Wednesday, June 3, 2026
Home Blog Page 13

Survey Series: Gubernatorial Candidates Answer the PFD Question

2

By Nathaniel Herz

This piece was originally published in Northern Journal, a newsletter and news website. Nathaniel Herz is an independent journalist and the founder and editor of Northern Journal. Herz has given Must Read Alaska express permission to republish his gubernatorial candidate survey series.

Northern Journal’s survey of Alaska’s many gubernatorial hopefuls is back — this time, asking how much money candidates would budget for Permanent Fund dividends.

We also find out when each candidate last rode on Alaska’s state ferry system — a publicly funded network that’s been the subject of polarizing budget debates in recent years.

Starting in this edition, we’ve narrowed the surveyed candidates to those who reported raising at least $3,000 in the latest round of campaign finance reports — as well as those who announced their candidacies after the latest reporting deadline.

Republicans Bernadette Wilson, Adam Crum, Treg Taylor and Nancy Dahlstrom did not respond to our questions; we sent them multiple requests.

Question 1

Gov. Mike Dunleavy proposed a Permanent Fund dividend amount for the coming fiscal year based on the historical statute tied to investment returns.

Dunleavy is budgeting some $2.365 billion for PFDs, which equals a payment of roughly $3,800 per Alaskan. That would leave an overall deficit of $1.5 billion — depleting a little less than half of Alaska’s primary savings account, the Constitutional Budget Reserve, according to legislative fiscal projections from earlier this year.

If you were governor, what’s the overall spending on Permanent Fund dividends that you would have proposed for the upcoming fiscal year? For reference, some 620,000 dividends were paid last year, so a $1,000-per-person PFD would equate to some $620 million in overall spending.

Question 2

When is the last time you rode an Alaska state ferry, where did you go, and what was the purpose of your trip?

Answers from Candidates

Dave Bronson, Republican and Former Mayor of Anchorage

Q1: $2.4 billion.

The Permanent Fund dividend is a return of value to Alaskans, created to share the value of our natural resources with the people who own them. It is important to follow the law. A statutory dividend today is about $2.4 billion. However, the state cannot absorb that cost overnight or reduce spending by that amount, and Alaskans do not support spending down the principal of the fund. What they want is a sustainable, long-term formula-driven approach like we once had.

I would begin by proposing the statutory dividend and working with the Legislature to reach a responsible compromise that restrains spending growth, identifies targeted reductions, and focuses on economic growth so Alaska can return to a sustainable dividend in the future.

Q2: I have never been on an Alaska state ferry.

Former Anchorage State Senator Tom Begich, a Democrat

Q1: $620 million to $910 million

I believe the statute should be rewritten; a new amount should be set by the Legislature as a starting amount somewhere in the range of the average over that last eight years (between $1,000 and $1,500) and tied to the earnings or losses of the fund over a one to three year average. Rising or falling with the earnings.

The Governor proposes the original amount, so I would likely propose the higher of those two amounts, but be clear when announcing the budget that I would be open to the Legislature’s number.

Q2: Outside of the Gravina ferry in Ketchikan (airport), which I rode today, I rode the (ferry) to Metlakatka on March 9th.

Democratic state Sen. Matt Claman

Q1: $620 million/$1,000

Alaskans tell us that we need improved investment in public education, public safety, and long-delayed capital projects without depleting $1.5 billion from our constitutional savings account. They know from the last eight years that a dividend based on the historical statute is not affordable.

Step one with increased oil revenue is proposing a common-sense budget that protects the Permanent Fund and has similar funding for all departments as this year, including a $1,000 dividend and taking no money from savings. Step two is working together with the Legislature for a balanced budget with improved investment in our schools and communities, an affordable dividend, and economic growth. Working together, Alaska’s future is strong and bright.

Q2: In about 2016, I rode the ferry as part of a wonderful circle trip in Southcentral Alaska. Drive from Anchorage to Sheep Mountain Lodge on the Glenn Highway, bike 200 miles from Sheep Mountain Lodge to Valdez, overnight in Valdez, ride the ferry from Valdez across Prince William Sound to Whittier, and drive home to Anchorage. Glorious!

Anchorage Doctor Matt Heilala, a Republican

Q1: Proposing the full statutory PFD simply isn’t feasible amid $1.5-2 billion operating deficits which would continue to deplete the CBR. Until the statutory formula can be adjusted constitutionally, we must compromise. Past full-PFD efforts failed due to these concerns, causing volatile dividends and calls for new taxes, which I strongly oppose. As governor I’d propose a PFD based on the immediate prior year legislative precedent: This year, $1,000 per Alaskan (the same as the original PFD), totaling roughly $620 million. This would help better align the executive and legislative efforts with less finger pointing and vitriol. I’d launch a parallel transparency initiative with Palantir’s Foundry.

Q2: I’ve ridden Alaska ferries like the Columbia on family trips across the coast. At 8, on Valdez-Whittier with my aunt & uncle, I wandered to the pilot house. They heard over PA: “Visitor here, what’s your name?” “Matt!” Captain let me blow the horn to trigger a glacier calving. Last: 15 yrs ago, Valdez-Whittier ferry with RV, kids, looped from ANC.

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Democratic Former State Representative

Q1: $1,500 PFD

The PFD is a critical lifeline for many Alaskans who depend on it for fuel, food, and other essentials. I believe it’s a good program that helps Alaskans.

I’m also not crazy about the either-or choices that have been forced on Alaskans: either we fund the PFD or we fund schools, ferries, and troopers.

As governor, I would make several no-brainer budget moves like closing the Hilcorp tax loophole and extending the corporate income tax to out-of-state online businesses that operate in Alaska (a bill that passed the legislature with 42 out of 60 votes, but got vetoed by Gov. Dunleavy).

Once we get that done, we can prioritize K-12 schools, public safety, roads and ferries, and distribute a PFD that makes a difference for Alaska families.

Q2: About 2 months ago. I took the M/V Kennicott from Sitka to Juneau. I was helping two friends in Juneau get their cars over from Sitka, and I was heading over myself to catch the start of legislative session. The combination of Starlink wifi and strong black coffee in the cafeteria let me do some serious damage to my email inbox on the sailing over.

Shelley Hughes, Republican Former State Senator

Q1: Aim: half draw

When Walker cut the PFD, I’d been fighting to reduce the 50% spending growth from the prior decade. I fought for a full PFD not only because its design was to empower families and the private sector but because of the unaddressed budget growth.

I’ll establish a Sunset Audit Commission to draft legislation aimed at efficiencies, fraud elimination, mandatory vs discretionary spending. I’m committed to rebuilding the PFD so it’s no longer an issue; we’ll pull out the stops to build a diversified economy to ensure steady, adequate revenue via a cheap energy portfolio, lands in Alaskan hands, and infrastructure. Other “dividends” as a result? Great jobs, better schools, affordable living, new routes, and real opportunities for our young people.

Q2: A Palmer girl with SE Alaska roots, I’m on the ferry every couple years. In last three summers, I round-tripped twice (Juneau/Haines) for two nephews’ weddings – outdoors along the water (gorgeous couples, spectacular settings!). Years prior, I’d take the ferry to Hoonah where I used to live and my mother lived until recently (she’s now in Juneau).

Matanuska-Susitna Borough Mayor Edna DeVries, a Republican

Q1: $2.365 billion

If we as political elected officials make laws for others to follow, it is important that we follow the laws that are set before us.

Q2: April 11, travelling from Juneau to Whittier, coming back from session.

Republican Former State Senator Click Bishop

Q1: It depends.

Alaska’s Constitution under Article 9 outlines how the governor shall submit a budget to the Legislature, and essentially requires the budget to be balanced at the end of the year.

As governor, I will proposed a balanced budget every year. We will pay dividends in every budget at the greatest amount possible in accordance with a balanced budget.

Whatever amount the governor proposes for the dividend, there are two things certain: 1) the state revenue forecast will change over the following 16 months; and 2) the Legislature will amend the budget.

We’re all in this together. It’s the public’s money for today’s basic needs that must be protected for tomorrow’s generations.

Q2: In September, I traveled aboard the AMHS Tustumena, Rusty Tusty, visiting coastal communities like Chignik, Sand Point, King Cove, and Cold Bay. Despite rough seas and fall storms, the trip offered time to meet local residents, tour the Izembek Refuge, and see firsthand how the Marine Highway serves as a lifeline for Alaska’s coastal towns.

Traditional Healer Meda DeWitt, an Independent

Q1: $1,300-$1,800

Gov. Dunleavy has proposed $6,700-$3,650 for eight years running, and it has been rejected by the Legislature each year because it would create a $1.5 billion deficit, draining half of our last savings account.

My approach: start with the POMV draw, deduct inflation-proofing first (skipped two years, eroding the fund’s real value), deduct operations, split the remainder 50/50 between dividends and the government. That produces a PFD of roughly $1,300–$1,800 per person, higher than last year’s historic low, lower than an unfunded promise, and honest about what the fund can sustain. Total dividend spending: approximately $800 million to $1.1 billion. No CBR drawdown required.

Alaska needs a formula, not an illusion.

Q2: Born in Klawock, I often rode the ferry. My earliest memory riding on the ferry, was during a storm, and a jellyfish hit the window. The last ferry trip memory was at seven years old. My grandmother passed away from a heart attack on that trip. Today, I ship vehicles, or large tools, to Yakutat. As a Tlingit, we fondly call the ferry the big blue canoe.

Federal DOT Awards Alaska $115.4 million for Port Infrastructure

0

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration has granted $115,410,041 in federal funding for Alaska’s port infrastructure.

The grant funds are part of the Port Infrastructure Development Program (PIDP), which has $450 million in available grant money for Fiscal Year 2026. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 117-58, November 15, 2021) (“IIJA”) provided PIDP with $2.25 billion to be given out over 5 years, starting in 2022 and ending this year. The FY 2026 Appropriations Act appropriated an additional $103,330,000 to PIDP FY26.

Grants are awarded to projects that “improve the safety, efficiency, or reliability of the movement of goods into, out of, around, or within a port.”

U.S. Representative for Alaska Nick Begich commented on the grant awards: “Major infrastructure investments are coming directly to Alaska. As a member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, I’ve fought to ensure Alaska’s unique needs are front and center. This funding strengthens economic growth and delivers important improvements for Alaska’s communities. These projects will modernize critical infrastructure, improve freight mobility, and ensure that Alaska is competitive and prepared as we prepare for economic growth in Alaska.”

Alaska will be using the funds to move seven key projects forward.

Most of the money ($38,621,386) will go to the Municipality of Skagway for the Port of Skagway Industrial Dock Redevelopment Project. Skagway, located at the northern terminus of Lynn Canal, is the most northerly, ice-free, deep-water coastal port of access to the Canadian Northwest and the Yukon Territory. Its strategic location makes it a significant player in regional transportation and commerce. The redevelopment project includes a multi-purpose dock, a new fuel header, demolition of an aging timber dock, upland improvements, and a non-fixed RORO ramp.

The State of Alaska Department of Transportation will receive the second largest amount ($34 million) for the Port MacKenzie Multimodal Port Expansion. Port MacKenzie offers 7,500 acres of uplands “dedicated solely to future commercial and industrial development,” plus 15 acres dockside and over 3 miles of shoreline. Funds will be used to complete the port’s railroad extension into the Interior. According to Alaska DOT Communications Director Shannon McCarthy, “One of the [grants] that we are really excited about is the Port MacKenzie multimodal port expansion project. This really helps complete the railroad down to Port MacKenzie and along Goose Bay Road.”

The third largest grant ($20,397,000) goes to the Alaska Railroad Corporation for the ARRC Port of Whittier Operational Efficiency Project. The money will be used to upgrade the railroad tunnel connecting the Port of Whittier to the railroad’s mainline track. The Whittier Terminal is Alaska’s only rail barge connection to the Lower 48 via Seattle and has long served as a critical multimodal gateway for freight and passenger movement in Southcentral Alaska.

$11,240,000 will go to the City of Homer for the Homer Port Coastal Freight Project. Smaller grants include $4,725,000 for the Anchorage’s Petroleum Terminal Replacement Planning Project; $4,074,520 for Whittier’s Planning and Design of the Delong Dock Replacement; and $2,351,175 for Chevak’s Cev’aq River Marine Barge Landing Facility.

Governor Dunleavy stated: “Alaska’s ports are the economic lifelines of our communities. These investments will modernize critical infrastructure, improve safety, and strengthen the supply chains Alaskans depend on every day. I want to thank Secretary Duffy and the Trump Administration for their commitment to advancing Alaska.”

“Investments like this are extremely impactful for communities like Homer and across Alaska,” said Homer Mayor Rachel Lord. “Modern, reliable port infrastructure is critical to our local and regional economy, from the movement of freight and commercial fishing to subsistence harvest access and tourism, ensuring families and businesses can continue to thrive. I appreciate Congressman Begich’s efforts to secure meaningful infrastructure investments for Alaska and for recognizing the importance of ports like Homer to our state’s future.”

Alaska DOT&PF Commissioner Ryan Anderson commented: “These projects address real, on-the-ground needs at ports across Alaska—improving freight movement, reliability, and day-to-day operations. By strengthening these connections, we’re helping facilitate economic growth and expanding opportunities for communities across the state.”

Bill to Clean Up Inactive State Accounts Passes Senate Unanimously

3

Today, April 22, the Senate unanimously passed Senate Bill 163, a bill to repeal three inactive fund accounts: the public access fund established by Sec. 38.05.874, the emergency fund account established by Sec. 47.27.075, and the 2001 Special Olympics World Winter Games reserve fund.

SB 163 was sponsored by Senator James Kaufman (R-Anchorage), who stated, “SB 163 is a part of an ongoing effort to clean up inactive funds and programs. I look forward to pushing legislation that continues to streamline state operations.”

According to a Senate Republicans press release, the three accounts “once served a role in our state budget, but have now sat dormant and unused for decades.”

The Legislative Finance Division had recommended repeal or revision of these funds, along with 53 others, in 2025.

Anchorage Election Commission to Review Potentially Rejected Mail-In Ballots April 23

0

Tomorrow, April 23, 5:00 pm -7:00 p.m., the Anchorage Election Commission will hold the Public Session of Canvass and Adoption of the Election Commission Report. During the session, the commission will review potentially rejected ballots envelopes and hear public comments regarding ballot envelope challenges.

Ballot envelopes face potential rejection for the following reasons:

  • Duplicate ballot envelope
  • Ballot envelope empty
  • Voter failed to provide identifying information
  • Voter is INACTIVE
  • Ballot not properly applied for
  • Multiple ballots in one envelope
  • Not registered in the Municipality of Anchorage
  • Voter does not meet certification requirements
  • Voter returned ballot envelope and asked to be removed from voter roll
  • Ballot envelope not dated/postmarked and received after Election Day
  • Ballot envelope received too late
  • Ballot envelope postmarked/voted after Election Day
  • No postmark, but received after Election Day
  • No postmark, but post office provided additional information
  • Voter not registered
  • Voter is deceased; voter determined to be deceased prior to ballots arriving to
    voters
  • Inadequate witnessing
  • Voter failed to sign ballot envelope
  • No signature match on ballot return envelope
  • No reference signature in SOA Voter Registration Database
  • Ballot envelope hand delivered after Election Day
  • Ballot envelope signed by somebody other than voter

Members of the public can comment on and review ballot envelopes tagged for potential rejection. Written comments can be submitted to [email protected] by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Members of the public can dial into the session by calling Conference
Bridge Phone Number – (907) 273-5190, Participant Code – 786815 #.

Following review and public discussion, the commission will determine the rejection or acceptance of the ballot envelopes in question. Any rejected ballot envelopes are separated and retained for 30 days after the election certification. Voters with rejected ballot envelopes will be notified by mail.

The Anchorage Assembly will certify the April 7, 2026, General Election at its regular assembly meeting on Tuesday, April 28, 2026.

Survey Series: Gubernatorial Candidates Talk Healthcare

0

By Nathaniel Herz

This piece was originally published in Northern Journal, a newsletter and news website. Nathaniel Herz is an independent journalist and the founder and editor of Northern Journal. Herz has given Must Read Alaska express permission to republish his gubernatorial candidate survey series.

Alaska has some of the nation’s highest health care costs. So, this edition of Northern Journal’s survey of gubernatorial hopefuls asks the candidates what they’d do about it. It also gets personal, asking what how they obtain health care coverage and what they pay on a monthly basis.

Republicans Bernadette Wilson, Adam Crum, Treg Taylor, Nancy Dahlstrom and Click Bishop did not respond or declined to respond to this edition’s questions; we sent them multiple requests.

Question 1

Alaska faces some of the nation’s highest health care costs — in overall spending on a per-person basis, and also on a per-person basis when it comes to spending by the state.

What would you do to help bring down costs both for patients and for the state, and how would your proposed policies affect access and quality of care?

Question 2

What health insurance program do you personally use, how do you qualify for it, and how well does it work for you?

Answers from Candidates

Shelley Hughes, Republican Former State Senator

Q1: Thirty years ago, healthcare costs in Alaska were slightly more than in the Lower 48; now they are excessively higher, hurting families and stifling business. We will work to change that. As governor, I’ll aggressively combat fraud using better data analytics and swift enforcement. With one of three Alaskans on Medicaid, I’ll ensure work training opportunities for good jobs for working age, able-bodied recipients and transition coverage. I’ll support bills for school districts to join AlaskaCare to save through economies of scale; to expand competition through functional price transparency and consumer-realized cost savings as reward for comparative healthcare shopping; to repeal Certificate of Need; to extend telehealth providers’ practice scopes to full extent of training and direct care models; to strengthen Health Savings Accounts; and to reduce defensive medicine through tort reform. These changes would lower costs without sacrificing access or quality – and encourage timely care.

Q2: AlaskaCare: spouse retiree plan and my retiree plan. Spouse is also covered by VA as a disabled veteran; he uses the VA for the vast majority of his care. Because of double coverage, we pay little to no out-of-pocket, so it’s fairly hassle free; we are extremely lucky. There were a number of years, though, where we functioned under one plan, paid high deductibles, fought to get treatments covered, struggled to pay off medical bills, etc. Insurance coverage has also impacted where I’ve gone for care. When I fought and fully beat breast cancer, I had to go out of state to avoid a large bill in the end when I would have preferred treatment and care at home in Alaska. Alaska’s healthcare market needs to be more competitive with the lower 48.

Monthly premium: Unable to verify exact numbers due to weekend but estimate $2,500.

Yearly deductible: Unable to verify exact numbers due to weekend but estimate $450.

Matanuska-Susitna Borough Mayor Edna DeVries, a Republican

Q1: Make telehealth more available. Gone are the days of doctors paying house calls such as they did in my younger days. Modernize telehealth rules so Alaskans can reliably see providers by phone or video across distances. Align reimbursement so telehealth is paid in a way that makes sense — enough to keep services available, but tied to quality and appropriate use. All health care should have a spiritual options including behavior care, physical health and mental health.

More education on daily routine, including eating and physical activity. More alternate methods, supplements, healthy school lunches, healthy snacks in vending machines, more time taken in meal selection and preparation.

A small percentage of patients drive a huge share of costs. I formally sat on Valley Hospital Board of Directors for eight years, discussing the habitual patients and their visit to the ER. When we manage chronic conditions early and well, we avoid strokes, amputations, ICU stays, and long-term disability — massive savings over time. Re: discussion on stress — more lifestyle choices.

The Mat Su Borough is self insured — more municipalities, including school boards, could operate this way. We also encourage employees to seek health solutions outside the state of Alaska.

Require medical providers to post publicly their rates so patients can make better financial decisions.

Use shared-savings contracts: When providers reduce avoidable ER visits, hospitalizations, and complications while maintaining quality, they share in the savings.

In our area we do have medical doctors providing a flat monthly rate.

Q2: I have health insurance with my employer, Mat-Su Borough, and Medicare. Works very well for me and I am happy to have both.
Monthly premium: $610

Yearly deductible: Depends on the services I am receiving. Eyes generally covered fully — dental according to years of service.

Former Anchorage State Senator Tom Begich, a Democrat

Q1: Healthcare costs lead Alaskans’ worries about the rising cost of living. No Alaskan should miss lifesaving care because of where they live or how far they travel. I plan to expand Denali Care to cover working Alaskans caught between Medicaid and unaffordable private plans, while reducing uncompensated ER care that drives up costs for all. I’ll bypass pharmacy benefit managers and establish a board to negotiate prescription drug prices directly with manufacturers, cutting out middlemen who inflate what we pay at the pharmacy. I’ll increase telehealth for rural access — expanding broadband partnerships and tele-specialty networks so Alaskans can see a provider without a $2,000 plane ticket. Geography should not be a death sentence. I’ll grow our healthcare workforce from within: expanding nursing and behavioral health training at University of Alaska, and strengthen loan repayment programs to keep providers in Alaskan communities long-term. Healthcare is a necessity. It’s time Alaska treated it like one.

Q2: I qualified for Medicare last October. I also have a state of Alaska retirement benefit as secondary. So far it works fine, but I haven’t had much occasion to use it. AlaskaCare allows me a form of Medicare advantage and pharmacy benefits.

Monthly premium: Medicare is $608.70 per quarter. The AlaskaCare is taken from my retirement.

Yearly deductible: Medicare A/B $1,736/$283, AlaskaCare $150

Democratic State Senator Matt Claman

Q1: We must shift our focus from health care for all to health for all and work together for better, more affordable care for all Alaskans. There are three key elements to improving health for all: 1) better preventive care and care coordination to make sure we get the best return on our investment, 2) respectful community-level data sharing to better address the health challenges facing Alaskans and effectively allocate resources, and 3) more affordable health insurance with more in-network providers. My administration will better coordinate health policy in executive branch departments to maximize state and federal dollars and improve care options for all Alaskans. We must invest in preventive care, community health workers, and health care provider training programs.

Q2: We have health insurance with the State of Alaska/AlaskaCare/Aetna based on my service in the state Legislature. The medical and dental insurance programs work reasonably well for us. Like other in-state insurance like Premera and Moda, however, the State of Alaska/AlaskaCare/Aetna should increase the number of in-network providers, eliminate its punitive reimbursement rates for out-of-network providers, and shift to reasonable out-of-network reimbursement rates.

Monthly premium: $455 for medical and dental

Yearly deductible: $350 per person/$700 per family

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Democratic Former State Representative

Q1: Policies and approaches I would focus on to bring down Alaska’s highest-in-the-nation cost of care:

  • supporting prevention;
  • supporting telehealth, incl. for prevention;
  • supporting care coordination, especially for patients with chronic, high-cost conditions, which is a major cost driver for the healthcare system overall);
  • supporting meaningful scopes of practice for healthcare professionals such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants — and in rural Alaska, community health aides and dental health aides — that allow them to fully use their training and expertise and not have patients be forced to ladder up to more specialized (and also more expensive) practitioners when it’s not entirely necessary.

I also think coordination and collaboration within the healthcare system, especially with our tribal health organizations, is incredibly important to protect finite state budget dollars when it comes to Medicaid.

Q2: Premera Blue Cross Bronze HSA 5800. I buy my plan from healthcare.gov.

It’s basically the least expensive (but still very expensive) available to me. It falls into a category called “catastrophic” insurance, because it only really helps if something goes seriously wrong.

My deductible is high enough that I pay out of pocket for basically everything. The bills that come back are often huge, even for simple procedures, which is terrifying as a patient. Was the blood test I just got $200 or $2,000? No one can tell you, often including the providers themselves. As I result I feel like I’m always on defense in any doctor’s office.

Monthly premium: $686.30

Yearly deductible: $5,800 in-network; $17,400 out-of-network

Traditional Healer Meda DeWitt, Independent

Q1: Alaska’s constitution provides for public health. We spend over $11,000 per person, more than any other state, yet outcomes don’t match.

We employ over 200 eligibility staff members whose job is to prove that people are poor enough to qualify for help, while backlogs keep eligible Alaskans from receiving help and cost us over $16 million in federal fines. We’re paying for emergencies on the front end rather than investing in prevention. Medicaid data shows that patients with no chronic conditions cost $4,581 per year, while those with eight or more cost $84,281. Every condition we prevent closes that gap.

I will protect Medicaid expansion, which covers 76,000 Alaskans and nearly halves the number of unpaid hospital bills. I will expand Denali KidCare. I will partner with Tribal health organizations, already the primary providers in 170+ rural communities, to extend care to all rural Alaskans. I will also create reimbursement pathways for traditional healing for all Alaskans.

Q2: My family uses multiple health care systems, which gives me a firsthand perspective on what works.

I receive care through the Indian Health Service, a treaty obligation between the federal government and Alaska Native peoples. My primary care is at the Alaska Native Medical Center under a Section 325 compact agreement, where Tribal health organizations contract directly with IHS to manage our own care. I also carry Cigna through my employer with a Health Savings Account.

My partner is a veteran who receives VA benefits and union health coverage. He and our eight children are also on my employer’s plan. Our kids are all Alaska Native and eligible for IHS services.

Living inside these systems, I see where they work and where they fail.

Monthly premium: Nunya

Yearly deductible: Cigna, $4,250 family deductible.

Independent Gregg B. Brelsford, an Attorney

Q1: We face extreme callousness from federal and state leaders. The federal “Big Beautiful Bill” cut 12,000 Alaskans from Medicaid and raised premiums for another 25,000. At the state level we’ve missed many opportunities to strengthen health care by getting a fair share of revenues from S-corporations and non-resident workers.
Ranked Choice Voting has brought more bipartisan problem-solving to Juneau. It helped elect legislators who worked across differences and overrode two 2025 vetoes to overcome seven years of K-12 underfunding. Extremist Republicans want to repeal RCV to drive us back to gridlock on improving health care and other needs. Don’t let them.

I support a commonsense approach to fortifying health care by combining practical market-based, access, and administrative strategies. This includes price transparency, telehealth coverage, Medicaid coverage for mental health and home care workers, and expanding physician assistant and nurse practitioner scopes of practice.

Q2: My wife and I are blessed to have Aetna and Medicare. They are provided through my Alaska public service covered by the state PERS retirement system and the federal government. These health insurance plans work smoothly for us – no major complaints.

Monthly premium: Decline to answer based on privacy concerns.

Yearly deductible: Decline to answer based on privacy concerns.

Dave Bronson, Republican and Former Mayor of Anchorage

Q1: Alaska does have some of the highest health care costs in the nation. That is unacceptable.

As governor, I will attack this problem head on by cutting the red tape and bureaucracy that drives up costs. We will expand telemedicine so Alaskans in rural areas can get quality care without expensive travel. Healthcare costs aren’t just the visit and service itself. It’s the getting there and back and stay in between. This is extremely challenging for Southeast Alaska. We will build out the ferry system to improve this cost for patients as well.

On the state side we will conduct a full audit of Medicaid and other state health programs to eliminate waste and fraud. We will move toward more competitive bidding and private sector solutions rather than growing the government bureaucracy. Healthcare should be driven by the doctor and patient, not insurance companies and lawyers. Healthcare needs legal reform. Insurance and pharmaceutical companies drive costs.

Q2: I use the V.A. and my wife has Tri-Care [an insurance program for military family members]. It has its challenges.
Monthly premium/yearly deductible: n/a

Anchorage Doctor Matt Heilala, a Republican

Q1: As a surgeon with nearly 30 years practicing in Alaska and owner of multiple clinics and ambulatory surgery centers, with an MBA in healthcare economics, I understand our state’s severe healthcare cost crisis firsthand. Alaska has some of the nation’s highest per-person healthcare spending. The best way to cut costs and boost access is by growing and diversifying industry to create more good jobs with employer-sponsored health benefits.We must repeal the Certificate of Need program, which protects monopolies and stifles competition. Additional reforms include price transparency, expanded use of ambulatory surgery centers, tort reform, and high-deductible catastrophic plans with Health Savings Accounts. I propose allowing physicians and private practices to write off patient balances as tax-deductible expenses to encourage medical goodwill for those struggling with costs.These changes will lower premiums and state spending while improving access and preserving quality care.

For the past 30 years, my health insurance has been provided through my own medical practice and business. Upon retiring from active practice, I transitioned to a COBRA plan through the medical practice that purchased and absorbed my former practice. It is currently the most expensive plan with the highest deductible I have had in all these years. While I do not personally use Health Savings Accounts at this time, I see tremendous opportunity in expanding their use to help Alaskans become smarter healthcare consumers and better control costs.

Monthly premium: $2,600 per month (for my wife and myself only).

Yearly deductible: Around $5,000 (yearly deductible).

More in Series

Survey Series: Which Candidates for Governor Support Increasing Taxes on Oil and Gas, Which Don’t, and Why?

Survey Series: Candidates for Governor Share Their Favorite Fish Recipes!

Survey Series: Which Gubernatorial Candidates Prioritize Alaska LNG Project?

Survey Series: Gubernatorial Candidates Share Specific Amount They Would Propose for Education Funding

Senate Passes $2.43 Billion Capital Budget: DOT&PF Dominates, K-12 Gets $83.5 million

1

Today, April 21, the Alaska State Senate approved the Fiscal Year 2027 Capital Budget (Senate Bill 214), which allocates a total $2,428,273,719 for capital projects and improvements impacting Alaska’s transportation system, public facilities, education, commerce, environment, natural resources, military, public safety, and more.

Approximately $248 million is allocated from the Unrestricted General Funds (UGF), $69 million from Designated General Funds, $104 million in other funds, and the remaining nearly $2 billion comes from federal matching funds.

The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities will receive 72% of the budget with $1.74 billion ($1.5 billion from federal matching) allocated to DOT&PF.

The Department of Education and Early Development (DEED) will receive $83.5 million to be used for major maintenance projects at Mt. Edgecumbe High School, Craig Elementary and Middle Schools, Sidney C. Huntington Elementary and High Schools, Sandpoint K-12, Tri-Valley School, Blackwell K-12, East High School, Service High School, North Pole High School, West Homer Elementary School, Mears Middle School, Schoenbar Middle School, Nenana School, Mears Middle School, Arctic Light Elementary School, Marshall K-12 School, Hooper Bay, Tuluksak K-12, and Stebbins K-12.

The capital funding for education will help DEED complete its top 15 priority projects and fund tank farm repairs at three rural schools.

A press release from the Senate Majority emphasized the urgency of the funding, which “was brought back into focus in February, when a delegation of Senate Finance members made an impromptu visit to Mt. Edgecumbe High School in Sitka.” They found leaking roofs, rodent infestations, and crumbling dormitories. The members declared conditions “deplorable.”

The rest of the capital funds to state departments in order from greatest to least amount of funding are as follows:

Department of Revenue: $94 billion
Department of Military and Veterans Affairs: $66.3 million
Department of Environmental Conservation: $32.3 million
Department of National Resources: $29.5 million
Department of Fish and Game: $20 million
Department of Labor and Workforce Development: $3 million
Department of Public Safety: $2.4 million

Additionally, the budget allocates $17.1 million to the University of Alaska and $5.7 million to the Judiciary.

Readers can access the full text of SB 214 below:

Opinion: Fighting for Our Veterans by Advancing Ibogaine Research

0

By Zack Gottshall

For tens of thousands of veterans, surviving combat was only the first battle.

Coming home did not mean returning to the life they left. It meant learning to function inside a mind that combat had permanently altered— one that replays what the body survived, that cannot quiet itself at night, that resists every conventional treatment the system has offered.

Twenty three veterans die by suicide every single day in this country. Not in combat. At home. After the deployment ended. After the medals were awarded. After everyone moved on.

Most of those deaths are connected to post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, and post-concussive disorders— the signature wounds of the post-9/11 wars. Wounds that do not show on an x-ray. Wounds that pharmaceuticals and therapy protocols have helped manage for some but have failed to adequately treat for far too many.

For that group— the treatment-resistant, the ones who have exhausted what the VA and civilian medicine could offer— the status quo is not a policy failure in the abstract. It is a death sentence in the specific.

On April 18, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to accelerate research, development, and regulatory review of treatments for serious mental illness. Veterans are explicitly named as a priority population. The order expands clinical trial access, improves data-sharing across agencies, and creates a Right to Try pathway for eligible patients. It also directs at least $50 million toward a federal-state partnership to advance these treatments, including psychedelics like ibogaine, through a legitimate, supervised scientific process.

Ibogaine is not new to veterans. It is new to the federal government.

For years, veterans have been traveling to clinics in Mexico at their own expense, outside the American medical system, beyond the reach of the VA because they had run out of options at home. Some went out of desperation. Many went because other veterans told them it worked.

The science is beginning to confirm what those veterans already knew.

Stanford University School of Medicine studied 30 Special Operations veterans, nearly all presenting with clinically severe psychiatric symptoms and significant functional impairment, who received ibogaine-assisted therapy at a medically supervised clinic in Mexico. One month after treatment, the results were striking: average reductions of 88% in PTSD symptoms, 87% in depression, and 81% in anxiety. Disability scores on the WHO assessment scale dropped from 30.2 (indicating mild to moderate impairment) to 5.1, indicating no disability.

These were not patients with mild symptoms who responded to a nudge. These were Special Operations veterans— elite, high-functioning individuals whose careers demanded peak performance— who had been functionally disabled by the cumulative trauma of combat. The improvements were rapid, sustained, and accompanied by measurable gains in cognitive function: concentration, memory, executive processing, and impulse control. Follow-up neuroimaging published in Nature Mental Health in 2025 documented changes in brain activity consistent with neuroplasticity— a biological fingerprint, not just self-reported relief.

This was an observational study, not a large-scale randomized controlled trial. Ibogaine carries real cardiac risks, particularly outside supervised clinical settings. Those facts matter and must be stated plainly.

But they are arguments for rigorous clinical infrastructure, not for continued inaction.

The executive order creates exactly that infrastructure. It does not legalize ibogaine. It does not short-circuit safety. It directs the FDA to fast-track review of breakthrough-designated treatments, establishes supervised access pathways, and funds the kind of serious, peer-reviewed investigation this therapy has never been able to get inside the United States.

For veterans, this is not a political story. It is not a psychedelics story. It is a what-do-we-owe-the-people-we-sent-to-war story.

We sent them into environments that changed their brains. We told them to perform at the edge of human capacity under sustained mortal threat. We brought them home and handed them a prescription and a therapy referral and called it care. For many, that was enough. For far too many, it was not.

Twenty three veterans a day is not a statistic that should be acceptable to any American, regardless of politics. It is a failure that has persisted across administrations, across decades, across every generation of post-war veterans we have asked to quietly absorb what combat cost them.

If ibogaine, rigorously studied and properly administered, can give even a significant fraction of treatment-resistant veterans their lives back— their cognition, their sleep, their relationships, their sense of a future worth living— then the obligation to pursue that answer is not optional. It is the minimum we owe them.

They held up their end. It is long past time we held up ours.

Zack Gottshall is a retired U.S. Army Intelligence Officer, a Commissioner on the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights, Vice President of the Taku/Campbell Community Council, and a small business owner in Anchorage, Alaska.

Begich Introduces Companion Bill to Meet Data Center Energy Demands Without Raising Americans’ Utility Bills

1

This morning, April 21, 2026, U.S. Representative Nick Begich (R-Alaska), along with Congressman Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) and Burgess Owens (R-Utah), introduced the House companion bill to the DATA Act of 2026, which seeks to expand energy production without raising costs for Americans.

The Decentralized Access to Technology Alternatives (DATA) Act of 2026 was first introduced by Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas). The bill creates a new category of electric utility: the consumer-regulated electric utility (CREU). CRUEs are off-grid electric systems that are “physically isolated from all regulated utilities, the bulk power system, and the Bulk Electric System.” The Act exempts these off-grid systems from federal regulations under the Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Department of Energy, and the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005.

While companies can operate these systems without federal oversight, the companies must foot the bill without the ability to pass it off to ratepayers. The isolation from the bulk power grid ensures American households will not see higher utility bills as the technology industry continues to grow and increase its energy demand.

Rep. Begich commented: “America must win the race to lead in artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. The DATA Act allows manufacturers to operate on fully self-contained, ‘grid-of-one’ power systems, so innovation can scale without forcing households to subsidize massive new energy demands or straining local utilities. For Alaska, this approach is especially critical. By leveraging our stranded energy assets and vast resource potential, this legislation creates a pathway for new jobs, new revenue, and long-term economic growth without raising energy costs for American families.”

The Act comes on the heels of President Trump’s “Ratepayer Protection Pledge Proclamation,” which promises, “leading United States hyperscalers and AI companies guarantee that data centers’ energy needs will not increase household electricity costs for American citizens.”

Seven leading technology companies accepted the pledge on March 4, 2026, agreeing to “build, bring, or buy the new generation resources and electricity needed to satisfy their energy demands, and pay for all new power delivery infrastructure upgrades to service their data centers.” They also promise to “voluntarily negotiate new, separate rate structures with their utilities and relevant State governments, and pay those rates, and for their infrastructure, whether they use the electricity or not. They will also invest in local communities and coordinate with grid operators to contribute to a more reliable grid.”

The President’s Proclamation effectuates the pledge as the national policy of the United States of America.

Alaska Family Council Hosts Pro-Life Advocate Training This Friday, April 24th

1

The day before Alaskans from across the state gather to march in defense of babies in the womb and their inalienable right to life, Alaskans are invited to the “Growing the Culture of Life in Alaska – Being a Better Communicator and Advocate” training, hosted by the Alaska Family Council in partnership with the Leadership Institute. The training will take place at the Petroleum Club of Anchorage, 2:00 p.m. -5:00 p.m., April 24th.

Attendees will “explore new, creative approaches to our pro-life communications and activism. Topics include a look at the lessons learned from pro-life efforts in the past, pivots in our words, and better signal how pro-lifers care, and activities that yield proven results.”

The training will cover the history of pro-life advocacy in Alaska, roadblocks to traditional efforts, tried-and-true communication tactics, and programs to change the legislative outlook and cultural landscape.

Use this link: Growing the Culture of Life in Alaska – Being a Better Communicator and Advocate | Leadership Institute to learn more or register for the event.