“Like many Alaskans, I am concerned about law and justice, so I find it a bit mystifying and extraordinary that the Attorney General of the State of Alaska would walk away from important criminal justice issues and, specifically, her duty to protect rural Alaskans,” he wrote.
While tribal banishment may have a place in a rural criminal justice system, Gov. Walker and Attorney General Lindemuth have not put any definition around it, Hawkins said, and cited examples of where sideboards need to be placed in this new State policy:
- Which communities will be allowed to administer tribal justice, including banishment? Could any community institute it?
- How will decisions be made about which communities can and cannot?
- Beyond banishment, how about imprisonment? Cruel and unusual punishment?
- What are the requirements for due process? Are there any?
- What will happen when justice is administered by a tribe and it leads to an Alaskan’s death due to lack of training and oversight?
“At the very least, Gov. Walker needs to clarify the parameters of his new ‘rural justice policy.’ Alaskans need to know in advance which communities they may travel to and still have their rights protected by the U.S. and Alaska Constitutions.”
Hawkins, a business entrepreneur and well-known figure in Alaska politics, filed a letter of intent to run for governor in September.
(Disclosure: Hawkins writes an occasional column on this site and his nonprofit, Alaska Wins, is an advertiser).