including Heilongjiang Governor Lu, who hosted meetings and banquets for the delegation.” Lu is a former First Secretary of  the  Communist Youth League, one of the most powerful political organizations in the nation. First Secretary is the top officer of the organization, and Lu held the job from 2008-2013.

Mrs. Walker was holding talks with someone who can make things happen in China.

“Recurring topics of discussion included increasing tourism between China and Alaska with direct flights, educational and cultural exchange opportunities, potential Alaska LNG shipments to China, Alaska seafood trade, and recent developments in China/U.S. trade,” according to the release.

The First Lady (or First Dude) of Alaska has traditionally held a more ceremonial role and usually stays out of politics. First ladies sometimes choose a topic to highlight — such as literacy, human trafficking, domestic violence, or another social concern.

It is unusual for a First Lady to conduct official business for the State. Even more unusual is for the State, looking for specific investment from the Chinese government, to accept a gift trip that would have run into the tens of thousands of dollars.

The trip was completed just as the U.S. State Department downgraded China into the worst category for human trafficking, Tier 3, which indicates the communist country has a serious problem with slavery and is making no efforts to curtail it. Russia and Iran are also Tier 3 countries, as are several on the African continent, according to the report released just a few days ago.

China is Alaska’s largest trading partner, and Gov. Bill Walker has been courting Chinese investors for his go-it-alone gasline. The president of the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation, Keith Meyers, was in China in May, touting Alaska’s gas and working to change the perception that U.S. trade barriers would prevent the Chinese from entering into American liquified natural gas projects.

Meyer, upon returning from China, said he also met with high-ranking Chinese officials. He spoke at the China LNG and Gas International Summit.

Meyer said that Chinese companies, looking to meet their country’s growing demand for gas, had previously felt that U.S. barriers prevented them from participating in American liquefied natural gas projects.

The state-owned corporation that has come under the close control of Gov. Walker is seeking Asian gas buyers to sign long-term contracts, but the project also needs major investors now that ExxonMobil, BP, and ConocoPhillips left the project last year. That might be where the Chinese fit in, at least in Gov. Walker’s mind.

In April, Walker met with Chinese President Xi Jinping as he stopped in Anchorage on his flight home after meeting with President Donald Trump. Walker talked at length with Xi Jinping about the Alaska LNG project, which has only enough money to make it until the end of this calendar year.

The appearance of an ethical breach is in the eye of the beholder. Mrs. Walker does not have the authority to incur any obligations on behalf of the state, but she does have unique and powerful influence over the governor. And she did conduct policy discussions on behalf of the State.

Would Alaskans be comfortable if Gov. Walker, rather than his wife and daughters, accepted an all-expense-paid trip from the Chinese government and held LNG talks?

Sarah Palin puts NY Times in legal crosshairs

Sarah Palin / Wikipedia photo

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has made the mainstream media boatloads of money as they covered her relentlessly over the years, usually in unflattering terms.

Now, she wants some of that money back.

Palin filed suit against The New York Times today. Her lawsuit says the Gray Lady defamed her in an editorial that essentially blamed her political action committee for causing the shooting of former Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

The editorial was titled “America’s Lethal Politics,” and insinuated that Palin’s “crosshairs” rhetoric resulted in the shooting that killed six people and wounded 13, including then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, during a meet-and-greet on Jan. 8, 2011 outside a Safeway store in Casas Adobes, Arizona. The editorial put it this way:

“In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl. At the time, we and others were sharply critical of the heated political rhetoric on the right. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin’s political action committee circulated a map that showed the targeted electoral districts of Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs. 

After receiving criticism, The Times clarified the paragraph and added, “But in that case no connection to the shooting was ever established.”

Palin alleges The Times published “a statement about her that it knew to be false: that Mrs. Palin was responsible for inciting a mass shooting at a political event in January 2011.”

Defamation of a public figure is a difficult hill for famous plaintiffs to climb in court. In many states, defamation law requires that public figures show there was actual malice, which means the defendant knew a statement about a public figure was untrue or treated the veracity of the statement with reckless disregard.

The newspaper had issued a more full-throated correction of the recent story about the shooting of congressman Scalise, one that did not clear Palin’s name specifically nor mention the name of her political action committee:

An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.

The Palin complaint finds the correction lacking: “As the public backlash over The Times’ malicious column mounted, it responded by making edits and ‘corrections’ to its fabricated story, along with half-hearted Twitter apologies–none of which sufficiently corrected the falsehoods that the paper published. In fact, none mentioned Mrs. Palin or acknowledged that Mrs. Palin did not incite a deranged man to commit murder.”

Senate takes a deep breath on health care bill

The U.S. Senate has postponed a vote on its health insurance reform bill until after the July 4th holiday. There were just too few affirmative votes among Republicans for the Better Care Reconciliation Act to make it to the floor.

Leaders were hoping to get the legislation passed before insurers like Premera announce their insurance prices for the coming year, something they are expected to do in July.

Conservatives and moderates had various reasons to balk at even bringing it to the floor for debate.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a moderate, said she wasn’t ready to vote on the BCRA because she was still trying to learn the impacts it would have on Alaska.

“I need to understand really what we’re talking about, with some of the conclusions that we saw yesterday with the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] score,” Murkowski told reporters. “Taking the time to get it right is where we should be.”

As for Murkowski, she wants these rather large Obamacare  items retained:

  • Prohibitions on discrimination for pre-existing conditions
  • No annual or lifetime limits
  • Coverage for dependents up to age 26
  • Continuation of coverage afforded under Medicaid Expansion
  • Maintaining access to Planned Parenthood facilities

Murkowski has proposed several other ways to lessen the burdens created by Obamacare:

  • Full repeal of the Cadillac Tax; (the Senate in 2015 delayed implementation of the Cadillac Tax — a tax on good health insurance policies — for two years)
  • Improving cost transparency of medical procedures;
  • Re-evaluating special enrollment periods to close potential loopholes;
  • Expanding both Health Savings and Flexible Spending Accounts;
  • Incentivizing people to live healthy lifestyles, in order to prevent and bring down the incidence of chronic diseases;
  • Supporting the Family Health Care Accessibility Act, improving the services provided by community health centers by enabling them to utilize volunteer primary care providers;
  • Supporting the Medicare Patient Empowerment Act, giving patients the option to negotiate the difference between an ongoing Medicare rate and the physician’s fees and providing the flexibility to increase access to care

The current version of the Senate bill repeals the individual mandate to carry health care coverage, but there are still some penalties for people who do not keep their coverage and those penalties are meant to act as a disincentive for people to drop coverage when they are healthy and then re-enroll again when they are sick. The BCRA also repeals the employer mandate for businesses that have 50 or more employees to offer coverage, another significant reform.

BCRA repeals most Obamacare taxes and rolls back the expansion of Medicaid for those states who accepted the federal expansion. Gov. Bill Walker was one of those governors who allowed expansion of Medicaid — albeit in a questionable way, without authority from the legislature — to cover working age adults with no children who are at or above 138 percent of the federally established poverty level.

The BCRA allows people up to age 26 to remain on their parents’ plans and bars insurers from denying insurance to those with pre-existing conditions, both of which are items on Sen. Murkowski’s must-have list.

The bill still has a lot of similarities to Obamacare, but does roll back some of the worst provisions (e.g., the individual mandate, the special taxes and the out-of-control Medicaid expansion). For conservative Republicans, who desire a much more market based system, these partial measures are highly problematic and very disappointing. Indeed, criticism has been unrelenting from both liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans.

Those who opposed Obamacare back in the day knew that once it was in place, it would be nearly impossible to fix, because once you hook people on a certain government-paid benefit — whether it’s an “Obama phone” or wage-based insurance subsidies — it’s hard to unwind because it creates a new class of dependent voters with something to protect. Senate Republican leaders are trying to thread that needle, finding enough consensus within a slim Senate majority to pass a bill that makes some progress but still leaves much to be desired.

Murkowski was a “no” vote on Obamacare when it passed in 2010, and Sen. Mark Begich, whom voters retired in 2014, was a “yes” vote.

At least six Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins and Dean Heller, both moderates with Murkowski, and Sens. Ron Johnson, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee, conservatives — said today they were not ready to vote on the bill and several other senators were undecided.

ALASKA’S HIGH COST OF CARE

“The American people know that Obamacare is failing, literally collapsing before our eyes,” said Vice President Mike Pence today.

For Alaska, a fix can’t come too soon, but to be any help to Alaskans, it is going to have to lower the amount people must pay for insurance and contain no mandates.

In 2013, the average premium for the individual market in Alaska was $344 per month.

By 2017, that amount had risen to $1,041, nearly $700 more per month than before Obamacare. It’s crippling for entrepreneurs and others who make too much to qualify for government subsidies.

The coverage mandates are also driving up premiums for workers in the private sector under qualified plans, hurting nearly all non-government employees in Alaska to the tune of hundreds of dollars per month, sapping discretionary income from other sectors of the economy.

Premera, the only company left doing business in the Alaska Individual health insurance market, has not released its rate request for 2018. Not for Alaska, anyway. In the past, Premera has filed its rate changes in May, but the federal government has given the company until July.

Senators may rewrite the bill but they cannot delay forever. With Republican control of the House, Senate and Executive Branch, they’ll lose their window of opportunity if they do not come to an agreement. And it’s likely if they don’t take action, President Donald Trump will let Obamacare fail under its own weight.

In an interview in March with The Washington Post, Trump said, “The best thing politically is to let Obamacare explode.”

The fact that it is the law of the land is on the Democrats, he said, and “when people get a 200 percent increase next year or a 100 percent or 70 percent, that’s their [Democrats’] fault.”

 

Delegation: Zinke issues first permit for King Cove Road

Photo of King Cove, Alaska from the air.
King Cove, Alaska

After years of begging the Obama Administration to allow a road to be built from King Cove to the Cold Bay airport, the people of King Cove are rejoicing that the Trump Administration has acted so quickly to order a survey that will determine options for a route through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge, which separates the communities.

The U.S. Department of Interior last week issued a survey permit to the Alaska Department of Transportation.

The city of King Cove, its tribes, Native corporation and borough support the road to the airport. The community has fought for a road for the past 35 years.

Ceremonial wear adorns musicians in King Cove, Alaska.

King Cove is located on the south side of the Alaska Peninsula. It lies on a sand spit along Deer Passage and Deer Island, and is nestled between two volcanoes some 18 miles south of Cold Bay and 625 miles southwest of Anchorage.

The community’s 3,360-foot gravel runway is buffeted by gale-force crosswinds, which make it unusable much of the time. A ferry operates occasionally between May and October, but for those who need immediate medical attention, the all-weather airport at Cold Bay is the only option — and a road to that airport was denied to the community by the previous administration. The road has been a priority of Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan as well as Congressman Don Young.

A state and federal land exchange that was in the works was frozen in 2013 by Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, who famously told the people of King Cove that someone had to stand up for the birds.

This week marked the three and a half year anniversary since Jewell rejected the road. Today, residents are hopeful.

“Unlike Secretary Jewell, we believe President-elect Donald Trump and Interior Secretary nominee Ryan Zinke value human lives as well as birds,” said King Cove Mayor Henry Mack in December. “We are confident they will take action because they understand that the lives of King Cove residents matter.”

Last year there were 17 medevacs from the community: three conducted by the Coast Guard and 14 were non-Coast Guard. Included among the over 60 medevacs that occurred since Secretary Jewell rejected the road were:

  • A King Cove woman in her 70s who broke her hip and had to wait for 40 hours for the weather to improve enough to be medevaced from King Cove to Anchorage.
  • A woman in her 70s suffered from heart issues was medevaced from King Cove to Cold Bay by the Coast Guard after high winds prevented Guardian Flight from landing. She was medevaced to Anchorage more than seven hours later.
  • A woman in her 20s was treated at the King Cove Clinic for a severely obstructed airway. Due to fog and low visibility, Guardian Flight was unable to land in King Cove. The patient was stabilized and a Coast Guard helicopter from a cutter in the Bering Sea was dispatched, arriving 7 ½ hours later. The patient was transported to Cold Bay and transferred to Guardian Flight bound for Anchorage.
  • A four-week-old infant suffering from respiratory distress was medevaced by the Coast Guard during a blizzard. The baby was transported to an Anchorage hospital.

Three years ago, 2014, King Cove tribes, the corporation, the city and the Aleutians East Borough (the King Cove Group) sued Secretary Jewell and other federal officials over the rejection of the road. In 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Holland ruled against King Cove and determined there was no violation of the National Environmental Policy Act or of the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act. That case is under appeal.

Last July, Murkowski, Sullivan and  Young introduced identical bills (S. 3204 and H.R. 5777) in Congress mandating an equal value land transfer in exchange for construction of a short, single-lane, non-commercial road.

In January of this year, Sens. Murkowski and Sullivan introduced a bill that would authorize a land exchange to allow  construction through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge.

“After years of secretarial apathy,” Murkowski said in January, referring to former Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, “I am eager to work with a new administration and a new Interior Secretary to restore common sense, resolve this horrible injustice, and end their needless pain and suffering.”

 

Another lawsuit for the Alaska Dispatch News

The future location of the Alaska Dispatch News, photographed last fall on the left, and today on the right.

By CRAIG MEDRED
CRAIGMEDRED.NEWS

Just when you think things can’t get much worse for Alaska’s largest newspaper in these tough times for the news business, things get worse.

Rumors circulating around Anchorage that the Alaska Dispatch News was no longer paying its bill have been given credence by a lawsuit filed by the newspaper’s newsprint provider.

Catalyst Paper went into an Anchorage court on June 22 asking for an order forcing Dispatch, which also does business as ADN.com, to pay its March and April paper bills.

Based in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, Catalyst is the largest producer of newsprint on the West Coast. 

Its suit against the ADN follows another filed against Arctic Partners, Inc., the Tacoma, Wash., company which owns a building on Arctic Boulevard that Dispatch was renovating  as its new print plant and Alaska news headquarters.

Only last fall, the building was emblazoned with a banner proclaiming “Alaska Dispatch News – COMING SOON.” The banner is gone now, and Dispatch appears to have been locked out of the building housing its new press after running up a bill of approximately $1 million with M&M Wiring, an Anchorage electric contractor.

Dispatch paid about half the bill, and then stopped making payments. M&M sued the building’s owners for the rest of the payment and slapped a lien on the old, oil-field-services warehouse to secure the debt.

An attorney for Arctic refused to comment on the case, but it appears the company’s response to the suit has been to lock Dispatch out of the building that houses its press.

Former clients of the Anchorage Daily News’ commercial printing operation – a sideline to newspaper production the Dispatch continued – say that might not matter much, however, because the new press apparently was installed on an inadequate foundation, sank inches in one corner, and because of that is inoperable.

[Read more at CraigMedred.news]

[Read: The summer of Alice Rogoff’s discontent]

Trump derangement syndrome case hits Ombudsman’s office

Remember when Montana Congressman-elect Greg Gianforte body slammed an aggressive reporter last month?

He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to community service, anger management classes and a $385 fine. And he won.

The same sort of thing happened in Alaska earlier this year, according to a report from the State of Alaska Ombudsman.

An official of the state — the report doesn’t say who — was leaving a public event in Anchorage, when a man approached him aggressively, shouting, and shoving a video recording device (his phone) at his face, and asked him to comment “on whether Donald Trump should be tried for treason for statements he made during his presidential election campaign.”

The official grabbed the cell phone and gave it to an aide to return to the angry man, who immediately reported the incident to police as an assault.

Anchorage police investigated and forwarded the case to the Department of Law. The prosecutor met with police detectives, reviewed police reports, video, photos, and audio recordings of the event, and spoke with the aggrieved Trump-hater several times.

The DA focused on the possibility of charging the official with fourth degree assault. But there was no physical injury and the official could simply claim he acted in self defense and used non-deadly force. The DA decided the official’s response was reasonable under the circumstances.

Stay tuned. We’ll update this post when/if we get the identity of the official.

COMPLAINTS ABOUT OCS: More scorching reports about the underperformance of the Office of Children’s Services were published by the Ombudsman recently. APRN has the story.

Linda Lord-Jensen

AND WITH THAT, THE OMBUDSMAN RETIRES: After 15 years of being Alaska’s complaint department, Alaska Ombudsman Linda Lord-Jenkins has retired.

Complaints about the Corrections Department made up 25 to 40 percent of cases she handled in her career. (A recent one involved inmates complaining about not getting enough toilet paper.)

As the agency’s senior investigator, Lord-Jenkins also served as an assistant ombudsman, starting in 1989, and served longer than any other investigator in the agency’s history.

She conducted more than 75 formal investigations and more than 2,700 informal reviews. She had earlier worked as a reporter and editor for newspapers in Alaska and Florida.

The ombudsman’s office, with 10 employees and a $1.2 million budget, is charged with investigating complaints about state agencies and workers.

Lord-Jenkins is married to journalist Paul Jenkins (Anchorage Daily Planet) and is term-limited out of the ombudsman job by statute.

NEW COMPLAINT DEPARTMENT CHIEF

Kate Burkhart, State Ombudsman

Kate Burkhart has been named the new Ombudsman for the State of Alaska. She was an assistant ombudsman in the past, and most recently served as the executive director of the Advisory Board on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse and the Alaska Mental Health Board.

Burkhart, who has a law degree from Tulane University Law School, also has been public interest attorney with Alaska Legal Services Corporation. Her legal practice focused on poverty law, domestic violence, Native and tribal law, and included work on behalf of mental health consumers and those experiencing substance abuse problems. Her bio says she often represented clients who were low-income, elderly, or children, and served as a guardian ad litem for children taken into state custody.